- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03721978
REVEAL 2 Trial (Evaluation of VGX-3100 and Electroporation for the Treatment of Cervical HSIL)
October 15, 2024 updated by: Inovio Pharmaceuticals
A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase 3 Study of VGX-3100 Delivered Intramuscularly Followed by Electroporation With CELLECTRA™ 5PSP for the Treatment of HPV-16 and/or HPV-18 Related High Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion (HSIL) of the Cervix
HPV-303 is a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of VGX-3100 delivered intramuscularly (IM) followed by electroporation (EP) delivered with CELLECTRA™ 5PSP in adult women with histologically confirmed high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 [CIN2] or grade 3 [CIN3]) of the cervix, associated with human papillomavirus (HPV-16) and/or HPV-18.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
203
Phase
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina, C1181ACH
- Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires
-
Ramos Mejía, Argentina, B1704ETD
- DIM Clinica Privada
-
-
Santa Fe
-
Rosario, Santa Fe, Argentina, S2000PBB
- Instituto de Ginecología
-
-
-
-
Bahia
-
Salvador, Bahia, Brazil, 40420-000
- Associacao Obras Sociais Irma Dulce Hospital Santo Antonio
-
-
Goiás
-
Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil, 74605-050
- Hospital das Clinicas de Goiânia
-
-
Paraná
-
Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil, 80530-010
- Hospital Erasto Gaertner
-
-
São Paulo
-
Jaú, São Paulo, Brazil, 17210-120
- Hospital Amaral Carvalho
-
Ribeirao Preto, São Paulo, Brazil, 14048-900
- Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto - USP
-
-
-
-
-
Tallinn, Estonia, 10119
- East Tallinn Central Hospital Womens Clinic
-
Tartu, Estonia, 51014
- Tartu University Hospital
-
-
Pärnumaa
-
Pärnu, Pärnumaa, Estonia, EE-80010
- Parnu Hospital
-
-
-
-
-
Kuopio, Finland, FI-70210
- Northern Savo Hospital District Muncipal Federation
-
-
Uusimaa
-
Helsinki, Uusimaa, Finland, FI-00290
- HUS Naistentaudit ja synnytykset
-
-
-
-
-
Vilnius, Lithuania, LT-08661
- Vilnius University hospital Santaros klinikos
-
Vilnius, Lithuania, LT-01117
- Vilnius District Central Outpatient Clinic
-
-
-
-
-
Śląskie, Poland, 40-611
- Centrum Medyczne Angelius Provita
-
-
Lubelskie
-
Lublin, Lubelskie, Poland, 20-880
- Niepubliczny Zakład Opieki Zdrowotnej Profimed
-
Lublin, Lubelskie, Poland, 20-880
- Samodzielny Publiczny Szpital Kliniczny nr 1 w Lublinie
-
-
-
-
-
Rio Piedras, Puerto Rico, 00935
- Puerto Rico Translational Research Center (PRTRC)
-
-
-
-
Gauteng
-
Centurion, Gauteng, South Africa, 0157
- Lynette Reynders Private Practice
-
-
Western Cape
-
Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa, 7925
- University of Cape Town
-
-
-
-
-
Madrid, Spain, 28041
- Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre
-
Madrid, Spain, 28009
- Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón
-
Valencia, Spain, 46010
- Hospital Clinico Universitario de Valencia
-
Valencia, Spain, 46026
- Hospital Universitari i Politecnic La Fe de Valencia
-
-
Barcelona
-
L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain, 08907
- Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge
-
-
-
-
Arizona
-
Tucson, Arizona, United States, 85712
- Visions Clinical Research- Tucson
-
-
Connecticut
-
Danbury, Connecticut, United States, 06810
- Nuvance Health
-
-
Delaware
-
Newark, Delaware, United States, 19713
- Christiana Care Health System
-
-
Florida
-
Lake Worth, Florida, United States, 33461
- Altus Research
-
Miramar, Florida, United States, 33027
- Salom and Tangir LLC
-
Sunrise, Florida, United States, 33351
- Precision Clinical Research, LLC
-
-
Georgia
-
Augusta, Georgia, United States, 30912
- Augusta University
-
-
Illinois
-
Oak Brook, Illinois, United States, 60523
- Affinity Clinical Research Institute
-
-
Louisiana
-
Marrero, Louisiana, United States, 70072
- Praetorian Pharmaceutical Research, LLC
-
-
Maryland
-
Hagerstown, Maryland, United States, 21740
- Unified Women's Clinical Research - Hagerstown
-
-
Massachusetts
-
Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02118
