Pain in Parkinson's Disease With Motor Fluctuations. (PAINinPD)

August 23, 2018 updated by: Michele Tinazzi, MD, PhD, Universita di Verona

Spontaneous and Evoked Pain in Parkinson's Disease With Motor Fluctuations: an Observational, Prospective, Clinical and Neurophysiological Study in Patients Under L-dopa Add on Therapies.

Pain (spontaneous pain) is a fundamental non-motor symptom (NMS) of Parkinson's disease (PD) that is prevalent throughout the condition and often unrecognized and undertreated. The study of the scalp laser-evoked potentials (LEPs) (evoked pain) allows a non-invasive exploration of pain central pathways in humans. This technique proved useful in elucidating the physiopathology underlying different pain syndromes. This study has been conceived to study spontaneous pain (and/or evoked pain by laser stimulation) in PD patients (with or without pain) with motor fluctuations under drugs-on (Safinamide Metansolfonato or Rasagilina Mesilato).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Pain (spontaneous pain) is a fundamental non-motor symptom (NMS) of Parkinson's disease (PD) that is prevalent throughout the condition and often unrecognized and undertreated. Different types of pain have been described in association with PD including musculoskeletal, dystonic, central and neuropathic pain. Although musculoskeletal pain is the most commonly reported, a number of patients experience multiple types of pain which are more frequent and disabling in the intermediate phase of disease and which ultimately have a significant negative impact on the patient's quality of life. Despite its relevance, the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying pain in PD are yet to be fully understood. An abnormal nociceptive input processing in the central nervous system leading to hypersensitivity to evoked pain probably underlies all the different pain types experienced by PD patients and also intervene in pain-free PD patients. Additional factors including female gender, depression, disease duration, motor complications, postural abnormalities, medical conditions associated with painful symptoms (osteoporosis, rheumatic or degenerative joint disease,) probably contribute to the quality and distribution of spontaneous pain. Abnormalities in pain processing may be the consequence of decreased basal ganglia dopaminergic neurotransmission, as dopamine has been demonstrated to modulate pain perception in supraspinal regions involved in the pain pathways, including insula, anterior cingulate cortex, thalamus and periaqueductal grey. Furthermore, a neurodegeneration involving non-dopaminergic systems (such as g-aminobutyric acid, glutamate, noradrenaline, and serotonin) that modulate pain processing in other regions of the central nervous systems may also play a relevant role. The variegated pain dimension experienced by PD patients makes its therapeutic management a demanding challenge for clinicians.

The study of the scalp laser-evoked potentials (LEPs) (evoked pain) allows a non-invasive exploration of pain central pathways in humans. This technique proved useful in elucidating the physiopathology underlying different pain syndromes. Some data show that LEPs are altered in PD, in both pain-free PD patients and in PD patients with different kinds of pain, with amplitude reduction in N2/P2 component. Acute levodopa challenge had no effect in normalizing the decreased pain threshold/LEPs observed in PD patients in early Parkinson's disease while in PD patients with motor complications it partially increased pain threshold. This is consistent with the hypothesis that motor complications and pain may share common pathophysiological mechanisms which include not only dopaminergic but also non-dopaminergic systems dysfunction (25).This study has been conceived to study spontaneous pain (and/or evoked pain by laser stimulation) in PD patients (with or without pain) with motor fluctuations under drugs-on (Safinamide Metansolfonato or Rasagilina Mesilato).

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

48

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Verona, Italy, 37126
        • Recruiting
        • Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Males or females patients with mid-to-late PD aged 30 to 80 years with or without chronic pain symptoms (duration >3 months) and motor fluctuations while receiving L-dopa alone or with other dopaminergic treatments.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • PD patients with or without pain willing to participate in this study and able to sign the written informed consent
  • To be included in the PD with pain group, the patient's intensity of pain must be moderate to severe over the last month, as reported by a numerical rating scores (NRS≥4) despite the optimal dopaminergic treatment
  • No modification of dopaminergic drugs and analgesic therapy with FANS during the 28 days before starting the enrollment in this study.
  • Diagnosis of idiopathic PD of ≥3 years duration
  • Hoehn and Yahr stage I-III during OFF time
  • Motor fluctuations (>1.5 hours' OFF time/day)
  • Patients who would have been treated with add-on therapy irrespective to the present protocol

