- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03786432
Prospective Study of Fusion Rates Using Spira-C Device for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Surgery (ACDF)
July 11, 2023 updated by: Jad Khalil MD, William Beaumont Hospitals
A Prospective Clinical Pilot Study Of Fusion Rates Using Spira™-C Titanium 3-D Printed Interbody Device For Anterior Cervical Discectomy And Fusion
The objective of this study is to perform a prospective, single-arm clinical evaluation utilizing the Spira™-C 3-D printed titanium interbody device for treatment of degenerative disc disease and spinal stenosis of the cervical spine to evaluate fusion status and patient reported outcomes.
The primary objective is fusion status or bony healing within the device.
Patient reported outcomes, i.e. pain, function, and quality of life will also be measured postoperatively.
Study Overview
Status
Terminated
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This is a post-market, single-arm, prospective clinical study to evaluate fusion status and patient reported outcomes using the Spira-C titanium interbody cage for degenerative disc disease where single-level ACDF surgery is indicated.
The treatment group will consist of 40 subjects treated with the Spira™-C interbody device at one level.
Patients with a diagnosis of cervical degenerative disc disease and/or spinal stenosis, radiculopathy or myelopathy and planning to undergo a 1-level ACDF surgery between C3-C7 will be screened and consented, if eligibility requirements are met.
Once the subject has been enrolled and the surgery has taken place; data will be collected regarding the surgical details will be collected.
Subjects will be followed up postoperatively at 6-weeks, 3-months, 6-months, and 12-months as per standard of care, at the private practice or clinic.
Subjects will be asked to complete questionnaires regarding pain, function, and quality of life before and after surgery during the postoperative follow-up visits.
Radiographic assessments will be performed at all postoperative visits; fusion status will be measured using cervical x-rays and CT scan at 12 months.
Radiographs will also be utilized to assess for device-related complications, including implant failure.
Any clinically significant complications related to the device will be recorded as an adverse event.
This study design reflects the current standard of care for cervical degenerative disc disease and spinal stenosis with symptoms of radiculopathy or myelopathy.
Data collected from subjects treated with the Spira™-C Interbody Device will be compared to historical data based on literature review of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage fusion rates and patient reported outcomes.
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion using an interbody device with plate and screw fixation is the treatment of choice after conservative therapies (non-surgical, i.e., physical therapy, epidural steroid injections, pain medications) have been exhausted.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
13
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Michigan
-
Royal Oak, Michigan, United States, 48073
- William Beaumont Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- ≥ 18 years of age and skeletally mature
- Able to provide consent
- Undergoing a primary, single-level ACDF between C3-C7
- Diagnosis of symptomatic degenerative disc disease
- Neck pain and/or radicular symptoms with a baseline Visual Analog Scale score of ≥ 4cm (0-10cm scale)
- Baseline Neck Disability Index score of ≥ 20
- Attempted at least 6-weeks of conservative non-operative treatment
Exclusion Criteria:
- Any prior history of cervical fusion
- Requires cervical fusion of more than one level
- Acute cervical spine trauma requiring immediate intervention
- BMI > 40
- Active systemic bacterial or fungal infection or infection at the operative site
- History of vertebral fracture or osteoporotic fracture
- Current treatment with chemotherapy, radiation, immunosuppression or chronic steroid therapy
- History of osteoporosis, osteopenia, or osteomalacia that would contraindicate spinal surgery
- Psychological or physical condition in the opinion of the investigator that would interfere with completing study participation including completion of patient reported outcomes
- History of neurological condition in the opinion of the investigator that may affect cervical spine function and pain assessments
- Subjects with a history of cancer must be disease free for at least 3 years; with the exception of squamous cell skin carcinoma
- Pregnant, or plans on becoming pregnant
- History of allergy to titanium
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Spira-C Interbody Device
40 subjects undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgery using Spira-C titanium interbody device
|
40 subjects undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgery using Spira-C titanium interbody device
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Successful Cervical Fusion Measured Radiographically
Time Frame: 12 months postoperative
|
Count of participants with successful cervical fusion as measured by CT scan and flexion/extension x-rays at 12-months as evidenced by the following three criteria: bony bridging, no development of pseudoarthrosis, and no presence of radiolucency at the treated cervical level
|
12 months postoperative
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Decreased Visual Analog Scale for Neck Pain
Time Frame: 12 months postoperative
|
Count of participants with equal to or greater than a 2-point decrease in patient reported outcomes as measured by Visual Analog Scale for pain (0-10 point scale, 0 = no pain and 10 = severe amount of pain) from baseline to 12-months in the neck region.
|
12 months postoperative
|
Decreased Neck Disability Index for Pain and Function
Time Frame: 12 months postoperative
|
Count of participants with equal to or greater than a 15-point decrease in patient reported outcomes as measured by Neck Disability Index (0-100 point scale, 0 = least amount disability, 100 = most severe disability) from baseline to 12-months.
|
12 months postoperative
|
Increased Quality of Life Measured by Short Form Health Survey-36 (SF-36)
Time Frame: 12 months postoperative
|
Count of participants with Equal to or greater than 15-point increase in patient reported general health score as measured by SF-36 (0-100 point scale, 0 = low favorable health state and 100 = most favorable health state) from baseline to 12-months.
|
12 months postoperative
|
Eating Assessment Tool-10 for Dysphagia
Time Frame: 12 months postoperative
|
Count of participants with score of less than 3 or equal to baseline in patient reported outcomes as measured by Eating Assessment Tool-10 from baseline to 12-months.
|
12 months postoperative
|
Worsening Neurological Deficit Per Cervical Spine Examination
Time Frame: 12 months postoperative
|
Count of participants with new or worsening neurological cervical spine deficit as evaluated by cervical spine (motor and sensory) examination from baseline to 12-months.
|
12 months postoperative
|
Count of Participants With Revision Surgery by Month 12
Time Frame: 12 months postoperative
|
Count of participants with revision surgery by month 12
|
12 months postoperative
|
Count of Participants With Development of Pseudoarthrosis by Month 12
Time Frame: 12 months postoperative
|
Count of participants with development of pseudoarthrosis by month 12
|
12 months postoperative
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Jad G Khalil, MD, William Beaumont Hospitals
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Cabraja M, Oezdemir S, Koeppen D, Kroppenstedt S. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: comparison of titanium and polyetheretherketone cages. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012 Sep 14;13:172. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-13-172.
