Dopamine Effect on Inhibitory Control (DEI)

November 15, 2023 updated by: Giovanni Mirabella
The effect of Levodopa medication on inhibitory control in Parkinson's patients is extremely debated despite the fact that this has potential clinical and therapeutic implications. A key confounding factor of many previous studies is that they did not take the disease duration in consideration. In fact, in moderate-to-advanced stages of Parkinson dopaminergic drugs could not produce a clear effect because too few dopaminergic cells for the drugs to operate on survived. Hence, in this study, we will compare the performance in the stop signal task in early-stage versus moderate-to-advanced stages Parkinson's patients both in ON and in OFF medication. In addition, to have a baseline measure of inhibitory control we will compare patient's performances with that of age-matched subjects.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The ability to stop a pending action is fundamental for survival in a natural environment where events cannot be fully predicted. Sudden events, such as the appearance of a physical obstacle, often require a quick change of the planned motor strategy and the first step toward this goal is to suppress the pre-programmed actions. Thus voluntary inhibition plays a crucial role in cognitive control and behavioral flexibility (1, 2). It has been shown that Parkinson's patients suffer from a specific deficit in this functions (3, 4, 5). However, it is extremely debated whether and how Levodopa medication (levodopa, dopamine agonists, anticholinergic drugs, or a combination of levodopa and an anticholinergic drug) affects response inhibition. A number of studies measuring inhibitory control via the stop signal task in Parkinson's patients seem to indicate that dopaminergic medications do not influence this executive function (5, 6, 7). However, a recent study (8) found that Levodopa medication does not affect specifically inhibitory control or movement readiness, but the balance between them. In fact, Parkinson's patients in the OFF medication state were able to maintain response latencies in the same range as healthy controls, but they showed a significant reduction in the ability to stop reactions abruptly. In contrast, patients' performance shifted significantly when taking dopaminergic medications. They move slower but stopping improved relative to the off dopamine state. This pattern suggests a role for dopamine in modulating the tradeoff between the two action control processes. In addition, studies of other specific populations and healthy adults suggest that dopaminergic medications deserve reconsideration in response inhibition. For instance, positron emission (PET) studies have found that higher levels of striatal D1 and D2/D3 receptor availability predict better performance on the stop signal task (9, 10) and that response inhibition performance evokes dopamine release in prefrontal, parietal, and temporal cortex in healthy adults (11). Even more importantly, a few recent studies provided evidence that early-stage Parkinson's patients with response inhibition impairment seem to benefit from dopaminergic treatment (12,13). Therefore, a plausible hypothesis is that the absence of a clear effect of dopaminergic medications could be ascribed to the fact that in most previous studies included Parkinson's patients in the moderate-to-advanced stages. In those patients, the diminished efficacy of dopaminergic drugs could be a consequence that too few dopaminergic cells for the drugs to operate on survived (14).

Hence, the aim of the present work is to re-assess the impact of dopaminergic medications on inhibitory control on Parkinson's patients using a reaching version of the stop signal task (e.g. 4, 15, 16, 17, 18) taking the disease duration in consideration. To this aim, the investigators will compare the performance in the stop signal task in early-stage versus moderate-to-advanced stages Parkinson's patients both in ON and in OFF medication. Finally, to have a baseline measure of inhibitory control the investigators will compare patients' performances with those of age-matched subjects.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

90

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

  • Italy
    • Isernia
      • Pozzilli, Isernia, Italy, 86077
        • IRCSS Neuromed Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Right-handedness (as assessed by the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory)
  2. Being in stable treatment with the administration of L-dopa and dopamine agonists (i.e. not having motor fluctuations and/or dyskinesia)
  3. Having a Hoehn & Yahr score between 1.5 and 3

