- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03759613
Evaluation of Gait Symmetry in Upper Extremity Burn Injuries
Evaluation of Gait Symmetry in Patients With Unilateral Upper Extremity Burn Injury
Study Overview
Detailed Description
Thirty individuals with lower extremity burn injury and sixty healthy subjects will be included in this study. Participants with burn injury will be included if they are aged of 18-50, able to walk independently at least 10 meters. Healthy subjects will be included if there are no orthopedic, neurological or musculoskeletal disorders that affect gait.
- Group: 30 Patients with burn injury
- Group: 30 healthy subjects (When evaluating the gait analysis, their arm will not be restricted (Their natural walking)
- Group : 30 healthy subject (When evaluating the gait analysis, their arm will be restricted )
Participants will evaluate with the following assessment tools: Demographic data; age, gender, height, body mass index; burn characteristics; type of burn injury, degree of burn injury, localization of burn injury and total burn surface area will be recorded.
All subjects' gait analysis will be conducted via GAITRite (computerized) system.
GAITRite system for gait parameters (step length, stride length, base support, step time, cycle time, cadence, velocity, single support, double support, swing ( % of gait cycle) and stance (% of gait cycle), Tampa Kinesiophobia scale for kinesiophobia level, visual analog scale for pain, a scale that developed by us for arm swing will be used.
These evaluations will be applied one time for participants. These evaluations will be made within 5 days following burn injury.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Ankara, Turkey, 06100
- Ozden Ozkal
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Clinical diagnosis of upper extremity burn injury
- must be able to walk independently
- Control group consists of healthy adults with the similar demographic characteristics as experimental group.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Walking with assist device
- Having a visual deficits
- Having an orthopedic problems that affect gait
- Having a neurological disorders
- Having a musculoskeletal disorders that affect gait
- Having an undergone orthopedic surgery
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: SCREENING
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: DOUBLE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: Experimental Group
Thirty subjects with unilateral upper burn injury will be included in this study.
GAITRite system for gait analysis, Tampa kinesiophobia scale for kinesiophobia level, visual analog scale for pain and a scale that developed by us for arm swing will be used.
Their evaluations will be made within 5 days following burn injury.
|
Gait Analysis: Gait analysis is not a routine assessment tool for upper extremity burn injuries. This analysis is an assessment method to estimate gait symmetry. Restriction arm swing: Participants in group will be restricted for arm swing using a bandage. Thus, the reciprocal arm swing will be prevented.
Other Names:
|
|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Control Group
Thirty healthy subjects will be included in this study.
GAITRite system for gait analysis, Tampa kinesiophobia scale for kinesiophobia level, visual analog scale for pain and a scale that developed by us for arm swing will be used.
When their gait analysis made, they will be asked to walk their natural walking.
|
Gait Analysis: Gait analysis is not a routine assessment tool for upper extremity burn injuries. This analysis is an assessment method to estimate gait symmetry. Restriction arm swing: Participants in group will be restricted for arm swing using a bandage. Thus, the reciprocal arm swing will be prevented.
Other Names:
|
|
SHAM_COMPARATOR: Control Grup (Restricted arm swing)
Thirty healthy subjects will be included in this study.
GAITRite system for gait analysis, Tampa kinesiophobia scale for kinesiophobia level, visual analog scale for pain and a scale that developed by us for arm swing will be used.
When their gait analysis made, their arms will be fixed with a bandage on their bodies.
Their arm swing will be restricted.
|
Gait Analysis: Gait analysis is not a routine assessment tool for upper extremity burn injuries. This analysis is an assessment method to estimate gait symmetry. Restriction arm swing: Participants in group will be restricted for arm swing using a bandage. Thus, the reciprocal arm swing will be prevented.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Gait Speed
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 5 months
|
It is measured by computerized gait analysis system.
Speed is the distance walked per unit of time.
It is determined in centimeters per second (cm/sec)
|
through study completion, an average of 5 months
|
|
step length
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 5 months
|
It is measured by computerized gait analysis system.
Difference in position between the feet at heel strike, in the direction of forward motion.
The unit of measure is centimeters.
It is calculated both right and left foot.
|
through study completion, an average of 5 months
|
|
Swing phase
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 5 months
|
It is measured by computerized gait analysis system.
Swing Phase,which accounts for 40% of a single gait cycle, the phase during which the foot is not in contact with the ground.
It is expressed in seconds (sec) and as a percentage of the gait cycle of the same foot.