- Boston Medical Center
-
-
Michigan
-
Saginaw, Michigan, United States, 48604
- Saginaw Valley Medical Research Group LLC
-
-
Nebraska
-
Norfolk, Nebraska, United States, 68701
- Meridian Clinical Research Norfolk
-
-
New Jersey
-
Newark, New Jersey, United States, 07103
- New Jersey Medical School
-
-
New York
-
Bronx, New York, United States, 10583
- Montefiore Medical Center
-
New York, New York, United States, 10032
- Columbia University Medical Center
-
Port Jefferson, New York, United States, 11777
- Suffolk Obstetrics and Gynecology
-
-
North Carolina
-
Greensboro, North Carolina, United States, 27408
- Unified Women's Clinical Research - Greensboro
-
Morehead City, North Carolina, United States, 28557
- Unified Women's Clinical Research - Morehead City
-
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States, 27103
- Lyndhurst Clinical Research
-
-
Ohio
-
Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43213
- ClinOhio Research Services
-
Fairfield, Ohio, United States, 45014
- Obstetrics & Gynecology Associates, Inc.
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Smithfield, Pennsylvania, United States, 15478
- Frontier Clinical Research-Smithfield
-
-
South Carolina
-
Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, United States, 29572
- Venus Gynecology, LLC
-
-
Tennessee
-
Memphis, Tennessee, United States, 38119
- Women's Physician Group Suite 203
-
-
Texas
-
Sugar Land, Texas, United States, 77479
- Storks Research
-
-
Virginia
-
Virginia Beach, Virginia, United States, 23456
- Group For Women - Tidewater Clinical Research Inc.
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Women aged 18 years and above
- Confirmed cervical infection with HPV types 16 and/or 18 at screening
- Cervical tissue specimen/slides provided to Study Pathology Adjudication Committee for diagnosis scheduled to be collected within 10 weeks prior to anticipated date of first dose of study drug
- Confirmed histologic evidence of cervical HSIL at screening
- Must be judged by Investigator to be an appropriate candidate for the protocol-specified procedure required at Week 36
- With respect to their reproductive capacity must be post-menopausal or surgically sterile or willing to use a contraceptive method with failure rate of less than 1% per year when used consistently and correctly from screening until Week 36
- Normal screening electrocardiogram (ECG)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Microscopic or gross evidence of adenocarcinoma-in-situ (AIS), high grade vulvar, vaginal, or anal intraepithelial neoplasia or invasive cancer in any histopathologic specimen at screening
- Cervical lesion(s) that cannot be fully visualized on colposcopy
- History of endocervical curettage (ECC) which showed cervical HSIL indeterminate, or insufficient for diagnosis
- Treatment for cervical HSIL within 4 weeks prior to screening
- Pregnant, breastfeeding or considering becoming pregnant during the study
- History of previous therapeutic HPV vaccination
- Immunosuppression as a result of underlying illness or treatment
- Receipt of any non-study, non-live vaccine within 2 weeks of Day 0
- Receipt of any non-study, live vaccine within 4 weeks of Day 0
- Current or history of clinically significant, medically unstable disease or condition which, in the judgment of the investigator, would jeopardize the safety of the participant, interfere with study assessments or endpoint evaluation, or otherwise impact the validity of the study results
- Presence of acute or chronic bleeding or clotting disorder that would contraindicate IM injections, or use of blood thinners within 2 weeks of Day 0
- Participation in an interventional study with an investigational compound or device within 30 days of signing informed consent
- Less than two acceptable sites available for IM injection
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Quadruple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: VGX-3100 + EP
Participants received 3 IM injections of 6 mg (in 1 mL) VGX-3100 followed by EP using the CELLECTRA™-5PSP device on Day 0, Week 4, and Week 12.
|
1 milliliter (mL) VGX-3100 injected IM.
