Evaluation of the Nonmotor Symptomatology of Parkinsonian Patients Treated With Two Strategies Related to Apomorphine Pump Therapy in French Hospitals (AGAPO)

November 24, 2023 updated by: Rennes University Hospital
There is currently no consensus on the adequate concomitant treatment to apomorphine pump in Parkinson's disease (PD). In practice, some centers withdraw all dopaminergic agonists when initiating apomorphine pump therapy, whereas others combine the two. To date, there has been no study led to determine the best strategy for efficiently treating motor and nonmotor symptoms, as well as improving patients' quality of life (QoL). This preliminary study, entitled AGAPO, aims at identifying significant differences in patients' evolution (nonmotor symptoms and quality of life), over a course of 6 months, depending on the two strategies adopted in French centers (apomorphine pump with or without dopaminergic agonists), through the Non Motor Symptoms Scale (NMSS, Chaudhuri et al, 2017).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

The recruitment period will be 24 months. The duration of the study will be 6 months for each patient due to adjustments of apomorphine pump parameters and oral medication as well time needed for motor and nonmotor changes to develop and influence QoL.

This study will be done without any modification of the planned treatment plan for each patient included. The treatments are administered in accordance with their marketing authorization and according to the usual practices of each center. No additional visits are expected.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

43

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Manon Auffret

Study Locations

      • Montpellier, France, 34295
        • Hopital Gui de Chauliac
      • Nîmes, France, 30029
        • CH Caremeau
      • Paris, France, 75013
        • CHU La Pitié Salpêtrière
      • Reims, France, 51100
        • CHU de Reims- hôpital Maison Blanche
      • Rennes, France, 35033
        • Chu de Rennes
      • Rouen, France, 76000
        • Chu Charles Nicolle

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults aged = or > 18 years,
  • Idiopathic PD (According to British Brain Bank Criteria) without any other known or suspected cause of symptoms,
  • Indicated for apomorphine pump therapy and according to the centers' practice, treatment with apomorphine pump association with dopamine agonists or apomorphine pump therapy alone
  • Presence of fluctuations for > 3 years,
  • Patients covered with social insurance.
  • Written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Neurological (other than Parkinson's disease) or severe psychiatric history (depression, schizophrenia, addiction, bipolar disorder, anxiety and depressive disorders);
  • Severe neurocognitive disorders (DSM-V)
  • History of use of apomorphine pump treatment or deep brain stimulation or lesional surgery for PD or intrajejunal L-Dopa;
  • History or current drug or alcohol abuse or dependencies;
  • History of impulse control disorders;
  • Adults legally protected (under judicial protection, guardianship or supervision), persons deprived of their liberty;
  • Inability to understand the information given on the study, to express informed consent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Apomorphine
Withdrawal of dopaminergic agonists at pump initiation
Apomorphine (5 mg/ml), supplied as solution for infusion in a 10 ml glass ampoule Hourly flow rate adjusted during the whole duration of the study to obtain the best effect in each patient
Other Names:
  • APO
Other: Dopaminergic Agonist + Apomorphine
Continuation of dopaminergic agonists at pump initiation
Apomorphine (5 mg/ml), supplied as solution for infusion in a 10 ml glass ampoule Hourly flow rate adjusted during the whole duration of the study to obtain the best effect in each patient and associated with dopaminergic agonists
Other Names:
  • AGAPO

