Treatment of Varicose Veins With the ELVeS® Radial® 2ring Slim Fiber. Are There Limitations?

April 30, 2021 updated by: be Medical
This study aims to prove that the ELVeS® Radial® 2ring slim fiber is safe and effective in endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) of varicose veins, with a reliable durability by evaluating procedural details/outcomes, clinical success, anatomic success, pain, post-operative adverse events and re-interventions.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

150

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Antwerp
      • Bonheiden, Antwerp, Belgium, 2820
        • Imelda Hospital
    • Limburg
      • Hasselt, Limburg, Belgium, 3500
        • Jessa Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

150 patients with varicose veins, eligible for treatment with EndoVenous Laser Ablation (EVLA).

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient is at least 18 years old.
  2. Patient must sign and date the informed consent form prior to treatment.
  3. Presence of unilateral or bilateral primary symptomatic varicose veins (CEAP grade ≥ C2).
  4. Patient has an insufficient Great Saphenous Vein (GSV), with or without laser ablation of anterior accessory saphenous vein (AASV), posterior accessory saphenous vein (PASV), and/or Small Saphenous Vein (SSV), with venous symptoms (valve incompetence), suitable for endovenous laser ablation (EVLA).
  5. Maximum diameter of the to be treated veins is ≤ 14mm.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Current deep vein thrombosis.
  2. Acute superficial thrombosis.
  3. Mean diameter of the to be treated veins > 14mm.
  4. Tortuous or very superficial veins considered unsuitable for laser treatment.
  5. Recurrent varicose veins.
  6. Pregnancy.
  7. Coagulopathy or bleeding disorders.
  8. Contraindications to the use of general or regional anesthesia.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Patients with varicose veins, eligible for EVLA
Device for endovenous laser ablation manufactured by Biolitec AG company (ELVeS system) - diode laser with a wavelength of 1470 nm

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Anatomic success
Time Frame: at 1 month follow-up
defined as occlusion of the treated veins and lack of reflux objectified with duplex ultrasonography
at 1 month follow-up
Anatomic success
Time Frame: at 12 months follow-up
defined as occlusion of the treated veins and lack of reflux objectified with duplex ultrasonography
at 12 months follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Procedural characteristics
Time Frame: at index-procedure
Details concerning the index-procedure
at index-procedure
Pain scoring using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: discharge
The VAS scale contains a 0 - 100 grading with 0 equaling no pain and 100 equaling the worst conceivable pain. The patient is asked to select the number on the scale that corresponds to the worst level of pain he/she experiences. Pain is classified into mild (1 - 30 mm), moderate (31 - 60 mm) and severe (61 - 100 mm). Absence of pain is defined as VAS = 0.
discharge
Pain scoring using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: at 1 week follow-up
The VAS scale contains a 0 - 100 grading with 0 equaling no pain and 100 equaling the worst conceivable pain. The patient is asked to select the number on the scale that corresponds to the worst level of pain he/she experiences. Pain is classified into mild (1 - 30 mm), moderate (31 - 60 mm) and severe (61 - 100 mm). Absence of pain is defined as VAS = 0.
at 1 week follow-up
Clinical success, defined as an objective improvement of clinical outcome after treatment, measured with the Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS)
Time Frame: at 1 month follow-up
The VCSS includes 9 hallmarks of venous disease, each scored on a severity scale from 0 to 3.
at 1 month follow-up
Clinical success, defined as an objective improvement of clinical outcome after treatment, measured with the Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS)
Time Frame: at 12 months follow-up
The VCSS includes 9 hallmarks of venous disease, each scored on a severity scale from 0 to 3.
at 12 months follow-up
Post-operative adverse events
Time Frame: at 1 week follow-up
numbness, persistent bruising, skin loss or ulceration, hematoma, infection, bleeding, deep venous thrombosis, etc.
at 1 week follow-up
Post-operative adverse events
Time Frame: at 1 month follow-up
numbness, persistent bruising, skin loss or ulceration, hematoma, infection, bleeding, deep venous thrombosis, etc.
at 1 month follow-up
Post-operative adverse events
Time Frame: at 12 months follow-up
numbness, persistent bruising, skin loss or ulceration, hematoma, infection, bleeding, deep venous thrombosis, etc.
at 12 months follow-up
Re-interventions
Time Frame: at 1 week follow-up
including reason for re-intervention and description of treatment
at 1 week follow-up
Re-interventions
Time Frame: at 1 month follow-up
including reason for re-intervention and description of treatment
at 1 month follow-up
Re-interventions
Time Frame: at 12 months follow-up
including reason for re-intervention and description of treatment
at 12 months follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

April 15, 2019

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

March 8, 2021

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

March 8, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 11, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 17, 2019

First Posted (ACTUAL)

January 22, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

May 3, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 30, 2021

Last Verified

April 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • ELVeS-01

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Varicose Veins

Clinical Trials on ELVeS® Radial® 2ring slim fiber

Subscribe