Effects of FMS Functional Movement Training on Body Posture Control in College Female Aerobics Athletes

May 10, 2024 updated by: Lan Li
For this experiment, it was planned to randomly assign 40 female college aerobics athletes to two groups: a traditional physical training group (control group, T, N=20) and a functional training group (experimental group, F, N=20). The control group will use traditional physical training methods, while the experimental group will use a training program based on the FMS functional movement design. The experimental group was scheduled to undergo a 12-week FMS functional movement training intervention, with each session lasting 40 minutes. Before and after the experiment, the subjects' FMS scores, body posture control, and competition performance will be measured.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Randomized into: Control, Traditional physical training Group, T, N = 20 , Intervention, Functional training Group, F, N = 20). The control group used traditional physical training methods, and the experimental group used FMS-based functional movement training methods. A 12-week functional movement training program was used and the experimental group was given intervention training 4 times a week for 40 min each time, and FMS scores, body posture control, and athletic performance were tested before and after the intervention. It was expected that the main assessment criteria would include the seven movements of the FMS Functional Movement Test (deep squat, hurdle step, lunge squat, shoulder flexibility, active straight leg raise, trunk stability push-up, and trunk rotational stability) as well as dynamic and static body postural control in aerobics movements. Tests of T-run and basic pace Y-jump time and athletic performance were used as secondary outcomes. The main tools included: a set of FMS tester, a roll of yellow tape, a measuring tape, a stopwatch, and a test chart for each index.

The test was divided into two phases. Phase 1: corrective training (1-4 weeks), Phase 2 is: the overall movement (functional patterning) 5-12 weeks, while the design concept of the program is shown in the increase of difficulty, specialization, but also includes the process of static stability to dynamic stability, and then finally, the overall movement pattern training. Tools used: balance disk, Swiss ball, solid ball, foam shaft, massage stick.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

① Must be able to understand and comply with the study regulations and sign an informed consent form.

② Have a stable summer training schedule with no plans to return home during the summer.

③ No serious diseases or complications.

Exclusion Criteria:

Athletes with recent sports injuries who may not participate in the training program.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control, Traditional Physical Training Group
The control group will use traditional physical training methods.
Experimental: Intervention, Functional Training Group,
Intervention, Functional Training Group will use functional movement training methods based on FMS.
The program control group will use traditional physical training methods, while the experimental group will use a training program based on FMS functional movement design. The experimental group will receive a 12-week FMS functional movement training intervention, with each session lasting 40 minutes. The experimental group will be divided into two phases, a corrective intervention phase and a capacity enhancement phase, and the main assessment criteria will include the seven movements of the FMS Functional Movement Test (squat, hurdle step, deep squat, shoulder mobility, active straight leg raise, trunk stabilizing push-ups, and trunk rotational stabilization), as well as the ability to control the body's dynamic and static postures during aerobic exercise.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
FMS Score
Time Frame: 90days
FMS test scores( in points)
90days
Eight-stage abdominal bridge
Time Frame: 90days
Control of body posture stability under static conditions, ( in points)
90days
five-step lateral bridge
Time Frame: 90days
Control of frontal body posture stability under static conditions (in points)
90days
six supine bridge
Time Frame: 90days
Control of back and hip stability under static conditions (in points)
90days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
T-type running
Time Frame: 90days
examine the control ability of the unilateral lower limb of the aerobic athlete's body posture in the rapid and dynamic state.(second )
90days
Y-type jumping
Time Frame: 90days
The body posture control test under the conditions of dynamic movement surface change(second )
90days
Aerobics competitive performance
Time Frame: 90days
Four groups of difficulty combinations ABCD and single competition routines were used for comprehensive scoring(points)
90days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Zijian Zhao, Zhengzhou University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

May 25, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 7, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 10, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

May 16, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 16, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 10, 2024

Last Verified

May 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

All IPDs collected, all IPDs used as a basis for results in publications.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

October 2024

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Postural Balance

Clinical Trials on Functional Movement Training Group

3
Subscribe