Vaginal CO2 Laser and the Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause

January 13, 2020 updated by: Themos Grigoriadis, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens

The Clinical, Histopathological, Cytological and Microbiological Efficacy of the Micro-ablative Fractional CO2 Laser : A Double-blind Randomized Placebo-controlled Trial

This study evaluates the clinical, histopathological, cytological and microbiological efficacy of Microablative Fractional CO2 laser intravaginally administered in postmenopausal women with Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause. Half participants will receive active CO2 laser therapy, while the other half will receive placebo CO2 laser therapy.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Athens, Greece, 11528
        • Urogynecological Unit of Alexandra Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Symptoms of vaginal atrophy (dyspareunia and/or vaginal dryness)
  • Menopause

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Systemic or local hormonal therapy the last 6 months
  • Use of moisturizers or lubricants the last month
  • Active genital infection (i.e herpes, vaginitis)
  • Prolapse stage >=2
  • Underlying pathologies that could interfere with the protocol compliance

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Laser Group

Microablative Fractional CO2 laser therapy at monthly intervals.

The laser parameters that will be used are the following: (1) Power: 30 ή 40 watts, 2) Dwell time:1000μs, 3) Spacing 1000 μm, 4) Depth: SmartStak parameter from 1-3 depending on the treatment status, 5) D-pulse mode.

3 therapies intravaginally administered will be applied at monthly intervals
Other Names:
  • SmartXide2 V2LR, Monalisa Touch, DEKA, Florence, Italy
Placebo Comparator: Placebo Group

Placebo CO2 laser therapies at monthly intervals.

The laser parameters that will be used are the following: 1) Power: 0.5 watts, 2) Dwell time:1000μs, 3) Spacing 1000 μm, 4) Depth: SmartStak parameter 1, 5) Smart-pulse mode.

3 therapies intravaginally administered will be applied at monthly intervals
Other Names:
  • SmartXide2 V2LR, Monalisa Touch, DEKA, Florence, Italy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
10-centimeter Visual Analogue Scale assessing intensity of dyspareunia and dryness
Time Frame: 24-months
It is a straight line with 2 endpoints "0" and "10". Zero defines "no dyspareunia at all" and "no dryness at all" , while 10 "dyspareunia as bad as it could be" and "dryness as bad as it could be". Participants will draw a line at or between the 2 end points. The distance between zero and drawn line will define the intensity of dyspareunia and dryness
24-months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Day-to Day Impact of vaginal aging questionnaire (DIVA)
Time Frame: 24 months
It includes 4 domains: activities of daily living (5 items), sexual functioning (5 items), emotional well-being (4 items), self-concept and body image (5-items). Each item of each domain could receive values from 0 to 4. Mean scores are calculated on each of the domain scales. Higher scores indicate greater symptom impact
24 months
Patients Global Impression of Improvement
Time Frame: 24 months
It is a single question with 7 possible answers. Patients will chose the answer that applies at their impression of improvement after the laser therapy
24 months
10-centimeter Visual Analogue Scale assessing intensity of itching, burning and dysuria
Time Frame: 24 months
It is a straight line with 2 endpoints "0" and "10". Zero defines "no symptom at all", while 10 "symptom as bad as it could be" and "dryness as bad as it could be". Participants will draw a line at or between the 2 end points. The distance between zero and drawn line will define the intensity of symptom
24 months
3 days voiding diary
Time Frame: 24 months
Assesses bladder function (frequency, urgency and incontinence)
24 months
Female Sexual Function Index
Time Frame: 24 months
It includes 6 domains assessing sexual functioning (desire, arousal, orgasm, lubrication, satisfaction and pain). Total score is calculated by summing scores of the 5 domains multiplied by certain factors with a minimum value of 2 and maximum 36
24 months
International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Short Form/Female Lower Urinary tract Symptoms (ICIQ-FLUTS)
Time Frame: 24 months
It is a 12-items questionnaire evaluating nocturia, urgency, bladder pain, frequency, hesitancy, straining, intermittency, urinary incontinence (urge, stress and unexplained), frequency of urinary incontinence and nocturnal enuresis. Filling, voiding and incontinence symptoms subscales range from 0 to 15, 0 to 12 and 0 to 20, respectively.
24 months
King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ)
Time Frame: 24 months
It has 3 sections: 1) general health and overall health related to urinary symptoms with 2 questions, 2) incontinence impact, role limitations, physical limitations, social limitations, personal limitations, emotions, sleep and energy, and severity coping measures with 19 questions and 3) bother or impact of urinary symptoms with 11 questions. Scores of each domain of the 2 sections range from 0 to 100. Scores of the third section range from 0 to 3. Higher scores indicate higher impact of urinary incontinence.
24 months
Vaginal Maturation Value
Time Frame: 24 months
It is calculated by defining the percentage of superficial, intermediate and parabasal epithelial cells on the vaginal pap smear, following the formula (1x%superficial)+(0.5x%intermediate)+(0x%parabasal). It may receive values from 0 to 100%.It is considered to be an indicator of the estrogenic stimulation, whereas values of 0-49%, 50-64% and 65-100% indicate absent/low, moderate and high estrogenic effect on the vaginal epithelium, respectively.
24 months
Vaginal Health Index Score
Time Frame: 24 months
It evaluates vaginal elasticity, fluid volume, ph of vaginal fluid, epithelial integrity and moisture. Each one of these may receive scores from 1 to 5. Total score is calculated by summing the 5 scores ranging from 5 to 25. Higher scores indicate better vaginal status.
24 months
Epithelial thickness
Time Frame: 24 months
Biopsies will be obtained from the lateral vaginal wall. Epithelial thickness (in μ) will be measured by a vertical line between basal layer cells and superficial layers.
24 months
Number of Blood vessels
Time Frame: 24 months
Computerized determination of number of capillary profiles in the test area will be performed percent of total area of subepithelial stroma), will be performed.
24 months
Size of blood vessels
Time Frame: 24 months
Computerized determination of diameter (in μ), length (in μ) αnd width (in μ) will be performed.
24 months
Density of blood vessels
Time Frame: 24 months
Computerized determination of volume density of blood vessels in percent of total area of subepithelial stroma will be performed
24 months
Cultures of vaginal samples
Time Frame: 24 months
Lactobacilli, aerobic bacteria, anaerobic bacteria, fungi will be evaluated
24 months
Polymerase Chain Reaction
Time Frame: 24 months
Lactobacilli, bacteria and fungi will be evaluated.
24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Stavros Athanasiou, Associate Proffesor, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 18, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

April 15, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

January 15, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 28, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 26, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

November 27, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 14, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 13, 2020

Last Verified

January 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 674/03-09-2018

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Vaginal Atrophy

Clinical Trials on Microablative Fractional CO2 laser

3
Subscribe