- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03720158
Enteral Omega 3 During Radiotherapy to Improve the Quality of Life and Functionality of Head and Neck Cancer Patients
July 21, 2022 updated by: Coordinación de Investigación en Salud, Mexico
Effect of Enteral Supplementation of Omega 3 Fatty Acids on the Quality of Life and Functionality of Patients With Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Undergoing Radiotherapy
Health-related Quality of Life (QoL) is a multidimensional construct that allows us to know the patient's perception of well-being, and how this perception is related to their illness and treatment.
In clinical research, especially clinical trials, the QoL measurement has become an important element to evaluate.
In patients with Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC), low QoL is associated with Malnutrition (MN), and Cancer Cachexia (CC) is a principal component in its multifactorial etiology.
The exacerbated hypercatabolic state of CC is caused by the increase of pro-inflammatory cytokines, Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS), and other catabolic mediators.
The clinical manifestation of CC is a continuous decrease in muscle mass (with or without loss of fat mass), which is not entirely reversible with nutritional support and which leads to the functional deterioration of patients.
Due to CC, the patients with HNSCC who receive total enteral nutritional support have difficulties in maintaining an optimal nutritional status, and this situation is more frequent during RadioTherapy (RT).
An immune-modulator nutrient, Omega-3 fatty acids (O3) have shown efficacy in improving the nutritional and inflammatory parameters of patients with HNSCC; however, little is known about their impact on patients' QoL and Functionality (Fx).
Therefore, this clinical trial is proposed to provide information about the usefulness of O3 for improving the Fx and QoL of patients with HNSCC receiving total enteral nutrition during RT.
Study Overview
Status
Terminated
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
- Objective: To determine the effect of the daily addition of five mL of an O3 highly concentrated substance (EicosaPentaenoic Acid - EPA: 2.25 g and DocosaHexaenoic Acid - DHA: 1.08 g), to the standard enteral nutrition diet during RT (5-7 weeks), on the Quality of Life (QoL) and Functionality (Fx) of patients with HNSCC.
- Methods: Randomized, double-blinded, controlled clinical trial. Patients with HNSCC (ages ranging from 18-80 years) who will receive total enteral nutrition support through percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and RT for the first time will be invited to participate in the study. Exclusion criteria are fish allergy, anticoagulant consumption, any supplement consumption 6 months prior to the experiment, any contraindication to the performance of the body composition analysis using bioelectrical impedance (Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis, BIA) (cardiac pacemaker, any metallic prosthesis, inability to stand, severe edema), or the presence of the mal-absorption syndrome, two or more cancer types, organ dysfunction, immune diseases, or any hospitalization during the 20 days prior to extraction of the blood sample. Patients with the consumption of any other nutritional supplement or diagnosed with any other cancer during the treatment period, or with insufficient or incorrectly processed blood-serum samples will be eliminated. After expressing their willingness to participate via the signing of the informed consent document, 86 patients with HNSCC will be allocated into two groups: The O3 Group will have the addition of 5 mL of an O3 highly concentrated substance containing 2.25 g of EPA and 1.08 g of DHA to the standard enteral diet during RT (5-7 weeks), and the Placebo or Control Group will have the addition of 5 mL of a placebo (pigmented and flavored corn oil) in a similar manner. All patients will be seen every 4 weeks at the Nutrition Support Service for nutritional assessment and counseling, and to receive the enteral nutrition containers (standard polymeric diet). On the same day, a Research Assistant (who will be blinded) will provide the supplements or the placebo. The patients' sociodemographic and clinical information, body composition, albumin, hemoglobin, C-reactive protein, tumor cachexia-related cytokines: IL (Interleukin) 1a, IL-1b, IL-6, IL-8, IFNγ (Interferon gamma), TGF-β (transforming growth factor beta), and TNF-α (Tumor necrosis factor alpha); and responses for the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life C-30 (EORTC-QLQ-C30) with the Head and Neck Cancer module (EORTC-QLQ-H&N35) questionnaires will be collected at the beginning of RT, at the end of RT, and 12 weeks after starting RT. Statistical analysis includes descriptive statistics, inference statistics (Student t-test, Mann-Whitney test, one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction, Kruskal-Wallis with Dunn's non-parametric test), and the Cox regression; an intention-to-treat analysis will be performed.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
9
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Jalisco
-
Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico, 44340
- Unidad de Investigación Biomédica 02, UMAE HE CMNO IMSS
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC) confirmed by histologic
