Efficacy in iNPH Shunting (PENS) Trial (PENS)

February 6, 2024 updated by: Johns Hopkins University

A Placebo-Controlled Efficacy in iNPH Shunting (PENS) Trial

The Placebo-Controlled Efficacy in Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus (iNPH) Shunting (PENS) trial is a multi-center blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled design investigation of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunt surgery to study the shunt efficacy in iNPH patients.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The primary intervention will be setting the FDA-approved Certas Plus with Siphonguard, programmable CSF shunt valve to active (open shunt group)(setting 4)(110 mm H2O) or placebo (closed shunt group)(setting 8)(>400 mm H2O)in a 1:1 ratio. By the time of the primary objective evaluation at three months, the closed shunt group will have zero months of active treatment, and the open shunt group will have three months of active treatment. At three months, shunts for subjects in the closed shunt group will be adjusted to setting 4. To maintain blinding, all patients will be adjusted / mock adjusted to the active setting in a similar fashion. Patients from both groups will not be adjusted before three months of active treatment, unless judged medically necessary by the treating team. Following the three month visit, all subjects in each group will have shunt adjustments according to clinical standards at each center.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Vancouver, Canada
        • Recruiting
        • University of British Columbia
        • Contact:
          • Thomas Zwimpfer
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Thomas Zwimpfer, MD
    • Alberta
      • Calgary, Alberta, Canada, AB T2N 1N4
        • Recruiting
        • University of Calgary
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Mark Hamilton, MD
      • Umeå, Sweden, 901 87
        • Suspended
        • Umea University
    • California
      • Davis, California, United States, 95616
        • Recruiting
        • University of California, Davis
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Kiarash Shahlaie, MD, PhD, FAANS
        • Contact:
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90089
        • Recruiting
        • University of Southern California
        • Contact:
          • Darrin Lee, MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Darrin Lee
      • Santa Monica, California, United States, 90404
        • Recruiting
        • Pacific Neuroscience Institute
        • Contact:
          • Garni Barkhoudarian, MD
          • Phone Number: 310-582-7450
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Garni Barkhoudarian, MD
    • Florida
      • Tampa, Florida, United States, 33612
        • Recruiting
        • University of South Florida
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Naomi Abel, MD
    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30322
        • Recruiting
        • Emory University
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Daniel Barrow, MD
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60612
        • Withdrawn
        • Rush University Medical Center
    • Indiana
      • Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46202
        • Recruiting
        • Indiana University
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Jesse Savage, MD
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21287
        • Recruiting
        • Johns Hopkins University
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Mark Luciano
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Abhay Moghekar
        • Contact:
    • Michigan
      • Detroit, Michigan, United States, 48202
        • Recruiting
        • Henry Ford Health System
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Jason Schwalb, MD
    • Minnesota
      • Rochester, Minnesota, United States, 55905
        • Recruiting
        • Mayo Clinic
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Benjamin Elder, MD
        • Contact:
    • New Mexico
      • Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States, 87106
        • Withdrawn
        • University of New Mexico Hospital
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10029
        • Recruiting
        • Mount Sinai Health System
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Peter Morgenstern, MD
      • New York, New York, United States, 10016
        • Recruiting
        • New York University Langone Health
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Jeffrey Wisoff, MD
    • North Carolina
      • Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States, 27157-1029
        • Recruiting
        • Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Daniel Couture, MD
    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44195
        • Recruiting
        • Cleveland Clinic
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Sean Nagel, MD
    • Oregon
      • Portland, Oregon, United States, 97239
        • Recruiting
        • Oregon Health & Science University
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Ahmed Raslan, MD
    • Texas
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75390-8855
        • Recruiting
        • The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Jonathan A. White, MD
    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98195
        • Recruiting
        • University of Washington
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Michael A. Williams, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

