Acetazolamide for Treating NPH in Shunt-candidates Patients

December 17, 2018 updated by: Rabin Medical Center

Acetazolamide for Treating NPH in Shunt-candidates Patients: an Open Label Feasibility Trial

Normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) consists of a triad of gait disturbance, cognitive deterioration, and urinary incontinence and is characterized by enlarged cerebral ventricles. Current treatment recommendations are based on surgical diversion of Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), by a ventriculoperitoneal shunt. When patients are appropriately selected, shunting for NPH has a sustained effect in one-half to two-thirds of patients with a reasonable complication rate. However, evidence regarding the efficacy of shunt surgery consists largely of observational studies with relatively short-term follow-up.

With regards to the adverse effects of shunting, even though decreased substantially in recent years, shunt complications are still common. Recent studies report ten to twenty-two percent of serious adverse effects following shunt surgery, mainly subdural hematoma (SDH) requiring surgery, infection, and cerebral infarction or hemorrhage. Most complication occur in the first year after the procedure. Many others suffer from adverse events that considered non-serious, such as postural headache and asymptomatic SDH.

Since shunt complications are common and potentially severe, there is a need for a better way to identify those patients that will likely benefit from shunting, and find alternative treatments for those unwilling or unable to withstand surgery.

Acetazolamide has been shown to reduce the production of CSF in clinical cases of raised intracranial pressure. It is considered the drug of choice for the treatment of idiopathic intracranial hypertension (pseudotumor cerebri). Intuitively, acetazolamide can be effective for the treatment of NPH by reducing the volume of CSF in the brain, and serve as a medical alternative to shunting. Few case reports and small series demonstrated improvement in MRI abnormalities in NPH-patients after administrating the medication.

This open-label study will examine the feasibility and effectiveness of acetazolamide in NPH-diagnosed patients who are shunt-candidates. Patients will be treated from time of diagnosis, and gait and cognition will be evaluated after 2-6 weeks. This trial would possibly pave the way to a larger randomized placebo-controlled trials, and perhaps offer a medical alternative to surgery for elderly patients and for patients for which operation is contraindicated.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

15

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Petah Tikva, Israel, 49100
        • Recruiting
        • Rabin Medical Center
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Yosi Laviv, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Idan Levitan, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Included will be subjects with a probable diagnosis of NPH. The diagnosis will be based primarily on presence of gait impairment plus at least one other impairment in urinary symptoms, cognition impairment or both.

  1. Are 50 years old or older.
  2. Patients who meet the criteria for NPH based on:

    • A typical personal history.
    • A typical brain imaging on head CT or MRI.
    • Normal lumbar puncture findings excluding other conditions.
    • Exclusion of other more likely diagnosis.
  3. Patients who underwent large-volume spinal tap and subsequently improved clinically by at least 10% in gait function or cognition.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cirrhosis or marked liver disease or dysfunction.
  • Severe renal disease or dysfunction.
  • Acidosis.
  • Hypersensitivity to acetazolamide, sulfonamides, or any component of the formulation.
  • Decreased sodium and/or potassium levels.
  • Adrenocortical insufficiency.
  • Patients with cognitive impairment who will not be able to give informed consent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: treatment group
patients who met the inclusion criteria will be allocated to the treatment group, and will receive acetazolamide from time of diagnosis until shunt surgery (2-6 weeks).
Patients will be assign and treated by acetazolamide from time of allocation until surgery (2-6 weeks after treatment initiation). The maximal dose of acetazolamide will be the same dose used to treat glaucoma, considering similarity of patients' characteristics, such as age and polypharmacy. We will start at a low dose of 250 mg once a day, and increase it slowly to a maximal dose of 500 mg twice a day. Dose will be individualized according to side-effects and tolerability. Renal and liver function tests will be performed before initiation of treatment, and will be examined again two weeks after treatment had begun.
Other Names:
  • Diamox

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from Baseline Gait
Time Frame: Baseline, week 4

Change from Baseline gait will be evaluated by the neurosurgery department's physiotherapist, using the timed-up-and-go (TUG) test (measured in seconds, higher values represent a worse outcome).

Patients will be evaluated at baseline (before treatment is started) and again before surgery (4 weeks later).

Baseline, week 4
Change from Baseline Balance
Time Frame: Baseline, week 4

Change from Baseline balance will be evaluated by the neurosurgery department's physiotherapist, using the TINETTI balance assessment score. (0-28 scale, higher values represent a better outcome).

Patients will be evaluated at baseline (before treatment is started) and again before surgery (4 weeks later).

Baseline, week 4

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from Baseline concentration function
Time Frame: Baseline, week 4

concentration function will be evaluated by the neurosurgery department's neuropsychologist using the color trial test (seconds, higher values represent a worse outcome).

Patients will be evaluated at baseline (before treatment is started) and again before surgery (4 weeks later).

Baseline, week 4
Change from Baseline visuospatial function
Time Frame: Baseline, week 4

visuospatial function will be evaluated by the neurosurgery department's neuropsychologist using the clock drawing test (0-10 scale, higher values represent a better outcome).

Patients will be evaluated at baseline (before treatment is started) and again before surgery (4 weeks later).

Baseline, week 4
Change from Baseline verbal fluency
Time Frame: Baseline, week 4

verbal fluency will be evaluated by the neurosurgery department's neuropsychologist using the verbal fluency test (Controlled Oral Word Association Test, number of words in one minute, higher values represent a better outcome).

Patients will be evaluated at baseline (before treatment is started) and again before surgery (4 weeks later).

Baseline, week 4

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
adverse effects
Time Frame: week 2-6
All adverse effects that may be attributed to the treatment will be recorded
week 2-6

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Yosi Laviv, MD, Rabin Medical Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

December 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 10, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 17, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

December 19, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 19, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 17, 2018

Last Verified

December 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus

Clinical Trials on Acetazolamide

Subscribe