Forced Versus Spray Coagulation in Women Undergoing LLETZ-conization for Cervical Dysplasia: a Randomized Trial (CONE-1)

July 7, 2022 updated by: Clemens Tempfer, Ruhr University of Bochum
In a randomized clinical trial of 120 women undergoing large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ)-conization for cervical dysplasia, two coagulation modes, spray versus forced coagulation, will be compared. The primary outcome of the study is time to complete hemostasis, secondary outcomes are intraoperative blood loss, postoperative pain, and postoperative bleeding complications.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Intraoperative bleeding during large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ)-conization can be achieved by two modes of electrocoagulation, spray coagulation and forced coagulation. Spray coagulation is a superficial coagulation mode, whereas forced coagulation is a deep tissue coagulation mode. It is unknown, whether spray or forced coagulation is superior regarding intraoperative hemostasis and other outcome Parameters such as postoperative bleeding and postoperative pain. Therefore, the investigator designed a randomized clinical trial of 120 women undergoing large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ)-conization for cervical dysplasia, comparing the two coagulation modes, spray coagulation and forced coagulation, The primary outcome of the study is time to complete hemostasis measured in seconds, secondary outcomes are intraoperative blood loss measured as difference in serum hemoglobin pre- and postoperatively, postoperative pain according to a 10 step VAS scale, and postoperative bleeding complications, defined as necessity to intervene surgically for vaginal bleeding up to 14 days postoperatively. The study Population consists of women undergoing LLETZ-conization for histologically proven cervical dysplasia. The study hypothesis states that the difference in the mean time until complete hemostais will be at least 1/3 shorter in women randomized to spray coagulation. With a study Population of 120 women, this study has a power of >80% to detect a difference of 1/3 of the mean coagulation time until complete hemostais based on an anticipated mean time of 85 seconds.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

160

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bochum, Germany, 44625
        • Ruhr University Bochum

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • histologically proven cervical dysplasia
  • colposcopy Prior to LLETZ-conization
  • informed consent
  • no known hematologic disorder

Exclusion Criteria:

  • significant language barrier
  • a personal history of LLETZ-conization

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Spray
cervical coagulation using a superficial electrical coagulation mode, ie spray coagulation
surgical method to achieve intraoperative hemostasis by a superficial electrocoagulation of 80 Watt voltage
Active Comparator: Forced
cervical coagulation using a deep tissue electrical coagulation mode, ie forced coagulation
surgical method to achieve intraoperative hemostasis by a deep tissue electrocoagulation of 80 Watt voltage

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
time to complete intraoperative hemostasis
Time Frame: 120 seconds
the time until complete hemostasis as judged by the surgeon has been achieved, will be measured in seconds
120 seconds

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
postoperative pain
Time Frame: 5 hours
patients will score their postoperative pain Level using a 10-step visual analogue scale (VAS) within 5 hours after surgery
5 hours
postoperative complications
Time Frame: 14 days
postoperative complications defined as the necessity to intervene surgically for vaginal bleeding within 14 days after surgery
14 days
intraoperative blood loss
Time Frame: 5 hours
intraoperative blood loss will be measured using the difference in serum hemoglobin one day prior to surgery and within 5 hours postoperatively
5 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Clemens B Tempfer, MD, Ruhr University Bochum

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 27, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 31, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

January 5, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 8, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 7, 2022

Last Verified

July 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Uterine Cervical Dysplasia

Clinical Trials on Spray

3
Subscribe