Boosting Primary Care Awareness and Treatment of Childhood Hypertension (BP-CATCH)

September 1, 2020 updated by: Michael Rinke, Montefiore Medical Center

BP-CATCH: Boosting Primary Care Awareness and Treatment of Childhood Hypertension

The proposed research, building on an ongoing AHRQ-funded research project to prevent pediatric diagnostic errors in primary care (R01HS023608) and using a prospective, cluster-randomized, stepped wedge design, will investigate whether 1) a quality improvement collaborative (QIC) intervention without subspecialist involvement, 2) a QIC with subspecialists and primary care physicians (PCPs) mutually engaged, and/or 3) a hub and spoke co-diagnosis, co-management model where PCPs diagnose and manage pediatric hypertension (HTN) with a supporting subspecialist advisor, reduce errors in pediatric HTN diagnosis and management compared to each other and usual care.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Pediatric HTN causes appreciable morbidity in pediatric patients and errors in diagnosis and management are frequent and understudied, jeopardizing pediatric safety in ambulatory settings. Additionally, the gap between the number of pediatric subspecialist providers and the number needed for patient care continues to widen, and it is unclear how to best reduce burden on subspecialists, improve PCP and subspecialist communication, and improve patient outcomes. This research team, with significant experience researching ambulatory pediatric safety, conducting QICs and HTN interventions, identified six large pediatric practice groups in rural, suburban and urban locations that are committed to reducing preventable HTN patient harm, to testing the effectiveness of a QIC to improve PCP HTN diagnosis and management, and to a hub and spoke HTN co-diagnosis and co-management model. The effect demonstrated by this project using a rigorous research design and the new 2017 pediatric HTN guidelines, will motivate pediatric clinics across the country to adopt these newly-identified best practices to improve pediatric HTN care. Primary care pediatricians have an imperative to diagnose and manage HTN and elevated BP (EBP) more accurately and earlier, and to improve interactions with subspecialists to reduce the lifelong preventable harm that results from these chronic conditions. This proposal, will identify a clear implementation strategy for rigorous, evidenced-based pediatric HTN diagnosis and management, and highlight a model to increase primary and subspecialty care integration that can be reproduced across other chronic conditions.

The primary human subjects of this work are the physicians and staff within the primary care pediatric practices and their associated pediatric hypertension subspecialists whose behavior the QIC is attempting to change. In order to know if these practices and subspecialists have changed their behaviors, we will look at patient data. To be included in the data cohort, patients must have a blood pressure (BP) measurement that is elevated (>= 90th percentile for patient's sex, age, and height, or >=120/80 (regardless of sex/age/ height) at a healthcare maintenance visit or non-acute care visit (e.g. chronic disease follow-up visit). The following patients would be excluded from the data cohort:

  • Prior hypertension or elevated BP diagnosis. Patient can have prior elevated BP measurements as long as no diagnosis has been made
  • BP>95th percentile + 30mm or >180/120 or symptomatic patient
  • Prior diagnosis of congenital heart disease, chronic kidney disease, urologic disease (e.g. posterior urethral valve, vesicoureteral reflux) or organ transplant,
  • Previously included in BP-CATCH data entry
  • Acute care visit (e.g., fever, viral illness, asthma attack, pain in any body part, etc.)

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

64

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • Bronx, New York, United States, 10461
        • Albert Einstein College Of Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion:

  • Primary care pediatric practices who see children ages 3-22 years old.
  • Practice must be able to field a 3-person core improvement team who can participate in the quality improvement collaborative.

Exclusion:

