Trial of Early Screening Test for Pre-eclampsia and Growth Restriction (TEST)

September 14, 2018 updated by: University College Dublin

An Open-label Randomized-Controlled Trial of Early Screening Test for Pre-eclampsia and Growth Restriction

A study of aspirin use in pregnancy to prevent high blood pressure and growth restriction of the fetus

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Ischemic placental disease (IPD) is an entity encompassing pre-eclampsia, fetal growth restriction (FGR) and placental abruption and has a combined incidence in pregnancy of 10-15%. Pre-eclampsia is a serious systemic condition affecting 3-5% of pregnancies and is responsible for > 50,000 of maternal deaths annually worldwide. The International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy defines pre-eclampsia as gestational hypertension with proteinuria of 300 mg or more in 24 h.

The use of low dose aspirin (LDA) prior to 16-weeks' gestation can prevent the pathological process causing placental disease by altering the balance of prostacyclin and thromboxane; hence preventing spiral artery thrombosis and widespread endothelial dysfunction.

There is extensive evidence, demonstrating the efficacy and safety of LDA for prevention of placental disease in high-risk pregnancies where there are clearly identifiable risk factors. However, there is a paucity of research into its efficacy in low-risk women. Administration of aspirin in pregnancy is associated with absolute risk reductions of 2% to 5% for pre-eclampsia, 1% to 5% for FGR 2% to 4% for preterm delivery with no associated increase in perinatal or maternal morbidity.

Several screening tests have been devised to detect the risk of pre-eclampsia and FGR from the first trimester. One of the most notable is that of The Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF), UK that have devised an algorithm encompassing uterine artery Doppler pulsatility indices, mean arterial pressure (MAP), the placental biomarkers PAPP-A and PLGF in addition to maternal characteristics, which can detect 96% of cases of pre-eclampsia requiring delivery before 34 weeks and 54% of all cases of pre-eclampsia at a fixed false-positive rate of 10%. The FMF screening test is reserved as a research tool, pending validation within a low-risk population. Thus far it has been externally validated in other studies of unselected women with conflicting results as to sensitivity and specificity for placental disease prediction. Following validation of the FMF screening test in low-risk nulliparous women, which is currently the topic of on-going research, the FMF pre-eclampsia screening test may potentially come into clinical practice in the future. Current guidelines followed within the UK, set by The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence advocate screening through history taking and provision of LDA in the presence of one major risk factor or two moderate risk-factors. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists have a similar stance and do not recommend screening to predict pre-eclampsia beyond obtaining an appropriate medical history to evaluate for risk factors. They recommend that any further screening tests beyond this should undergo a cost-effectiveness analysis before being used in routine practice.

It has been postulated that it is more cost-effective to use prophylactic medication, notably aspirin for the prevention of placental disease rather than screening and treating an entire low-risk population. The reason for this is because aspirin is felt to be an effective, affordable and safe treatment in pregnancy.

In light of such evidence, with an emerging novel screening test for pre-eclampsia and the efficacy of LDA for placental disease prevention it may be more clinically effective and affordable to prescribe LDA routinely to all women in their first pregnancy as opposed to being upon the basis of a screening test. To assess this hypothesis a preliminary pilot study is required to determine feasibility, acceptability and statistical power required for such a study. The study proposed is a three-armed parallel, multi-center, open-label randomized control trial (RCT) in low-risk women to determine; (i) the efficacy and (ii) the acceptability of women to take routine LDA, versus no LDA versus LDA on the basis of a pre-eclampsia screening test in their first pregnancy. It can be anticipated that the use of such a three-armed study will aid in determining if it is more acceptable to women and feasible to prescribe LDA routinely compared to not at all, or based on results of a screening test.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