- McGilvray KC, Easley J, Seim HB, Regan D, Berven SH, Hsu WK, Mroz TE, Puttlitz CM. Bony ingrowth potential of 3D-printed porous titanium alloy: a direct comparison of interbody cage materials in an in vivo ovine lumbar fusion model. Spine J. 2018 Jul;18(7):1250-1260. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.02.018. Epub 2018 Feb 26.
- Seaman S, Kerezoudis P, Bydon M, Torner JC, Hitchon PW. Titanium vs. polyetheretherketone (PEEK) interbody fusion: Meta-analysis and review of the literature. J Clin Neurosci. 2017 Oct;44:23-29. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2017.06.062. Epub 2017 Jul 21.
- Li ZJ, Wang Y, Xu GJ, Tian P. Is PEEK cage better than titanium cage in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgery? A meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Sep 1;17(1):379. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-1234-1.
- Rao PJ, Pelletier MH, Walsh WR, Mobbs RJ. Spine interbody implants: material selection and modification, functionalization and bioactivation of surfaces to improve osseointegration. Orthop Surg. 2014 May;6(2):81-9. doi: 10.1111/os.12098.
- Hsu MR, Haleem MS, Hsu W. 3D Printing Applications in Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery. Minim Invasive Surg. 2018 Apr 1;2018:4760769. doi: 10.1155/2018/4760769. eCollection 2018.
- Niu CC, Liao JC, Chen WJ, Chen LH. Outcomes of interbody fusion cages used in 1 and 2-levels anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: titanium cages versus polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2010 Jul;23(5):310-6. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181af3a84.
- Lee YS, Kim YB, Park SW. Risk factors for postoperative subsidence of single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: the significance of the preoperative cervical alignment. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Jul 15;39(16):1280-7. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000400.
- Chen Y, Wang X, Lu X, Yang L, Yang H, Yuan W, Chen D. Comparison of titanium and polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages in the surgical treatment of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a prospective, randomized, control study with over 7-year follow-up. Eur Spine J. 2013 Jul;22(7):1539-46. doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-2772-y. Epub 2013 Apr 9.
- Wilcox B, Mobbs RJ, Wu AM, Phan K. Systematic review of 3D printing in spinal surgery: the current state of play. J Spine Surg. 2017 Sep;3(3):433-443. doi: 10.21037/jss.2017.09.01.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
January 10, 2019
Primary Completion (Actual)
June 30, 2022
Study Completion (Actual)
June 30, 2022
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
December 20, 2018
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
December 20, 2018
First Posted (Actual)
December 26, 2018
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
July 28, 2023
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
July 11, 2023
Last Verified
July 1, 2023
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2018-378
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
Yes
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Cervical Radiculopathy
-
Cairo UniversityCompletedCervical Radiculopathy | Disc Herniation | Cervical Radiculopathy at C5 Nerve Root | Cervical Radiculopathy at C6 Nerve Root | Cervical Radiculopathy at C7 Nerve RootEgypt
-
Riphah International UniversityRecruitingCervical Radiculopathy | CervicalPakistan
-
Gazi UniversityRecruitingCervical Radiculopathy | Cervical Radicular Pain | Cervical Radiculitis | Cervical Root SyndromeTurkey
-
Marmara UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
Linkoeping UniversityRecruitingCervical RadiculopathySweden
-
Oslo University HospitalActive, not recruiting
-
Cairo UniversityUnknownCervical Radiculopathy
-
Isra UniversityUnknown
-
Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth...UnknownCervical Radiculopathy
-
Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese MedicineFudan University; Suzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine; Changchun... and other collaboratorsUnknown
Clinical Trials on Spira-C Interbody Device
-
National Taiwan University HospitalBaui Biotech Co., Ltd.RecruitingCervical Disc DegenerationTaiwan
-
Aurora Spine and PainRecruitingDegenerative Disc DiseaseUnited States
-
Medicrea InternationalActive, not recruitingCervical Disc Disease | Cervical Discopathy | C-CURVE , Cervical Interbody CageFrance, Belgium
-
Expanding Orthopedics Ltd.Rush University Medical CenterUnknownDegenerative Disc Disease | Spondylolisthesis | RetrolisthesisUnited States
-
Lahey ClinicDePuy SynthesActive, not recruitingLumbar Spondylolisthesis | Lumbar Spondylosis | Degenerative SpondylolisthesisUnited States
-
Invibio LtdMedical Metrics Diagnostics, IncCompletedSpondylolisthesis, Grade 1 | Degenerative Disc Disease LumbarUnited States
-
Invibio LtdMedical Metrics Diagnostics, Inc; Keos LLC; Technomics Research; Viedoc TechnologiesRecruitingDegenerative Disc Disease | Spondylolisthesis | RetrolisthesisUnited States
-
Globus Medical IncCompletedSymptomatic Cervical Disc Disease
-
Bio2 TechnologiesMCRATerminatedSymptomatic Cervical Disc DiseaseUnited States
-
RTI SurgicalCompletedIntervertebral Disc DegenerationBelgium