- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03738774
Addressing Post-Intensive Care Syndrome Among Survivors of COVID (APICS-COVID) (APICS)
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
Despite the accumulation of data documenting the reality of extensive functional impairments following ICU stay, the specific treatment needs of individuals experiencing Post-Intensive Care Syndrome (PICS) are not well known largely because of a relative lack of knowledge about the specific unmet needs of patients at risk for PICS at the time of hospital discharge. These possible needs include oxygen prescriptions, equipment for noninvasive ventilation, durable medical equipment prescriptions, coordination with government assistance and community health programs, physical or occupational therapy in the home or at an outpatient clinic, medications restarted or discontinued as appropriate.
This study will enrol individuals who were diagnosed with acute respiratory failure during an ICU admission and were discharged from the ICU alive. Once enrolled, participants' medical records will be reviewed for demographic and medical information. Questionnaires will be used to assess the participant's status prior to ICU admittance, including comorbidities, medications, physical functioning, quality of life, alcohol/smoking/substance use, social support and healthcare utilization. While in the ICU, participants will receive usual clinical care in this observational study. Data on mechanical ventilation, arterial blood gas values, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) diagnosis, delirium, and medical status will be collected. Information regarding the patients' postdischarge needs including medical equipment, medication, home care services, dialysis, appointments, counselling and referral will also be collected by reviewing the discharge note. Follow-up evaluations by phone call will occur at 1-4 weeks, 3 and 6 months following the ICU discharge. At 1-4 weeks, the investigators will evaluate, via phone call whether the patient's post-discharge needs are met. At 3 months and 6 months phone calls, standardized surveys will be used to assess mortality status, readmission, healthcare utilization, functional outcomes, quality of life, mental health status, coping and social support and return to work.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Maryland
-
Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21287
- Johns Hopkins Hospital
-
-
Massachusetts
-
Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02215
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
-
-
Tennessee
-
Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37235
- Vanderbilt University
-
-
Utah
-
Murray, Utah, United States, 84107
- Intermountain Medical Center
-
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84148
- George Wahlen Salt Lake City Veterans Administration Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
Respiratory failure:
- Mechanical Ventilation via endotracheal tube/tracheostomy ≥ 24hrs
- continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), bilevel positive airway pressure (BIPAP) ≥ 24 consecutive hrs (provided for acute respiratory failure not for Obstructive Sleep Apnea or other stable use)
- High flow nasal cannula ≥ 24 consecutive hrs (FIO2 ≥ 0.5 and flow rate ≥ 30 L/min)
- Expected to be discharged home alive
- Within the pandemic expansion cohort, COVID-19 status (defined as a positive result on an appropriately validated molecular diagnostic assay for infection with SARS-CoV-2) will be used to guide enrollment
Exclusion Criteria:
- Lack of informed consent
- Patient in the ICU < 24hrs
- Mechanical ventilation at baseline
- Residing at a medical institution at the time of hospital admission
- Homelessness
- Primary residence not in USA
- Prisoner
- More than mild dementia (either known diagnosis of moderate or worse dementia or Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly (IQ-CODE) > 3.6; screening performed on patient > 50 years old or with family reports of possible memory decline)
- Patient on hospice at or before time of enrollment
- Patients who, based solely on pre-existing medical problems (such as poorly controlled neoplasm or other end-stage disease, including Stage IV heart failure or severe burns), would not be expected to survive six months in the absence of the acute respiratory failure.
- Patient with neurological injury either receiving treatment for intracranial hypertension or who are not expected to return to consciousness.
- Unable to communicate by telephone in English or Spanish
- Patients mechanically ventilated solely for airway protection or obstruction
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Number of deaths or hospital readmissions within three months of discharge
Time Frame: 3 months after hospital discharge
|
Number of patients who died or were readmitted to the hospital within three month of hospital discharge
|
3 months after hospital discharge
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Number of ER visits
Time Frame: 3 months after hospital discharge
|
Number of visits to the emergency department within three months of hospital discharge.
|
3 months after hospital discharge
|
Healthcare utilization
Time Frame: Within 3 months of hospital discharge
|
Gather information about healthcare resources utilization.
For example, readmission to hospital after discharge or visits with primary care doctor.
|
Within 3 months of hospital discharge
|
Cognitive Functional outcome as assessed by Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) - Blind Instrument
Time Frame: After 3 months of hospital discharge
|
Using MoCA-Blind Instrument which assesses different types of cognitive abilities and can be administered via phone.
Scores range from 0 to 22 points, with a score of 18 and higher generally considered normal.
|
After 3 months of hospital discharge
|
Physical function outcome as assessed by Activity of Daily Living (ADL-Katz Index)
Time Frame: At 3 months after hospital discharge
|
This will be assessed using the Activity of Daily Living (ADL-Katz Index) instrument.
ADL evaluates functional status as a measurement of the patient's ability to perform activities of daily living.
Each activity is rated as being completed independently or not.
Scores range is 0-6 points, higher score is better.
|
At 3 months after hospital discharge
|
Physical function outcome as assessed by Activity of Daily Living (ADL-Katz Index)
Time Frame: At 6 months after hospital discharge
|
This will be assessed using the Activity of Daily Living (ADL-Katz Index) instrument.
