Micronized Progesterone Versus Norethisterone Acetate in Combination With Estrogen as Menopausal Hormone Therapy

June 2, 2024 updated by: Angelica Lindén Hirschberg

Safety of Oral Micronized Progesterone Versus Norethisterone Acetate in Continuous Combination With Oral Estrogen as Menopausal Hormone Therapy - a Double-blind Randomized Study- PROBES Study (Progesterone Breast Endometrial Safety Study)

About one third of all women during menopausal transition have significant climacteric symptoms with considerable impact on quality of life. Meta-analysis has shown a beneficial risk profile with menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) for women 50 to 60 years. Still, there is a great need to find safe MHT able to control excessive endometrial stimulation by estrogen without stimulatory effects on the breast by the combination of estrogen/progestogen. Recent observational studies indicate a lower risk for breast cancer using micronized progesterone (mP) combined with estrogen but increased risk of endometrial cancer than by standard MHT. In a randomized trial, the balance between benefits and risks of mP vs. progestogens (norethisterone (NETA)) in combination with estrogen will be explored. For apparent reasons, long-term largescale clinical trials with endometrial and breast cancer as the primary endpoints, are not feasible. However, much knowledge can be obtained using relevant surrogate markers. Mammographic breast density is a strong risk factor for breast cancer, and endometrial hyperplasia is a strong risk factor for endometrial cancer. The primary objective is to compare the effects of one year treatment with mP versus progestogen, in combination with estradiol on mammographic breast density. Furthermore, to evaluate the effect of one year treatment with mP in continuous combination with estradiol on endometrial pathology (hyperplasia and cancer).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Postmenopausal women with climacteric symptoms will be randomized (1:1) to double blind treatment with oral mP or NETA in combination with oral estradiol. For the breast part, a power analysis revealed that 91 women/group would be sufficient to detect a significant difference in mammographic breast density between the groups at the 5%-level (two-sided) with 80% power. Considering the estimated rate of discontinuation and incomplete data, the target sample for the breast part is 260 patients. For the endometrial part, it is estimated that two or less women with serious adverse endometrial outcomes would result in an annual incidence of endometrial pathology of 0.67% or less with an upper bound of the one-sided 95% CI of 2.08% or less. Considering the estimated rate of discontinuation and incomplete data in the mP + estradiol group, the target sample for this part of the study is 390 patients. The total number of patients in part 1 and 2 will be 520.

Mammography at baseline and after 12 months of treatment will be assessed by independent radiologists at the Karolinska University Hospital blinded to treatment. In addition to visual judgment, a computer based quantitative assessment will be performed. All mammograms will be anonymous so that the operator will be unaware of the patient's identity and type of treatment. Percentage change in mammographic density will be evaluated and compared between the groups.

Endometrial biopsies at baseline and after 12 months of treatment will be evaluated by two independent pathologists at the Karolinska University Hospital for the incidence of endometrial pathology (hyperplasia or cancer) in the mP + estradiol group. Furthermore, immunostaining of the proliferation marker Ki-67, and other markers related to proliferation and apoptosis will be analyzed and compared between groups.

Different validated self-assessment questionnaires will be used for screening of mood disorders like depression and anxiety, as well as quality of life and menopausal symptoms. The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) is a tool for screening, diagnosing, and measuring the severity of depression. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) is an instrument for detecting states of depression and anxiety in the setting of a hospital or medical outpatient clinic. Health related quality of life is measured using the Psychological General Well-Being Index (PGWB). The Women's Health Questionnaire (WHQ) measures menopausal symptoms. The change in scores will be compared between the groups.

Blood lipid profile, serum hormones, growth and metabolic factors, and coagulation factors will be analyzed.

The gut- and vaginal microbiome will be characterized and compared between groups.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

520

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Stockholm, Sweden, 171 76
        • Recruiting
        • Karolinska University Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Helena Kopp Kallner, MD, PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Alkistis Skalkidou, MD, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

