- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03670732
CPAP vs.Unsynchronized NIPPV at Equal Mean Airway Pressure (NICA)
May 26, 2020 updated by: Martin Keszler, Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island
Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation vs. Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure at Equivalent Mean Airway Pressure in Preterm Infants: Effect on Oxygenation, CO2 Elimination, Work of Breathing and Frequency of Cardio-respiratory Events.
This study seeks to determine if standard continuous positive airway pressure, known as CPAP is as effective as a more complicated approach that generates intermittent increases in airway pressure applied to the nostrils via a breathing machine.
The latter is known as NIPPV and requires costly equipment to operate.
Previous studies did not ensure that the average pressure applied to the lungs was equal and thus did not make for a fair comparison.
The investigators believe that when the same average pressure is applied with the two techniques, CPAP is just as effective as NIPPV and may have fewer side effects, such as blowing air into the stomach.
Each baby will receive CPAP or NIPPV in a random sequence for a period of 12 hours, followed by 12 hours on the alternate technique.
Study Overview
Status
Unknown
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This is a pilot clinical trial to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of two commonly used types of non-invasive respiratory support.
Preterm infants < 34 weeks gestational age, who are stable on either of the two modalities of support will be studied in a cross-over study design, such that each subject acts as his/her own control.
The study will assess the relative efficacy of these modalities when used with equal mean airway pressure comparing measures of oxygenation, CO2 removal, apnea/bradycardia/desaturation events and work of breathing.
The initial phase of the study is complete and preliminary analysis supports the hypothesis that there is no difference between the modalities when the mean airway pressure is equal.
However we recognized that use of the RAM cannula, which does not transmit pressure effectively is an important study limitation.
The findings are valid, but may only be applicable to this interface, which is widely used, but increasingly recognized as flawed.
We are now extending the study to determine if the findings will be the same when short bi-nasal prongs are used.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Anticipated)
80
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Contact
- Name: Martin Keszler, MD
- Phone Number: 47490 401 274 1122
- Email: mkeszler@wihri.org
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Lisa Grady, MD
- Phone Number: 401 274 1122
- Email: LGrady@wihri.org
Study Locations
-
-
Rhode Island
-
Providence, Rhode Island, United States, 02905
- Recruiting
- Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island
-
Contact:
- Martin Keszler, MD
- Phone Number: 47490 401-274-1122
- Email: mkeszler@wihri.org
-
Contact:
- Ashish Gupta, MD
- Phone Number: 47466 401 274 1122
- Email: AKGupta@wihri.org
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
No older than 6 months (CHILD)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Gestational Age 23-34 completed weeks
- Stable on non- invasive respiratory support for at least 24h
- CPAP level of 7-12 cmH2O or NIPPV with MAP 7-12 cmH2O
- FiO2 requirement of <0.40
Exclusion Criteria:
- Clinical instability as judged by the clinical team
- FiO2 requirement of > 0.40 for more than 60 min.
- >10 apnea/bradycardia/desaturation events in past 24 h requiring moderate or vigorous stimulation.
- Anticipated intubation within next 24 h.
- Active abdominal pathology (Spontaneous Intestinal Perforation, confirmed or suspected Necrotizing Enterocolitis, bowel obstruction).
- Hemodynamically significant patent ductus arteriosus (PDA)
- Anticipated weaning off non-invasive support in the next 24 h.
- Any major congenital anomalies, congenital heart disease (other than PDA, atrial septal defect or ventricular septal defect) and cardiac arrhythmias
- Lack of study equipment or personnel
- Lack of parental consent
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: CROSSOVER
- Masking: NONE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: CPAP first
The intervention is application of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP).
The order of the two interventions of this crossover study is randomized but each subject will be exposed to both interventions.
The period of CPAP will be compared to the period of NIPPV.
|
Continuous positive airway pressure is applied for 12 hours at a mean airway pressure that is the same as the subject was receiving prior to entry into the study
Other Names:
NIPPV is applied for 12 hours at a mean airway pressure that is the same as the subject was receiving prior to entry into the study
Other Names:
|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: NIPPV first
The intervention is application of nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV).
The order of the two interventions of this crossover study is randomized but each subject will be exposed to both interventions.
