- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03637738
Medico Economic Study, Comparing Intrabeam® on Surgical Resection Bed to Conventional Surgery + EBRT, in Breast Cancer (RIOP-SEIN)
Medico Economic Study, Randomized, Comparing Intraoperative Radiotherapy With Intrabeam® on Surgical Resection Bed Versus Conventional Surgery + EBRT in Postmenopausal Patients Operated by Conservative Surgery for Low Risk Breast Cancer
Current breast cancer treatment is based on surgery, radiation, chemotherapy and hormonotherapy. Conservative surgery or mastectomy are followed by complementary externe radiotherapy.
This adjuvant external breast radiotherapy (EBRT) is heavy, spread over more than 6 weeks with :
- 25 sessions and delivery of a unit dose of 2 Gy to obtain a total dose of 50 Gy (5 sessions per week in general);
- 16 Gy overimpression (boost) dose located in the tumour bed, in 5 to 8 fractions, in situations at high risk of recurrence.
In addition, EBRT is responsible for many adverse effects, some of which can lead to lasting or permanent sequelae.
Many focused partial breast irradiation techniques have been developed in recent years with the objective of reducing the duration and morbidity of overall breast irradiation.
Among these techniques, intraoperative breast radiotherapy (IBRT) is recommended in cancers diagnosed at early stages for which tumorectomy is expected and which present a low risk of recurrence.
The main advantages of IBRTare :
- Improvement of the quality of life due to a single session of radiotherapy associated with surgical ;
- Increased precision to deliver the necessary dose in tumour tissue;
- Preservation of surrounding healthy tissue ;
- Reduction in the overall cost of treatment through shorter hospital stays and the absence of medical transport for conventional radiotherapy sessions.
RIOP SEIN is a project supported by Institut National du Cancer (INCa)
, which consists of a medico-economic evaluation of IBRT, with Intrabeam® system on surgical resection bed relative to conventional surgery + EBRT in postmenopausal patients operated by conservative surgery for Low risk breast cancer
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Main objective is the economic comparison Intrabeam® system versus EBRT, in terms of real costs. Costs will be taken into account:
- of equipment,
- of staff,
- of transport.
Secondary objectives are :
- Compare local-regional survival without recurrence with conventional irradiation
- Analyze the rate of early and late complications
- Impact of intraoperative irradiation on the esthetic outcome and quality of life of patients
Schedule of the visits :
RIOP arm : Surgery with Intrabeam®. A first visit will be scheduled at 2 months from surgery then at 6 months then every 6 months for 5 years, then every year after 5 years.
RTE arm: surgery, EBRT over 33 sessions then visit at 6 months then every 6 months 6 for 5 years, then every year after 5 years.
In RIOP ARM, additional EBRT may be performed +/- chemotherapy if the treatment received is insufficient.
Quality of life will be assessed in each treatment arm at inclusion before randomization, 2 months after surgery, every 6 months for 5 years and every year after 5 years using quality of life questionnaires: Euroqol EQ 5D, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC)-QlQ-C30 and BR23 module specific for breast cancer.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Bordeaux, France, 33000
- Institut Bergonie
-
Brest, France, 29609
- CHU Morvan
-
Dijon, France, 21079
- Centre G F Leclerc
-
Lyon, France, 69 000
- Centre Leon Berard
-
Marseille, France, 13009
- Institut Paoli Calmette
-
Montpellier, France, 34298
- INSTITUT REGIONAL DU CANCER MONTPELLIER - Val D'Aurelle
-
Paris, France, 75000
- Hopital Saint Louis
-
Saint Herblain, France, 44805
- Centre René Gauducheau
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Histologically proven invasive ductal breast cancer,
- Menopausal women at least 55 years old,
- Clinical and ultrasound size ≤ to 20 mm, N0,
- Biopsy with all following criteria: SBR I or II, HER2 (0, +, ++ with FISH or SISH required), positive estrogen receptors, no embolus
- No personal history of breast cancer or BRCA gene mutation.
- Social insurance
- Signed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Bifocal or bilateral breast cancer,
- Presence of invasive ductal carcinoma with diffuse micro calcifications on mammography,
- Invasive lobular carcinoma,
- Presence of lymph node involvement,
- History of malignant disease if life expectancy without recurrence at 10 years <90%,
- Adult under guardianship,
- History of chest radiation therapy (Hodgkin's).
