A Comparison of Ureteroscopic Treatment of Nephrolithiasis With and Without Moses Technology

December 30, 2023 updated by: Nicole L. Miller, Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Prospective Randomized Double Blind Clinical Trial to Compare Holmium Laser Lithotripsy With and Without Moses Laser Technology for the Ureteroscopic Treatment of Nephrolithiasis

Flexible ureteroscopy is characterized as first-line therapy for the treatment of renal stones < 2 cm in size. This involves passing a flexible endoscope into the renal pelvis through the urethra, bladder and ureter in a retrograde fashion. Holmium: YAG laser remains the preferred energy modality to subsequently break stones of this size into fragments small enough to remove or pass spontaneously through the ureter. Advances in the understanding of laser energy delivery have led to the recent commercialization of the "Moses Effect" - the creation of vapor bubbles/cavities between the laser fiber tip and the target through which laser energy can more efficiently travel. Lumenis was the first to optimize this laser phenomenon and market it as "Moses Technology" in their Lumenis Pulse P120H laser system. This system is already FDA approved through the 510K pathway and is commercially available. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the potential of Moses laser technology to reduce operative time compared to non-Moses settings for ureteroscopic treatment of nephrolithiasis.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

There is ongoing debate on the optimal means of laser stone fragmentation, and Moses technology is the latest advancement to raise questions regarding clinical utility. Initial preclinical studies demonstrated significantly reduced stone retropulsion and higher stone ablation volume with Moses technology, leading to the conclusion that the system allows more efficient laser lithotripsy. Human studies also showed that laser lithotripsy with Moses technology utilized laser energy in less time for stone fragmentation: 10.0 (2.6-15.0) min without vs 6.0 (2.8-13.0) min with Moses technology.

Others have evaluated the cost effectiveness of Moses technology in their own cohort of 40 patients who underwent standard laser lithotripsy by comparing a 35% projected decrease in procedure time against the cost of the Moses laser fiber and machine. Mean stone size was 10.2 mm in this group of patients, and mean lasing time was 3.0 minutes. While a significant positive association was seen between stone size and laser time, cost analysis failed to show a benefit in using Moses technology across sizes.

To date, there are limited clinical data obtained through rigorous study methodology. In addition, knowledge gaps remain regarding the effect of Moses technology on other clinically meaningful outcomes such as stone-free rate. Therefore, the investigators propose a multi-center, prospective, randomized, double blind clinical trial to further assess the effect of Moses technology for lithotripsy. The investigators aim to study a broader range of outcomes which will be facilitated by being the largest study to date. The investigators also aim to study novel outcomes such as grading retropulsion and visibility by independent blinded review as well as effects of Moses technology on independently reducing surgeon burnout. Indeed, a randomized, double blind clinical trial evaluating Moses technology in 66 patients undergoing ureteroscopy was presented as a 2018 European Association of Urology abstract. While this single center study demonstrated safety and reduced fragmentation time as well as procedure time using Moses technology, it did not show a significant difference in stone-free rates. This study is also yet to be published as a manuscript.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

171

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Arizona
      • Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85054
        • Mayo Clinic
    • California
      • San Diego, California, United States, 92103
        • University of California San Diego
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10032
        • Columbia University
    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27710
        • Duke University Medical Center
    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44195
        • Cleveland Clinic
    • Tennessee
      • Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37232
        • Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Solitary renal stone 8 to 20 mm in size or in the case of multiple stones the conglomerate diameter (additive maximal diameter of all stones on axial imaging of computed tomography) of 8-20 mm is required
  • Must be a suitable operative candidate for flexible ureteroscopy per urologic guidelines
  • Must be 18 years or older
  • Must be able to give consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Concomitant stones in the ureter
  • Prior ipsilateral upper urinary tract reconstructive procedures or history of ipsilateral ureteral stricture
  • Prior radiotherapy to the abdomen or pelvis
  • Neurogenic bladder or spinal cord injury
  • Pregnancy
  • Untreated UTI

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Moses Laser Lithotripsy
Patients will have flexible URS performed in standard fashion, without deviation from the standard of care. Laser settings will be at the surgeons' discretion but will be within the range identified as standard for dusting technique using Moses laser technology.
Holmium laser energy will be delivered for the ureteroscopic fragmenting of kidney stones. Energy will be generated by the commercial available, FDA approved Lumenis PulseTM P120H laser system and Moses laser fiber. Renal stones will be fragmented using a dusting technique. Moses laser settings will be turned on.
Other Names:
  • Moses Laser Lithotripsy
Active Comparator: Standard Laser Lithotripsy
Patients will have flexible URS performed in standard fashion, without deviation from the standard of care. Laser settings will be at the surgeons' discretion but will be within the range identified as standard for dusting technique (between 0.2-0.5 J and 40-80 Hz). The short pulse setting will be utilized for non-Moses settings.
Holmium laser energy will be delivered for the ureteroscopic fragmenting of kidney stones. Energy will be generated by the commercial available, FDA approved Lumenis PulseTM P120H laser system and Moses laser fiber. Renal stones will be fragmented using a dusting technique. Moses laser settings will be turned off.
Other Names:
  • Standard Laser Lithotripsy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Operative Time
Time Frame: Beginning to end of procedure time
Total operative times between Moses holmium laser lithotripsy and non-Moses holmium laser lithotripsy in the ureteroscopic treatment of renal stones using a dusting technique
Beginning to end of procedure time

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Stone retropulsion
Time Frame: First 20 seconds of laser lithotripsy
Stone movement during laser lithotripsy will be recorded on video and graded on a Likert scale by blinded reviewers
First 20 seconds of laser lithotripsy

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Nicole L Miller, MD, Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 13, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 5, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 5, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

August 10, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

January 3, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 30, 2023

Last Verified

December 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Nephrolithiasis

Clinical Trials on Holmium laser lithotripsy with Moses Technology

3
Subscribe