Analysis of Sensory Motor Training in Chronic Ankle Instability

August 15, 2019 updated by: Universidade Estadual de Londrina

Effect of Sensory Motor Training With and Without Sports Shoes on the Dynamic Postural Control of Athletes With Chronic Ankle Instability

Introduction: Sensory motor training (STS) is part of rehabilitation and injury prevention in individuals with chronic ankle instability (ICS). The use of footwear during SST may interfere with neuromuscular responses, but little is known about the difference in motor control response when training is applied with the use of shoes or bare feet. Objectives: To establish the effect of sensory motor training with and without sports shoes on the dynamic postural control of athletes with chronic ankle instability. Materials and Methods: The study will be performed with athletes linked to the Athletics of the State University of Londrina, aged between 18 and 30 years, both sexes, with chronic ankle instability assessed using the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT) questionnaire. Dynamic postural control will be evaluated in Force Platform and muscle recruitment through the electromyography of the muscles: anterior tibial, lateral and medial gastrocnemius, long fibular, gluteus maximus and gluteus medius. After the evaluation the volunteers will be randomized into two groups: 1) barefoot sensory-motor training and 2) sensory motor training with sneakers. The two groups will develop the same protocol of sensory motor training consisting of exercises, for five weeks, twice a week. At the end of the training they will be re-evaluated and the data analyzed. Expected Results: It is expected to find better postural control in the group that will perform in barefoot sensory-motor training.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The total sample was determined in 54 volunteers, distributed equally in two groups: Chronic Ankle Instability and Control. Each group will be randomized for sensory-motor training with sneakers and without sneakers.

Inclusion criteria: athletes of both sexes, aged between 18 and 30 years, with history of ankle sprain in the last 12 months, sensation of instability or "yielding" of the ankle and score determined by the CAIT <24 questionnaire, did not perform sensory-motor training or conventional physiotherapy in the last six months.

Exclusion criteria: presence of pain complaints at the time of evaluation, recurrence of sprain with acute inflammatory signs, painful complaints in the lower limbs, lower limb surgery with neurological, cardiovascular, rheumatologic, diabetes, altered plantar sensitivity.

Participants with chronic ankle instability and controls will be randomly assigned to the two treatment groups, through the program www.ramdom.com, in blocks in the two groups: Sensory Motor Training Group with Tennis (TSMT) and Group Training Sensory Motor Barefoot ( TSMD).

Scratchs:

Since this is a study with intervention in participants with chronic ankle instability, there is a risk of new sprain during sensorimotor training. In case it occurs, the participant will receive all the support of the team coordinated by the professor Christiane Guerino de Souza Macedo in the extension project: Physiotherapy from theory to practice.

Procedures:

Initially the participants will complete the demographic data sheet (age, weight, height, BMI, level of physical activity and dominance in the lower limbs) and history of lower limb injury. Will respond to the chronic ankle instability questionnaire CAIT-p. They will sign the informed consent form (TCLE).

Following, the Lunge test will be performed to analyze ankle mobility. The same will be developed with the participant in orthostatism in front of a wall, with a tape measure, the participant will begin the test with a distance of 2cm from the wall and will be incremented by 1cm each time until the greater distance is reached. You will perform maximum knee flexion without the heel lifting from the floor or assuming a valgus position, with the goal of bringing the knee up to the wall. The result will be established by means of the halux-wall distance.

Postural control and muscle recruitment of a lower limb with the same direction should not be assessed by force platform and electromyography, respectively. The evaluations are made for the blind and according to the order of the instruments and the use or not of the shoe.

The anchoring of electromyographic analysis electrodes is performed on the anterior tibialis muscle (TA), lateral gastrocnemius (GL), medial gastrocnemius (GM), long fibularis (FL), gluteus maximus (GMe) and gluteus maximus (GMa). There will be a screening of electrotherapy supplements and cleaning of the area with alcohol rubbing (Moraes et al., 2012). The electrodes will be attached to the previous muscular points, according to the guide.

After placement of the electrodes the participant will be positioned with the lower limb to be tested on one step (based on height of applied force platform) and perform a series of assactions per second for thirty seconds controlled by metronome. This evaluation will be done 3 times. With a rest period of one full day in each test.

For an evaluation of dynamic postural control (BIOMEC400, Sistema EMG do Brasil, SP Ltda.). On the platform will be placed the member with chronic instability of the ankle and perform squatting to 30 seconds. With a rest period of one morning between each sitting test. They will be carried out 3 times with sneakers and 3 times with bare feet.

At this moment, the main parameters of COP-based postural control are: The area of COP ellipse (A-COP in cm²) and the mean COP oscillation distance (VEL in cm / s) are the most indicated in the directions: anteroposterior (A / P) and medium-lateral (M / L). Results were calculated for an average of three trials.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

29

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Paraná
      • Londrina, Paraná, Brazil, 86038-350
        • university hospital of the State University of Londrina

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 30 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  • athletes of both sexes
  • aged between 18 and 30 years,
  • with history of the first ankle sprain for at least 12 months,
  • feeling of instability or "flaccidity" of the ankle
  • score determined by the CAIT questionnaire of less than 24,
  • have not undergone sensory-motor or conventional physiotherapy training in the last six months.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Withdrawal at the time of the evaluation,
  • Recurrence of sprain accompanied by signs of inflammation, acute and painful complaints in the lower group,
  • history of lower limb surgery, neurological, cardiovascular, rheumatologic, diabetes, altered plantar sensitivity.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Group TSM ICT sneakers
  • ICT with sneaker
  • five weeks
  • twice a week
  • half hour.
Sensory motor training with sneakers for volunteers with Chronic ankle instability, for five weeks, twice a week.
Experimental: Group TSM ICT barefoot
  • ICT barefoot
  • five weeks
  • twice a week
  • half hour.
Sensory motor training without sneakers for volunteers with Chronic ankle instability, for five weeks, twice a week.
Experimental: Group TSM health barefoot
  • Health with sneaker
  • five weeks
  • twice a week
  • half hour.
Sensory motor training without sneaker for volunteers with Chronic ankle instability, for five weeks, twice a week.
Experimental: Group TSM health sneakers
  • Health barefoot
  • five weeks
  • twice a week
  • half hour.
Sensory motor training with sneakers for volunteers with Chronic ankle instability, for five weeks, twice a week.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Postural control response after intervention
Time Frame: twenty weeks
Response of sensorial motor training in improving motor control in volunteers with chronic ankle instability or not. Will use force platform.
twenty weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Muscle recruitment response after intervention
Time Frame: twenty weeks
Response of sensorial motor training in the muscular recruitment of volunteers with chronic ankle instability or not, and the difference in response when performed with sneakers or barefoot. Will use electromyography.
twenty weeks
measurement ankle dorsiflexion
Time Frame: twenty weeks
The dorsiflexion will be mensure with the Lunge test in centimeter
twenty weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 20, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 20, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

July 30, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 21, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 6, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

December 7, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 20, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 15, 2019

Last Verified

July 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Sensory motor training

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Recruitment

Clinical Trials on Group TSM ICT sneakers

3
Subscribe