The Validity and Reliability of the Four Square Step Test

September 30, 2019 updated by: Emine Handan Tüzün, Eastern Mediterranean University

The Validity and Reliability of the Four Square Step Test in Typically Developed Children

This study will evaluate concurrent and discriminative validity, reliability and level of agreement between the Timed Up & Go test and the four square step test in typically developed children.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Participants will be assessed by two physiotherapists on two separate days. Prior to the trial, testing instructions to be delivered to participants will be translated and adapted into Turkish. In order to maximize potential agreement and to improve rating accuracy, reliability, and validity, assessment skills of the raters will be refreshed through training.

Administration of the tests will be performed in a corridor of the school. Assessments will be performed in a quiet and adequately lighted environment to minimize the distraction. Participants will be tested with their regular footwear. The demographic information of participants will be recorded. The dynamic balance performances on the four square step test (FSST) and the Timed up & Go test (TUG) will be assessed by Rater A and B independently and these assessments repeated 24-h later. The participants will be allowed to rest up to five minutes between sessions. A stopwatch will be used to measure time to complete the FSST and TUG test.

Evaluations of concurrent and discriminative validity will be based on mean scores from the first measurement of rater A. Pearson's correlation coefficient (r) will be used to assess the concurrent validity of the FSST and TUG tests. Between-groups discriminative validity of the FSST will be evaluated by the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Bonferroni post-hoc test. Both intra- and inter-rater reliability will be assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). ICC2,1 and ICC2,2 estimates and their 95% confidence intervals will be calculated based on absolute-agreement. Bland & Altman plots will be constructed to demonstrate agreement between TUG and FSST, and between assessments of rater A and B.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

150

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Ankara, Turkey
        • 1. Eastern Mediterranean University Health Sciences Faculty, Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation,

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

5 years to 10 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Typically developed children between the ages of 5-10 in Cihangir-Düzova Elementary School in Famagusta, North Cyprus.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • aged 5 to 10 years,

Exclusion Criteria:

  • have musculoskeletal or neurological disorders,
  • have history of surgeries of the spine or orthopedic,
  • have uncorrected visual acuity.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Other
  • Time Perspectives: Other

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Four Square Step test
Time Frame: At baseline
Assessing of the dynamic balance in typically developed children. A square will be formed by using four 90 cm long canes placed on the ground. Instructions will be given and encouraged to complete the sequence as fast as possible without touching the canes. The sequence of trial was 1,2,3,4,1,4,3,2,1. The best time will be taken as the score of FSST which are completed successfully.
At baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Time Up and Go test
Time Frame: At baseline
Assessing of the dynamic balance in typically developed children. A three meter pathway on the testing floor will be marked with red colored masking tape. The TUG will be administered using 2 standard chairs. The best time will be taken as the score of TUG which are completed successfully.
At baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Emine H Tüzün, Prof. PhD., Eastern Mediterranean University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation,
  • Principal Investigator: Levent Eker, Assist.Prof., Eastern Mediterranean University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation,
  • Principal Investigator: Selma Uzuner, MSc.,PT., Eastern Mediterranean University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation,
  • Principal Investigator: Buse Sezerel, MSc.,PT., Girne Akçiçek Hospital
  • Principal Investigator: Hayriye Tomaç, MSc.,PT., Eastern Mediterranean University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation,
  • Principal Investigator: Serpil Mıhçıoğlu, MSc.,PT., Eastern Mediterranean University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation,
  • Principal Investigator: Wayne Dite, BAppSci (PE), Austin Hospital Royal Talbot Rehabilitation Center, Kew, Vic, Australia

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 30, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 15, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

July 30, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 1, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 1, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

October 3, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 1, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 30, 2019

Last Verified

September 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • ETK00-2018-0202

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Balance, Postural

Clinical Trials on the Four Square Step test

Subscribe