It is calculated both right and left foot.
|
through study completion, an average of 5 months
|
|
Stance Phase
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 5 months
|
It is measured by computerized gait analysis system.The gait phase that lasts from heel strike to toe off, which accounts for 60% of a single gait cycle.
It is expressed in seconds (sec) and as a percentage of the gait cycle of the same foot.
It is calculated both right and left foot.
|
through study completion, an average of 5 months
|
|
Single Support
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 5 months
|
It is measured by computerized gait analysis system.
Only one foot in contact with the floor.
It is expressed as a percentage of the gait cycle.
It is calculated both right and left foot.
|
through study completion, an average of 5 months
|
|
Double Support
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 5 months
|
It is measured by computerized gait analysis system.
Boot feet in contact with the floor.
It is expressed as a percentage of the gait cycle.
It is calculated both right and left foot.
|
through study completion, an average of 5 months
|
|
Gait symmetry index
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 5 months
|
It's calculated in order to evaluate symmetry for bilateral parameters of gait.
The value of symmetry index =0 equals full symmetry.
Minimum score is 0 indicates perfect symmetry.
Maximum score is endless.
The higher score is indicated the more asymmetrica gait pattern.
|
through study completion, an average of 5 months
|
|
Cadence
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 5 months
|
It is measured by computerized gait analysis system.
Rhythm expressed in steps per second.
|
through study completion, an average of 5 months
|
|
Base support
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 5 months.
|
It is measured by computerized gait analysis system.
It is the distance between two linescutting feet equal halves.
The unit of measure is centimeters.
|
through study completion, an average of 5 months.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Tampa Kinesiophobia Scale
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 5 months
|
This scale consists of a 17-item self-report questionnaire that measures the fear of re-injury because of movement.
Items are scored on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 1 "strongly disagree" to 4 "strongly agree".
The total scores for scale range from 17 to 68.
Maximum score means higher level of kinesiophobia.
|
through study completion, an average of 5 months
|
|
Pain severity
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 5 months
|
Pain severity was assessed by visual analogue scale.
This scale score range from "no pain=0 point " to "worst imaginable pain=10 points" for intensity.
Maximum point means worst pain severity.
|
through study completion, an average of 5 months
|
|
Arm swing
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 5 months
|
Arm swing will be evaluated with an arm swing scale.
Arm swing scale consists of a 5 item questions for each side (left arm-right arm).
Totally, scale consist of 10 questions.
Scale score range from "10 points: indicates normal arm swing" to "0 points: indicates totally restricted arm swing.
Maximum score means best arm swing.
|
through study completion, an average of 5 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Ozden Ozkal, PhD, PT, Hacettepe University
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ACTUAL)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- GO 18/785
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Burn Injury
-
Klinikum St. Georg gGmbHCompletedSevere Burn InjuryGermany
-
American Burn AssociationUnited States Department of DefenseActive, not recruitingBurn Injury | Physical Injury | Thermal BurnUnited States
-
Molnlycke Health Care ABCompletedBurn InjuriesChina
-
Jason SperryUnited States Department of DefenseNot yet recruitingBurn Injury | Thermal BurnUnited States
-
The Metis FoundationModulated Imaging Inc.; The United States Institute of Surgical ResearchNot yet recruitingBurn | Burn InjuryUnited States
-
Dr Anthony De Buys RoessinghTerminated
-
The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical...Recruiting
-
Vanderbilt University Medical CenterRecruiting
-
SERDA bvThe Metis FoundationEnrolling by invitation
-
Shriners Hospitals for ChildrenCompleted
Clinical Trials on Gait Analysis
-
University of LiegeRecruitingStroke | Hemiplegic GaitBelgium
-
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)Completed
-
Henri Mondor University HospitalNot yet recruitingStroke | Walking, Difficulty | Spasticity/ParesisFrance
-
Istanbul Medipol University HospitalMedipol UniversityCompletedGait Disorders in Children | Brachial Plexus PalsyTurkey
-
Dr.Joller BioMedical ConsultingActive, not recruiting
-
Taif UniversityCairo UniversityCompleted
-
The University of Hong KongCompletedAdult Spinal DeformityHong Kong
-
University Hospital, BrestCompleted
-
Medical Corps, Israel Defense ForceAriel UniversityUnknownChronic Instability of JointIsrael
-
Istituto Ortopedico RizzoliCompletedKnee OsteoarthritisItaly