A Comparison of the Resection Rate of Cold Snare Polypectomy for Large (10-15 mm) and Small (5-9 mm) Colorectal Polyps (CSP)

PLA Army General Hospital of Beijing

Colorectal cancer remains the third most common cause of death from cancer worldwide. Colonoscopy allows removal of adenomatous polyps is the best colorectal cancer screening, according to the adenoma-carcinoma sequence. Recent studies have reported approximately 30% of interval cancer may be incomplete polyp resection. Complete polyp resection may be particularly important when implementing new methods for surveillance colonoscopies. Cold snare polypectomy (CSP) is considered to be a safer procedure for removing subcentimeter lesions than conventional hot snare polypectomy (HSP). CSP removal of polyps sized ≤5 mm have recommended by the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guideline as the preferred technique. Previous report said that the complete resection rate of CSP for adenomatous polyps 4-9 mm in size was comparable to that of HSP, and in the foreseeable future CSP can be one of the standard techniques for 4-9 mm colorectal polyps. However, data on complete resection of colorectal polyps 1.0-1.5 mm in size is sparse. Investigators are interested in comparison of the resection rate of cold snare polypectomy for large (10-15 mm) and small (5-9 mm) colorectal polyps using CSP.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Adenomatous Polyps
• Intervention / Treatment: Other: Cold snare polypectomy

Detailed Description

Participantswho meet inclusion criteria will be asked to participate, investigators will include all patients with resectable polyps, but only adenomatous polyps will be included for analysis. See also inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Colonoscopy, after bowel preparation with polyethylene glycol solution was performed using standard colonoscopes (CF-HQ290I, CF-Q260AI) and polypectomy snares(13mm Captivator and 10mm Captivator II).

All procedures were performed by experienced endoscopists (each with over 1000 colonoscopies performed) including CSP. All polyps between 5 and 15mm will be removed with a polypectomy snare. Polyp size will be measured using the tip of the snare catheter (2.5mm). Difficulty of resection will be grade by polyp resection time. Following the resection, jet stream of water will be used to wash mucosal defect thoroughly. After endoscopist's attestation that polyp removal was complete by carefully observe the resection margins with near focus mode, for large lesions (10-15mm) 4 biopsies will be performed from all four quadrants of resection margins, for small lesions (5-9mm) biopsies were performed from two marginal sites located symmetrically on the left and right of the mucosal defects to confirm residual polyp tissue.

If polyp resection is complicated by bleeding (not self-sustained), no biopsies will be taken and any additional polyps that will be found during the remaining examination will be excluded from analysis. Severe bleeding that will complicate resection margins examination will be excluded from analysis, Endoscopic haemostasis will be performed when active haemorrhage continued for ≥30s.

A single research subject may have many eligible polyps. To avoid taking many biopsies, the investigators will not include more than 5 eligible polyps (the first 5 that are detected) per patient in the study.

Laboratory Analysis:

The polyps will be evaluated by experienced pathologists according to Vienna classification. Resection margins for each polyp will be recorded as: R0= adenomatous tissue free, R1=adenomatous tissue detection. Investigators will only include adenomatous polyps in the analysis. for financial requests of the resection margin biopsies. The pathological diagnosis of the biopsies will become part of the medical record. If biopsies contain adenomatous tissue the participants will be ask to return for a follow-up colonoscopy within six month.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 1000
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• China
  • Dongcheng District
    • Beijing, Dongcheng District, China, 100700
      • Department of Gastroenterology, PLA Army General Hospital

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 40 years to 85 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: Yes
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Patient ≥40 and <85
• Provide written informed consent
• Patients are found to have colorectal polyps between 5 and 15mm in size

Exclusion Criteria:

• History of inflammatory bowel disease
• Polyposis of the alimentary tract
• Antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy 5 days before the procedure
• Pregnancy
• Haemodialysis
• An American Society of Anaesthesiologists class III or higher
• Depressed lesions and lesions highly suspected to be cancerous based on endoscopic appearance

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: OTHER
• Allocation: NON_RANDOMIZED
• Interventional Model: PARALLEL
• Masking: NONE

