Mesh and Mesh Fixation in Laparoscopic Groin Hernia Surgery

November 30, 2022 updated by: Bengt Novik

Mesh and Mesh Fixation in Laparoscopic Groin Hernia Surgery: A Swedish Hernia Registry Study

The study attempts to quantify the relative risks for recurrence depending on complex combinations of plausible risk factors, in particular mesh, mesh fixation, hernia size and hernia type.

For this purpose the investigators will analyze data from the Swedish Hernia Registry (SHR).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This is an open cohort study design where the investigators will analyze existing data that have been prospectively collected in the Swedish Hernia Registry (SHR), which covers > 95% of all groin hernia repairs in Sweden. The very large cohort of more than 38,000 TEP (totally extraperitoneal) and TAPP (transabdominal preperitoneal) repairs enables assessment of the relative risks for recurrence depending on complex combinations of plausible risk factors, in particular mesh, mesh fixation, hernia size and hernia type, with fulfilling statistical power.

Each participant was entered at the date of surgery, when demographic and intraoperative data were registered. Reoperations were registered in the SHR in the same manner as index repairs, and were used as endpoints.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

38450

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

15 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The study population consists of all laparoscopic TEP and TAPP repairs that have been registered in the SHR from September 1, 2005 until December 31, 2017.

The database is the SHR, which was launched in 1992 and prospectively records groin (lateral, medial and femoral) hernia repairs, including both public and private hospitals.

The source population are all residents in Sweden from the age of 15 years, having a state-assigned personal identity number.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All laparoscopic (mainly TEP and TAPP) repairs that have been registered in the SHR from January 1, 2005 until December 31, 2018.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Open repairs.
  • Hernioplasties that were converted from laparoscopic to open surgery.
  • Age < 15 years.
  • Patients not having a 10-digit state-assigned Patient Identification Number.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
StdPPM

Standard pure polypropylene mesh.

"Standard" is defined in SHR by weight ≥ 50 g/square meter.

By laparoscopic (keyhole) approach, the hernia is repaired with a plastic mesh which the surgeon may or may not anchor with some sort of fixation device
Other Names:
  • Laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal mesh repair
By laparoscopic (keyhole) approach, the hernia is repaired with a plastic mesh which the surgeon may or may not anchor with some sort of fixation device
Other Names:
  • Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal mesh repair
LWM

Lightweight mesh: Either a pure polypropylene mesh, or a polypropylene-based composite mesh.

The study uses SHR's classification of "light-weight" = <50 g/square meter.

By laparoscopic (keyhole) approach, the hernia is repaired with a plastic mesh which the surgeon may or may not anchor with some sort of fixation device
Other Names:
  • Laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal mesh repair
By laparoscopic (keyhole) approach, the hernia is repaired with a plastic mesh which the surgeon may or may not anchor with some sort of fixation device
Other Names:
  • Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal mesh repair
Tacks, metal
Metal staples or tacks. Material specification of staples/tacks was introduced in SHR 2012.
By laparoscopic (keyhole) approach, the hernia is repaired with a plastic mesh which the surgeon may or may not anchor with some sort of fixation device
Other Names:
  • Laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal mesh repair
By laparoscopic (keyhole) approach, the hernia is repaired with a plastic mesh which the surgeon may or may not anchor with some sort of fixation device
Other Names:
  • Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal mesh repair
Tacks, absorbable
Absorbable synthetic staples or tacks. Material specification of staples/tacks was introduced in SHR 2012.
By laparoscopic (keyhole) approach, the hernia is repaired with a plastic mesh which the surgeon may or may not anchor with some sort of fixation device
Other Names:
  • Laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal mesh repair
By laparoscopic (keyhole) approach, the hernia is repaired with a plastic mesh which the surgeon may or may not anchor with some sort of fixation device
Other Names:
  • Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal mesh repair
Tacks, uncategorized

Staples or tacks were in SHR 2005-2011 not further categorized.

This category also includes staples/tacks registered from 2012 and forth, not being specified as either metal or absorbable.

By laparoscopic (keyhole) approach, the hernia is repaired with a plastic mesh which the surgeon may or may not anchor with some sort of fixation device
Other Names:
  • Laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal mesh repair
By laparoscopic (keyhole) approach, the hernia is repaired with a plastic mesh which the surgeon may or may not anchor with some sort of fixation device
Other Names:
  • Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal mesh repair
Fibrin glue
Biologic glue/sealant produced from human donor blood
By laparoscopic (keyhole) approach, the hernia is repaired with a plastic mesh which the surgeon may or may not anchor with some sort of fixation device
Other Names:
  • Laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal mesh repair
By laparoscopic (keyhole) approach, the hernia is repaired with a plastic mesh which the surgeon may or may not anchor with some sort of fixation device
Other Names:
  • Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal mesh repair
Non-fixation
Mesh is deployed without fixation
By laparoscopic (keyhole) approach, the hernia is repaired with a plastic mesh which the surgeon may or may not anchor with some sort of fixation device
Other Names:
  • Laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal mesh repair
By laparoscopic (keyhole) approach, the hernia is repaired with a plastic mesh which the surgeon may or may not anchor with some sort of fixation device
Other Names:
  • Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal mesh repair
3D Mesh
Mesh categorized by anatomical shaped, rather than material or weight. Therefore, this category will be excluded in the original study. Depending on the volume of casess found, the 3D mesh category may eventually be analyzed separately in another study..
By laparoscopic (keyhole) approach, the hernia is repaired with a plastic mesh which the surgeon may or may not anchor with some sort of fixation device
Other Names:
  • Laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal mesh repair
By laparoscopic (keyhole) approach, the hernia is repaired with a plastic mesh which the surgeon may or may not anchor with some sort of fixation device
Other Names:
  • Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal mesh repair

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Reoperation for recurrence
Time Frame: Assessment at Dec 31, 2018
The date of the recurrent surgery
Assessment at Dec 31, 2018
Death
Time Frame: Assessment at Dec 31, 2018
The date of death
Assessment at Dec 31, 2018

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Bengt Novik, Dept of Clinical Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Danderyd Hospital, Stockholm

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2005

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 21, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 26, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

November 27, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 1, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 30, 2022

Last Verified

November 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Recurrence

Clinical Trials on TEP

Subscribe