External Pop-out and Classic Fetal Head Extract During Cesarean Section

May 11, 2020 updated by: Mohammed Khairy Ali, Assiut University

Feasibility and Outcomes of External Pop-out Versus Classic Fetal Head Extract During Cesarean Section: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Cesarean section is the delivery of the fetus through a surgical incision in the abdominal wall (laparotomy) and uterine wall (hysterotomy). The rate of cesarean delivery has increased progressively in the last decades until it becomes the most common operation performed all over the world.

A multitude of efforts had been done aiming at a reduction of cesarean section related maternal morbidities; most of them are related to technical modifications of how to open and how to close the abdominal and uterine incisions. The comparative studies of blunt versus sharp extension of the uterine incision showed a reduction of the incidence of unintended extension from 8.8% to 4.8%.

Delivery of the fetal head through the uterine incision is one of the major technical problems during elective cesarean section, especially when the presenting part is non-engaged. All of the previously described procedures, alternative to the classic manual head extraction, were inconclusive and not convincing to the obstetricians for routine use.

Also, no reported well-designed trials favor one of them over other. Application of vacuum cup, use of forceps blade, increasing fundal pressure and making additional uterine incisions were previously reported as alternative techniques. None of them gain any popularity or proved to be used as a basic step during cesarean section, besides many complications were reported due to their use on mothers and infants.

The vulnerability of the lower uterine segment for tears is related to the stage of labor. The frequency of unintended extension was reported to be 15.5%, and 35.0% in cases operated in first and second stages of labor respectively.

As with any surgical operation, anticipating difficulties during cesarean delivery and avoiding these difficulties is always the greatest practice. Although much has been written about techniques for managing difficult head extraction during vaginal deliveries, the reports addressed the management of difficult head delivery during cesarean section in literature are scarce.

The original techniques of fetal head extraction entail the introduction of the obstetricians hand or other instruments into the lower uterine segment. This puts the lower uterine segment at risk of damage and incision extensions with its consequences of increased blood loss, increased operative time, infection, adhesion and blood transfusion. Adherence to the available the generated good quality evidence bases practice in cesarean section is anticipated to decrease such morbidities.

The idea of the present technique was derived from the fact that during vaginal delivery the main task of the obstetrician is to support the perineum while the fetal head extends to get out through birth canal.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

910

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Assiut, Egypt, 71111
        • Women Health Hospital - Assiut university

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 40 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Pregnant women in single, living, term (>37 weeks), cephalic fetus.
  2. Women eligible for elective Cesarean section.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Multiple gestations
  2. Placenta previa
  3. Fetal congenital anomalies as hydrocephalus
  4. Intrauterine fetal death.
  5. US evidence anhydramnios

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Classic head extraction group
by putting the fingers of the right inside the lower uterine segment to deliver the head
Other: External Pop out group
The palmar aspect of the fingers will be resting on the uterovesical peritoneal reflection not directly on the fetal head.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Number of women developed uterine tears
Time Frame: 5 minute
5 minute

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Time of head extraction (minutes)
Time Frame: 10 minutes
10 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 15, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 15, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

July 26, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 13, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 11, 2020

Last Verified

May 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • EPCS

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cesarean Section Complications

Clinical Trials on Classic head extraction during Cesarean section

Subscribe