- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03726333
Hepatic Impairment Study for Lorlatinib in Cancer Patients
A PHASE 1 STUDY TO EVALUATE THE EFFECT OF HEPATIC IMPAIRMENT ON THE PHARMACOKINETICS AND SAFETY OF LORLATINIB IN ADVANCED CANCER PATIENTS
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This will be a Phase 1, open label, multi center, multiple dose, non randomized, Phase 1 clinical trial of lorlatinib in advanced cancer patients with varying degrees of hepatic impairment and necessary age , weight , and gender matched prospect normal hepatic function patients. This study is intended to evaluate the potential effect of hepatic impairments on the PK and safety of lorlatinib after daily administration of lorlatinib and to provide dosing recommendation for patients with varied degree of hepatic impairment if possible.
Patients in the study will be assigned to different groups (A1, normal liver function, control for group B; A2, normal liver function, control for group C; B, mild hepatic impairment; C, moderate hepatic impairment; D, severe hepatic impairment) according to their liver function. The enrollment of approximately 76 advanced cancer patients is anticipated in this study in order to have 8 PK-evaluable patients in each of Groups A1, A2, B and C, and 6 PK-evaluable patients in Group D for final statistical analysis. Evaluable patients are those who complete the planned PK sample collection on Cycle 2 Day 1 and have no lorlatinib dose modification until completion of Cycle 2 Day 1 PK evaluation. Patients who are not evaluable for PK will be replaced. Each patient will be treated with repeated oral once daily doses of lorlatinib in 21-day cycles until disease progression, patient refusal, or unacceptable toxicity occurs. The dose schedule may be modified as necessary for individual patients according to tolerability.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Phase 1
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Colorado
-
Aurora, Colorado, United States, 80045
- University of Colorado Denver CTO (CTRC)
-
Aurora, Colorado, United States, 80045
- University of Colorado Hospital, Anschutz Cancer Pavilion (ACP)
-
Aurora, Colorado, United States, 80045
- University of Colorado Hospital, Anschutz Inpatient Pavilion (AIP)
-
Aurora, Colorado, United States, 80045
- University of Colorado Hospital, Anschutz Outpatient Pavilion (AOP)
-
-
Georgia
-
Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30322
- Emory University Hospital
-
Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30322
- Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University
-
Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30322
- The Emory Clinic
-
Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30322
- Investigational Drug Service
-
-
Texas
-
San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78229
- Mays Cancer Center
-
San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78229
- University Health System
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Histologically or cytologically confirmed solid malignancy or lymphoma that is metastatic or unresectable, and for which standard curative or palliative measures do not exist, or are no longer effective;
- Biliary obstruction with a biliary drain or stent;
- Neurologically stable gliomas and brain metastases;
- ECOG performance status of 0, 1, or 2;
- adequate bone marrow function;
- adequate pancreatic function;
- adequate renal function;
- female patients with negative pregnancy test
Exclusion Criteria:
- untreated esophageal varices; uncontrolled ascites;
- episodes of hepatic encephalopathy within the last 4 weeks;
- spinal cord compression; major surgery within 4 weeks prior to enrollment;
- radiation therapy within 2 weeks prior to enrollment;
- last anti-cancer treatment within 2 weeks prior to screening;
- previous high-dose chemotherapy requiring stem cell rescue;
- prior to irradiation to >25% of the bone marrow;
- gastrointestinal abnormalities;
- known prior or suspected hypersensitivity to lorlatinib or lorlatinib tablet;
- clinically significant bacterial, fungal or viral infections for non-liver cancer patients;
- clinically significant cardiovascular disease;
- uncontrolled hypertension; acute pancreatitis with predisposing characteristics;
- history of grade 3 or 4 interstitial fibrosis or interstitial lung disease;
- active hemoelysis or evidence of biliary sepsis;
- prior major gastrointestinal surgery;
- concurrent use of known strong CYP3A inhibitors, inducers and P-gp substrates with a narrow therapeutic index;
- concurrent use of CYP3A substrates with narrow therapeutic indices;
- prior treatment with lorlatinib; active bleeding disorder
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Group A1 Normal hepatic function
continued daily administration of lorlatinib in patients with normal hepatic function
|
continued daily administration of 100 mg lorlatinib
continued daily administration of lorlatinib at the dose level same as Group C for the first 22 days and 100 mg QD afterwards
continued daily administration of 100 mg QD lorlatinib
continued daily administration of lorlatinib at 50 mg QD initially and may be adjusted based on PK and safety results from the initial several patients
continued daily administration of lorlatinib at the dose level determined based on preliminary PK and safety results from first several patients in Group C
|
|
Active Comparator: Group A2 Normal hepatic function
continued daily administration of lorlatinib in patients with normal hepatic function
|
continued daily administration of 100 mg lorlatinib
continued daily administration of lorlatinib at the dose level same as Group C for the first 22 days and 100 mg QD afterwards
