- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03598764
External Pop-out and Classic Fetal Head Extract During Cesarean Section
Feasibility and Outcomes of External Pop-out Versus Classic Fetal Head Extract During Cesarean Section: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Cesarean section is the delivery of the fetus through a surgical incision in the abdominal wall (laparotomy) and uterine wall (hysterotomy). The rate of cesarean delivery has increased progressively in the last decades until it becomes the most common operation performed all over the world.
A multitude of efforts had been done aiming at a reduction of cesarean section related maternal morbidities; most of them are related to technical modifications of how to open and how to close the abdominal and uterine incisions. The comparative studies of blunt versus sharp extension of the uterine incision showed a reduction of the incidence of unintended extension from 8.8% to 4.8%.
Delivery of the fetal head through the uterine incision is one of the major technical problems during elective cesarean section, especially when the presenting part is non-engaged. All of the previously described procedures, alternative to the classic manual head extraction, were inconclusive and not convincing to the obstetricians for routine use.
Also, no reported well-designed trials favor one of them over other. Application of vacuum cup, use of forceps blade, increasing fundal pressure and making additional uterine incisions were previously reported as alternative techniques. None of them gain any popularity or proved to be used as a basic step during cesarean section, besides many complications were reported due to their use on mothers and infants.
The vulnerability of the lower uterine segment for tears is related to the stage of labor. The frequency of unintended extension was reported to be 15.5%, and 35.0% in cases operated in first and second stages of labor respectively.
As with any surgical operation, anticipating difficulties during cesarean delivery and avoiding these difficulties is always the greatest practice. Although much has been written about techniques for managing difficult head extraction during vaginal deliveries, the reports addressed the management of difficult head delivery during cesarean section in literature are scarce.
The original techniques of fetal head extraction entail the introduction of the obstetricians hand or other instruments into the lower uterine segment. This puts the lower uterine segment at risk of damage and incision extensions with its consequences of increased blood loss, increased operative time, infection, adhesion and blood transfusion. Adherence to the available the generated good quality evidence bases practice in cesarean section is anticipated to decrease such morbidities.
The idea of the present technique was derived from the fact that during vaginal delivery the main task of the obstetrician is to support the perineum while the fetal head extends to get out through birth canal.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Assiut, Egypt, 71111
- Women Health Hospital - Assiut university
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Pregnant women in single, living, term (>37 weeks), cephalic fetus.
- Women eligible for elective Cesarean section.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Multiple gestations
- Placenta previa
- Fetal congenital anomalies as hydrocephalus
- Intrauterine fetal death.
- US evidence anhydramnios
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Other: Classic head extraction group
|
by putting the fingers of the right inside the lower uterine segment to deliver the head
|
|
Other: External Pop out group
|
The palmar aspect of the fingers will be resting on the uterovesical peritoneal reflection not directly on the fetal head.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Number of women developed uterine tears
Time Frame: 5 minute
|
5 minute
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Time of head extraction (minutes)
Time Frame: 10 minutes
|
10 minutes
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- EPCS
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Cesarean Section Complications
-
Assiut UniversityNot yet recruitingCesarean Section Complications | Cesarean Section Niche
-
Recep Tayyip Erdogan University Training and Research...CompletedCesarean Section Complications | Cesarean Section; DehiscenceTurkey
-
Ataturk UniversityUnknownCesarean Section Complications | Cesarean Section; Complications, Wound, Dehiscence | Cesarean Section, Repeated | Cesarean, Uterine Scar Thickness | Cesarean, Residual Myometrial ThicknessTurkey
-
Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Training and Research HospitalCompletedCesarean Section Complications | Cesarean Section; DehiscenceTurkey
-
Zagazig UniversityCompletedCesarean Section ComplicationsSaudi Arabia
-
University of CalgaryCompletedCesarean Section ComplicationsCanada
-
Peking University People's HospitalCompleted
-
Aswan University HospitalCompletedCesarean Section ComplicationsEgypt
-
Gaziosmanpasa Research and Education HospitalUnknownCesarean Section ComplicationsTurkey
-
Ain Shams UniversityUnknownCesarean Section ComplicationsEgypt
Clinical Trials on Classic head extraction during Cesarean section
-
The Reading Hospital and Medical CenterRecruitingPregnancy Related | Cesarean Delivery Affecting Fetus | Delivery ComplicationUnited States
-
Norwegian University of Science and TechnologySt. Olavs HospitalCompletedUrinary Incontinence | Uterine Prolapse | Fecal IncontinenceNorway
-
Assiut UniversityCompletedCaesarean SectionEgypt
-
Mersin UniversityCompletedCesarean Section Complications | Scar; DeformityTurkey
-
Cairo UniversityCompletedIntrauterine Contraceptive Device ComplicationEgypt
-
Medical University of ViennaUnknownCesarean Section | Transvaginal Ultrasound | Uterine Scar Deficiency | Myometrial Thickness | Single-layer Continuous Uterotomy Suture | Double-layer Continuous Uterotomy SutureAustria
-
Mountain Area Health Organization CenterUnknown
-
Adana City Training and Research HospitalCompletedPain | Cesarean Section | Cosmetics SensitivityTurkey
-
Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa (IUC)CompletedCesarean Section Complications | Postpartum HemorrhageTurkey
-
Sygehus LillebaeltCompletedCesarean SectionDenmark