Universal vs. Targeted School Screening for Adolescent Major Depressive Disorder

April 11, 2023 updated by: Deepa Sekhar, Milton S. Hershey Medical Center

Randomized Controlled Trial of Universal vs. Targeted School Screening for Adolescent Major Depressive Disorder

The primary goal of the proposed study is to compare the effectiveness of universal school based screening for adolescent major depressive disorder to the current school process of targeted screening based on concerning behavior.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The prevalence of annual major depressive disorder (MDD) episodes has increased by greater than 50% from 2008 to 2015 among US adolescents. Paralleling the rise in MDD, suicide is now the 2nd leading cause of adolescent deaths. Despite the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) 2009 endorsement of universal screening for adolescent MDD in primary care, MDD screening occurs in less than 2% of office visits.

The primary goal of the proposed study is to compare the effectiveness of universal versus targeted adolescent MDD screening in a school setting. Universal screening was chosen to be conducted in schools because, compared to medical settings; schools are more likely to regularly engage with adolescents.

The hypothesis is that universal school-based screening with the validated Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) will result in increased rates of MDD screening, identification and treatment engagement. The Penn State team brings a breadth of experience in pediatrics, community-engaged research, adolescent health, psychiatry and engagement with minority populations.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

12909

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Pennsylvania
      • Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States, 17033
        • The Pennsylvania State University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Students in grades 9-12 at 14 public schools in Pennsylvania. This is a change from the originally anticipated 16 schools, as 2 were unable to continue participation. Anticipated enrollment numbers will be updated once the data are finalized.

HRSA funding for primarily rural school districts (only one is urban). PCORI funding for urban school districts.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Students whose parents complete the opt-out consent
  • Students not enrolled in one of the participating schools
  • Students not in grades 9-12
  • Students with disabilities that are deemed unable to participate by the school district

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Screening
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Targeted Screening Arm (Current Process)
Students randomized to the targeted screening arm will complete their routine school-based health screenings. Students will be followed through the academic year for referrals to the Student Assistance Program (SAP). SAP currently exists in all Pennsylvania (PA) schools and functions like a triage service. If a student exhibits behavior concerning for MDD (raised by any contact, e.g. teachers, nurse, parent, peer, or even self-referral), SAP will triage the student and based on the initial assessment provide recommendations for school or community-based services.
Experimental: Universal Screening Arm (Intervention)
Students randomized to the universal screening arm will complete the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) during the academic year. This screening tool includes nine close-ended questions with a scoring system ranging from 0 to 27. Scores >10 are considered a "positive" screen. Students with a positive PHQ-9 result will then proceed to SAP triage as per the current process for those referred via the targeted screening arm.

Students with PHQ-9 score >10, corresponding to a positive MDD screen, will proceed through the same SAP triage process as students referred by traditional means.

SAP triage will determine MDD identification. As SAP triage is not diagnostic, MDD identification is based on SAP recommendations for MDD related school or community services.

Treatment engagement will be tracked per current SAP processes.

To immediately identify and address suicidal intent, the survey will flag a positive response to PHQ-9 question 9 in real time. A suicidal student would proceed directly to management through the school crisis plan.

Students in the intervention arm will also be tracked for behavior concerning for MDD at any point in the school year prompting SAP triage referral.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) Composite: Positive Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9; Universal Arm) or MDD Concern Prompting Student Assistance Program (SAP) Referral, Confirmed MDD Symptoms by SAP, Engage With One SAP Recommended Service/Treatment
Time Frame: up to 9 months

Universal 1) Adolescents with PHQ-9 score >10 or who at any point in the year exhibit behavior concerning for MDD prompting a SAP triage request (PHQ-9 score: min 0, max 27, higher scores=greater depression symptoms), 2) Adolescents identified with MDD by SAP triage, and 3) Adolescents who successfully engage with at least one SAP recommendation.

Prior Sept-Nov screening adjusted per school preference.

