Application of Tachosil During Lymphadenectomy

November 21, 2018 updated by: Paweł Miotła, Medical University of Lublin

Does Intraoperative Application of TachoSil Reduce the Number of Lymphocele After Pelvic Lymphadenectomy?

The prevention of lymphoceles was assessed using collagen patch coated with the human coagulation factors (TachoSil, Nycomed International Management GmbH, Zurich, Switzerland; NCT Number ICMJE NCT01192022; Other Study ID Numbers ICMJE TC-2402-040-SP; U1111-1130-9121 Registry Identifier: WHO) on 50 consecutive patients with endometrial and cervical cancer stages IB to II who had undergone open hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy (PL).

Methods:

Each patient was simultaneously randomized in two groups: as a control (side without Tachosil applied) and study group (side with Tachosil applied). All surgical parameters were collected and patients underwent ultrasound examination on postoperative days 1, 6, and 30, and at the end of treatment.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The study was approved by the Bioethics Committee of the Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland (KE-0254/276/2013). The study population consisted of 50 women undergoing pelvic lymphadenectomy for cervical and endometrial cancer and meeting the inclusion/exclusion criteria requirements. Inclusion criteria for the study included women undergoing open hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for cervical or endometrial cancer, age between 18 and 70 years, who signed a written informed consent. Exclusion criteria included women with previously diagnosed lymph edema or disease of the lymphatic system or a known disease of the immune system. Prospective randomized clinical intervention trial of 50 open surgery during 2013-2014 at 2nd Department of Gynecology in Lublin. Women were centrally randomized by the principal investigator (TR). Surgeons allocated Tachosil for one side (left or right) after lymphadenectomy, second side was as a control side without Tachosil. Allocation was communicated by telephone after informed consent had been obtained and after lymphadenectomy had been completed. Outcome assessment was performed by the independent reviewers. Outcome assessors were blinded to the treatment allocation. The open surgery were performed as follows: in women who underwent routine pelvic lymphadenectomy, lymph node tissue was removed from the external iliac vessels, the obturator fossa, the interiliac region, and the common iliac region after identification and appropriate preparation of iliac vessels and obturator nerve. At the end of the procedure, hemostasis was checked. A Tachosil® patch of 4.8x4.8 cm was attached to one side of the obturator fossa (study group) and the same patient constituted also control group, because no Tachosil® patch was used on the second side of lymphadenectomy. Specific drainage of the retroperitoneum was performed. Patients had to agree to participate in the study and signed informed consent at least one day before surgery. Taking into consideration the examined group the patient was allocated to, the surgeon applied either one Tachosil® patches in the study group or no Tachosil® in the control group. After placing for 4 minutes, a uniform pressure was applied to it to provide rapid haemostasis by forming a strong, fibrin clot adjacent to the tissue surface. Tachosil was placed alternately once in the left, once in the right obturator fossa, so that each of the patients participating in the study could be their own control. The next step was a radical hysterectomy with adnexa. After completion of the procedure, the stump of the vagina stitching to the hollow was performed by passing the vaginal seam through the vaginal wall, the right-side sacro-uterus ligament, the right round ligament, the peritoneal uterine vesiculitis, the left round ligament, the left sacro-uterine ligament and finally the vaginal wall. This way of fixation allowed free lymphatic drainage of the retroperitoneal space. Two drains from the vicinity of the pits of the curtains were removed through the abdominal wall, which were left to the second day after surgery or longer if the volume of secretion in the drainage exceeded 40 ml per day. The urinary bladder catheter was removed on the third day after surgery and ultrasound after voiding (PVR) was evaluated. Surgical procedures were performed by four doctors with extensive experience in oncological gynecology. The surgical protocols were blinded to other researchers who controlled patients in the postoperative period. The data obtained by them were analyzed by an independent reviewer. The evaluation criteria of the study were the development of lymph cysts and their volume. Antibiotic prophylaxis was implemented according to local hospital recommendations. In addition, metronidazole was administered at a dose of 500 mg every 8 hours. i.v. for the first three days after the procedure. Patients also received small-molecule heparin at a dose of 4,000 IU from the day preceding the surgery up to 30 days after its completion. Due to the fact that lymphatic cysts usually appear 7 to 15 days after lymphadenectomy, the ultrasound examination of the presence and volume of lymphocele was performed on the 7th and 30th day after the surgery and after completing the oncological complementary treatmentThe criteria proposed by Tinelli et al. were used to define lymphocele.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

50

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Lublin, Poland, 20-954
        • IInd Department of Gynecology

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • cervical cancer (FIGO IA1, IA2, IB1, IB2)
  • endometrial cancer (FIGO IA, IB, II)
  • age between 18 and 70 years
  • signed a written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • lymph edema
  • disease of the lymphatic system
  • a known disease of the immune system

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: TACHOSIL GROUP
Surgical procedures were performed by four doctors with extensive experience in oncological gynecology. A TachoSil® absorbable patch of 4.8x4.8 cm was attached, once, intraoperatively to one side of the obturator fossa (study group). Specific drainage of the retroperitoneum was performed.
Other Names:
  • NCT01192022
No Intervention: GROUP WITHOUT TACHOSIL
The same patient constituted also control group, because no TachoSil® absorbable patche was used on the second side of lymphadenectomy. Specific drainage of the retroperitoneum was performed.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The incidence and volume of lymphocele.
Time Frame: 1 year
Number of participants with lymphocele as assessed by USG scan at 1,6,30 days and the drainage volume in ml with/without Tachosil assessed by USG scan at 1,2,6,30 days
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The incidence of lymphocele after adjuvant treatment
Time Frame: 1 year
Number of participants with lymphocele as assessed by USG scan after complement adjuvant treatament
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Tomasz Rechberger, Prof, IInd Department of Gynecology, Medical University of Lublin, Poland

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 29, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 18, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 21, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

November 26, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 26, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 21, 2018

Last Verified

November 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

from now to ongoing

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • Study Protocol

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cervical Cancer

Clinical Trials on TACHOSIL GROUP

Subscribe