Contribution and Reproducibility of Lung Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Acute Heart Failure in the ED

March 16, 2022 updated by: Pr. Semir Nouira, University of Monastir

Contribution LUS and Reproducibility of Lung Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Acute Heart Failure in the Emergency Department (ED)

Discrimination between cardiac and non-cardiac causes of dyspnea can be challenging, causing excessive delay before adequate therapy. In clinical practice lung ultrasound (LUS) is becoming an easy and reliable noninvasive tool for the evaluation of dyspnea and can shorten the time to diagnosis .However the reproductibility of this test was not extensively studied.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Dyspnea is one of the most distressing situations for the patient . Emergency cases do not always present in conditions that are ideal for immediate diagnosis, which sometimes compromises outcome. Physical examination, laboratory findings and radiography are imperfect, resulting in a need for sophisticated test results that delay management.

Lung ultrasonography is becoming a standard tool in critical cases in the ED.

the investigators aim to perform ultrasonography on consecutive patients admitted to the ICU with dyspnea, comparing lung ultrasonography results on initial presentation with the final diagnosis by the ICU team.

Three items were assessed: artifacts (horizontal A lines or vertical B lines indicating interstitial syndrome), lung sliding, and alveolar consolidation and/or pleural effusion, these items were grouped to assess ultrasound profiles.

This study assesses the potential of lung ultrasonography to diagnose heart failure.The second aim of this study was to evaluate the inter-observer reproducibility of LUS performed by ED residents in the evaluation of cardiac causes of acute dyspnea.

Patients presenting to the ED with acute dyspnea will be prospectively enrolled in this study. In each patient, LUS was performed by two ED residents blinded to clinical diagnoses.

AHF was determined on the base of clinical exam, chest x-ray , brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and echocardiographic findings.

A patient lung comet score (LCS) was obtained by summing the number of comets in each of the scanned spaces.

Then the probability of AHF was defined as :

low probability (LCS<15) intermediate probability (15 <LCS<30), and high probability (LCS>30 ).

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

1024

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 90 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

all patients admitted to the ED with acute dyspnea, with the final diagnosis of heart failure

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • non traumatic dyspnea with the final diagnosis of heart failure

Exclusion Criteria:

  • impossibility to give consent to participate in the study
  • post traumatic dyspnea
  • pregnant women
  • need for endotracheal intubation or inotropic drugs
  • patients who were deemed too unstable for sonography by the treating team

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
operator 1
ED resident experimented in pulmonary ultrasonography and blinded to the final diagnosis
operator 2
a different ED resident experimented in pulmonary ultrasonography and blinded to the final diagnosis

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
the reproductibility of LUS in the diagnosis of heart failure
Time Frame: 0 days
the reproductibility of the LUS in the diagnosis of heart failure between two different operators (using the Kappa and the agreement index)
0 days
the accuracy of LUS in the diagnosis of heart failure the accuracy of LUS in the diagnosis of heart failure measured by sensitivity ,specificity, and area under the roc curve
Time Frame: 0 days
the accuracy of LUS in the diagnosis of heart failure measured by sensitivity ,specificity, and area under the roc curve
0 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

October 1, 2016

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

January 1, 2017

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

January 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 6, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 5, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

September 6, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

March 17, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 16, 2022

Last Verified

March 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dyspnea; Cardiac

3
Subscribe