Transfusion Ratio of Fresh Frozen Plasma (FFP) to Packed Red Blood Cell (PRBC) During Burn Excision and Grafting (FFP)

September 21, 2021 updated by: Tina L Palmieri, Shriners Hospitals for Children

A Randomized Prospective Trial of Fresh Frozen Plasma (FFP) to Packed Red Blood Cell (PRBC) Ratio: Comparison of a Traditional (1:4) to Liberal (1:1)FFP Transfusion Policy During Burn Excision and Grafting

The purpose of this study is to determine if burn injured patients who receive blood transfusions in the operating room have better outcomes when given transfusions at a set ratio (1:1)of PRBC to FFP.

Traditionally, patients that need blood transfusions during surgery are given mostly packed red blood cells (PRBC) and some fresh frozen plasma (FFP). This is usually about 1:4 ratio of FFP to PRBC.

In this study, we will compare this traditional approach (1:4) to a 1:1 ratio of FFP to PRBC during the operative period.

The hypothesis of the study is that the use of FFP/PRBC ratio of 1:1, compared to a ratio of 1:4 will result in a(n)

  1. decrease in the amount of blood transfused in the operating room
  2. decrease in the amount of blood transfused during hospitalization
  3. improvement in coagulation parameters (PT/PTT, INR, antithrombin III, Protein C and Fibrinogen in the operative period (from operation start to 12 hours post operatively) and at 24 hours postoperatively
  4. decrease the hospital length of stay, lung dysfunction, infections, and mortality

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The hypothesis of the study is that the use of a fresh frozen plasma/packed red blood cells (FFP/PRBC) ratio of 1:1, compared to a ratio of 1:4 during operative excision of >20% TBSA will: result in a decrease in the amount of blood transfused in the operating room, a decrease in the amount of blood transfused during hospitalization, an improvement in coagulation parameters (PT/PTT, INR) in the operative period (from operation start to 12 hours postoperatively) and at 24 hours postoperatively, and a decrease in hospital length of stay, lung dysfunction, number of infections, and mortality.

The primary objective of the study is to determine if aggressive correction of intraoperative coagulopathy during burn excision and grafting results in improved outcomes.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

72

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Sacramento, California, United States, 95817
        • Shriners Hospital for Children Northern California

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

1 month to 18 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient is 1 month to </= 18 yrs of age
  • Admitted to Shriners Hospitals for Children Northern California
  • Patient has a third degree burn >/= 20 % total body surface area (TBSA)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Infants < 5 kg
  • Pregnancy

    • 18 years of age
  • Inability or unwillingness to receive blood products
  • Pre-existing need for hemodialysis
  • Brain death or imminent brain death
  • Non-survivable burn as determined by the attending burn surgeon
  • Pre-existing hematologic disease
  • Closed head injury with Glasgow Coma Score <9

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: 1:1 Ratio of FFP to PRBC
Randomized treatment to receive blood products at a ratio of 1:1 FFP to PRBC during the operative period (start of surgery to 12 hours post operatively)
Blood product transfusion at a ratio of 1:1 FFP to PRBC or 1:4 FFP to PRBC during the operative period (start of surgery to 12 hours post operatively)
Active Comparator: 1:4 Ratio FFP to PRBC
Randomized treatment to receive blood products at a ratio of 1:4 FFP to PRBC during the operative period (start of surgery to 12 hours post operatively)
Blood product transfusion at a ratio of 1:1 FFP to PRBC or 1:4 FFP to PRBC during the operative period (start of surgery to 12 hours post operatively)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
change in the amount of blood transfused in the operating room and during hospitalization
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 months- From date of hospital admit to date of hospital discharge, assessed over duration of hospitalization up to 12 months
All transfusions during the operative period and entire hospitalization will be documented
Baseline to 12 months- From date of hospital admit to date of hospital discharge, assessed over duration of hospitalization up to 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
change in rate of survival
Time Frame: From date of hospital admit to date of hospital discharge, assessed over duration of hospitalization up to 12 months
survival outcome as captured at discharge
From date of hospital admit to date of hospital discharge, assessed over duration of hospitalization up to 12 months
change in coagulopathy in the operative period as defined by change in PT/PTT measurement
Time Frame: from operation start to 12 hours post operatively
PT/PTT obtained pre and post operatively per protocol
from operation start to 12 hours post operatively
change in hospital length of stay
Time Frame: From date of hospital admit to date of hospital discharge, assessed over duration of hospitalization up to 12 months
Number of days in hospital from admit to discharge
From date of hospital admit to date of hospital discharge, assessed over duration of hospitalization up to 12 months
change in number of infectious episodes
Time Frame: From date of hospital admit to date of hospital discharge, assessed over duration of hospitalization up to 12 months
number of new onset infections captured as defined by the Burn Sepsis Consensus Conference
From date of hospital admit to date of hospital discharge, assessed over duration of hospitalization up to 12 months
change in organ dysfunction
Time Frame: From date of hospital admit to date of hospital discharge, assessed over duration of hospitalization up to 12 months
Change in organ dysfunction as evidenced by change in MODS
From date of hospital admit to date of hospital discharge, assessed over duration of hospitalization up to 12 months
change in pulmonary dysfunction
Time Frame: From date of hospital admit to date of hospital discharge, assessed over duration of hospitalization up to 12 months
pulmonary dysfunction measured by P:F ratio and number of days on mechanical ventilation
From date of hospital admit to date of hospital discharge, assessed over duration of hospitalization up to 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Tina Palmieri, MD, SHCNC and UC Davis

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

February 28, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 31, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 21, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

October 1, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 1, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 21, 2021

Last Verified

September 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • SHC 70014
  • 216586 (Other Identifier: UC Davis IRB)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Burn Injury

Clinical Trials on Treatment

Subscribe