Evaluation of PET 18F-Fludarabine for the Initial Assessment and End-treatment of Symptomatic Multiple Myeloma Patients (Myelofludate)

December 24, 2021 updated by: Nantes University Hospital

Exploratory Study Evaluating the Interest of PET to 18F-Fludarabine for the Initial Assessment and End-treatment Evaluation of Patients With Symptomatic Multiple Myeloma in the First Line of Treatment, Not Candidates for Marrow Autograft

The objective of this exploratory study is to evaluate, for the first time, the sensitivity of 18F-Fludarabine to the initial diagnosis of MM compared to FDG-PET and MRI. The interest of this molecule will also be investigated as part of the end-of-treatment therapeutic evaluation.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

35

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Angers, France, 49100
        • CHU d'Angers
        • Contact:
          • Pacôme Fosse, MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Pacôme Fosse, MD
      • Brest, France, 29000
        • CHU de Brest
        • Contact:
          • Pierre Yves Salaün, MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Pierre Yvese Salaün, MD
      • Caen, France, 14000
        • CHU de Caen
        • Contact:
          • Nicolas Aide, MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Nicolas Aide, MD
      • Nantes, France, 44093
        • CHU de Nantes
        • Contact:
          • Caroline Bodet-Milin, MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Caroline bodet Mion, MD
      • Rennes, France, 35000
        • CHU de Rennes
        • Contact:
          • Thierry Lamy, MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Thierry Lamy, MD
      • Rennes, France, 35000
        • Centre Eugene Marquis
        • Contact:
          • Anne Devillers, MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Anne DEVILLERS, MD
      • Tours, France, 37000
        • CHU de Tours
        • Contact:
          • Maria Joao Santiago-Ribeiro, MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Maria Joao Santiago-Ribeiro, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Symptomatic MM in the first line in patients who are not candidates for autologous bone marrow transplantation.
  • Patients eligible for one of the treatments considered as standard in a patient who is not eligible for autograft, according to ESMO's European recommendations
  • MM with measurable disease either by the serum evaluation of the monoclonal component or by the determination of free light chains (serum or urinary).
  • Patient affiliated with a social insurance scheme
  • The patient must understand and voluntarily sign the informed consent form
  • Women of childbearing potential must have a serum pregnancy test (performed within 2 days before each PET scan.)
  • Women of childbearing potential must use an effective contraceptive method throughout the course of the study and for 30 days after the last PET.
  • Male patients (vasectomised or not) with a pregnant partner or a partner of childbearing potential must use a condom and a spermicide until 90 days after the last PET.
  • HIV serology known to be negative
  • Karnofsky ≥ 70 or ECOG 0-1

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age under 18 years
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Male or female refusing birth control conditions
  • Primary AL amyloidosis and myeloma complicated by amyloidosis
  • Neutropenia <1000 PN / mm3
  • Thrombocytopenia <70,000 / mm3
  • Hepatic impairment: bilirubin> 35μmol / L and SGOT, SGPT, alkaline phosphatase greater than 3 N
  • Renal impairment defined by creatinine clearance <50 ml / min
  • History of other malignancies with the exception of basal cell carcinoma and stage I cervical cancer
  • Severe active infection
  • Active infection with known hepatitis B or C virus.
  • Patient with insulin-dependent or non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.
  • Intolerance or known allergy to any of the study drugs or any of its analogues
  • Psychiatric illness that may interfere with participation in the study
  • Patient under safeguard of justice
  • Intellectual inability to sign informed consent
  • Persons protected by law

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Fludatep
PET with 18F-Fludarabine
Two PET with 18F-Fludarabine : one at Baseline, the second one at the end of treatment of myeloma

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Detection of sensitivity of the lesions (osseous and extra-osseous) of 18Fludarabine PET (FludaTEP)
Time Frame: Before treatment

The sensitivity of the initial FludaTEP will be evaluated using an optimal reading mode lesion analysis (ie by consensus of experts) by defining :

True positive:

  • positive lesion with 18F-Fludarabine and positive with PET-FDG or MRI
  • or positive lesion with 18-F-Fludarabine, negative with PET-FDG and MRI, but confirmed by further complementary imaging (CT) or histological examination, or confirmed at follow-up

False negative:

-negative lesion with 18F-Fludarabine and positive FDG-PET and / or MR Lesions positivity in PET-FDG and MRI will be assessed by central reading done by consensus of experts. Lesions positivity with 18F-Fludarabine will be defined by central reading assessed by 2 nuclear physicians experts in hematology with no access to the other exams' results.

Before treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To evaluate the specificity and the positive and negative predictive values of the FludaTEP for the initial assessment through an optimal reading mode.
Time Frame: Before treatment

The specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of the FludaTEP for the initial assessment will be assessed through an optimal reading mode lesion analysis (ie by consensus of experts) using same true positive and false positive définitions as for the main endpoint and defining: -positive lesion with 18F-Fludarabine but not found or confirmed on an histological examination, or other imaging technique (PET-FDG, MRI +/- Scan) or at follow-up

True negative:

-negative lesion with 18F-Fludarabine and negative with FDG-PET and MRI

Before treatment
To evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the FludaTEP for the initial balance according to the local reading
Time Frame: Before treatment
The specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of the FludaTEP for the initial balance will be evaluated through lesion analysis based on the local reading investigator center reading using definitions of VP, VN, FP, and FN described above.
Before treatment
To evaluate the prognostic impact of FDG-PET and FludaTEP on the number of lesions detected by each imaging technique in a population of MM patients in the 1st line therapeutic but not candidates for marrow autograft.
Time Frame: After treatment
The prognostic impact of FDG-PET and FludaTEP as a function of the number of lesions detected by each imaging technique will be evaluated by evaluating the impact of these data on progression-free survival and overall survival. Progression-free survival is defined as the time between the beginning of treatment of the disease and relapse or progression. Overall survival is defined as the time between the start of treatment and death.
After treatment
To evaluate the prognostic impact of FludaTEP on the initial assessment and for the end-of-treatment therapeutic evaluation
Time Frame: Before and After treatment
The prognostic impact of FludaTEP on the initial assessment and for the end-of-treatment therapeutic evaluation will be determined by evaluating the impact of a decrease and a negation of the signal in imaging on an increase in progression-free survival and overall survival.
Before and After treatment
Evaluate in a population of MM patients the existence of a correlation between the 18Fludarabine and FDG uptake intensities
Time Frame: Before and After treatment
Correlations between the 18Fludarabine and FDG uptake intensities assessed by SUVs and the quantitative expression of markers measured in flow cytometry and cytogenetic data (in particular the expression of the coding gene for hexokinases) will be measured using Spearman's correlation coefficient.
Before and After treatment
Evaluate in a population of MM patients the existence of a correlation between the 18Fludarabine and FDG uptake intensities and the cytogenetic data Tolerance to 18F-Fludarabine
Time Frame: Before and After treatment
Tolerance to 18F-Fludarabine will be evaluated by clinical monitoring during 2 hours following the 18F-Fludarabine injection. Clinical data will be taken prior to the 18F-Fludarabine injection, prior to the data capture at 60min and after the last data capture.
Before and After treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

April 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

April 1, 2024

Study Completion (Anticipated)

April 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 20, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 4, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

February 6, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 28, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 24, 2021

Last Verified

December 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Myeloma

Clinical Trials on 18F-Fludarabine

3
Subscribe