Improving Brain Function After Breast Cancer Study

November 6, 2020 updated by: Ashley M. Henneghan, University of Texas at Austin

Improving Cognition in Breast Cancer Survivors Using Meditation: A Pilot Study

This study will explore the feasibility and potential effects of a simple, home-based daily meditation intervention on breast cancer survivors' cognitive and psychological functioning as well as inflammatory regulation.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study will compare two home based 8-week interventions (Kirtan Kriya meditation vs.

relaxing instrumental music listening) in 40 breast cancer survivors ages 21-75 who completed chemotherapy 3 months to 5 years prior.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

36

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • Austin, Texas, United States, 78712
        • University of Texas at Austin

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years to 75 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals with a history of non-inflammatory breast cancer (stages I-IV):
  • Received chemotherapy as part of their treatment
  • Completed chemotherapy treatment 3 months to 10 years prior to study enrollment
  • Individuals who have report cognitive deficits

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Breast cancer survivors with a history of metastases to the brain
  • A physician diagnosis of: dementia, a learning disability, unmanaged major depression, psychosis, schizophrenia, bipolar, traumatic brain injury, cancer of the central nervous system, diabetes, arthritis
  • Taking oral steroids within 30 days of enrolling
  • A regular meditation practice (greater than 1 time per week)
  • Currently taking immune modifying medications

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: PREVENTION
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Kirtan Kriya meditation
Participants will mediate for 12 minutes a day for 8 consecutive weeks.
The program incorporates song with visualization and mudras, and is a multi-faceted, multisensory exercise that appears to engage several areas of the brain implicated in cognitive decline, yet is simple to learn and practice. The meditation includes a repeated Kirtan or song, a mudra or physical/motor component, and a visualization component. The meditation sound file will contain a user friendly introduction to the Kirtan Kriya meditation technique along with detailed instructions and meditation tracks. Three tracks will contain 12 minute guided meditations with the same female voice, and 2 with nature sounds, 2 without any additional sounds. Another 2 tracks will provide only the timing cues (1 with nature sounds, 1 without) so that the participant can conduct the meditation session without guidance if they chose.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Relaxing instrumental music
Participants will relax listening to music for 12 minutes a day for 8 consecutive weeks.

The participants will receive audio files and an instruction sheet to facilitate their practice.

The audio tracks are 12 minutes in length and contain relaxing instrumental music from Mozart, Bach, Beethoven, Debussy, and Pachebel. Participants are instructed to sit comfortably with their eyes closed and listen to a track of their choice for 12 min daily, for 8 weeks and to record each session on their practice log.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Verbal learning and memory performance-Hopkins Verbal Learning Test Immediate and Delayed Recall
Time Frame: Baseline, Time 2 (8 weeks after baseline), and Time 3 (16 weeks after baseline).
The change of the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised scores for immediate and delayed recall from baseline to Time 3 (16 weeks after baseline) will be assessed. This test measures immediate and delayed verbal memory. Measured as words recalled and adjusted for age and education. Higher words recalled suggests greater verbal learning and memory performance.
Baseline, Time 2 (8 weeks after baseline), and Time 3 (16 weeks after baseline).
Verbal Fluency Performance-Controlled Oral Word Association Test
Time Frame: Baseline, Time 2 (8 weeks after baseline), and Time 3 (16 weeks after baseline).
The change of the Controlled Oral Word Association Test, a measure of verbal fluency, scores from baseline to Time 3 (16 weeks after baseline) will be assessed. Measured as number of words produced and adjusted for age and education. Higher words produced suggests greater verbal fluency performance.
Baseline, Time 2 (8 weeks after baseline), and Time 3 (16 weeks after baseline).
Executive Functioning Performance- Trail Making Test Parts A & B
Time Frame: Baseline, Time 2 (8 weeks after baseline), and Time 3 (16 weeks after baseline).
The change in Trails A & B scores, a measure of processing speed and executive attention, from baseline to Time 3 (16 weeks after baseline) will be assessed. Where time until completion is measured and adjusted for age and education. Faster time until completion suggests higher executive function.
Baseline, Time 2 (8 weeks after baseline), and Time 3 (16 weeks after baseline).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor concentration
Time Frame: Baseline, and Time 2 (8 weeks after baseline).
The change of concentration in picograms per millilitre from will be assessed baseline to Time 2 (8 weeks after baseline).
Baseline, and Time 2 (8 weeks after baseline).
Interferon gamma concentration
Time Frame: Baseline, and Time 2 (8 weeks after baseline).
The change of concentration in picograms per millilitre from baseline to Time 2 (8 weeks after baseline) will be assessed.
Baseline, and Time 2 (8 weeks after baseline).
Interleukin-1 β concentration
Time Frame: Baseline, and Time 2 (8 weeks after baseline).
The change of concentration in picograms per millilitre from baseline to Time 2 (8 weeks after baseline) will be assessed.
Baseline, and Time 2 (8 weeks after baseline).
Interleukin-2 concentration
Time Frame: Baseline, and Time 2 (8 weeks after baseline).
The change of concentration in picograms per millilitre from baseline to Time 2 (8 weeks after baseline) will be assessed.
Baseline, and Time 2 (8 weeks after baseline).
Interleukin-4 concentration
Time Frame: Baseline, and Time 2 (8 weeks after baseline).
The change of concentration in picograms per millilitre from baseline to Time 2 (8 weeks after baseline) will be assessed.
Baseline, and Time 2 (8 weeks after baseline).
Interleukin-5 concentration
Time Frame: Baseline, and Time 2 (8 weeks after baseline).
The change of concentration in picograms per millilitre from baseline to Time 2 (8 weeks after baseline) will be assessed.
Baseline, and Time 2 (8 weeks after baseline).
Interleukin-6 concentration
Time Frame: Baseline, and Time 2 (8 weeks after baseline).
The change of concentration in picograms per millilitre from baseline to Time 2 (8 weeks after baseline) will be assessed.
Baseline, and Time 2 (8 weeks after baseline).
Interleukin-7 concentration
Time Frame: Baseline, and Time 2 (8 weeks after baseline).
The change of concentration in picograms per millilitre from baseline to Time 2 (8 weeks after baseline) will be assessed.
Baseline, and Time 2 (8 weeks after baseline).
Interleukin-8 concentration
Time Frame: Baseline, and Time 2 (8 weeks after baseline).
The change of concentration in picograms per millilitre from baseline to Time 2 (8 weeks after baseline) will be assessed.
Baseline, and Time 2 (8 weeks after baseline).
Interleukin-10 concentration
Time Frame: Baseline, and Time 2 (8 weeks after baseline).
The change of concentration in picograms per millilitre from baseline to Time 2 (8 weeks after baseline) will be assessed.
Baseline, and Time 2 (8 weeks after baseline).
Interleukin-12 concentration
Time Frame: Baseline, and Time 2 (8 weeks after baseline).
The change of concentration in picograms per millilitre from baseline to Time 2 (8 weeks after baseline) will be assessed.
Baseline, and Time 2 (8 weeks after baseline).
Interleukin-13 concentration
Time Frame: Baseline, and Time 2 (8 weeks after baseline).
The change of concentration in picograms per millilitre from baseline to Time 2 (8 weeks after baseline) will be assessed.
Baseline, and Time 2 (8 weeks after baseline).
Tumor necrosis factor alpha concentration
Time Frame: Baseline, and Time 2 (8 weeks after baseline).
The change of concentration in picograms per millilitre from baseline to Time 2 (8 weeks after baseline) will be assessed.
Baseline, and Time 2 (8 weeks after baseline).
Self-reported cognitive function
Time Frame: Baseline, Time 2 (8 weeks after baseline), and Time 3 (16 weeks after baseline).
The change of Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cognitive for perceived cognitive function and impact on quality of life from baseline to Time 3 (16 weeks after baseline) will be assessed. Lower scores indicate worse functioning. This scale demonstrated adequate reliability in our previous study (Cronbach's α 0.98).
Baseline, Time 2 (8 weeks after baseline), and Time 3 (16 weeks after baseline).
Anxiety Symptoms
Time Frame: Baseline, Time 2 (8 weeks after baseline), and Time 3 (16 weeks after baseline).