CELLECTRA™-5PSP used for EP following IM injection of VGX 3100.
|
|
Placebo Comparator: Matched Placebo + EP
Participants received 3 IM injections of 1 mL VGX-3100 matching placebo followed by EP using the CELLECTRA™-5PSP device on Day 0, Week 4, and Week 12.
|
CELLECTRA™-5PSP used for EP following IM injection of VGX 3100.
1 mL of matched Placebo injected IM.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Baseline Biomarker-positive Participants for ITT Population: Percentage of Participants With No Histologic Evidence of Cervical HSIL on Histology Sample and No Evidence of HPV-16 and/or HPV-18 in Cervical Samples
Time Frame: At Week 36
|
Baseline biomarker-positive participants with no histologic (i.e., biopsies or excisional treatment) evidence of cervical HSIL, no evidence of HPV-16 and/or HPV-18 at Week 36, and participants who did not have unscheduled excision or biopsy sample obtained between the initial dose up to Week 36 were considered to be responders.
No evidence of HSIL was defined by histology as negative, squamous atypia, or low-grade intraepithelial lesion (LSIL).
Cervical samples for HPV-16 and/or HPV-18 were collected using the ThinPrep™.
The efficacy time frame is defined by a biopsy or surgical excision at any time starting from 14 days prior to the protocol-specified target date of Week 36.
The first tissue removal sample within the time frame determines the histology endpoint.
|
At Week 36
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Baseline Biomarker-positive Participants for Safety Population: Number of Participants With Any Local and Systemic Adverse Events (AEs)
Time Frame: From Baseline to Week 40
|
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment.
An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of the pharmaceutical product, whether or not considered related to the pharmaceutical product.
Pre-existing conditions which worsen during a study are also considered as AEs.
Nausea, fatigue, injection site bruising, injection site erythema, injection site haematoma, injection site induration, injection site pain, injection site pruritus, injection site swelling, malaise, pyrexia, arthralgia, myalgia, headache and erythema were considered as local and systemic AEs for baseline biomarker-positive participants for safety population.
|
From Baseline to Week 40
|
|
Safety Population: Number of Participants With Local and Systemic AEs
Time Frame: From Baseline to Week 40
|
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment.
An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of the pharmaceutical product, whether or not considered related to the pharmaceutical product.
Pre-existing conditions which worsen during a study are also considered as AEs.
Nausea, chills, fatigue, injection site bruising, injection site erythema, injection site haematoma, injection site haemorrhage, injection site induration, injection site oedema, injection site pain, injection site paraesthesia, injection site pruritus, injection site swelling, malaise, pain, pyrexia, temperature regulation disorder, arthralgia, myalgia, headache and erythema were considered as local and systemic AEs for safety population.
|
From Baseline to Week 40
|
|
Baseline Biomarker-positive Participants for Safety Population: Number of Participants With Any Treatment Emergent AEs (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEs (Including Suspected Unexpected Serious Adverse Reaction [SUSAR] and Unexpected Adverse Device Effect [UADE])
Time Frame: From Baseline to Week 40
|
AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product, which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment.
Serious AE (SAE) is any experience that suggested significant hazard, contraindication, side effect/precaution, & fulfilled any of the following: fatal, life-threatening, required in-patient hospitalization/prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect, was medically significant/required intervention to prevent other outcomes.
TEAEs are any AEs starting on or after the first administration of any investigational product (IP).
TEAEs included both serious and non-serious TEAEs.
UADE is any SAE on health/safety or any life-threatening problem/death caused by, or associated with a device, if that effect, problem/death was not previously identified in nature, severity/degree of incidence in the investigational plan or application.
|
From Baseline to Week 40
|
|
Safety Population: Number of Participants With Any TEAEs and Serious TEAEs (Including SUSAR and UADE)
Time Frame: From Baseline to Week 40
|
AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment.
SAE is any experience that suggested significant hazard, contraindication, side effect, or precaution, and fulfilled any of the following criteria: fatal, life-threatening, required in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect, was medically significant or required intervention to prevent other outcomes.
TEAEs are defined as AEs starting on or after the first administration of any IP.
TEAEs included both serious and non-serious TEAEs.