41 years to 56 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Healthy and naturally postmenopausal women (more than one year since last menstruation or FSH > 40 IE/L) with climacteric symptoms (sweating, hot flush and/or sleep problems) that adversely affect the quality of life
  • Age 45-60 years
  • BMI > 19 kg/m2 and ≤ 32 kg/m2
  • Intact uterus
  • In case of previous MHT use, washout 8 weeks for oral MHT and 4 weeks for transdermal MHT or local estrogen treatment before screening
  • Written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous history or risk factors for breast cancer, breast cancer in situ or abnormal mammogram at baseline as assessed clinically by a radiology expert
  • Previous history or risk factors for endometrial cancer or hyperplasia or abnormal/proliferative endometrial biopsy at baseline
  • Vaginal bleeding
  • Any concomitant medical treatment except for well-controlled hypertension, non-insulin treated type 2 diabetes, asthma and hypothyroidism
  • History or presence of or risk factor for cardiovascular disease including thromboembolic disorder or cerebrovascular disease
  • History or presence of liver and gallbladder disease, familial hyperlipidemia, epilepsy or classical migraine with aura
  • History or presence of clinically significant depression or other psychiatric disorder that might in anyway compromise the performance of the trial or undermine its scientific validity
  • Porphyria, Systemic lupus erythematosus and otosclerosis
  • Current use of MHT or local estrogen treatment
  • Alcohol and/or drug abuse
  • Clinically significant findings on physical and/or gynecological examination at baseline
  • Hypersensitivity to any of the study treatments

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Micronized progesterone in continuous combination with oral estrogen
Capsule 100 mg mP (Utrogestan®) orally per day in continuous combination with 1 mg encapsulated estradiol (Estrofem®)
Capsule 100 mg mP (Utrogestan®) orally per day in continuous combination with 1 mg encapsulated estradiol (Estrofem®)
Active Comparator: Norethisterone acetate in continuous combination with oral estrogen
Capsule 0.5 mg NETA/ 1 mg estradiol (Activelle®) orally per day (encapsulated and identical to Estrofem® and one matched placebo to Utrogestan.
Capsule 0.5 mg NETA/ 1 mg estradiol (Activelle®) orally per day (encapsulated and identical to Estrofem® and one matched placebo to Utrogestan

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mammographic breast density
Time Frame: At baseline and 12 months treatment
Percentage change in mammographic density
At baseline and 12 months treatment
Endometrial pathology
Time Frame: At baseline and 12 months treatment
The incidence of endometrial pathology (hyperplasia or cancer)
At baseline and 12 months treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Bleeding pattern
Time Frame: 3, 6, 9 and 12 months
Bleeding patterns registered in diary (number of days of bleedings)
3, 6, 9 and 12 months
Breast cell proliferation
Time Frame: At baseline and 12 months treatment
Percentage change in breast cell proliferation (proliferation marker Ki-67)
At baseline and 12 months treatment
Endometrial histology and cell proliferation
Time Frame: At baseline and 12 months treatment
Percentage change in endometrial cell proliferation (histology classification and proliferation marker Ki-67)
At baseline and 12 months treatment
Endometrial thickness
Time Frame: At baseline and 12 months treatment
Change in endometrial thickness by ultrasound
At baseline and 12 months treatment
Gene and protein expression of growth factors and apoptosis markers in breast and endometrial tissue
Time Frame: At baseline and 12 months treatment
Change in gene and protein expression (proliferation and apoptosis markers)
At baseline and 12 months treatment
Depression (PHQ-9)
Time Frame: At baseline and 12 months treatment
Change in score of PHQ-9: A 4-point scale where a larger value reflects more depression.
At baseline and 12 months treatment
Anxiety (HADS)
Time Frame: At baseline and 12 months treatment
Change in score of HADS: A 4-point scale where a larger value reflects more anxiety.
At baseline and 12 months treatment
Quality of life (PGWB)
Time Frame: At baseline and 12 months treatment
Change in score of PGWBI, where a where a higher score reflects more well-being.
At baseline and 12 months treatment
Menopausal symptoms (WHQ)
Time Frame: At baseline and 12 months treatment
WHQ: A 4-point scale where a larger value reflects less menopausal symptoms.
At baseline and 12 months treatment
Serum levels of hormones, growth factors, lipids and coagulation factors.
Time Frame: At baseline and 12 months treatment
Change in serum levels of these markers
At baseline and 12 months treatment
Gut- and vaginal microbiome
Time Frame: At baseline and 12 months treatment
Change in microbiome diversity and relative abundance of different microbial species.
At baseline and 12 months treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 15, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 9, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 15, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

October 19, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

June 4, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 2, 2024

Last Verified

June 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Deidentified data will be available to external researchers upon reasonable request after publication of the results and approval of the study management team.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Earliest from January 2028 and for ten years ahead.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Investigators whose proposed use of the data has been approved by the study management team.

To achieve aims in the approved proposal.

Proposals should be directed to angelica.hirschberg.linden@ki.se. To gain access, data requestors will need to sign a data access agreement.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • ICF
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Menopausal Symptoms

Clinical Trials on Micronized progesterone in continuous combination with oral estrogen

Subscribe