Modified Suction-assisted Cartilage Shaver for Axillary Osmidrosis

January 3, 2019 updated by: Shang-Hung Lin, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital

The Efficacy of Modified Suction-assisted Cartilage Shaver for Axillary Osmidrosis

This study included patients who suffered from moderate to severe axillary osmidrosis to receive the modified suction-assisted cartilage shaver, and evaluated the efficacy and complications.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

<Patients> After obtaining the agreement of Chang Gung Medical Foundation Institutional Review Board, the investigators retrospectively included patients from July 2013 to September 2017. There were 39 patients treated for AO by the same dermatologist with suction-assisted cartilage shaver at the Department of Dermatology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan. There were 28 females and 11 males, ranging from 14 to 52 years of age. The participants were all bothered by the axillary osmidrosis, which had a huge impact on their daily life with the embarrassing malodors. Operations were performed under local anaesthesia and in an outpatient basis.

<Operation> During the procedure, both of patient's axillae were exposed with the patient lying supine and arms abducted to avoid injury to the brachial plexus. The investigator cut the axillary hair short for better visualizing the region of apocrine glands, which are located near the hair follicles. The hair bearing elliptical region of axilla was marked before hair cutting. Tumescent solution was prepared with 0.1% lidocaine, 1:500,000 epinephrine and 10mEq/L sodium bicarbonate. The investigator injected the tumescent solution to the subcutaneous level of each axilla in view of the hydro-dissection ability of tumescent and minimizing the bleeding.

A 0.5-cm long incision was made in the center of identified elliptical surgical area at each axilla for the better access of arthroscopy to remove the apocrine glands located at dermo-subcutaneous junction, and for hiding the scar in the skin crease to make it less noticeable. A suction-assisted cartilage shaver (E9005 System, Linvatec Corporation, Largo, Florida, USA) was introduced through the incisions to remove of the subcutaneous tissue containing the apocrine glands radially. The investigator set the system to keep the inner cannula at 1500 rotations per minute in oscillation mode. After defatting, the incisions were closed primarily with 4-0 polyglactin. The investigator anchored the defatting skin to the axillary fascia by using 4-0 nylon sutures instead of the tie-over dressing used in the conventional shaver procedure, and the investigator also made several drainage holes by inserting an 18G needle obliquely into the defatting skin rather than placing the drainage tubes used in the conventional shaver procedure. Therefore, draining tubes were no longer needed. The investigator will remove the stitches at the 8th day after the operation.

<Efficacy assessments> The participants' medical history, physical examinations, and vital signs were carefully collected before the operation. The investigators retrospectively evaluated the pre- and post-operative clinical efficacies with a patient-centered scoring method. The severity of AO before the operation was classified from 1 to 5 to indicate the least severe to the most severe condition, from undetectable, mild, moderate, severe, to unbearable of malodor. The clinical efficacy was classified to 5 grades: poor (0%-20%), fair (21%-39%), acceptable (40%- 59%), good(60%-79%), and excellent (80%-100%), which was evaluated based on the elimination of malodor and the post-operative satisfaction. To evaluate the safety, adverse reactions such as hematoma, seroma, infection, wound necrosis, skin necrosis or perforation, and scar formation were recorded.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

100

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Kaohsiung City, Taiwan, 83301
        • Recruiting
        • Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • ADULT
  • OLDER_ADULT
  • CHILD

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with axillary osmidrosis and require surgical intervention.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with moderate to severe axillary osmidrosis and require surgical intervention.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with bleeding tendency were excluded.
  • Patients with active infections.
  • Patients with major cardiovascular diseases.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Axillary osmidrosis patients
Patients with axillary malodor and require surgical intervention. The subcutaneous apocrine glands shaving were used.
A 0.5-cm long incision was made in the identified elliptical surgical area at each axilla for the access of arthroscopy to remove the apocrine glands. A suction-assisted cartilage shaver (E9005 System, Linvatec Corporation, Largo, Florida, USA) was introduced through the incisions to remove of the subcutaneous apocrine glands radially. After defatting, the incisions were closed primarily with 4-0 polyglactin. We anchored the defatting skin to the axillary fascia by 4-0 nylon sutures instead of the tie-over dressing or tissue glues, and we also made several drainage holes by inserting an 18G needle obliquely into the defatting skin. Therefore, draining tubes were no longer needed. We will remove the stiches at the 8th day after the operation.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The change of malodor of axillary osmidorsis after the modified suction-assiated cartilage shaver
Time Frame: The treatment efficacy is evaluated 1 year after the surgery.
The efficacy of surgical treatment for axillary osmidrosis is evaluated by the change of the malodor. The degree of malodor is subjective, therefore, the investigators classified the degree of malodor from 1 to 5 to indicate the least severe to the most sever condition. The degree of malodor was recorded before the operation, 1 month after the operation, and 1 year after the operation. The investigators evaluate the efficacy of the surgical treatment by the changes of the degree of the malodor of axillary osmidrosis.
The treatment efficacy is evaluated 1 year after the surgery.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The rate of complications of the modified suction-assiated cartilage shaver for axillary osmidrosis
Time Frame: The immediate and longterm complications are recorded and evaluated at 1 week and 1 year respectively after the surgery.
To evaluate the safety of the modified surgical method, adverse reactions such as hematoma, seroma, infection, wound necrosis, skin necrosis or perforation, and scar formation were recorded and evaluated.
The immediate and longterm complications are recorded and evaluated at 1 week and 1 year respectively after the surgery.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Shang-Hung Lin, M.D., Chang Gung Memorial Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

December 12, 2018

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 1, 2019

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 28, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 2, 2019

First Posted (ACTUAL)

January 4, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

January 7, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 3, 2019

Last Verified

January 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 201801926B0

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Treatment Outcome

Subscribe