Effectiveness of Risk-based Sequential Screening for Esophageal and Gastric Cancer (ERSS-EGC)

Effectiveness of Risk-based Sequential Screening for Esophageal and Gastric Cancer: A Community-Based Randomized Controlled Trial

To evaluate the feasibility, applicability, effectiveness, and health-economic value of the risk-based sequential screening modality for esophageal and gastric cancers, the investigators aim to initiate a community-based randomized controlled trial in Xun County, Henan Province, which is a high-risk region of upper gastrointestinal cancer (UGIC) in northern China.

A total of 258 target villages from all the 11 communities (townships and streets) in Xun County will be randomly selected and assigned to the sequential screening group and the universal screening group at a ratio of 2:1 and the total sample size will be 21,000.

In the sequential screening group, participants in the top 50% risk level (i.e., stratified as the high-risk subgroup) will be offered a standard upper gastrointestinal endoscopic screening. In contrast, all participants in the universal screening group will receive the endoscopic examination. The surveillance strategy for participants with screening-detected premalignant lesions in the sequential screening group will be tailored based on individualized risk assessment using endoscopic characteristics, pathological diagnosis, and biomarkers. Surveillance for participants in the universal screening group will adhere to current guidelines for UGIC screening and clinical treatment.

Detection rates of upper gastrointestinal malignant lesions, early-stage malignant lesions and premalignant lesions, and health-economic indicators such as the unit cost per detected malignant lesions will be compared between the two groups.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

A series of challenges have arisen for the current UGIC screening modality in China, including high screening costs, low detection rates, delayed and unstandardized treatment, and lack of sustainability and scalability. These challenges significantly hinder the normalization and high-quality implementation of UGIC prevention and control efforts. The precision shift in the screening modality is expected to result in substantial savings in medical resources while maximizing the identification and management of high-risk populations.

The investigators aim to initiate a community-based randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of risk-based sequential screening for esophageal and gastric cancer (ERSS-EGC trial) in Xun County of Henan Province, which is a high-risk region of UGIC in northern China.

According to the baseline data obtained from our prior UGIC screening program conducted in the same region (He et al., Gut, 2019), the detection rate of upper gastrointestinal malignant lesions in the targeted population (aged 50-69 years) in the universal screening group is estimated to be 1.1%. It is assumed that the implementation of sequential screening will increase this detection rate by 70%, indicating an expected detection rate of 1.9% for upper gastrointestinal malignant lesions in the sequential screening group. Ultimately, a total of 7,674 endoscopies (with 3,837 in each group) will be required to achieve a statistical power of 80% at a one-sided significance level of 2.5%.

Based on the estimated population coverage determined by sample size, a total of 258 target villages from all the 11 communities (townships and streets) in Xun County will be randomly selected, stratified by townships and streets. These 258 target villages will be randomly assigned to either the sequential screening group or the universal screening group at a ratio of 2:1, based on the population size of each village and stratified by region (urban and rural areas). This results in 172 villages in the sequential screening group and 86 villages in the universal screening group. Approximately 21,000 permanent residents aged 50 to 69 residing in the target villages will be enrolled in the trial.

All enrolled eligible participants will receive an epidemiological questionnaire investigation (collecting data on basic information, dietary habits, environmental exposure, family history, symptoms, quality of life, etc.), and a physical examination.

In the sequential screening group, all enrolled participants will be offered a risk assessment for esophageal and gastric malignancies based on two questionnaire-based diagnostic models (Liu et al., Cancers, 2022, 14(23):5945; Zheng et al., Chin Med J (Engl), 2024). Participants identified as "high-risk" (i.e., with a top 50% risk level) for esophageal and/or gastric malignancy will receive the standard upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Standardized diagnosis and treatment recommendations will be provided to patients with screening-detected malignant lesions, and green referral channels will be established for them. For participants with screening-detected premalignant lesions, the risk of progression will be evaluated based on endoscopic characteristics, pathological diagnosis, and biomarkers. Individualized reexamination and surveillance will be implemented accordingly.

In the universal screening group, all enrolled participants will receive the same standard upper gastrointestinal endoscopy as those in the sequential screening group, irrespective of the results of the risk assessment. Standardized diagnosis and treatment recommendations will be provided to patients with screening-detected malignant lesions, and green referral channels will be established for them. For participants with screening-detected premalignant lesions, the reexamination and surveillance will be performed according to the current guidelines for UGIC screening and clinical treatment.

The primary outcome of this study is the detection rate of upper gastrointestinal (esophageal/gastric) malignant lesions. The secondary outcomes include the rate of early-stage upper gastrointestinal (esophageal/gastric) malignant lesions, detection rate of upper gastrointestinal (esophageal/gastric) premalignant lesions, response rate of endoscopic examination, total screening costs, unit cost per detected upper gastrointestinal malignant lesions, unit cost per detected early-stage upper gastrointestinal malignant lesions, unit cost per detected upper gastrointestinal premalignant lesions, satisfaction of project executors and participants, rate of timely treatment, UGIC-specific mortality, all-cause mortality, and quality of life.