continued daily administration of 100 mg QD lorlatinib
continued daily administration of lorlatinib at 50 mg QD initially and may be adjusted based on PK and safety results from the initial several patients
continued daily administration of lorlatinib at the dose level determined based on preliminary PK and safety results from first several patients in Group C
|
|
Experimental: Group C moderate hepatic impairment
continued daily administration of lorlatinib in patients with moderate hepatic impairment
|
continued daily administration of 100 mg lorlatinib
continued daily administration of lorlatinib at the dose level same as Group C for the first 22 days and 100 mg QD afterwards
continued daily administration of 100 mg QD lorlatinib
continued daily administration of lorlatinib at 50 mg QD initially and may be adjusted based on PK and safety results from the initial several patients
continued daily administration of lorlatinib at the dose level determined based on preliminary PK and safety results from first several patients in Group C
|
|
Experimental: Group D severe hepatic impairment
continued daily administration of lorlatinib in patients with severe hepatic impairment
|
continued daily administration of 100 mg lorlatinib
continued daily administration of lorlatinib at the dose level same as Group C for the first 22 days and 100 mg QD afterwards
continued daily administration of 100 mg QD lorlatinib
continued daily administration of lorlatinib at 50 mg QD initially and may be adjusted based on PK and safety results from the initial several patients
continued daily administration of lorlatinib at the dose level determined based on preliminary PK and safety results from first several patients in Group C
|
|
Experimental: Group B mild hepatic impairment
continued daily administration of lorlatinib in patients with mild hepatic impairment
|
continued daily administration of 100 mg lorlatinib
continued daily administration of lorlatinib at the dose level same as Group C for the first 22 days and 100 mg QD afterwards
continued daily administration of 100 mg QD lorlatinib
continued daily administration of lorlatinib at 50 mg QD initially and may be adjusted based on PK and safety results from the initial several patients
continued daily administration of lorlatinib at the dose level determined based on preliminary PK and safety results from first several patients in Group C
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Area Under Plasma Lorlatinib Concentration-Time Curve From Time 0 to Dosing Interval of 24 Hours (AUC24) at Steady State On Cycle 2 Day 1
Time Frame: Cycle 2 day 1 at times 0 (predose), 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 10, and 24 hours post lorlatinib dose.
|
AUC24 was defined as area under the plasma concentration time profile during 1 dosing interval (24 hours).
|
Cycle 2 day 1 at times 0 (predose), 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 10, and 24 hours post lorlatinib dose.
|
|
Observed Maximal Plasma Concentration (Cmax) at Steady State on Cycle 2 Day 1
Time Frame: Cycle 2 day 1 at times 0 (predose), 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 10, and 24 hours post lorlatinib dose.
|
Cmax was defined as maximum plasma concentration and was observed directly from data.
|
Cycle 2 day 1 at times 0 (predose), 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 10, and 24 hours post lorlatinib dose.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number Of Patients Experienced Treatment Emergent Adverse Event Assessed by Investigator
Time Frame: From Screening (within 28 days prior to Cycle 1 Day 1) through and including at least 28 days after after the last lorlatinib dose. The duration is approximately 42 days.
|
An Adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant.
A serious AE was any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that resulted in death; was life-threatening; required hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; resulted in congenital anomaly/birth defect or that was considered to be an important medical event.
AEs were graded by the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) version 4.03.
The grades were defined as follows: Grade 0: no change from normal or reference range; Grade 1: mild AE; Grade 2: moderate AE; Grade 3: severe AE; Grade 4: life-threatening consequences, urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5: death related to AE.
The focus of AE summaries was on treatment-emergent AE (TEAE).
An AE was considered TEAE if the event occurred during the on-treatment period.
|
From Screening (within 28 days prior to Cycle 1 Day 1) through and including at least 28 days after after the last lorlatinib dose. The duration is approximately 42 days.
|
|
Objective Response Rate (ORR)
Time Frame: Baseline up to approximately 1 year
|
ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall confirmed response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor (RECIST) version 1.1 relative to the response-evaluable population.
|
Baseline up to approximately 1 year
|
|
Duration of Response (DR)
Time Frame: Baseline up to approximately 1 year
|
DR was measured from the date that an objective tumor response (CR or PR) was first documented (whichever occurred first) to date of objective tumor progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first.
|
Baseline up to approximately 1 year
|
|
Lorlatinib Area Under Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time 0 to the Time of the Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) After Single Dose on Cycle 1 Day 1
Time Frame: Cycle 1 day 1 at times 0 (predose), 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 10, and 24 hours post lorlatinib dose.