UADE is any SAE on health/safety or any life-threatening problem/death caused by, or associated with a device, if that effect, problem/death was not previously identified in nature, severity/degree of incidence in the investigational plan or application.
|
From Baseline to Week 40
|
|
ITT Population: Percentage of Participants With No Histologic Evidence of Cervical HSIL on Histology Sample and No Evidence of HPV-16 and/or HPV-18 in Cervical Samples
Time Frame: At Week 36
|
Participants with no histologic (i.e., biopsies or excisional treatment) evidence of cervical HSIL, no evidence of HPV-16 and/or HPV-18 at Week 36, and participants who did not have unscheduled excision or biopsy sample obtained between the initial dose up to Week 36 were considered to be responders.
No evidence of HSIL was defined by histology as negative, squamous atypia, or low-grade intraepithelial lesion (LSIL).
Cervical samples for HPV-16 and/or HPV-18 were collected using the ThinPrep™.
The efficacy time frame is defined by a biopsy or surgical excision at any time starting from 14 days prior to the protocol-specified target date of Week 36.
The first tissue removal sample within the time frame determines the histology endpoint.
|
At Week 36
|
|
Baseline Biomarker-positive Participants for ITT Population: Percentage of Participants With No Histologic Evidence of Cervical HSIL on Histology Sample
Time Frame: At Week 36
|
Baseline biomarker-positive participants with no histologic (i.e., biopsies or excisional treatment) evidence of cervical HSIL at Week 36 and participants who did not have unscheduled excision or biopsy sample obtained between the initial dose up to Week 36 were considered to be responders.
No evidence of HSIL was defined by histology as negative, squamous atypia, or LSIL.
The efficacy time frame is defined by a biopsy or surgical excision at any time starting from 14 days prior to the protocol-specified target date of Week 36.
The first tissue removal sample within the time frame determines the histology endpoint.
|
At Week 36
|
|
ITT Population: Percentage of Participants With No Histologic Evidence of Cervical HSIL on Histology Sample
Time Frame: At Week 36
|
Participants with no histologic (i.e., biopsies or excisional treatment) evidence of cervical HSIL at Week 36 and participants who did not have unscheduled excision or biopsy sample obtained between the initial dose up to Week 36 were considered to be responders.
No evidence of HSIL was defined by histology as negative, squamous atypia, or LSIL.
The efficacy time frame is defined by a biopsy or surgical excision at any time starting from 14 days prior to the protocol-specified target date of Week 36.
The first tissue removal sample within the time frame determines the histology endpoint.
|
At Week 36
|
|
Baseline Biomarker-positive Participants for ITT Population: Percentage of Participants With No Evidence of HPV-16 and/or HPV-18 in Cervical Samples by Type Specific HPV Testing
Time Frame: At Week 36
|
Baseline biomarker-positive participants with no evidence of HPV-16 and/or HPV-18 at Week 36 time frame and participants in whom an excision or biopsy sample was not obtained between the initial dose up to Week 36 were considered to be responders.
Cervical samples for HPV-16 and/or HPV-18 were collected using the ThinPrep™.
The efficacy time frame is defined by a biopsy or surgical excision at any time starting from 14 days prior to the protocol-specified target date of Week 36.
The first tissue removal sample within the time frame determines the histology endpoint.
|
At Week 36
|
|
ITT Population: Percentage of Participants With No Evidence of HPV-16 and/or HPV-18 in Cervical Samples by Type Specific HPV Testing
Time Frame: At Week 36
|
Participants with no evidence of HPV-16 and/or HPV-18 at Week 36 and participants who did not have unscheduled excision or biopsy sample obtained between the initial dose up to Week 36 were considered to be responders.
Cervical samples for HPV-16 and/or HPV-18 were collected using the ThinPrep™.
The efficacy time frame is defined by a biopsy or surgical excision at any time starting from 14 days prior to the protocol-specified target date of Week 36.
The first tissue removal sample within the time frame determines the histology endpoint.
|
At Week 36
|
|
Baseline Biomarker-positive Participants for ITT Population: Percentage of Participants With No Histologic Evidence of LSIL or HSIL on Histology Sample
Time Frame: At Week 36
|
Baseline biomarker-positive participants with no histologic evidence of cervical HSIL, squamous atypia, or LSIL at Week 36 and participants who did not have unscheduled excision or biopsy sample obtained between the initial dose up to Week 36 were considered to be responders.