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: RIOP-Intrabeam® system
Surgery with Intrabeam®. A first visit will be scheduled at 2 months from surgery then at 6 months then every 6 months for 5 years, then every year after 5 years. Additional EBRT may be performed +/- chemotherapy if the treatment received is insufficient. |
The radiation source is inserted at the immediately on surgical resection bed after tumorectomy and started for 20 to 55 minutes to perform intraoperative radiotherapy precisely targeting the tissues that present the greatest risk of local recurrence.
The applied dose will be 20 Gy on the applicator surface.
|
|
Active Comparator: conventional surgery +RTE
surgery, EBRT over 33 sessions then visit at 6 months then every 6 months 6 for 5 years, then every year after 5 years.
|
Conventional EBRT, 5 to 10 weeks after surgery, according to the usual recommendations, 2 Gy per session, 5 sessions per week, with a total dose on the mammary gland of 50 Gy + a boost of 16 Gy on surgical resection bed .
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Actual cost
Time Frame: 2 months after the end of radiotherapy
|
Actual cost measured individually for each patient for both techniques used, involving all costs from surgery to 2 months after the end of radiotherapy including costs related to possible acute complications of radiotherapy
|
2 months after the end of radiotherapy
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Local-regional recurrence rate
Time Frame: 10 years
|
Analysis of the local-regional relapse rate with Intrabeam system as compared with the results published with EBRT
|
10 years
|
|
Complication rates
Time Frame: 10 years
|
Early and late complication rates
|
10 years
|
|
Esthetic result
Time Frame: 10 years
|
Taking photos at inclusion, 2 months, 1 year, 5 years and 10 years from the end of radiotherapy
|
10 years
|
|
quality of life after surgery and radiotherapy
Time Frame: 10 years
|
questionnaires EQ 5D
|
10 years
|
|
quality of life after surgery and radiotherapy
Time Frame: 10 years
|
questionnaires EORTC-QLQ-C30
|
10 years
|
|
quality of life after surgery and radiotherapy
Time Frame: 10 years
|
questionnaires BR23
|
10 years
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: MAGALI LE BLANC, MD, ICO Nantes
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- ICO-2012-03
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Menopausal Patients
-
Hadir F. El-DessoukyCompletedChronic Periodontitis | Menopausal Patients | Omega 3 Fatty AcidsSaudi Arabia
-
University of Wisconsin, MadisonNot yet recruiting
-
Sehit Prof. Dr. Ilhan Varank Sancaktepe Training...Not yet recruitingMenopausal Women | Hormone Therapy | Menopausal Symptom Relief | Menopausal Hormone TherapyTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Angelica Lindén HirschbergRecruiting
-
Olly, PBCCompletedRandomized Placebo Controlled Clinical Study of an Oral Product in Subjects With Menopausal SymptomsMenopausal SymptomsUnited States
-
Graminex LLCKGK Science Inc.Recruiting
-
Mersin UniversityCompleted
-
University of ValenciaCompleted
-
Center for Epidemiology and Health Research, GermanyBayerCompletedMenopausal SymptomsGermany
-
Eetho Brands, IncNot yet recruitingMenopausal Symptoms
Clinical Trials on RIOP-Intrabeam® system
-
Northwell HealthCompletedSpinal MetastasesUnited States
-
Loyola UniversityUnknownSpinal MetastasisUnited States
-
Gangnam Severance HospitalUnknown
-
University of Southern CaliforniaTerminatedBreast CancerUnited States
-
Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of ChicagoPhotoelectron CorporationCompletedGlioblastoma Multiforme | Brain Tumor, RecurrentUnited States
-
CVRx, Inc.Completed
-
Prof. Dr. Carsten PerkaJulius Wolff InstituteUnknown
-
CochlearAvaniaCompletedHearing Loss, Conductive | Hearing Loss, Mixed | Single-Sided Deafness | Bone ConductionUnited States, Australia
-
CereVasc IncAlvaMed, Inc.; Simplified Clinical Data Systems, LLCTerminatedPilot Study to Evaluate the CereVasc® EShunt® System in the Treatment of Communicating HydrocephalusHydrocephalus | Hydrocephalus, CommunicatingUnited States
-
VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare SystemUniversity of California, Los AngelesRecruitingPost-Traumatic Stress DisorderUnited States