- Non-pediatric practices

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Cohort 1
0-6 months: Quality Improvement Collaborative (QIC) with PCP and without subspecialist, Registry & BP measurement 7-12 months: QIC with Subspecialist to improve communication and standardize, 13-18 months: Hub and Spoke co-management QIC with Primary care and Subspecialist 19-24 months: Sustainability of changes
During this phase, practice will begin working on improving HTN practices within their clinic via a QIC, while the other cohort will act as a control (usual care) with data collection. They will attend an initial 1-day interactive video webinar learning session where they will learn QI methodology, enhance and practice QI skills, identify local 30-60 day aims to improve local HTN practices and increase their understanding of pediatric HTN. They will also begin tracking data on a HTN registry and learn how to ensure accurate BP measurement is completed in their clinic. They will participate in QI coaching, monthly video conferences, and monthly mini-root cause analyses (Mini-RCAs).
Practices will integrate their HTN subspecialist into the QIC and focus on issues at the boundary of PCP and subspecialty care (e.g. pre-referral work-up, communication across providers, and time for next available appointment).
Practices will continue QIC components and implement a hub and spoke model, where the PCP diagnoses and provides definitive management for pediatric HTN with subspecialist support.
Practices will sustain their changes, illustrating the durability of these system changes even after QIC completion and without central feedback and regular meetings.
Active Comparator: Cohort 2
0-6 months: Control condition Usual Care and Registry & BP measurement, 7-12 months: Quality Improvement Collaborative (QIC) with PCP and without subspecialist 13-18 months: QIC with Subspecialist to improve communication and standardize 19-24 months: Hub and Spoke co-management QIC with Primary care and Subspecialist
During this phase, practice will begin working on improving HTN practices within their clinic via a QIC, while the other cohort will act as a control (usual care) with data collection. They will attend an initial 1-day interactive video webinar learning session where they will learn QI methodology, enhance and practice QI skills, identify local 30-60 day aims to improve local HTN practices and increase their understanding of pediatric HTN. They will also begin tracking data on a HTN registry and learn how to ensure accurate BP measurement is completed in their clinic. They will participate in QI coaching, monthly video conferences, and monthly mini-root cause analyses (Mini-RCAs).
Practices will integrate their HTN subspecialist into the QIC and focus on issues at the boundary of PCP and subspecialty care (e.g. pre-referral work-up, communication across providers, and time for next available appointment).
Practices will continue QIC components and implement a hub and spoke model, where the PCP diagnoses and provides definitive management for pediatric HTN with subspecialist support.
Practices will submit control data and not receive centralized data feedback. They will also begin tracking data on a HTN registry and learn how to ensure accurate BP measurement is completed in their clinic.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of patients without all correct diagnostic and management decisions
Time Frame: average 34 months
Number of patients without all correct diagnostic and management decisions per 100 patients with measured elevated BP
average 34 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of patients without re-measuring of BP twice in clinic via auscultation
Time Frame: average 34 months
Number of patients without re-measuring of BP twice in clinic via auscultation at specified points per 100 patients with measured elevated BP
average 34 months
Number of patients without weight counseling management decisions
Time Frame: average 34 months
Number of patients without weight counseling at specified points per 100 patients with measured elevated BP
average 34 months
Number of patients without lifestyle modification counseling management decisions
Time Frame: average 34 months
Number of patients without lifestyle modification counseling management decisions at specified points per 100 patients with measured elevated BP
average 34 months
Number of patients without nutrition counseling management decisions
Time Frame: average 34 months
Number of patients without nutrition counseling management decisions at specified points per 100 patients with measured elevated BP
average 34 months
Number of patients without repeat BP measurement visits appropriately timed
Time Frame: average 34 months
Number of patients without repeat BP measurement visits appropriately timed at specified points per 100 patients with measured elevated BP
average 34 months
Number of patients without initial laboratory workup diagnostic decisions
Time Frame: average 34 months
Number of patients without initial laboratory workup at specified points per 100 patients with measured elevated BP
average 34 months
Number of patients without Subspecialist referral
Time Frame: average 34 months
Number of patients without Subspecialist referral at specified points per 100 patients with measured elevated BP
average 34 months
Number of patients without echocardiogram workup diagnostic decisions
Time Frame: average 34 months
Number of patients without echocardiogram workup diagnostic decisions at specified points per 100 patients with measured elevated BP
average 34 months
Number of patients without echocardiogram diagnostic decisions
Time Frame: average 34 months
Number of patients without echocardiogram diagnostic decisions at specified points per 100 patients with measured elevated BP
average 34 months
Number of patients without radiology diagnostic decisions
Time Frame: average 34 months
Number of patients without radiology diagnostic decisions at specified points per 100 patients with measured elevated BP
average 34 months
BPs measured correctly that met specific criteria
Time Frame: average 34 months
Number of measured BPs correctly per 100 patients with BP measured with appropriately screened patient, patient position, cuff size, inflation, BP percentiles correctly documented and interpreted
average 34 months
Time to third new next available subspecialist appointment
Time Frame: average 33 months
Third new next available appointment for pediatric patients to subspecialist clinics in order to assess the effects of pediatric primary care providers referring and managing different types of patients with hypertension.
average 33 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Michael L Rinke, MD, Albert Einstein College of Medicine and The Children's Hospital at Montefiore

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 14, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

July 14, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 19, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 20, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

December 21, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 3, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 1, 2020

Last Verified

September 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2018-9287
  • R01HS026239 (U.S. AHRQ Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pediatric Hypertension

Clinical Trials on QIC with PCP and without subspecialist

3
Subscribe