ADL evaluates functional status as a measurement of the patient's ability to perform activities of daily living.
Each activity is rated as being completed independently or not.
Scores range is 0-6 points, higher score is better.
|
At 6 months after hospital discharge
|
Physical function outcome as assessed by Instrumental Activity of Daily Living (IADL-Lawton)
Time Frame: At 3 months after hospital discharge
|
This will be assessed using the Instrumental Activity of Daily Living (IADL-Lawton) instrument.
IADL evaluates independent living skills.
Each activity has specific level of participation that can be selected.
Scores range from 0 (low function, dependent) to 8 points (high function, independent).
|
At 3 months after hospital discharge
|
Physical function outcome as assessed by Instrumental Activity of Daily Living (IADL-Lawton)
Time Frame: At 6 months after hospital discharge
|
This will be assessed using the Instrumental Activity of Daily Living (IADL-Lawton) instrument.
IADL evaluates independent living skills.
Each activity has specific level of participation that can be selected.
Scores range from 0 (low function, dependent) to 8 points (high function, independent).
|
At 6 months after hospital discharge
|
Mental health Functional outcome as assessed by Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
Time Frame: After 3 months of hospital discharge
|
Using Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) instrument which scores for anxiety and depression, range: 0-21 points; lower score is better, with scores ≥8 points, indicating substantial symptoms.
|
After 3 months of hospital discharge
|
Functional outcomes-Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)
Time Frame: After 3 months of hospital discharge
|
Using Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R) instrument which is a 22-item self-report measure that assesses subjective distress caused by traumatic events.
range: 0-4 points; lower score is better, with scores ≥1.6 indicating substantial symptoms.
For this outcome mean or median scores can be reported along the with the proportion of patients above the threshold.
|
After 3 months of hospital discharge
|
Coping or social support
Time Frame: After 3 months of hospital discharge
|
Using Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) instrument which is a brief (12-item) tool designed to measure perceptions of support from three sources: Family, Friends, and a Significant Other.
Each item is scored on a 7-point Likert scale (ranging from Very Strongly Disagree to Very Strongly Agree, with midpoint as Neutral).
Higher scores indicate greater levels of social support.
|
After 3 months of hospital discharge
|
Health related quality of life
Time Frame: At 3 months after hospital discharge
|
Using EQ-5D instrument which is a standardized instrument for measuring generic health status. EQ-5D-5L consists a descriptive system and the EQ Visual Analogue scale (EQ VAS). The descriptive system comprises 5 dimensions; Mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression. Each is rated with 5 levels of severity of problems: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, extreme problems. The visual analog scale ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores reflecting better perceived current health-related quality of life state. |
At 3 months after hospital discharge
|
Health related quality of life
Time Frame: At 6 months after hospital discharge
|
Using EQ-5D instrument which is a standardized instrument for measuring generic health status. EQ-5D-5L consists a descriptive system and the EQ Visual Analogue scale (EQ VAS). The descriptive system comprises 5 dimensions; Mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression. Each is rated with 5 levels of severity of problems: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, extreme problems. The visual analog scale ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores reflecting better perceived current health-related quality of life state. |
At 6 months after hospital discharge
|
Number of deaths within 6 Months after discharge
Time Frame: 6 months after hospital discharge
|
Number of patients who died within six months of hospital discharge
|
6 months after hospital discharge
|
Return to work
Time Frame: 6 month after hospital discharge
|
Employment status within six month after hospital discharge.
Including addition descriptions of return to work, for example, change in duties or change in effectiveness.
|
6 month after hospital discharge
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Samuel M Brown, MD, Intermountain Medical Center
- Principal Investigator: James C Jackson, PsyD, Vanderbilt University
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- IRB181120
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Post Intensive Care Syndrome
-
University of MelbourneEnrolling by invitationICU Acquired Weakness | Intensive Care Unit Syndrome | Intensive Care Unit Acquired Weakness | Post Intensive Care Unit Syndrome | Post Intensive Care SyndromeAustralia
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisRecruitingIntensive Care Unit Syndrome | Pediatric Post-intensive Care SyndromeFrance
-
Vanderbilt UniversityNational Institute on Aging (NIA); Ohio State UniversityRecruitingPost-intensive Care SyndromeUnited States
-
St. Justine's HospitalCentre de recherche du Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke; McGill... and other collaboratorsRecruiting
-
University of PittsburghAgency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)RecruitingCritical Care | Health Services | Transitional Care | Post-intensive Care SyndromeUnited States
-
Uppsala UniversityActive, not recruiting
-
University of CalgaryCanadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)Active, not recruitingDelirium | Post Intensive Care Unit Syndrome | Intensive Care Unit Delirium | Post Intensive Care Unit Syndrome FamilyCanada
-
Medical Centre LeeuwardenCompletedCritical Illness | Intensive Care Unit Acquired Weakness | Post Intensive Care Unit SyndromeNetherlands
-
University of CalgaryAlberta Health servicesCompleted
-
Mayo ClinicNot yet recruitingPost-Intensive Care SyndromeUnited States