No evidence of LSIL was defined as no evidence of cervical squamous intraepithelial neoplasia 1 (CIN1), CIN2, or CIN3 on biopsies or excisional treatment.
No evidence of HSIL was defined by histology as negative, squamous atypia, or LSIL.
The efficacy time frame is defined by a biopsy or surgical excision at any time starting from 14 days prior to the protocol-specified target date of Week 36.
The first tissue removal sample within the time frame determines the histology endpoint.
|
At Week 36
|
|
ITT Population: Percentage of Participants With No Evidence of Histologic LSIL or HSIL on Histology Sample
Time Frame: At Week 36
|
Participants with no histologic evidence of cervical HSIL, squamous atypia, or LSIL at Week 36 and participants who did not have unscheduled excision or biopsy sample obtained between the initial dose up to Week 36 were considered to be responders.
No evidence of LSIL was defined as no evidence of CIN1, CIN2, or CIN3 on biopsies or excisional treatment.
No evidence of HSIL was defined by histology as negative, squamous atypia, or LSIL.
The efficacy time frame is defined by a biopsy or surgical excision at any time starting from 14 days prior to the protocol-specified target date of Week 36.
The first tissue removal sample within the time frame determines the histology endpoint.
|
At Week 36
|
|
Baseline Biomarker-positive Participants for ITT Population: Percentage of Participants With No Evidence of LSIL or HSIL on Histology Sample and No Evidence of HPV-16 and/or HPV-18 by Type Specific HPV Testing
Time Frame: At Week 36
|
Baseline biomarker-positive participants with no histologic evidence of cervical HSIL, squamous atypia, or LSIL, no evidence of HPV-16 and/or HPV-18 by type specific HPV testing at Week 36, and participants who did not have unscheduled excision or biopsy sample obtained between the initial dose up to Week 36 were considered to be responders.
No evidence of LSIL was defined as no evidence of CIN1, CIN2, or CIN3 on biopsies or excisional treatment.
No evidence of HSIL was defined by histology as negative, squamous atypia, or LSIL.
The efficacy time frame is defined by a biopsy or surgical excision at any time starting from 14 days prior to the protocol-specified target date of Week 36.
The first tissue removal sample within the time frame determines the histology endpoint.
|
At Week 36
|
|
ITT Population: Percentage of Participants With No Evidence of LSIL or HSIL on Histology Sample and No Evidence of HPV-16 and/or HPV-18 by Type Specific HPV Testing
Time Frame: At Week 36
|
Participants with no histologic evidence of cervical HSIL, squamous atypia, or LSIL, no evidence of HPV-16 and/or HPV-18 by type specific HPV testing at Week 36, and participants who did not have unscheduled excision or biopsy sample obtained between the initial dose up to Week 36 were considered to be responders.
No evidence of LSIL was defined as no evidence of CIN1, CIN2, or CIN3 on biopsies or excisional treatment.
No evidence of HSIL was defined by histology as negative, squamous atypia, or LSIL.
The efficacy time frame is defined by a biopsy or surgical excision at any time starting from 14 days prior to the protocol-specified target date of Week 36.
The first tissue removal sample within the time frame determines the histology endpoint.
|
At Week 36
|
|
Baseline Biomarker-positive Participants for ITT Population: Percentage of Participants With No Progression of Cervical HSIL to Cervical Carcinoma
Time Frame: From Baseline at Week 36
|
Baseline biomarker-positive participants with no histologic evidence of cervical adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) or cervical carcinoma at Week 36 relative to baseline and participants in whom an excision or biopsy sample was not obtained between initial dose up to Week 36 were considered as responders.
The efficacy time frame is defined by a biopsy or surgical excision at any time starting from 14 days prior to the protocol-specified target date of Week 36.
