Prophylactic Donor Lymphocyte Infusion After Allo-PBSCT for Patients With Very High-risk Hematologic Malignancies

December 11, 2018 updated by: Daihong Liu, Chinese PLA General Hospital
Unmanipulated allogenic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (allo-PBSCT) has been an established treatment to cure high-risk leukemia/lymphoma. Relapse is the main cause of treatment failure for patients with relapsed/refractory disease or with very high-risk gene mutations such as TP53, TET2 and DNMT3a. Donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) is an option to reduce relapse after allo-PBSCT for very high-risk disease without effective targeted therapy. In this study, the investigators aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of prophylactic DLI with G-CSF-primed peripheral blood progenitors for prevention of relapse after allo-PBSCT in patients with very high-risk leukemia/lymphoma.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Conventional DLI has invariably been associated with high rates of severe graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and GVHD-related non-relapse mortality (NRM). Thus, in our previous studies, the DLI procedure has been modified to use G-CSF-mobilized peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) instead of steady-state lymphocytes. G-CSF mobilization results in the modulation of the polarization potential of T cells from Th1 to Th2. In addition, T-cell hyporesponsiveness is induced via the proliferation of dendritic cell 2 and monocytes and the down-regulation of CD28/B7. Furthermore, G-CSF augments NK-T-cell-dependent CD8+ cytotoxicity. These data constructed the rationale for the use of G-CSF-primed peripheral blood DLI to reduce DLI-associated GVHD and enhance the GVT effect of DLI. To date, there is no effective target therapy for acute leukemia with gene mutations such as DNMT3A, TET2 and TP53 and their response to chemotherapy and survival even after allogenic stem cell transplantation remains poor. Hypomethylating agents were reported to reverse the repression of HLA molecules and cancer testis antigens on leukemia cells, rendering them more sensitive to anti-leukemic activity mediated by DLI. The use of low-dose decitabine after allogenic stem cell transplantation was safe for early hematopoietic reconstitution. Therefore, decitabine was planned to be given prior to prophylactic DLI in the current study.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

40

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Beijing
      • Beijing, Beijing, China, 100853
        • Chinese PLA General Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

10 years to 61 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • disease in the non-remission (NR) state prior to transplantation, including primary induction failure, relapse untreated or refractory to reinduction chemotherapy.
  • achieving CR1 with ≥3 cycles of induction of chemotherapy.
  • carrying TP53, DNMT3a, TET2 or FLT3-ITD gene mutation.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • early relapse, either molecular relapse or hematological relapse.
  • primary or secondary graft failure.
  • concomitant uncontrolled disease and/or organ dysfunction (infection, severe heart, renal, respiratory or hepatic failure…).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Prophylactic DLI
The scheduled time of the first prophylactic DLI was +30 ~ +60 days after transplantation for HLA-matched sibling donors (MSD)-PBSCT recipients and +60 ~ +90 days after transplantation for HLA-haploidentical sibling donors (HID)-PBSCT recipients.
The G-CSF-mobilized PBSCs from cryopreserved cells of the graft were infused to the recipient at a dose of 2X10^7 CD3+ cells/kg recipient body weight. Decitabine (10 mg/m2, days 1 to 5) followed by prophylactic DLI would be given to those patients carrying TET2, DNMT3a or TP53 gene mutations.
Other Names:
  • Decitabine (trade name Dacogen)
No Intervention: No prophylactic DLI

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cumulative incidence of relapse at 1 year after randomization
Time Frame: 1 year
Relapse was defined as hematologic recurrence of malignancies after transplantation. Cumulative incidence of relapse was analyzed in a competing risk framework using Gray's method.
1 year
Cumulative incidence of non-relapse mortality (NRM) at 1 year after randomization
Time Frame: 1 year
NRM was defined as death from any cause without relapse. Cumulative incidence of NRM was analyzed in a competing risk framework using Gray's method.
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Relapse-free survival (RFS) at 1 year after randomization
Time Frame: 1 year
RFS will be evaluated in an intent-to-treat analysis by Kaplan Meier estimate and Log Rank test. Survival will be calculated from the date of randomization.
1 year
Cumulative incidence of acute GVHD at 100 days after randomization
Time Frame: 100 days
The cumulative incidence of acute GVHD was estimated considering the competing risks.
100 days
Cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD at 1 year after randomization
Time Frame: 1 year
The cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD was estimated considering the competing risks.
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

January 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 7, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 7, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

December 11, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 13, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 11, 2018

Last Verified

December 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation

Clinical Trials on Prophylactic DLI

Subscribe