The changes of anxiety symptoms will be assessed with the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System scale from baseline to Time 3 (16 weeks after baseline).

The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scale will be used to measure anxiety Short Form 8a. Higher scores indicate greater anxiety. This scale demonstrated adequate reliability in our previous study (Cronbach's α's 0.96).

Baseline, Time 2 (8 weeks after baseline), and Time 3 (16 weeks after baseline).
Feelings of depression
Time Frame: Baseline, Time 2 (8 weeks after baseline), and Time 3 (16 weeks after baseline).

The changes of feelings of depression will be assessed with the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System scale from baseline to Time 3 (16 weeks after baseline).

The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scale will be used to measure depressive symptoms using the Short Form 8a. This 10-item scale measures the degree that life circumstances are appraised as having been stressful in the previous 4 weeks. Higher scores indicate greater feeling of depression. This scale demonstrated adequate reliability in our previous study (Cronbach's α's 0.96).

Baseline, Time 2 (8 weeks after baseline), and Time 3 (16 weeks after baseline).
Perceived Fatigue
Time Frame: Baseline, Time 2 (8 weeks after baseline), and Time 3 (16 weeks after baseline).
The changes of fatigue symptoms will be assessed with the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System scale from baseline to Time 3 (16 weeks after baseline). The PROMIS Fatigue- Short Form 8a will be used to evaluate fatigue. Higher scores indicate greater fatigue. This measure demonstrated adequate reliability in our previous study (Cronbach's α 0.93).
Baseline, Time 2 (8 weeks after baseline), and Time 3 (16 weeks after baseline).
Perceived stress
Time Frame: Baseline, Time 2 (8 weeks after baseline), and Time 3 (16 weeks after baseline).
The changes in perceived stress will be assessed with the Perceived Stress Scale from baseline to Time 3 (16 weeks after baseline). Measures the perception of stress with a 10 item scale. Higher scores indicate greater perceived stress.
Baseline, Time 2 (8 weeks after baseline), and Time 3 (16 weeks after baseline).

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

September 28, 2018

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

January 1, 2020

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

January 30, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 29, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 3, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

October 4, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

November 9, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 6, 2020

Last Verified

November 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2018-05-0155

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Only group averaged data will be presented and published.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Breast Cancer Survivors

Clinical Trials on Kirtan Kriya meditation

Subscribe