Trial of PCC Versus FFP in Patients Undergoing Heart Surgery (PROPHESY)

November 16, 2020 updated by: Queen Mary University of London

A Pragmatic Pilot Randomised Phase II Controlled Trial of Prothrombin Complex Concentrates (PCC) Versus Fresh Frozen Plasma (FFP) in Adult Patients Who Are Undergoing Heart Surgery

The PROPHESY trial is a single centre pilot trial investigating Fresh Frozen Plasma (FFP) or Prothrombin Complex Concentrate (PCC) treatment for patients who are bleeding during cardiac surgery, and who are NOT receiving a vitamin K antagonist agent (e.g. warfarin).

This pilot study will investigate the feasibility of delivering the different components of the trial, so that investigators can determine if it's feasible to move to a future large trial that will aim to compare the efficacy and safety of FFP versus PCC in adult patients who are actively bleeding during cardiac surgery.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

There are ~ 30,000 cardiac procedures performed each year in the United Kingdom (UK), and it is estimated that ~30% of these cases require plasma transfusion for management of bleeding during cardiovascular surgery. Bleeding after cardiac surgery that requires blood transfusion is associated with significant morbidity and mortality, resulting in substantial costs to the health service.

There have been no clinical trials that have compared the safety and efficacy of FFP versus PCC in cardiac surgery in patients who are bleeding, and who are not on vitamin K antagonists. In the UK, FFP transfusion is the standard treatment for management of bleeding: however, the use of PCC in this setting is rising, with several observational studies now demonstrating that it is safe, and that its administration is associated with reduced blood transfusion requirements, albeit no difference in other outcomes. Potential advantages of PCC over FFP are: increased concentration of clotting factors leading to faster improvement of reversing coagulopathy; improved ease and speed of administration; reduced fluid volume; and reduced incidence of immune modulatory side effects.

While observational studies have suggested that PCC can be safely administered in bleeding patients undergoing cardiac surgery, the clinical equipoise and, the lack of high quality evidence means that a randomised control trial is required to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of both in bleeding patients undergoing cardiac surgery not relating to warfarin. Prior to such a trial, the investigators will perform a single-centre pilot study to assess if individual components of a large trial are deliverable.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

50

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • London, United Kingdom, EC1A 7BE
        • St Bartholomew's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥18 years
  • Able to give consent
  • Any cardiovascular surgeries excluding procedures under exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to consent
  • Patients refusing blood transfusion for any reason
  • First time isolated coronary artery bypass grafts (CABG)
  • First time isolated aortic valve replacement (excluding active endocarditis)
  • Thoraco-abdominal surgeries
  • Minor surgeries that do not involve cardiopulmonary bypass
  • Use of warfarin within four days
  • Use of direct oral anticoagulants (i.e. dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban or edoxaban) within 48 hrs (or 72 hours if patient has renal impairment - i.e. estimated glomerular filtration rate of <30ml/min)
  • Inherited bleeding disorder (i.e. any inherited clotting factor deficiencies, or platelet disorders)
  • Pregnancy
  • Known or suspected allergy to FFP or PCC
  • Known or suspected allergy to heparin, Sodium citrate dihydrate, sodium dihydrogenphosphate dihydrate and Glycine
  • History of Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
  • Individuals who have Immunoglobulin A (IgA) deficiency with known antibodies against IgA
  • Documented venous thromboembolism in the last three months
  • Documented antiphospholipid syndrome
  • Severe protein S deficiency
  • Participation in another clinical trial, where the patient has received Investigational Medicinal Product in the last 3 months

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Fresh Frozen Plasma (FFP)

Patients randomised to the comparator arm will receive Fresh Frozen Plasma (FFP)

FFP will be provide as a solution for intravenous administration, once thawed.

The dose of the FFP will be ~ 15 mL/kg.

Subjects may receive multiple doses of FFP as required if bleeding continues, as per usual care

Fresh Frozen Plasma a blood component manufactured from whole blood collection.
Experimental: Prothrombin Complex Concentrate (PCC)

Patients randomised to the experimental arm will receive PCC at ~15 IU/kg. PCC will be reconstituted into a solution for intravenous administration.

Subjects will receive a single dose of PCC, and if bleeding continues, standard treatment will be administered

PCC is a blood product produced through pooling of thousands of human plasmas, which is then treated to inactivate enveloped viruses. From the pooled plasma, vitamin K dependent clotting factors (factors II, VII, IX and X, and protein C and protein S), are selected to produce the concentrated form called PCC.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Recruitment rate
Time Frame: Within 24 hours of surgery
Proportion of eligible patients who consent to the study Proportion of patients who have consented and who bleed within 24 hours and who require FFP transfusion.
Within 24 hours of surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Delivery of different components of the trial to see if a larger trial is feasible
Time Frame: Collected at 90 days or death, whichever occurs first
The data collected from different trial componenets, such as study drugs administration, study procedure adherence and analysis of clinical outcome data will be combined and assessed to see whether it is feasible to successfully run this pilot as a larger, multi-centre trial
Collected at 90 days or death, whichever occurs first
To compare the impact of FFP and PCC on the haemostatic capacity of bleeding patients after cardiac surgery
Time Frame: Within 24 hours of surgery
Routine clotting tests and additional clotting tests will be performed to measure clotting factor levels, markers for clotting and anticoagulant activity in patients receiving FFP compare to PCC
Within 24 hours of surgery
Qualitative research involving completion of a Delphi survey to apprise the management and conduct of a larger trial
Time Frame: Completed over a 4 month period during the study follow-up stage
Using the Delphi survey, information will be obtained from patient and public involvement (PPI) and healthcare professionals on the design/running of the larger trial, in order to understand how best to optimise identification and recruitment of participants, and to improve adherence to the trial procedures and protocol.
Completed over a 4 month period during the study follow-up stage
Qualitative research involving interviews of patients and healthcare professionals involved in PROPHESY to apprise the management and conduct of a larger trial
Time Frame: By the 90 days end of study visit
Interviews will be conducted with 6 study subjects and 8 healthcare professionals involved in the PROPHESY trial to inform on the key aspects for the successful conduct and mangement of a larger trial
By the 90 days end of study visit

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Laura Green, MBBS MsC MD(Res) MRCP FRCPath, Queen Mary University of London

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 29, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

January 29, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 8, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 18, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

October 23, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 17, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 16, 2020

Last Verified

September 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 012507
  • 2018-003041-41 (EudraCT Number)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

IPD Plan Description

Study results will be published in peer review journals and presented at national/international scientific meetings.

The sponsor retains the right to review all publications prior to submission. Responsibility for ensuring accuracy of any publication from this study is delegated to the Chief Investigator.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Bleeding

Clinical Trials on Fresh Frozen Plasma

3
Subscribe