The first tissue removal sample within the time frame determines the histology endpoint.
|
From Baseline at Week 36
|
|
ITT Population: Percentage of Participants With No Progression of Cervical HSIL to Cervical Carcinoma
Time Frame: From Baseline at Week 36
|
Participants with no histologic evidence of cervical AIS or cervical carcinoma at Week 36 relative to baseline and participants who did not have unscheduled excision or biopsy sample obtained between the initial dose up to Week 36 were considered to be responders.
The efficacy time frame is defined by a biopsy or surgical excision at any time starting from 14 days prior to the protocol-specified target date of Week 36.
The first tissue removal sample within the time frame determines the histology endpoint.
|
From Baseline at Week 36
|
|
Baseline Biomarker-positive Participants for ITT Population: Percentage of Participants Who Have Cleared HPV-16 and/or HPV-18 in Non-cervical Anatomic Locations
Time Frame: From Baseline at Week 36
|
Percentage of baseline biomarker-positive participants who have cleared HPV-16 and/or HPV-18 on specimens from non-cervical anatomic locations (oropharynx, vagina and intra-anal) at Week 36 Visit compared to baseline were reported.
|
From Baseline at Week 36
|
|
ITT Population: Percentage of Participants Who Have Cleared HPV-16 and/or HPV-18 in Non-cervical Anatomic Locations
Time Frame: From Baseline at Week 36
|
Percentage of participants who have cleared HPV-16 and/or HPV-18 on specimens from non-cervical anatomic locations (oropharynx, vagina, and intra-anal) at Week 36 Visit compared to baseline were reported.
|
From Baseline at Week 36
|
|
Baseline Biomarker-positive Participants for mITT Population: Serum Concentrations of Anti-HPV-16 and Anti-HPV-18 Antibody
Time Frame: At Week 15 and Week 36
|
A standardized binding enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was performed to measure the anti-HPV-16/18 antibody response induced by VGX-3100.
E7 is a viral protein produced by cells infected by HPV-16/18.
|
At Week 15 and Week 36
|
|
mITT Population: Serum Concentrations of Anti-HPV-16 and Anti-HPV-18 Antibody
Time Frame: At Week 15 and Week 36
|
A standardized binding ELISA was performed to measure the anti-HPV-16/18 antibody response induced by VGX-3100.
E7 is a viral protein produced by cells infected by HPV-16/18.
|
At Week 15 and Week 36
|
|
Baseline Biomarker-positive Participants for mITT Population: Change From Baseline in Interferon-Gamma Response Magnitude at Week 15 and 36
Time Frame: Baseline; Week 15 and Week 36
|
Assessment of cellular immune activity occurred via the application of the Interferon-γ enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot (IFN-γ ELISpot).
Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) isolated from whole blood sample were used for analysis.
E6 and E7 are viral proteins produced by cells infected by HPV-16/18.
|
Baseline; Week 15 and Week 36
|
|
mITT Population: Change From Baseline in Interferon-Gamma Response Magnitude at Week 15 and 36
Time Frame: Baseline; Week 15 and Week 36
|
Assessment of cellular immune activity occurred via the application of the IFN-γ ELISpot.
PBMCs isolated from whole blood sample were used for analysis.
E6 and E7 are viral proteins produced by cells infected by HPV-16/18.
|
Baseline; Week 15 and Week 36
|
|
Baseline Biomarker-positive Participants for mITT Population: Change From Baseline in Flow Cytometry Response Magnitude at Week 15
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 15
|
Assessment of cellular immune activity was measured using the application flow cytometry for the purposes of performing a Lytic Granule Loading Assay.
The Lytic Granule Loading assay examines the following external cellular markers: CD3, CD4, CD8 (T cell identification), CD137, CD38, and CD69 (T cell activation markers) as well as PD-1 (exhaustion/activation marker).
Here, changes from baseline in the percentage of CD8+CD137+Perforin+, CD8+CD38+Perforin+, and CD8+CD69+Perforin+ are reported.
|
Baseline, Week 15
|
|
mITT Population: Change From Baseline in Flow Cytometry Response Magnitude at Week 15
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 15
|
Assessment of cellular immune activity was measured using the application flow cytometry for the purposes of performing a Lytic Granule Loading Assay.
The Lytic Granule Loading assay examines the following external cellular markers: CD3, CD4, CD8 (T cell identification), CD137, CD38, and CD69 (T cell activation markers) as well as PD-1 (exhaustion/activation marker).
