CPAP vs.Unsynchronized NIPPV at Equal Mean Airway Pressure (NICA)

May 26, 2020 updated by: Martin Keszler, Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island

Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation vs. Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure at Equivalent Mean Airway Pressure in Preterm Infants: Effect on Oxygenation, CO2 Elimination, Work of Breathing and Frequency of Cardio-respiratory Events.

This study seeks to determine if standard continuous positive airway pressure, known as CPAP is as effective as a more complicated approach that generates intermittent increases in airway pressure applied to the nostrils via a breathing machine. The latter is known as NIPPV and requires costly equipment to operate. Previous studies did not ensure that the average pressure applied to the lungs was equal and thus did not make for a fair comparison. The investigators believe that when the same average pressure is applied with the two techniques, CPAP is just as effective as NIPPV and may have fewer side effects, such as blowing air into the stomach. Each baby will receive CPAP or NIPPV in a random sequence for a period of 12 hours, followed by 12 hours on the alternate technique.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This is a pilot clinical trial to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of two commonly used types of non-invasive respiratory support. Preterm infants < 34 weeks gestational age, who are stable on either of the two modalities of support will be studied in a cross-over study design, such that each subject acts as his/her own control. The study will assess the relative efficacy of these modalities when used with equal mean airway pressure comparing measures of oxygenation, CO2 removal, apnea/bradycardia/desaturation events and work of breathing. The initial phase of the study is complete and preliminary analysis supports the hypothesis that there is no difference between the modalities when the mean airway pressure is equal. However we recognized that use of the RAM cannula, which does not transmit pressure effectively is an important study limitation. The findings are valid, but may only be applicable to this interface, which is widely used, but increasingly recognized as flawed. We are now extending the study to determine if the findings will be the same when short bi-nasal prongs are used.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Rhode Island
      • Providence, Rhode Island, United States, 02905
        • Recruiting
        • Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island
        • Contact:
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

No older than 6 months (CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Gestational Age 23-34 completed weeks
  • Stable on non- invasive respiratory support for at least 24h
  • CPAP level of 7-12 cmH2O or NIPPV with MAP 7-12 cmH2O
  • FiO2 requirement of <0.40

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Clinical instability as judged by the clinical team
  • FiO2 requirement of > 0.40 for more than 60 min.
  • >10 apnea/bradycardia/desaturation events in past 24 h requiring moderate or vigorous stimulation.
  • Anticipated intubation within next 24 h.
  • Active abdominal pathology (Spontaneous Intestinal Perforation, confirmed or suspected Necrotizing Enterocolitis, bowel obstruction).
  • Hemodynamically significant patent ductus arteriosus (PDA)
  • Anticipated weaning off non-invasive support in the next 24 h.
  • Any major congenital anomalies, congenital heart disease (other than PDA, atrial septal defect or ventricular septal defect) and cardiac arrhythmias
  • Lack of study equipment or personnel
  • Lack of parental consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: CROSSOVER
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: CPAP first
The intervention is application of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). The order of the two interventions of this crossover study is randomized but each subject will be exposed to both interventions. The period of CPAP will be compared to the period of NIPPV.
Continuous positive airway pressure is applied for 12 hours at a mean airway pressure that is the same as the subject was receiving prior to entry into the study
Other Names:
  • CPAP
NIPPV is applied for 12 hours at a mean airway pressure that is the same as the subject was receiving prior to entry into the study
Other Names:
  • NIPPV
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: NIPPV first
The intervention is application of nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV). The order of the two interventions of this crossover study is randomized but each subject will be exposed to both interventions. The period of CPAP will be compared to the period of NIPPV.
Continuous positive airway pressure is applied for 12 hours at a mean airway pressure that is the same as the subject was receiving prior to entry into the study
Other Names:
  • CPAP
NIPPV is applied for 12 hours at a mean airway pressure that is the same as the subject was receiving prior to entry into the study
Other Names:
  • NIPPV

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Apnea/bradycardia events
Time Frame: Duration of intervention (12 hours)
Number of episodes of apnea and/or bradycardia that trigger alarm on the bedside monitor
Duration of intervention (12 hours)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of of desaturation events
Time Frame: Duration of intervention (12 hours)
Number of episodes of pulse oximetry readings that trigger alarm on the bedside monitor
Duration of intervention (12 hours)
Mean oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry and proportion of time below 88%
Time Frame: Duration of intervention (12 hours)
Mean oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry and proportion of time at saturation <88%
Duration of intervention (12 hours)
Mean transcutaneous PCO2 and proportion of time >55 torr
Time Frame: Duration of intervention (12 hours)
Mean transcutaneous PCO2 and proportion of time at PCO2 > 55 torr
Duration of intervention (12 hours)
Mean fraction of inspired oxygen
Time Frame: Duration of intervention (12 hours)
Mean fraction of inspired oxygen (FIO2)
Duration of intervention (12 hours)
Mean respiratory rate
Time Frame: Duration of intervention (12 hours)
Mean respiratory rate
Duration of intervention (12 hours)
Mean degrees of phase lag by RIP
Time Frame: Duration of intervention (12 hours)
Estimate of work of breathing based on phase angle as determined by respiratory inductive plethysmography
Duration of intervention (12 hours)
Number of episodes of feeding intolerance
Time Frame: Duration of intervention (12 hours)
number of instances of interruption of feeding, abdominal radiographs
Duration of intervention (12 hours)
Instances of treatment failure
Time Frame: Duration of intervention (12 hours)
Inability to tolerate assigned treatment by pre-defined criteria
Duration of intervention (12 hours)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Sunil Shaw, PhD, Brown University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

September 30, 2017

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

June 30, 2022

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

June 30, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 12, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 12, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

September 14, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

May 28, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 26, 2020

Last Verified

May 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Clinical Trials on continuous positive airway pressure

3
Subscribe