Comparison of Peri Implant Soft Tissue Esthetics With Immediate Temporization With and Without Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft

December 7, 2018 updated by: Dina Osama Abdelwahab Megahed, Cairo University

Comparison of Peri-implant Soft Tissue Esthetics Around Single Delayed Implant With Immediate Provisionalization Placed in The Esthetic Zone With and Without Using Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft: A Randomized Clinical Trial

The aim of this study is to clinically evaluate peri-implant soft tissue esthetics around single delayed implants in the esthetic zone.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

To compare the efficacy of soft tissue augmentation on the peri-implant soft tissue esthetics along with immediate temporization to immediate temporization only.

Population (P): patients with a single missing tooth in the esthetic zone Intervention (I): Delayed implant placement with immediate temporization and subepithelial connective tissue graft Comparator (C): Delayed implant placement with immediate temporization Primary outcome: Pink esthetic score (PES) Time frame: 6 months Study design: Randomized controlled clinical trial

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

22

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Cairo, Egypt
        • Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age > 18 years old
  2. Good medical and psychological health
  3. Absence of untreated caries lesions and untreated/uncontrolled periodontal disease. If patients required periodontal treatment (non-surgical and/or surgical), this was arranged outside the study protocol and completed at least 30 days prior to the enrolment
  4. Need of a single-tooth replacement in the aesthetic (incisor, canine or premolar) region
  5. Willingness to sign the informed consent form

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Any known disease (not including controlled diabetes mellitus), infections or recent surgical procedures within 30 days of study initiation;
  2. Chronic treatment (i.e., 2 weeks or more) with any medication known to affect oral status (e.g., phenytoin, dihydropyridine, calcium antagonists and cyclosporine) within 1 month before baseline visit;
  3. Anticoagulant therapy with warfarin, clopidogrel, ticlopidine or once daily aspirin (more than 81 mg);
  4. HIV or Hepatitis;
  5. Physical handicaps that would interfere with the ability to perform adequate oral hygiene;
  6. Alcoholism or chronic drug abuse;
  7. Heavy smokers (>10/cigarettes per day);
  8. Lack of adequate primary stability at implant insertion that enables immediate provisionalization (insertion torque ca 30 Ncm).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Delayed implant placement with immediate provisionalization
Single delayed implant placement in the esthetic zone with placing an immediate temporary crown placed within 48 hours after the surgery
delayed implant placement in the esthetic zone with immediate provisinalization and placement of a connective tissue graft buccal
Experimental: Implant with immediate temporization and soft tissue graft
Single delayed implant placement in the esthetic zone with placing a subepithelial connective tissue graft buccal to the implant and immediate temporary crown within 48 hours after the surgery
delayed implant placement with immediate provisionalization

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pink Esthetic Score
Time Frame: 3 months post definitive prosthesis
Pink esthetic score evaluates the soft tissue esthetics around implant supported crowns. Using a 0-1-2 scoring system, 0 being the lowest, 2 being the highest value. The maximum achievable PES is 14. 7 variables are measured: mesial and distal papillae being 0 if absent, 1 if incomplete and 2 if complete. Alveolar process, soft tissue level, contour, texture and color being 0 if major discrepancy, 1 if minor discrepancy and 2 if matches the contralateral
3 months post definitive prosthesis

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient satisfaction by Visual analogue scale (VAS)
Time Frame: 3 months post definitive
Patient satisfaction will be evaluated using a questionnaire which is based on a visual analog scale (VAS). A horizontal VAS bar, 100 mm long, with the right anchor labeled "much less than natural teeth" which is marked by zero and the left anchor labeled "much more" which is marked by 10 will be used. Five questions will be formulated to record the patients' satisfaction in terms of functionality and from an esthetic point of view. Participants will look in a mirror and also be viewed a photograph before recording their answers on the horizontal calibrated line.
3 months post definitive
Buccal peri-implant soft tissue thickness
Time Frame: 3 months post definitive
the soft tissue thickness buccal to the implant by using an anesthesia needle and digital caliper
3 months post definitive
Recession of the buccal peri-implant mucosa
Time Frame: 3 months post definitive
measured at the apical zenith of the mucosal margin on the implants after digital superimposition of the optically scanned models as the vertical distance change between the former and the new position of soft tissue margins.
3 months post definitive

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Azza Ezz AlArab, PHD, Professor in the department of Oral Medicine and Periodontology

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

December 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

May 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 7, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 7, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

December 10, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 10, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 7, 2018

Last Verified

December 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Dinaosamaperio

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Immediate Temporization and Soft Tissue Augmentation Around Delayed Implants

Clinical Trials on delayed implant with immediate provisionaliztion and soft tissue graft

Subscribe