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Presence of severe sensory deficits
  2. Presence of overt signs of dementia (a. mini-mental state examination, MMSE must be ≥24; b. intelligence quotient ≥75).
  3. Comorbidity with other psychiatric disorders that might interfere with task execution (i.e. attentional disorders).
  4. Presence of severe tremor or rigidity of the right arm in the OFF medication state.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: PD patients H&Y=1.5-2 Medications ON
Idiopathic Parkinson's patient's with Hoehn and Yahr score of 1.5- 2 i.e. in an early stage of the disease, under stable treatment with the administration of L-dopa and dopamine agonists. Patients will not present severe sensory deficits or any other neurological disease besides PD, as will be assessed by a standard neurological examination, and they will be all right-handed as will be assessed by the Edinburgh handedness inventory. Age range: 40-70
Drug: PD patients H&Y=1.5-2 Medications ON
Parkinson's patients will be allowed to the first-morning dose of levodopa medicament (levodopa, dopamine agonists, anticholinergic drugs, or a combination of levodopa and an anticholinergic drug) which normally allowed the patient to attain the best control of symptoms one hour before being tested (19). Patients will perform both the stop-signal task and the go-only task. Experimental conditions will be counterbalanced across patients.
Experimental: PD patients H&Y=3 Medications ON
Parkinson's patient's with Hoehn and Yahr score of 3, i.e. in moderate-to-advanced stages of the disease under stable treatment with the administration of L-dopa and dopamine agonists. Patients will not present severe sensory deficits or any other neurological disease besides PD, as will be assessed by a standard neurological examination, and they will be all right-handed as will be assessed by the Edinburgh handedness inventory. Age range: 40-70
Drug: PD patients H&Y=3 Medications ON
Parkinson's patients will be allowed to the first-morning dose of levodopa medicament (levodopa, dopamine agonists, anticholinergic drugs, or a combination of levodopa and an anticholinergic drug) which normally allowed the patient to attain the best control of symptoms one hour before being tested (19). Patients will perform both the stop-signal task and the go-only task. Experimental conditions will be counterbalanced across patients.
Experimental: PD patients H&Y=1.5-2 Medications OFF
Same as above described
Drug: PD patients H&Y=1.5-2 Medications OFF
Parkinson's patients will not take medications overnight prior to the study (20). Patients will perform both the stop-signal task and the go-only task. Experimental conditions will be counterbalanced across patients. This intervention will be given on a different day with respect to the Medication ON intervention. The order of intervention will be counterbalanced across subjects
Experimental: PD patients H&Y=3 Medications OFF
Same as above described
Drug: PD patients H&Y=3 Medications OFF
Parkinson's patients will not take medications overnight prior to the study (20). Patients will perform both the stop-signal task and the go-only task. Experimental conditions will be counterbalanced across patients. This intervention will be given on a different day with respect to the Medication ON intervention. The order of intervention will be counterbalanced across subjects
Experimental: Healthy age-matched controls
Healthy controls. Right-handed healthy subjects (it will be assessed by the Edinburgh handedness inventory) with normal or corrected-to-normal vision, without a history of neurological diseases. Age range: 40-70.
Behavioral: Healthy age-matched controls
Healthy controls will perform the stop signal task and the go-only task in the same day. The order of administration will be counterbalanced.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes of length of the Stop Signal Reaction Time
Time Frame: Up to one year
Reactive inhibition refers to the ability of a subject to react to the stop instruction, and it is measured by the stop-signal reaction time (SSRT). This variable cannot be measured, but it can be estimated by using the race model (21, 4, 16, 17, 18, 22).
Up to one year
Changes of the length of Reaction Times and Movement Times
Time Frame: Up to one year
Proactive inhibition refers to the ability of subjects to shape their response strategy in anticipation of known task demands driven by endogenous signals. In the case of the countermanding task, the endogenous signal is represented by the awareness of the fact that sometimes an imperative stop-signal could have been presented. Proactive control could be assessed by measuring reaction times (i.e. the time to initiate a response, RTs) and movement times (i.e. the time to execute the motor response, MTs) of no-stop trials. Previous research has shown that when a movement is produced in the context of the countermanding task, that is when the subject executes a no-stop trial, its RT is lengthened (e.g. 4, 15, 16, 17, 18, 22) and its MT is shortened compared to situations in which the same movement has to be performed in the context of a simple RT-task (go-only trial; 4, 15, 17)
Up to one year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Giovanni Mirabella

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 30, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 20, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

November 10, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 4, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 7, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

September 11, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

November 16, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 15, 2023

Last Verified

November 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • GMirab_01

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Idiopathic Parkinson's Disease

Clinical Trials on PD patients H&Y=1.5-2 Medications ON

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Guatemala

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

3
Subscribe