- Eligible for receiving total enteral nutrition support through percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy for the first time
- Eligible for receiving RadioTherapy (RT) for the first time
Exclusion Criteria:
- Allergy to fish
- Consumption of anticoagulants
- Consumption of any supplement 6 months prior to the experiment
- Any contraindication to the performance of the Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA) (cardiac pacemaker, any metallic prosthesis, inability to stand, severe edema)
- Mal-absorption syndrome
- Two or more cancer types
- Organ dysfunction
- Immune diseases
- Any hospitalization during the 20 days prior to extraction of the blood sample
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Omega 3 Group
Five mL of an Omega-3 highly concentrated substance (containing 2.25 g of EPA and 1.08 g of DHA) will be added daily to the standard enteral diet during the entire radiotherapy treatment period (from 5-7 weeks)
|
Five mL of an Omega-3 highly concentrated substance (containing 2.25 g of EPA and 1.08 g of DHA) will be added daily to the standard enteral diet during the entire radiotherapy
Other Names:
|
|
Placebo Comparator: Placebo or Control Group
Five mL of pigmented and flavored corn oil will be added daily to the standard enteral diet during the entire radiotherapy treatment period (from 5-7 weeks)
|
Five mL of pigmented and flavored corn oil will be added daily to the standard enteral diet during the entire radiotherapy treatment period (from 5-7 weeks)
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Global Health Status/Quality of Life (GHS/QoL) subscale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)
Time Frame: From baseline (time 0) up to the ending of RT (from 5-7 weeks) (time 1); from baseline up to 12 weeks (time 2)
|
The QLQ-C30 is a 30-item subject self-report questionnaire composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures.
These include five functional scales (physical, role, emotional, social, and cognitive), three symptom scales (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, and pain), a global health status / QoL scale (GHS/QoL), and six single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and difficulties).
Participants rate items on a four-point scale, with 1 as "not at all" and 4 as "very much."
The principle for scoring these scales is the same in all cases: 1. Estimate the average of the items that contribute to the scale; this is the raw score.
2. Use a linear transformation to standardize the raw score, so that scores range from 0 to 100; a higher score represents a higher ("better") level of functioning, or a higher ("worse") level of symptoms.
A change of 5 - 10 points is considered a small change.
A change of 10 - 20 points is considered a moderate change.
|
From baseline (time 0) up to the ending of RT (from 5-7 weeks) (time 1); from baseline up to 12 weeks (time 2)
|
|
Change in Physical Functioning (PF) subscale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)
Time Frame: From baseline (time 0) up to the ending of RT (from 5-7 weeks) (time 1); from baseline up to 12 weeks (time 2)
|
The QLQ-C30 is a 30-item subject self-report questionnaire composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures.
These include the Physical Functioning Scale and four more functional scales (role, emotional, social, and cognitive), three symptom scales (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, and pain), a global health status / QoL scale, and six single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and difficulties).
Participants rate items on a four-point scale, with 1 as "not at all" and 4 as "very much."
The method for scoring these scales is: 1. Estimate the average of the items that contribute to the scale; this is the raw score.
2. Use a linear transformation to standardize the raw score, so that scores range from 0 to 100; a higher score represents a higher ("better") level of functioning, or a higher ("worse") level of symptoms.
A change of 5 - 10 points is considered a small change.
A change of 10 - 20 points is considered a moderate change.
|
From baseline (time 0) up to the ending of RT (from 5-7 weeks) (time 1); from baseline up to 12 weeks (time 2)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Changes in serum cancer cachexia-related cytokines: IL (Interleukin)-1a, IL-1b, IL-6, IL-8, IFNγ (Interferon gamma), TGF-β (transforming growth factor beta), and TNF-α (Tumor necrosis factor alpha)
Time Frame: From baseline (time 0) up to the ending of RT (from 5-7 weeks) (time 1); from baseline up to 12 weeks (time 2)
|
Changes of the serum levels quantified by means of the Enzyme-Linked ImmunoSorbent Assay (ELISA)
|
From baseline (time 0) up to the ending of RT (from 5-7 weeks) (time 1); from baseline up to 12 weeks (time 2)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Investigators
- Study Chair: Luz Ma. Adriana Balderas-Peña, PhD, Unidad de Investigación Biomédica 02, UMAE HE CMNO IMSS
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Fearon K, Strasser F, Anker SD, Bosaeus I, Bruera E, Fainsinger RL, Jatoi A, Loprinzi C, MacDonald N, Mantovani G, Davis M, Muscaritoli M, Ottery F, Radbruch L, Ravasco P, Walsh D, Wilcock A, Kaasa S, Baracos VE. Definition and classification of cancer cachexia: an international consensus. Lancet Oncol. 2011 May;12(5):489-95. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70218-7. Epub 2011 Feb 4.