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Difference in the Non Motor Symptoms Scale (NMSS) between the Baseline assessment and the assessment at 6 months' follow up
Time Frame: 6 months
The Non-Motor Symptoms Scale (NMSS) measures the frequency and severity of a range of non-motor symptoms in Parkinson's Disease, through 30 questions grouped into 9 domains: cardiovascular, sleep/fatigue, mood/cognition, perceptual problems/hallucinations, attention/memory, gastro-intestinal tract, urinary, sexual function, and miscellaneous (pain, taste/smell, weight change, excessive sweating). Severity is rated on a scale from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). Frequency is rated on a scale from 1 (rarely) to 4 (very frequent). Item scores are calculated as the product of severity and frequency; the total score is obtained by summing the item scores. The NMSS total score ranges from 0 to 360 with a lower score indicating fewer symptoms. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement in symptoms (reduced score).
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in the Parkinson's Disease Quality of Life Questionnaire (PDQ39) between the Baseline assessment and the assessment at 6 months' follow up
Time Frame: 6 months
Parkinson's Disease Quality of Life Questionnaire (PDQ-39): the 39-Item Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) is a commonly used measure of self-appraisal in PD. It is a measure of health status and quality of life, by assessing difficulties in 8 dimensions of daily living: mobility (10 items), activities of daily living (6 items), emotional well-being (6 items), stigma (4 items), social support (3 items), cognition (4 items), communication (3 items) and bodily discomfort (3 items). The frequency of each event is determined by selecting one of 5 options: never (scored 0) / occasionally (scored 1) / sometimes (2) / often (3) / always (4). Each dimension total score range from 0 to 100, with lower scores reflecting better quality of life.
6 months
Change in the Neurologist Global Impression of change (CGI) between the Baseline assessment and the assessment at 6 months' follow up
Time Frame: 6 months
The Change in the Neurologist (clinician) Global Impression of change (CGI) provides a brief, stand-alone assessment of the clinician's view of the patient's global functioning prior to and after initiating a study medication. It ranges from severely impaired to dramatically improved.
6 months
Change in non-motor aspects of experiences of daily living (MDS-UPDRS I) between the Baseline assessment and the assessment at 6 months' follow up
Time Frame: 6 months
The Movement Disorder Society-Sponsored Revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) is the standard validated tool for the assessment of patients with Parkinson's Disease (PD). This combined scale includes subsections collecting data regarding: nonmotor experiences of daily living (part I), their motor experiences of daily living (part II) an examination of the motor features of PD (part III), and motor complications arising from the use of dopamine replacement (part IV). The Part I include 13 items (6 semistructured interview items and 7 self-reported items) scored on a scale from 0 (normal) to 4 (severe). Higher scores reflect worse condition.
6 months
Change in apathy assessed on the long version of Lille Apathy Rating Scale between the Baseline assessment and the assessment at 6 months' follow up (LARS)
Time Frame: 6 months
The Lille apathy rating scale (LARS) is a measure of apathy through nine domains (each corresponding to a clinical manifestation of apathy: everyday productivity, interests, taking the initiative, novelty seeking, motivation - Voluntary actions, emotional responses, concern, social life & self-awareness) and 33 queries. The interview is structured, with a precise scoring mode for each reply (-2 to 2); when an item does not apply to the patient or the reply cannot be classified, it is scored "0" (for non-applicable and/or non-classifiable) The scale's overall score ranges from -36 to +36, with highest scores reflecting apathy severity. 4 factorial sub-scores (intellectual curiosity, emotion, action initiation and self-awareness) are calculated from sub-scale scores.
6 months
Change in occurrence of anxiety (STAI-YA) between the Baseline assessment and the assessment at 6 months' follow up
Time Frame: 6 months
Present feelings
6 months
Change in occurrence of anxiety (STAI-YB) between the Baseline assessment and the assessment at 6 months' follow up
Time Frame: 6 months
General feelings
6 months
Change in behavioral symptoms assessed by Ardouin Scale between the Baseline assessment and the assessment at 6 months' follow up
Time Frame: 6 months
Changes from baseline in hyper and hypo dopaminergic symptoms scores will be assessed through the Ardouin Scale of Behavior in Parkinson's Disease (ASBPD). It is designed for assessing mood and behavior with a view to quantifying changes related to Parkinson's disease, to dopaminergic medication, and to non-motor fluctuations. Its 21 items address nonmotor symptoms and are grouped into four dimensions: general psychological assessment, apathy, nonmotor fluctuations and hyperdopaminergic behaviors, with a 5-point rating scale ranging from 0 (Absent) to 4 (Severe). A score ≥ 2 is considered as a warning sign.
6 months
Change in emotional function assessed by the short form of the TEIQue between the Baseline assessment and the assessment at 6 months' follow upscale
Time Frame: 6 months
The Trait Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire-Short Form (TEIQue-SF) aims at evaluating emotional intelligence through a self-report inventory that measure global trait emotional intelligence (trait EI) through a 30-item questionnaire. The trait EI is about perceptions and not about abilities, competencies or skills ; high scores are not necessarily adaptive (good) and low scores are not necessarily maladaptive (bad).
6 months
Change in emotional function assessed by the short form of the BEQ scale between the Baseline assessment and the assessment at 6 months' follow up
Time Frame: 6 months
The Berkeley Expressivity Questionnaire (BEQ) is a self-report measure of three emotional expressivity facets related to emotional expressivity: expressivity of negative and positive emotions, and strength of expression impulse. Each of the 16 items is answered on a 7-point Likert-type ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree). The 3 facets can be kept as separate scores or combined to form an overall Emotional Expressivity score.
6 months
Change in motor aspects of experiences of daily in "on" and "off" medication (MDS-UPDRS II) between the Baseline assessment and the assessment at 6 months' follow up
Time Frame: 6 months
The Movement Disorder Society-Sponsored Revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) is the standard validated tool for the assessment of patients with Parkinson's Disease (PD). This combined scale includes subsections collecting data regarding: nonmotor experiences of daily living (part I), their motor experiences of daily living (part II) an examination of the motor features of PD (part III), and motor complications arising from the use of dopamine replacement (part IV). The Part II include 13 self-reported items) scored on a scale from 0 (normal) to 4 (severe). Higher scores reflect worse condition.
6 months
Change in motor examination during "on" periods (MDS-UPDRS III) between the Baseline assessment and the assessment at 6 months' follow up
Time Frame: 6 months
The Movement Disorder Society-Sponsored Revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) is the standard validated tool for the assessment of patients with Parkinson's Disease (PD). This combined scale includes subsections collecting data regarding: nonmotor experiences of daily living (part I), their motor experiences of daily living (part II) an examination of the motor features of PD (part III), and motor complications arising from the use of dopamine replacement (part IV). The Part III include 18 items scored on a scale from 0 (normal) to 4 (severe). Higher scores reflect worse condition.
6 months
Change in motor complications with MDS-UPDRS IV between the Baseline assessment and the assessment at 6 months' follow up
Time Frame: 6 months
The Movement Disorder Society-Sponsored Revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) is the standard validated tool for the assessment of patients with Parkinson's Disease (PD). This combined scale includes subsections collecting data regarding: nonmotor experiences of daily living (part I), their motor experiences of daily living (part II) an examination of the motor features of PD (part III), and motor complications arising from the use of dopamine replacement (part IV). The Part IV include 6 items assessed in a semistructured interview, scored on a scale from 0 (normal) to 4 (severe). Higher scores reflect worse condition.
6 months
Change in motor examination with the Schwab and England scale between the Baseline assessment and the assessment at 6 months' follow up
Time Frame: 6 months