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients under (or with previous assumptions) monoamine oxidase inhibitor therapy.
  • Late-stage PD experiencing severe, disabling peak-dose or biphasic dyskinesia, or unpredictable or widely swinging symptom fluctuations
  • "de novo" patients, patients in early stage or non-fluctuating patients
  • Evidence of dementia (MMSE <24)
  • Sign and symptoms suggestive of atypical parkinsonism
  • Major psychiatric illnesses
  • Severe and progressive medical illnesses
  • Concomitant diseases potentially causing acute or chronic pain (i.e., rheumatologic conditions, severe polyneuropathy, and spine injuries)
  • Treatments with tri-tetracyclic antidepressants, serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), opioids, neuroleptics, barbiturates and phenothiazines, pregabalin and gabapentin
  • Any type of retinopathy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
PD with PAIN
12 patients will undergo add-on drugs therapy with safinamide metansolfonato.
safinamide metansolfonato
PD without PAIN
12 patients will undergo add-on drugs therapy with safinamide metansolfonato.
safinamide metansolfonato
PD with PAIN rasagilina
12 patients will undergo add-on drugs therapy with rasagilina mesilato.
rasagilina mesilato
PD without PAIN rasagilina
12 patients will undergo add-on drugs therapy with rasagilina mesilato.
rasagilina mesilato

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Latency (ms) of N1/P1 complex.
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 12 weeks
Laser-evoked potentials (LEPs) to explore the primary pain pathway will be assessed at each visit (V0 and V1). The technique of LEPs recording will be carried out as previously performed by our research group.
Change from baseline at 12 weeks
Latency (ms) of N2/P2 complex.
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 12 weeks
Laser-evoked potentials (LEPs) to explore the primary pain pathway will be assessed at each visit (V0 and V1). The technique of LEPs recording will be carried out as previously performed by our research group.
Change from baseline at 12 weeks
Amplitude (microvolt) of N1/P1 complex.
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 12 weeks
Laser-evoked potentials (LEPs) to explore the primary pain pathway will be assessed at each visit (V0 and V1). The technique of LEPs recording will be carried out as previously performed by our research group.
Change from baseline at 12 weeks
Amplitude (microvolt) of N2/P2 complex.
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 12 weeks
Laser-evoked potentials (LEPs) to explore the primary pain pathway will be assessed at each visit (V0 and V1). The technique of LEPs recording will be carried out as previously performed by our research group.
Change from baseline at 12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Body localization
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 12 weeks
The presence of pain (yes/no, dichotomous variable) in one or more body parts: head, upper limbs, lower limbs, shoulders, neck, trunk , lumbar back, pelvis, knees.
Change from baseline at 12 weeks
King's Pain Scale for Parkinson's Disease
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 12 weeks
(score)
Change from baseline at 12 weeks
Italian version of the brief pain inventory short form
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 12 weeks
(score)
Change from baseline at 12 weeks
Clinical global impression of change
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 12 weeks
(score)
Change from baseline at 12 weeks
The 39-Item Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39)
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 12 weeks
(score)
Change from baseline at 12 weeks
Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 12 weeks
(score)
Change from baseline at 12 weeks
Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 12 weeks
(score)
Change from baseline at 12 weeks
Total daily off time
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 12 weeks
Total daily off time will assessed by patient diaries reporting frequency and duration of the off periods (hours)
Change from baseline at 12 weeks
Off time following the first morning L-dopa dose
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 12 weeks
(hours)
Change from baseline at 12 weeks
Age
Time Frame: One timepoint
Age
One timepoint
Gender
Time Frame: One timepoint
(male/female)
One timepoint
Schooling
Time Frame: One timepoint
(years)
One timepoint
Job
Time Frame: One timepoint
type of job
One timepoint
Weight
Time Frame: One timepoint
(kg)
One timepoint
Disease duration
Time Frame: One timepoint
(years)
One timepoint
Age at PD onset
Time Frame: One timepoint
(years)
One timepoint
Laterality of PD symptom onset
Time Frame: One timepoint
(right, left, bilateral)
One timepoint
Most Affected Side
Time Frame: One timepoint
(right, left, bilateral)
One timepoint
Pain symptoms at PD onset
Time Frame: One timepoint
(yes, no)
One timepoint
Dominant phenotype
Time Frame: One timepoint
(Tremor, Bradikinetic/rigid, Mixed)
One timepoint
Modified H&Y
Time Frame: One timepoint
(score)
One timepoint
Pharmacologic therapy for PD
Time Frame: One timepoint
Pharmacologic therapy
One timepoint
Comorbilities
Time Frame: One timepoint
Comorbilities
One timepoint
Mini-Mental State Examination
Time Frame: One timepoint
(score)
One timepoint
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
Time Frame: One timepoint
(score)
One timepoint

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Michele Tinazzi, MD, PhD, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 28, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

March 28, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

November 30, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 26, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 23, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

August 27, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 27, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 23, 2018

Last Verified

August 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Parkinson Disease

Clinical Trials on safinamide metansolfonato (12 weeks)

Subscribe