|
AUClast was defined as area under the plasma concentration time profile from time 0 to the time of the last quantifiable concentration (Clast)
|
Cycle 1 day 1 at times 0 (predose), 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 10, and 24 hours post lorlatinib dose.
|
|
The Time of The Last Quantifiable Concentration (Tlast) of Lorlatinib After Single Dose on Cycle 1 Day 1
Time Frame: Cycle 1 day 1 at times 0 (predose), 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 10, and 24 hours post lorlatinib dose.
|
Tlast was defined as the time of the last quantifiable concentration.
|
Cycle 1 day 1 at times 0 (predose), 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 10, and 24 hours post lorlatinib dose.
|
|
The Time to Cmax (Tmax) of Lorlatinib After Single Dose on Cycle 1 Day 1
Time Frame: Cycle 1 day 1 at times 0 (predose), 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 10, and 24 hours post lorlatinib dose.
|
Tmax was defined as time for Cmax.
|
Cycle 1 day 1 at times 0 (predose), 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 10, and 24 hours post lorlatinib dose.
|
|
Observed Minimal Plasma Concentration (Cmin) at Steady State On Cycle 2 Day 1
Time Frame: Cycle 2 day 1 at times 0 (predose), 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 10, and 24 hours post lorlatinib dose.
|
Cmin was defined as minimum plasma concentration and was observed directly from data.
|
Cycle 2 day 1 at times 0 (predose), 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 10, and 24 hours post lorlatinib dose.
|
|
Plasma Lorlatinib AUClast at Steady State On Cycle 2 Day 1
Time Frame: Cycle 2 day 1 at times 0 (predose), 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 10, and 24 hours post lorlatinib dose.
|
AUClast was defined as area under the plasma concentration time profile from time 0 to the time of Clast.
|
Cycle 2 day 1 at times 0 (predose), 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 10, and 24 hours post lorlatinib dose.
|
|
Plasma Lorlatinib Tlast at Steady State On Cycle 2 Day 1
Time Frame: Cycle 2 day 1 at times 0 (predose), 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 10, and 24 hours post lorlatinib dose.
|
Tlast was defined as the time of the last quantifiable concentration.
|
Cycle 2 day 1 at times 0 (predose), 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 10, and 24 hours post lorlatinib dose.
|
|
Apparent Clearance (CL/F) at Steady State On Cycle 2 Day 1
Time Frame: Cycle 2 day 1 at times 0 (predose), 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 10, and 24 hours post lorlatinib dose.
|
Clearance of a drug is a measure of the rate at which a drug is metabolized or eliminated by normal biological processes.
CL/F was calculated as Dose/AUC24 at steady-state.
|
Cycle 2 day 1 at times 0 (predose), 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 10, and 24 hours post lorlatinib dose.
|
|
Plasma Lorlatinib Metabolite AUC24 at Steady State
Time Frame: Cycle 2 day 1 at times 0 (predose), 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 10, and 24 hours post lorlatinib dose.
|
AUC24 was defined as area under the plasma concentration time profile during one dosing interval (24 hours).
|
Cycle 2 day 1 at times 0 (predose), 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 10, and 24 hours post lorlatinib dose.
|
|
Plasma Lorlatinib Metabolite AUClast After Single Dose
Time Frame: Cycle 1 day 1 at times 0 (predose), 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 10, and 24 hours post lorlatinib dose.
|
AUClast was defined as area under the plasma concentration time profile from time 0 to the time of Clast.
|
Cycle 1 day 1 at times 0 (predose), 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 10, and 24 hours post lorlatinib dose.
|
|
Plasma Lorlatinib Metabolite AUClast at Steady State
Time Frame: Cycle 2 day 1 at times 0 (predose), 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 10, and 24 hours post lorlatinib dose.
|
AUClast was defined as area under the plasma concentration time profile from time 0 to the time of Clast.
|
Cycle 2 day 1 at times 0 (predose), 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 10, and 24 hours post lorlatinib dose.
|
|
Plasma Lorlatinib Metabolite Cmax After Single Dose
Time Frame: Cycle 2 day 1 at times 0 (predose), 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 10, and 24 hours post lorlatinib dose.
|
Cmax was defined as maximum plasma concentration and was observed directly from data.
|
Cycle 2 day 1 at times 0 (predose), 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 10, and 24 hours post lorlatinib dose.
|
|
Plasma Lorlatinib Metabolite Cmax at Steady State
Time Frame: Cycle 2 day 1 at times 0 (predose), 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 10, and 24 hours post lorlatinib dose.
|
Cmax was defined as maximum plasma concentration and was observed directly from data.
|
Cycle 2 day 1 at times 0 (predose), 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 10, and 24 hours post lorlatinib dose.