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: small polyps; Cold snare polypectomy ; Polyp size will be measured using the tip of the snare catheter (2.5mm).Small (5-9 mm) colorectal polyps will be removed with a polypectomy snare. Following the resection, jet stream of water will be used to wash mucosal defect thoroughly. After endoscopist's attestation that polyp removal was complete by carefully observe the resection margins with near focus mode, biopsies were performed from two marginal sites located symmetrically on the left and right of the mucosal defects to confirm residual polyp tissue.	Other: Cold snare polypectomy; cold snare polypectomy (CSP), which does not include electrocautery to do a polypectomy with a snare
EXPERIMENTAL: large polyps; Cold snare polypectomy; Polyp size will be measured using the tip of the snare catheter (2.5mm). Large (10-15 mm) colorectal polyps will be removed with a polypectomy snare. Following the resection, jet stream of water will be used to wash mucosal defect thoroughly. After endoscopist's attestation that polyp removal was complete by carefully observe the resection margins with near focus mode, 4 biopsies will be performed from all four quadrants of resection margins.	Other: Cold snare polypectomy; cold snare polypectomy (CSP), which does not include electrocautery to do a polypectomy with a snare

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
incomplete CSP resection rate of neoplastic polyps and subgroup analyses of possible factors that could contribute to an incomplete resection	Incomplete resection was presence of neoplastic tissue from histopathologic examination of polyp margin biopsies. Subgroup included polyp size (5-7mm/8 -9mm/10 -15mm), location (right/left side was defined proximal/distal to the splenic flexure), location with respect to colonic folds (between/on the fold or not), flat morphology (measured by the tip of the 2.4-mm snare catheter), en bloc vs piecemeal resection, a snare exclusively designed as a cold snare versus traditional polypectomy snare, Neoplastic polyps( Adenoma, sessile serrated adenomas/polyps, high-grade dysplasia), and ease of polyp resection (easy or 30s; moderately difficult or 30-60s, difficult or 60s).	six months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
polypectomy procedure times	Time required for resection was defined as the time between the insertion of the snare into working channel to the end of polyp resection	six months
the rates of procedure-related complications	Delayed bleeding was defined as haemorrhage after colonoscopy requiring endoscopic haemostasis;submucosal disruption; perforation	six months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
adequate assessment of the polyp lateral or vertical margin	Pathological assessment	1 year
margins assess after resection	narrow band imaging to delineate polyp margins	1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Yuqi He

Publications and helpful links

General Publications

• Kawamura T, Takeuchi Y, Asai S, Yokota I, Akamine E, Kato M, Akamatsu T, Tada K, Komeda Y, Iwatate M, Kawakami K, Nishikawa M, Watanabe D, Yamauchi A, Fukata N, Shimatani M, Ooi M, Fujita K, Sano Y, Kashida H, Hirose S, Iwagami H, Uedo N, Teramukai S, Tanaka K. A comparison of the resection rate for cold and hot snare polypectomy for 4-9 mm colorectal polyps: a multicentre randomised controlled trial (CRESCENT study). Gut. 2018 Nov;67(11):1950-1957. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314215. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
• Matsuura N, Takeuchi Y, Yamashina T, Ito T, Aoi K, Nagai K, Kanesaka T, Matsui F, Fujii M, Akasaka T, Hanaoka N, Higashino K, Tomita Y, Ito Y, Ishihara R, Iishi H, Uedo N. Incomplete resection rate of cold snare polypectomy: a prospective single-arm observational study. Endoscopy. 2017 Mar;49(3):251-257. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-100215. Epub 2017 Feb 13.
• Ma X, Feng X, Li Y, Du Y, Wang J, Wu Y, Jin H, Xie X, Wang X, Jin P, Yang L, Wang H, Leung J, Sheng J, He Y. A Comparison of Incomplete Resection Rate of Large and Small Colorectal Polyps by Cold Snare Polypectomy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 May;20(5):1163-1170. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.11.010. Epub 2021 Nov 17.

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (ACTUAL): September 3, 2018
• Primary Completion (ACTUAL): January 15, 2020
• Study Completion (ACTUAL): February 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: August 22, 2018
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: August 23, 2018
• First Posted (ACTUAL): August 27, 2018

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (ACTUAL): March 2, 2020
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: February 27, 2020
• Last Verified: February 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Keywords: Cold snare polypectomy; Colorectal polyps; CARE Study
• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Neoplasms by Histologic Type; Neoplasms; Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial; Pathological Conditions, Anatomical; Adenoma; Polyps; Adenomatous Polyps
• Other Study ID Numbers: PLA GH-CSP-1

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: NO
• IPD Plan Description: individual participant data can be seen after article been published

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No