The Schwab & England activities of daily living evaluates patients' autonomy through a percentage ranging from 0% (=Vegetative functions such as swallowing, bladder and bowel functions are not functioning. Bedridden.) to 100% ( = Completely independent. Able to do all chores without slowness, difficulty or impairment. Essentially normal).

Unaware of any difficulty.

6 months
Change in motor examination with the Hoehn & Yarr scale
Time Frame: 6 months
The severity of PD is assessed through the Modified Hoehn & Yahr rating scale, consisting of 10levels comprised between 0 (best), 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5 (worst).
6 months
Change in cognitive function assessed by the MoCA scale between the Baseline assessment and the assessment at 6 months' follow up
Time Frame: 6 months
The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is a short tool (one-page 30-point test administered in approximately 10 minutes) to evaluate a multitude of cognitive domains (visuospatial / executive functioning, object naming, memory, attention, language, abstraction, orientation). MoCA scores range between 0 and 30; a score ≥ 26 is considered to be normal.
6 months
Change of dose for treatments assessed by levodopa (L-DOPA) équivalents between the Baseline assessment and the assessment at 6 months' follow up
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Frequency, type and severity of therapy-related adverse events
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Marc VERIN, PH, Rennes University Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 15, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 2, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

June 2, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 1, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 1, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

October 3, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 27, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 24, 2023

Last Verified

November 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Parkinson Disease

Clinical Trials on Apomorphine

Subscribe