|
|
Plasma Lorlatinib Metabolite Tlast After Single Dose
Time Frame: Cycle 1 day 1 at times 0 (predose), 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 10, and 24 hours post lorlatinib dose.
|
Tlast was defined as the time of the last quantifiable concentration.
|
Cycle 1 day 1 at times 0 (predose), 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 10, and 24 hours post lorlatinib dose.
|
|
Plasma Lorlatinib Metabolite Tlast at Steady State
Time Frame: Cycle 2 day 1 at times 0 (predose), 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 10, and 24 hours post lorlatinib dose.
|
Tlast was defined as the time of the last quantifiable concentration.
|
Cycle 2 day 1 at times 0 (predose), 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 10, and 24 hours post lorlatinib dose.
|
|
Metabolite Ratio of Lorlatinib Metabolite for AUC24 (MRAUC24) at Steady State on Cycle 2 Day 1
Time Frame: Cycle 2 day 1 at times 0 (predose), 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 10, and 24 hours post lorlatinib dose.
|
MRAUC24 was defined as metabolite ratio of lorlatinib metabolite for AUC24.
|
Cycle 2 day 1 at times 0 (predose), 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 10, and 24 hours post lorlatinib dose.
|
|
Metabolite Ratio of Lorlatinib Metabolite for AUClast (MRAUClast) at Steady State on Cycle 2 Day 1
Time Frame: Cycle 2 day 1 at times 0 (predose), 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 10, and 24 hours post lorlatinib dose.
|
MRAUClast was defined as metabolite ratio of lorlatinib metabolite for AUClast.
|
Cycle 2 day 1 at times 0 (predose), 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 10, and 24 hours post lorlatinib dose.
|
|
Metabolite Ratio of Lorlatinib Metabolite for Cmax (MRCmax) at Steady State on Cycle 2 Day 1
Time Frame: Cycle 2 day 1 at times 0 (predose), 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 10, and 24 hours post lorlatinib dose.
|
MRCmax was defined as metabolite ratio of lorlatinib metabolite for AUClast.
|
Cycle 2 day 1 at times 0 (predose), 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 10, and 24 hours post lorlatinib dose.
|
|
Metabolite Ratio of Lorlatinib Metabolite for AUClast (MRAUClast) at Steady State on Cycle 1 Day 1
Time Frame: Cycle 1 day 1 at times 0 (predose), 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 10, and 24 hours post lorlatinib dose.
|
MRAUClast was defined as metabolite ratio of lorlatinib metabolite for AUClast.
|
Cycle 1 day 1 at times 0 (predose), 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 10, and 24 hours post lorlatinib dose.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Director: Pfizer CT.gov Call Center, Pfizer
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- B7461009
- HEPATIC IMPAIRMENT (Other Identifier: Alias Study Number)
- lorlatinib HEPATIC IMPAIRMENT (Other Identifier: Alias Study Number)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Advanced Cancers
-
Shanghai Chia Tai Tianqing Pharmaceutical Technology...Recruiting
-
M.D. Anderson Cancer CenterCompleted
-
M.D. Anderson Cancer CenterTerminated
-
M.D. Anderson Cancer CenterYukiguni Maitake Company Ltd.Terminated
-
M.D. Anderson Cancer CenterEuropean CommissionCompletedAdvanced CancersUnited States, Spain, France, Israel
-
Aeglea BiotherapeuticsCompletedAdvanced CancersUnited States
-
M.D. Anderson Cancer CenterFoundation MedicineCompleted
-
M.D. Anderson Cancer CenterCompleted
-
M.D. Anderson Cancer CenterSabinsa CorporationWithdrawnAdvanced Cancers
-
M.D. Anderson Cancer CenterTerminatedAdvanced CancersUnited States
Clinical Trials on lorlatinib
-
Guangdong Provincial People's HospitalPeking Union Medical College Hospital; Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South... and other collaboratorsActive, not recruiting
-
Guangdong Association of Clinical TrialsActive, not recruitingCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung | Brain Metastases | Leptomeningeal MetastasisChina
-
CStone PharmaceuticalsPfizerActive, not recruitingAdvanced or Metastatic ROS1-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung CancerChina
-
PfizerActive, not recruitingNon-Small Cell Lung Cancer ALK-positiveChina
-
The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical...Not yet recruiting
-
PfizerRecruitingALK+ Non-Small-Cell Lung CarcinomaFrance
-
University of Milano BicoccaPfizerCompletedAnaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma, ALK-PositiveItaly
-
Chugai PharmaceuticalNot yet recruitingALK Positive Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
-
M.D. Anderson Cancer CenterRecruitingAdvanced Non-Small Cell Lung CancerUnited States