Through a comprehensive comparison with the universal screening, this trial will provide high-level evidence regarding the feasibility, applicability, effectiveness, and health-economic value of the sequential screening modality. Furthermore, it could effectively facilitate standardized diagnosis and treatment for screening-detected patients, providing crucial practical experience and scientific evidence for the reform and development of secondary prevention strategies for UGIC in China.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

21000

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Beijing
      • Beijing, Beijing, China, 100142
        • Department of genetics, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Zhonghu He, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Permanent residency in the target villages in Xun County, Henan Province, China;
  • Aged 50 to 69 at the enrollment;
  • Voluntarily participate in this study and provide informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Had a history of endoscopic examination within 5 years prior to the initial interview;
  • Had a history of cancer;
  • Had a history of mental disorder;
  • Positive for hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV);
  • Had severe cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases;
  • Had severe respiratory disease, dyspnea, or asthmaticus status;
  • Had retropharyngeal abscess, severe spinal deformity, or aortic aneurysm;
  • With physical debility unable to tolerate endoscopic examination, or with difficulty in achieving sedation and self-control;
  • In the acute phase of corrosive inflammation of the upper gastrointestinal tract, or with suspected perforation of the upper gastrointestinal tract;
  • Had massive ascites, severe abdominal distension, or severe esophageal varices;
  • Pregnancy;
  • Had severe history of allergies;
  • Had propensity for bleeding (coagulopathy);
  • Others unable to tolerate the clinical examinations involved in this study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Screening
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Sequential screening group
The enrolled participants will undergo a questionnaire investigation and receive a risk assessment for esophageal and gastric malignancies based on two questionnaire-based diagnostic models. Participants identified as "high-risk" (i.e., with a top 50% risk level) for esophageal and/or gastric malignancy will receive the standard upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Standardized diagnosis and treatment recommendations will be provided to patients with screening-detected malignant lesions, and green referral channels will be established for them. For participants with screening-detected premalignant lesions, the risk of progression will be evaluated based on endoscopic characteristics, pathological diagnosis, and biomarkers. Individualized reexamination and surveillance will be implemented accordingly.
  1. An epidemiological questionnaire-based risk assessment for UGIC conducted prior to the endoscopic examination;
  2. Individuals identified as "high-risk" receive the upper gastrointestinal endoscopic examination with Lugol's Iodine in the esophagus and indigo carmine staining in the stomach;
  3. Individualized reexamination and surveillance strategy will be given to participants diagnosed with premalignant lesions, based on evaluation of risk progression using endoscopic characteristics, pathological diagnosis, and biomarkers.
Active Comparator: Universal screening group
The enrolled participants will undergo a questionnaire investigation and receive the same standard upper gastrointestinal endoscopy as those in the sequential screening group, irrespective of the results of the risk assessment. Standardized diagnosis and treatment recommendations will be provided to patients with screening-detected malignant lesions, and green referral channels will be established for them. For participants with screening-detected premalignant lesions, the reexamination and surveillance will be performed according to the current guidelines for UGIC screening and clinical treatment.
  1. A questionnaire investigation;
  2. All participants undergo the upper gastrointestinal endoscopic examination with Lugol's Iodine in the esophagus and indigo carmine staining in the stomach;
  3. Reexamination and surveillance will be performed according to the current guidelines for UGIC screening and clinical treatment.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Detection rate of upper gastrointestinal (esophageal/gastric) malignant lesions
Time Frame: 12 months
Number of detected malignant lesions / Number of completed endoscopies × 100%
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of early-stage upper gastrointestinal (esophageal/gastric) malignant lesions
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
Detection rate of upper gastrointestinal (esophageal/gastric) premalignant lesions
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
Response rate of endoscopic examination
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
Total screening costs
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
Unit cost per detected upper gastrointestinal (esophageal/gastric) malignant lesions
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
Unit cost per detected early-stage upper gastrointestinal (esophageal/gastric) malignant lesions
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
Unit cost per detected upper gastrointestinal (esophageal/gastric) premalignant lesions
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
Satisfaction with the risk-based sequential screening modality
Time Frame: 12 months
Satisfaction with the risk-based sequential screening modality is measured through a one-on-one interview using a semi-structured questionnaire specially designed for this trial.
12 months
Rate of timely treatment
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
UGIC-specific mortality
Time Frame: 5-10 years
5-10 years
All-cause mortality
Time Frame: 5-10 years
5-10 years
Quality of life Scale Score
Time Frame: 12 months
European Quality of Life 5-Dimension (EQ-5D) index score is used to assess health-related quality of life.
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

June 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2034

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 3, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 10, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

March 12, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 16, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 15, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Gastric Cancer

Clinical Trials on Risk Assessment and Individualized Surveillance

3
Subscribe