60 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age ≥ 60 years; and
  2. Diagnosis of iNPH and recommendation for shunt surgery based on the Investigator's clinical judgement based on criteria and testing as described in the iNPH Guidelines;
  3. Evans Ratio ≥ 0.30; and
  4. One positive supplementary test to include either large volume Lumbar Puncture or extended CSF drainage per institutional standards; and
  5. History or evidence of gait impairment (such as decreased step height or length, decreased speed, retropulsion as described in the iNPH Guidelines) duration ≥ 6 months; and
  6. Participant has the sensory motor skills, communication skills and understanding to comply with the testing and reporting required in the PENS trial; and
  7. Participant is able to give written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Unable to walk 10 meters with or without an assistive device; or
  2. Baseline fastest gait velocity (out of three gait trials) >1 m/sec prior to drainage trial and fastest gait velocity improvement is < 30% with or without an assistive device; or
  3. Unable to return to the study center for follow up evaluation and shunt programming; or
  4. Participant is not medically cleared for shunt surgery per local standards; or
  5. Secondary NPH. (Prior encephalitis, meningitis, subarachnoid hemorrhage, traumatic brain injury (including concussion) within two years or with brain injury or skull fracture on baseline imaging, brain abscess, brain tumor, obstructive hydrocephalus (including acquired aqueductal stenosis and carcinomatous meningitis); or
  6. Prior or existing shunts, endoscopic third ventriculostomy, or any previous surgical intervention for hydrocephalus; or
  7. Previous intracranial neurosurgical procedure; or
  8. Symptomatic cerebral or cerebellar infarction occurring within 6 months from screening (asymptomatic lacunar infarctions are permitted); or
  9. Diagnosis of Parkinsonian syndrome that, in the investigator's judgment, will complicate the outcome evaluation; or
  10. Diagnosis of schizophrenia or any psychiatric diagnosis (including depression) that, in the investigator's judgment, will complicate the outcome evaluation (such as neuroleptic treatment for schizophrenia); or
  11. Diagnosis of dementia disorder where the investigator considers cognition deficit limits participation in the study; or
  12. Conditions impairing gait that are considered to be unrelated to hydrocephalus, such as hemiparesis, spasticity, cerebellar ataxia or musculoskeletal and joint disease, which will interfere with gait assessment or the potential for gait improvement.
  13. Individuals with contraindication to MRI (e.g., implanted electric and electronic devices, aneurysm clip(s), any metallic fragment or foreign body, coronary and peripheral artery stents, cardiac pacemaker, known claustrophobia, or known/possible pregnancy or breast-feeding) will be excluded according to institutional guidelines.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Open Shunt Group
FDA-approved Certas Plus with Siphonguard, programmable CSF shunt valve setting to active (open shunt group)(setting 4)(110 mm H2O) at time of shunt implantation
Brain shunt surgery using a programmable CSF shunt valve
Other Names:
  • FDA-approved Certas Plus with Siphonguard
Sham Comparator: Closed Shunt Group
FDA-approved Certas Plus with Siphonguard, programmable CSF shunt valve setting to placebo (closed shunt group)(setting 8)(>400 mm H2O) at time of shunt implantation followed by setting to active (setting 4) (110 mm H2O) three months after the procedure.
Brain shunt surgery using a programmable CSF shunt valve
Other Names:
  • FDA-approved Certas Plus with Siphonguard

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Gait velocity
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 months
Evaluation of CSF shunting in iNPH patients through a group comparison of change from baseline at three months between active and placebo-controlled groups, using the primary endpoint of gait velocity (in meters per second).
Baseline and 3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Gait velocity
Time Frame: Baseline and 9 months
Evaluate the change in gait velocity among all study participants between baseline and 9 months of active shunting, using the primary outcome of gait velocity (in meters per second).
Baseline and 9 months
Cognition as assessed by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
Time Frame: 3 months
Evaluate the effect of shunting between active and placebo-controlled groups at three months using MoCA test to assess cognition. Scores on the MoCA range from 0 to 30, with a score of 26 and higher generally considered normal.
3 months
Cognition as assessed by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
Time Frame: 9 months
Evaluate the effect of shunting between active and placebo-controlled groups at nine months using MoCA test to assess cognition. Scores on the MoCA range from zero to 30, with a score of 26 and higher generally considered normal.
9 months
Bladder Control as assessed by the Overactive Bladder Questionnaire, short form
Time Frame: 3 months
Evaluate the effect of shunting between active and placebo-controlled groups at three months using Overactive Bladder Questionnaire, short form (OAB-q sf.) to assess bladder control. The OAB-q sf consists of three QOL domains: coping, sleep, and emotional/social interaction. All scale scores are transformed to a 0- to 100-point scale, with lower scores indicating greater effect, i.e., worse QOL.
3 months
Bladder Control as assessed by the Overactive Bladder Questionnaire, short form
Time Frame: 9 months
Evaluate the effect of shunting between active and placebo-controlled groups at nine months using Overactive Bladder Questionnaire, short form (OAB-q sf.) to assess bladder control. All scale scores are transformed to a 0- to 100-point scale, with lower scores indicating greater effect, i.e., worse QOL.
9 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mark Luciano, MD, PhD, Johns Hopkins University
  • Study Director: Richard Holubkov, PhD, University of Utah

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 18, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 5, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 5, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

October 18, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 7, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 6, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IRB00305245
  • 1U01NS122764 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
  • PENS (Other Identifier: Johns Hopkins University Department of Neurosurgery)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus (INPH)

Clinical Trials on programmable CSF shunt valve

3
Subscribe