Targeted

1) Adolescents with behavior concerning for MDD prompting a SAP triage request, 2) Adolescents identified with MDD by SAP triage, and 3) Adolescents who successfully engage with at least one SAP recommendation

Concern for MDD based on a primary or secondary potentially MDD related SAP "incoming referral reason"

SAP triage is not diagnostic, so MDD identified based on recommendations for MDD related school or community services (e.g. mental health treatment services)

HRSA funds mostly rural schools (all rural but one school) and PCORI funds urban schools

up to 9 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
MDD Treatment Engagement: Successful Engagement With at Least One SAP Recommendation
Time Frame: up to 9 months
Universal and targeted screening arms: Adolescents who successfully engage with at least one SAP recommendation. This may be fulfilled by parental report that an appointment was successfully scheduled.
up to 9 months
Student School Policy Violations and Suspensions Based on School District Data
Time Frame: up to 9 months

data aggregate by grade level only

schools currently track the number of student policy violations (e.g. for drug and alcohol, violence) and student suspensions

up to 9 months
Missed School Days
Time Frame: up to 9 months
data aggregate by grade level only
up to 9 months
MDD Screen Positive/Concern: Adolescents Who Screen Positive for MDD Either by PHQ-9 (Universal Screening Arm Only) or by Concern for MDD Prompting a Request for SAP Triage
Time Frame: up to 9 months

Universal screening arm: Adolescents with PHQ-9 score >10 or who at any point in the year exhibit behavior concerning for MDD prompting a self or collateral request for SAP triage (PHQ-9 score: min 0, max 27, higher scores=greater depression symptoms)

Targeted screening arm: Adolescents with behavior concerning for MDD which prompts self or collateral request for SAP triage at any point during the school year.

Concern for MDD is based on a primary or secondary potentially MDD related SAP "incoming referral reason".

up to 9 months
Suicidal Adolescent
Time Frame: up to 9 months

Universal screening arm: PHQ-9 positive response to question #9 re: suicidal thoughts, which requires management by the state-mandated school crisis plan or student self or collateral report of suicidal thoughts, which requires management by the state-mandated school crisis plan (source school district).

Targeted screening arm: Student self or collateral report of suicidal thoughts, which requires management by the state-mandated school crisis plan (source school district).

Any student suicide attempts or completed suicides shared with the school district will also be included.

up to 9 months
MDD Identification: Adolescents Confirmed With MDD Symptoms in Need of Follow-up Based on Triage by the School SAP Team
Time Frame: up to 9 months

Universal and targeted screening arms: Adolescents who are identified as having MDD symptoms in need of follow-up based on triage by the school SAP team.

As SAP triage is not diagnostic, MDD identified will be based on SAP recommendations for school or community services which are MDD related (e.g. mental health treatment services).

up to 9 months
Grade Point Average (Gpa)
Time Frame: up to 9 months
data aggregate by grade level only
up to 9 months
Grade Advancement/Graduation: This Measure Represents the Percent of Students Promoted in Each Grade for the School (Grades 9-12, School District Data)
Time Frame: up to 9 months

data aggregate by grade level only

Note: The clinical trials record previously included additional secondary outcome measures for the Keystone testing and SAT/ACT testing. However, as these data were only received from one school, and these tests are only given in specific grades, reporting these outcomes would require disclosure of the number of students in specific grades at this school. This level of detail could allow specific school identification, and the variables were removed.

up to 9 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Subgroup Analyses Based on School District Demographic Data
Time Frame: up to 9 months
Sex (Male, Female), Ethnicity, Race, Rural/Urban
up to 9 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Deepa Sekhar, MD, Penn State College of Medicine

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 6, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 20, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

February 3, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 15, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 22, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

October 23, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 11, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 11, 2023

Last Verified

April 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • STUDY00010090
  • R40MC31765 (Other Grant/Funding Number: Health Resources and Services Administration)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

De-identified data set

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data available December 2022, details of how long the data will be available are TBD

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

At this time, data would be accessed by contacting the Principal Investigator, Deepa Sekhar.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ANALYTIC_CODE

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Major Depressive Disorder

Clinical Trials on Universal Screening Arm

Subscribe