Here, changes from baseline in the percentage of CD8+CD137+Perforin+, CD8+CD38+Perforin+, and CD8+CD69+Perforin+ are reported.
|
Baseline, Week 15
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Director: Jeffrey Skolnik, MD, Inovio Pharmaceuticals
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
February 28, 2019
Primary Completion (Actual)
August 23, 2022
Study Completion (Actual)
September 15, 2022
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
October 25, 2018
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
October 25, 2018
First Posted (Actual)
October 26, 2018
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
October 17, 2024
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
October 15, 2024
Last Verified
October 1, 2024
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Neoplasms by Histologic Type
- Neoplasms
- Carcinoma
- Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial
- Uterine Cervical Diseases
- Uterine Diseases
- Precancerous Conditions
- Neoplasms, Squamous Cell
- Female Urogenital Diseases
- Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications
- Urogenital Diseases
- Genital Diseases
- Genital Diseases, Female
- Carcinoma in Situ
- Carcinoma, Squamous Cell
- Uterine Cervical Dysplasia
- Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions of the Cervix
Other Study ID Numbers
- HPV-303
- 2018-004114-17 (EudraCT Number)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
Yes
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Cervical Dysplasia
-
University of Mississippi Medical CenterNot yet recruitingCervical Dysplasia, Uterine | Vaginal Dysplasia | Vulvar Dysplasia
-
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases...Hoffmann-La RocheCompletedHIV Infections | Cervix, DysplasiaUnited States, Puerto Rico
-
M.D. Anderson Cancer CenterNational Cancer Institute (NCI)Terminated
-
Sunnybrook Health Sciences CentreCompleted
-
Ruhr University of BochumCompletedUterine Cervical DysplasiaGermany
-
University of CopenhagenDanish Cancer SocietyUnknown
-
University of TennesseeIntegra LifeSciences CorporationCompletedCervical DysplasiaUnited States
-
NHS Greater Glasgow and ClydeUnknownCervical Carcinoma | Cervical Dysplasia
-
William Marsh Rice UniversityM.D. Anderson Cancer Center; Albert Einstein College of Medicine; The Cleveland... and other collaboratorsCompleted
-
Zydolab - Institute of Cytology and Immune CytochemistryCompleted
Clinical Trials on VGX-3100
-
Inovio PharmaceuticalsCompletedPapillomavirus InfectionsUnited States, Puerto Rico
-
Inovio PharmaceuticalsCompletedHuman Papillomavirus (HPV)Puerto Rico, United States
-
Inovio PharmaceuticalsCompletedCervical Dysplasia | Cervical High Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion | HSILUnited States, Spain, Portugal, Italy, Philippines, Thailand, Slovakia, Lithuania, Estonia, Belgium, South Africa, Germany, Argentina, United Kingdom, Poland, Puerto Rico, Finland, Mexico, Peru
-
Inovio PharmaceuticalsCompletedAnal NeoplasmUnited States, Canada
-
Inovio PharmaceuticalsUniversity of PennsylvaniaCompletedHead and Neck Squamous Cell CancerUnited States
-
Inovio PharmaceuticalsCompletedCervical Intraepithelial NeoplasiaSouth Africa, United States, Korea, Republic of, Canada, Estonia, India, Georgia, Australia, Puerto Rico
-
AIDS Malignancy ConsortiumNational Cancer Institute (NCI); The Emmes Company, LLC; Inovio PharmaceuticalsCompletedAnal Intraepithelial Neoplasia | High Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Neoplasia | HIV Positivity | Human Papillomavirus-16 Positive | Human Papillomavirus-18 PositiveUnited States, Puerto Rico
-
Inovio PharmaceuticalsCompletedCervical CancerUnited States
-
Inovio PharmaceuticalsCompletedHuman Papillomavirus (HPV) | Vulvar Dysplasia | Vulvar Intraepithelial Neoplasia (VIN) | Vulvar High Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion (HSIL) | VIN2 | VIN3 | Pre-cancerous Lesions of the VulvaUnited States
-
VGX Pharmaceuticals, LLCGeneOne Life Science, Inc.Completed