- Perloy A, Maasland DHE, van den Brandt PA, Kremer B, Schouten LJ. Intake of meat and fish and risk of head-neck cancer subtypes in the Netherlands Cohort Study. Cancer Causes Control. 2017 Jun;28(6):647-656. doi: 10.1007/s10552-017-0892-0. Epub 2017 Apr 5.
- Righini CA, Timi N, Junet P, Bertolo A, Reyt E, Atallah I. Assessment of nutritional status at the time of diagnosis in patients treated for head and neck cancer. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis. 2013 Feb;130(1):8-14. doi: 10.1016/j.anorl.2012.10.001. Epub 2012 Dec 20.
- Ravasco P, Monteiro-Grillo I, Vidal PM, Camilo ME. Nutritional deterioration in cancer: the role of disease and diet. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2003 Dec;15(8):443-50. doi: 10.1016/s0936-6555(03)00155-9.
- van Bokhorst-de van der Schueren MA, van Leeuwen PA, Sauerwein HP, Kuik DJ, Snow GB, Quak JJ. Assessment of malnutrition parameters in head and neck cancer and their relation to postoperative complications. Head Neck. 1997 Aug;19(5):419-25. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0347(199708)19:53.0.co;2-2.
- Sheth CH, Sharp S, Walters ER. Enteral feeding in head and neck cancer patients at a UK cancer centre. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2013 Oct;26(5):421-8. doi: 10.1111/jhn.12029. Epub 2013 Feb 5.
- Alshadwi A, Nadershah M, Carlson ER, Young LS, Burke PA, Daley BJ. Nutritional considerations for head and neck cancer patients: a review of the literature. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Nov;71(11):1853-60. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2013.04.028. Epub 2013 Jul 9.
- Planas M, Puiggros C, Redecillas S. [Contribution of nutritional support to fight cancer cachexia]. Nutr Hosp. 2006 May;21 Suppl 3:27-36. Spanish.
- Murphy BA, Ridner S, Wells N, Dietrich M. Quality of life research in head and neck cancer: a review of the current state of the science. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2007 Jun;62(3):251-67. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2006.07.005. Epub 2007 Apr 3.
- Mulasi U, Vock DM, Kuchnia AJ, Jha G, Fujioka N, Rudrapatna V, Patel MR, Teigen L, Earthman CP. Malnutrition Identified by the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics and American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition Consensus Criteria and Other Bedside Tools Is Highly Prevalent in a Sample of Individuals Undergoing Treatment for Head and Neck Cancer. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2018 Jan;42(1):139-147. doi: 10.1177/0148607116672264. Epub 2017 Dec 11.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
October 10, 2018
Primary Completion (Actual)
July 31, 2021
Study Completion (Actual)
July 31, 2021
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
October 15, 2018
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
October 24, 2018
First Posted (Actual)
October 25, 2018
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
July 25, 2022
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
July 21, 2022
Last Verified
July 1, 2022
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2017-785-110
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
No
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Quality of Life
-
Ziekenhuis Oost-LimburgRecruitingQuality of Life | Postoperative Quality of Recovery | Health-Related Quality-of-LifeBelgium
-
B. Braun Medical SAUnknownQuality of Life of Colostomized Patient
-
Assiut UniversityUnknownImproving Quality of LifeEgypt
-
Istituto Ortopedico RizzoliUniversity of BolognaCompletedImprove Quality of LifeItaly
-
Children's National Research InstituteCompletedProfessional Quality of LifeUnited States
-
Mattu UniversityCompletedBreif Description: Patients' Quality of Life ofEthiopia
-
Region VästmanlandUnknownHealth Related Quality of Life
-
Ain Shams UniversityCompletedHealth Related Quality of LifeEgypt
-
Institute of Oncology LjubljanaUnknownHealth-related Quality of LifeSlovenia
-
Oslo University HospitalNorwegian Fund for Postgraduate Training in PhysiotherapyCompletedHealth-Related Quality of LifeNorway
Clinical Trials on Omega 3 Group
-
Fundación del Caribe para la Investigación BiomédicaNaturmegaNot yet recruitingMixed DyslipidemiaColombia
-
Federal University of UberlandiaRecruiting
-
University of ManitobaCompleted
-
Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer CenterNational Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedBreast Neoplasms | ArthralgiaUnited States
-
Pennington Biomedical Research CenterCompleted
-
AstraZenecaCompletedDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2 | Exocrine Pancreatic InsufficiencySweden, Poland, Latvia, Denmark, Hungary, Slovakia
-
Applied Science Private UniversityCompletedVitamin D DeficiencyJordan
-
Tanta UniversityCompletedLipid Profile | Intrauterine Growth Restriction | NeonatesEgypt
-
Appalachian State UniversityCompleted