The period of CPAP will be compared to the period of NIPPV.
|
Continuous positive airway pressure is applied for 12 hours at a mean airway pressure that is the same as the subject was receiving prior to entry into the study
Other Names:
NIPPV is applied for 12 hours at a mean airway pressure that is the same as the subject was receiving prior to entry into the study
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Number of Apnea/bradycardia events
Time Frame: Duration of intervention (12 hours)
|
Number of episodes of apnea and/or bradycardia that trigger alarm on the bedside monitor
|
Duration of intervention (12 hours)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Number of of desaturation events
Time Frame: Duration of intervention (12 hours)
|
Number of episodes of pulse oximetry readings that trigger alarm on the bedside monitor
|
Duration of intervention (12 hours)
|
Mean oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry and proportion of time below 88%
Time Frame: Duration of intervention (12 hours)
|
Mean oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry and proportion of time at saturation <88%
|
Duration of intervention (12 hours)
|
Mean transcutaneous PCO2 and proportion of time >55 torr
Time Frame: Duration of intervention (12 hours)
|
Mean transcutaneous PCO2 and proportion of time at PCO2 > 55 torr
|
Duration of intervention (12 hours)
|
Mean fraction of inspired oxygen
Time Frame: Duration of intervention (12 hours)
|
Mean fraction of inspired oxygen (FIO2)
|
Duration of intervention (12 hours)
|
Mean respiratory rate
Time Frame: Duration of intervention (12 hours)
|
Mean respiratory rate
|
Duration of intervention (12 hours)
|
Mean degrees of phase lag by RIP
Time Frame: Duration of intervention (12 hours)
|
Estimate of work of breathing based on phase angle as determined by respiratory inductive plethysmography
|
Duration of intervention (12 hours)
|
Number of episodes of feeding intolerance
Time Frame: Duration of intervention (12 hours)
|
number of instances of interruption of feeding, abdominal radiographs
|
Duration of intervention (12 hours)
|
Instances of treatment failure
Time Frame: Duration of intervention (12 hours)
|
Inability to tolerate assigned treatment by pre-defined criteria
|
Duration of intervention (12 hours)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Investigators
- Study Director: Sunil Shaw, PhD, Brown University
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
September 30, 2017
Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)
June 30, 2022
Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)
June 30, 2022
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
September 12, 2018
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
September 12, 2018
First Posted (ACTUAL)
September 14, 2018
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
May 28, 2020
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
May 26, 2020
Last Verified
May 1, 2020
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 1010049
- WIH 17-0037 (OTHER: Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Respiratory Distress Syndrome
-
Tanta UniversityRecruitingAcute Lung Injury/Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) | Respiratory Distress Syndrome, PediatricEgypt
-
Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore...Dr Anna Lavizzari; Dr Francesca Gaia CiuffiniCompletedNewborn Respiratory Distress SyndromeItaly
-
University Hospital, Clermont-FerrandWithdrawn
-
Assiut UniversityRecruitingNeonatal Respiratory DistressEgypt
-
Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint JosephCompletedEarly Neonatal Respiratory Distress: Changes in Level IIb Hospital Over a Period of One Year (DROPE)Neonatal Respiratory Distress SyndromeFrance
-
Karolinska University HospitalCompletedRespiratory Distress Syndrome, Adult | Respiratory Distress Syndrome, ChildSweden
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisNot yet recruitingAcute Respiratory Distress Syndrome ARDS
-
Michael A. MatthayThe University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston; United States Department... and other collaboratorsCompletedRespiratory Distress Syndrome, AdultUnited States
-
Faron Pharmaceuticals LtdSeventh Framework ProgrammeTerminatedRespiratory Distress Syndrome, AdultSpain, United Kingdom, France, Italy, Finland, Czechia, Belgium, Germany
-
Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and...TerminatedAcute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)India
Clinical Trials on continuous positive airway pressure
-
University Hospital, GrenobleResMed; Société francophone de pneumologie de langue francaiseCompletedType 1 Diabetes | Sleep Apnea SyndromeFrance
-
University Hospital, MontpellierCompletedCoronary Artery Disease | Sleep Apnea SyndromeFrance
-
Sanjay R PatelBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; National Institutes of Health (NIH); Brigham...CompletedSleep Apnea, Obstructive | Diabetes MellitusUnited States
-
Chinese Pulmonary Vascular Disease Research GroupCompletedObstructive Sleep Apnea | Coronary Heart DiseaseChina
-
Fisher and Paykel HealthcareHelios Klinik AmbrockCompleted
-
Poitiers University HospitalCompletedObstructive Sleep Apnea Syndromes
-
Indiana UniversityNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)Completed
-
University Hospital, MontpellierUnknownObstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome | Brain InfarctionFrance
-
Eileen R. ChasensCompletedSleep Apnea, Obstructive | Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2United States
-
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli...CompletedSleep Apnea, Obstructive | Fatigue | SarcoidosisItaly