546

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Dublin, Ireland
        • National Maternity Hospital
      • Dublin, Ireland
        • Rotunda Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Nulliparous women.
  • Ability to speak and .read English
  • Singleton pregnancy at <14 weeks.
  • Willing to sign voluntarily a statement of informed consent to participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of fetal anomaly at the time of the first trimester scan
  • Women with known major risk factors for pre-eclampsia who should already be on Aspirin as per National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidance; specifically chronic hypertension, underlying connective tissue, renal or vascular disorder, type 1 diabetes mellitus.
  • Under 18 years of age.
  • Currently enrolled in other clinical trials.
  • Contraindications to Aspirin therapy.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Routine low-dose aspirin
Subjects shall receive standard antenatal care as well as taking oral low-dose aspirin from the eligibility visit until 36-week gestation once daily, as prescribed by the research clinician. Fetal Medicine Foundation screening test results from the recruitment visit shall not be disclosed to the participants in this arm.
One 75 mg aspirin dose taken daily
Other Names:
  • Nu-Seals 75
  • 75 mg aspirin
No Intervention: No aspirin
No low-dose aspirin will be prescribed. Fetal Medicine Foundation screening test results from the recruitment visit shall not be disclosed to the participants in this arm.
Active Comparator: Test-indicated low-dose aspirin
The Fetal Medicine Foundation screening test will be used to determine whether a subject is at high risk of developing any pre-eclampsia until 42-week gestation. Participants with risk > 1:8 must start low-dose aspirin treatment immediately. Participants with a risk < 1:8 will be excluded.
One 75 mg aspirin dose taken daily
Other Names:
  • Nu-Seals 75
  • 75 mg aspirin

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The proportion of eligible women that agree to participate in the study
Time Frame: Throughout study completion, less than 40 weeks
The proportion of eligible women that agree to participate in the study - this will be reflected as a proportion of the number of women approached at the screening stage (feasibility)
Throughout study completion, less than 40 weeks
Adherence to aspirin if prescribed
Time Frame: 36 weeks
Rate of adherence among study subjects prescribed aspirin.
36 weeks
The proportion of study subjects in whom it is possible to obtain first trimester trans-abdominal uterine artery Doppler examination
Time Frame: 36 weeks
This outcome includes the subjectively recorded ease of acquisition (feasibility).
36 weeks
The proportion of study subjects with a completed screening test who are issued the screening result within one week of having the test performed
Time Frame: 1 week
This includes the number of women within the screen and treatment group that went beyond 16-weeks before receiving the screening test result as beyond this time LDA may not be effective (feasibility).
1 week
Attendance at study visits
Time Frame: 36 weeks
Rate of attendance of study visits by study subjects
36 weeks
Satisfactory collection of all endpoints and variables
Time Frame: 36 weeks
Proportion of study subjects on which data for all other endpoints can be collected
36 weeks
Any specific study protocol violations
Time Frame: 36 weeks
Proportion of study subjects for which protocol violations are recorded
36 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The rate of pre-eclampsia as defined by the International Society for the Study of Pre-eclampsia in Pregnancy.
Time Frame: Childbirth
Childbirth
The rate of fetal growth restriction.
Time Frame: Childbirth
Childbirth
Spontaneous or iatrogenic delivery.
Time Frame: Prior to 34 and 37 completed weeks of gestation
Prior to 34 and 37 completed weeks of gestation
Rate of admission to the neonatal intensive care unit.
Time Frame: Childbirth
rate of placental abruption, any reported death (stillbirth, neonatal or infant death) and small for gestational age infants.
Childbirth
Patient acceptability: ease of swallowing medication proportioned between categories of a 5-point Likert scale from "strongly agree" to "strongly disagree"
Time Frame: 20--22 weeks
Proportion of subjects who either 1) "strongly agree", 2) "agree", 3) neither agree/disagree", 4) disagree or 5) strongly disagree with the statement "Aspirin was easy to swallow".
20--22 weeks
Patient acceptability: reasons of failing compliance with study intervention regimen proportioned between answers to a 5-point multiple-choice question.
Time Frame: 20--22 weeks
Proportion of subjects who chose either "Reservations of taking aspirin", "Bleeding", "It caused stomach upset", "I forgot" or "Other" as a reason for missing aspirin dose.
20--22 weeks
Patient acceptability: opinions on the screening test proportioned between categories of a 3-point rating scale ranging from "Useful" to "Inconvenient"
Time Frame: 20--22 weeks
Proportion of subjects who chose either 1) "Useful", 2) "Neither useful/inconvenient" or 3) "Inconvenient" to complete the statement "With regards the screening test I found it"
20--22 weeks
Patient acceptability: opinions for taking study intervention in the future proportioned between answers to a 3-point multiple-choice question.
Time Frame: 20--22 weeks
Proportion of subjects who chose either "Take aspirin routinely", "Take aspirin only if I was at risk" or "Neither" to complete the statement "In a future pregnancy I would"
20--22 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 13, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

April 13, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 20, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 14, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

September 17, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 17, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 14, 2018

Last Verified

September 1, 2018

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Placenta Diseases

Clinical Trials on Low dose aspirin

3
Subscribe