Laparoscopic Surgery: Comparison of Conventional Trocars to the Teleflex® MiniLap® System (MiniTroc)

April 28, 2021 updated by: University Hospital, Lille

Benign Gynecologic Laparoscopic Surgery: Comparison of Conventional Trocars to the Teleflex® MiniLap® System in Length of Hospitalization, Pain and Aesthetics, a Randomized Study.

During laparoscopy, trocars are essential: they allow the passage of instruments through the wall. In gynecology, with exception, trocars 5mm (used for the passage of endo-scissors and forceps) and 10 to 12mm are used (especially for optics).

Trocars are responsible for complications, such as vascular wounds, digestive wounds, pain, infections or postoperative hernias, or aesthetic sequelae, and should be chosen with caution: most complications of laparoscopy are essentially due to their placement, and the complications at the introduction of the first trocar are the most frequent.

The MiniLap® system developed by Teleflex does not require trocars in the case of a single forceps, or a single 5mm trocar with the necessary forceps change (this is the Percuvance® system). The aim of the latter is to make minimally invasive surgery even less invasive, thanks to a reduction in the number of trocars used (in many cases, elimination of two trocars), smaller incisions (percutaneous use of instruments, with a diameter of 2,4mm) thus reducing the complications

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Lille, France
        • Hôpital Jeanne de Flandres, CHU

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • BMI <35kg / m2
  • No history of multiple abdominopelvic surgery
  • Without absolute contraindication to laparoscopy
  • In the context of ambulatory surgery
  • With precise laparoscopy of indication:

    • Exploratory or diagnostic
    • Exploration of infertility
    • Performing a tubal permeability test
    • Performing a salpingectomy
    • Realization of a tubal sterilization
    • Realization of a tubal plasty
    • Performing an ovariectomy
    • Performing a simple ovarian cystectomy
  • Patient have been informed during her preoperative consultation and have signed the consent in a free and informed manner upon admission to hospital

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Performing an emergency surgery
  • Carcinological surgery
  • Performing a benign but complex surgery such as:

    • Hysterectomy
    • Prolapse cure
    • promontofixation
    • Complex surgery of endometriosis
    • Removal of large cyst from the ovary.
  • Person unable to receive informed information and / or give consent. Person deprived of liberty.
  • Pregnant or nursing woman.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: trocars of type MiniLap
Patients benefiting from the use of trocars of type MiniLap of Teleflex during the realization of their coelioscopy scheduled in ambulatory
Subjects participating in the study will undergo laparoscopic gynecologic surgery as planned in the routine care, but using the MiniLap System instead of the conventional single-use trocars used usually.
Active Comparator: trocars classics
Patients benefiting from the use of trocats classics during the realization of their coelioscopy scheduled(programmed) in ambulatory.
Subjects participating in the study will undergo laparoscopic gynecologic surgery as planned in the routine care using the conventional single-use trocars used usually.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The time required to validate the Marshall and Chung criteria authorizing outpatient discharge when using the Minilap® system in comparison to the use of conventional trocars.
Time Frame: at the end of surgery, an average 3 hours
at the end of surgery, an average 3 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: at immediate postoperative (baseline,1 hour and 3 hours) and postoperative visit (6 weeks ± 1 after surgery).
subjective evaluation of pain of the patient by 0 to 10 scale
at immediate postoperative (baseline,1 hour and 3 hours) and postoperative visit (6 weeks ± 1 after surgery).
Aesthetic scars using a scale of 0 to 10
Time Frame: postoperative visit (6 weeks ± 1 after surgery).
subjective evaluation of the patient and the surgeon by means of a 0 to 10 scale
postoperative visit (6 weeks ± 1 after surgery).
number of complication per operative
Time Frame: At immediate postoperative (baseline,1 hour and 3 hours)
collection of the complications per operating by means of a questionnaire to be filled(performed) by the surgeon at the end of intervention
At immediate postoperative (baseline,1 hour and 3 hours)
of the intraoperative use of the trocar system using a questionnaire to be completed by the surgeon
Time Frame: At immediate postoperative (baseline,1 hour and 3 hours)
At immediate postoperative (baseline,1 hour and 3 hours)
post-operative complications at the level of the trocar apertures using a questionnaire
Time Frame: at immediate postoperative (baseline,1 hour and 3 hours) and postoperative visit (6 weeks ± 1 after surgery).
at immediate postoperative (baseline,1 hour and 3 hours) and postoperative visit (6 weeks ± 1 after surgery).

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Chrystelle Rubod, MD,PhD, University Hospital, Lille

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 15, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 27, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

April 27, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 29, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 30, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

October 31, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 29, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 28, 2021

Last Verified

April 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2017_81
  • 2018-A01276-49 (Other Identifier: ID-RCB number, ANSM)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Gynecologic Surgeries

Clinical Trials on laparoscopic gynecologic surgery with the MiniLap System.

Subscribe