Fluoroscopy Guided Lumbar Facet Joint Injection Versus Ultrasound Guided Injection in Patients With Low Back Pain Due to Facet Syndrome

December 7, 2018 updated by: Mansoura University

Comparative Study Between Fluoroscopy Guided Lumbar Facet Joint Injection Versus Ultrasound Guided Injection in Patients With Low Back Pain Due to Facet Syndrome

The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of fluoroscopy guided lumbar facet joint injection versus ultrasound guided injection in patients with low back pain due to facet syndrome.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

All patients will be randomly classified into two equal groups (40 patients each) by using closed envelops, a computer generated random allocation codes.

Group 1(Fluoroscopy guided group) (n =40 patients):

The patient will be placed in the prone position with a pillow under the abdomen to correct the lumbar lordosis. The joint to be injected is located and marked, the x ray tube is then slowly rotated till the joint appear in profile as two parallel lines. After cleaning and drapping and administration of local anesthesia a22-g spinal needle is inserted in line with x-ray beam till bony contact is felt. All procedures will be performed under sterile conditions. Each facet joint is infiltrated with a mixture containing 0.5 ml of 0.25 % bupivacaine and 0.5 ml (20mg) methylprednisolone acetate injected into the joint.

Group2 (Ultrasound guided group) (n=40 patients):

Patients will be placed in a prone position. Posterior paravertebral parasagittal sonograms will be obtained to identify of the different spinal levels. The spinous process and adjacent structures (lamina of the vertebral arch, facet joint, accessory process, and mammillary process) will be delineated by transverse sonograms at the target level, and the midpoint of the facet joint space will be established. After cleaning and drapping and administration of local anesthesia. If the joint is clearly or partially visible, a spinal needle is advanced under US guidance into the joint space of each lumbar facet joint. The needle is inserted 1-2 cm laterally from the midline at the lateral end of the transducer and precisely positioned in the US plane at an angle of approximately 45owith respect to the axial plane until the needle tip reached the target and bony contact is felt. This enables visualization of the needle, which appears as a bright line-shaped echo pattern on the transverse sonogram. If the needle placement is correct, a mixture containing 0.5 ml of 0.25 % bupivacaine and 0.5 ml(20mg) methylprednisolone acetate is administered intra-articular (until resistance was encountered) and injected around the posterior facet joint capsule.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Tanta, Egypt, 43636
        • Anesthesia , ICU, and pain medicine department

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients, more than 18 years old, with pain associated with lumbar hyper-extension, lateral flexion, and tenderness on paravertebral regions corresponding to facet joints but normal findings on the straight leg raise test and neurologic examination.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient refusal and lack of consent.
  • Local or systemic infection.
  • allergy to steroids or local anesthetics
  • Patients with coagulopathies.
  • Evidence of nerve root compression at the expected level on MRI.
  • Pregnant patients

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Group 1(Fluoroscopy guided group)
IN Fluoroscopy guided group, with x-ray beam, after cleaning and drapping and administration of local anesthesia, a22-g spinal needle is inserted in line till bony contact is felt under sterile conditions. Each facet joint is infiltrated with a mixture containing 0.5 ml of 0.25 % bupivacaine and 0.5 ml (20mg) methylprednisolone acetate injected into the joint.
Fluoroscopy guided Facet joint injection (The patient will be placed in the prone position with a pillow under the abdomen to correct the lumbar lordosis. The joint to be injected is located and marked, the x ray tube is then slowly rotated till the joint appear in profile as two parallel lines. After cleaning and drapping and administration of local anesthesia a22-g spinal needle is inserted in line with x-ray beam till bony contact is felt. All procedures will be performed under sterile conditions. Each facet joint is infiltrated with a mixture containing 0.5 ml of 0.25 % bupivacaine and 0.5 ml (20mg) methylprednisolone acetate injected into the joint.)
Active Comparator: Group2 (Ultrasound guided group)
In Ultrasound guided group, with Ultrasound guidance, , a mixture containing 0.5 ml of 0.25 % bupivacaine and 0.5 ml(20mg) methylprednisolone acetate is administered intra-articular (until resistance was encountered) and injected around the posterior facet joint capsule.
Ultrsound guided Facet joint injection (Patients will be placed in a prone position. The needle is inserted 1-2 cm laterally from the midline at the lateral end of the transducer and precisely positioned in the US plane at an angle of approximately 45o with respect to the axial plane)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Success rate of the technique
Time Frame: 1 day
Success rate of the technique
1 day

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The visual analogue scale (VAS) score
Time Frame: Up to 3 months
The visual analogue scale (VAS) score: before injections and at 1hour,a week, a month, and three months after injections.
Up to 3 months
Oswestry disability index. (ODI)
Time Frame: Up to 3 months
(Pain Intensity, Personal Care, Lifting, Walking, Sitting, Standing, Sleeping, Sex Life, Social Life and Traveling )
Up to 3 months
Duration of procedure
Time Frame: 2 hours
Duration of procedure
2 hours
Complications
Time Frame: 1 week
Allergy, infection
1 week

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Marwa Abogabal, MSc., Anesthesia, ICU and pain medicine department of Tanta university

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 30, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 30, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

July 30, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 25, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 7, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

December 10, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 10, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 7, 2018

Last Verified

December 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 30476/08/15

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Facet Syndrome of Lumbar Spine

Clinical Trials on Fluoroscopy guided Facet joint injection

3
Subscribe