Effect of Introducer Length on the Rate of Radial Artery Occlusion During Endovascular Coronary Procedures (IntroLength)

Effect of Introducer Length on the Rate of Radial Artery Occlusion During Endovascular Coronary Procedures: а Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial

This study evaluates estimate impact of introducers length during endovascular coronary procedures on rate of a radial artery occlusion. For half of participants will use short introducers, while for other will use long introducers during transradial coronary intervention.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The transradial approach for coronary angiography and interventions is increasingly utilized around the world. Radial artery occlusion is the most common significant complication after transradial catheterization, with incidence varying between 1% and 10%. Endothelial injury of the radial artery and decrease in blood flow after sheath and catheter insertion appear to contribute to thrombus formation and are predisposing factors for radial artery occlusion. Procedural factors can predict and influence radial artery occlusion incidence. Sheath size and its relation to radial artery diameter, as well as the utilization of specific pharmacological agents (such as anticoagulants and vasodilators) have been studied. But, impact of Introducer sheath length on the rate of a radial artery occlusion has not been studied. The investigators suggest that, longer introducer sheath sizes can prevented the vascular damage and a pro-thrombotic environment.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Tyumen, Russian Federation, 625026
        • Tyumen Cardiology Research Center, Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Science

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age over 18 years old
  • Applicability of transradial approach

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Failure of the transradial approach

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Long introducer 6Fr-25cm
The investigators will perform transradial coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary interventions using long introducer sheath 6Fr-25cm
The investigators will perform transradial coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary interventions using introducer sheath 6Fr-25cm
Active Comparator: Short introducer 6Fr-10cm
The investigators will perform transradial coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary interventions using short introducer sheath 6Fr-10cm
The investigators will perform transradial coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary interventions using introducer sheath 6Fr-10cm

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Radial Artery Occlusion
Time Frame: up to 10 days
Participants who diagnosed a radial artery occlusion with color Doppler ultrasound.
up to 10 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With a Hematoma, Stage I
Time Frame: up to 10 days
Rate of access site complications during percutaneous procedures performed via a transradial approach. Local hematomas are classified according to the following scale: I - diameter not more than 5 cm, II - not more than 10 cm, III - not more than 10 cm, but not higher than the elbow, IV - above the elbow, V - with the threat of hand ischemia [Bertrand, O. F., De Larochelliere, R., Rodes-Cabau, J., Proulx, G., Gleeton, O., Manh Nguyen, C., Dery J.P., Barbeau G., Noel B., Larose E., Poirier P., Roy L. A Randomized Study Comparing Same-Day Home Discharge and Abciximab Bolus Only to Overnight Hospitalization and Abciximab Bolus and Infusion After Transradial Coronary Stent Implantation. Circulation, 2006 114(24), 2636-2643.doi:10.1161/circulationaha.106.638627]. Hematomas more than stage I were not recorded in both groups.
up to 10 days
Rate of Conversion of Needle Type
Time Frame: up to 10 days
Rate of conversion type of Needle type during percutaneous procedures performed via a transradial approach.
up to 10 days
Time of the Introducer Insertion
Time Frame: up to 10 days
Time from start punction of the radial artery to full insertion of the introducer
up to 10 days
Time of the Procedure
Time Frame: up to 10 days
Time from insertion of the introducer to finish the procedure
up to 10 days
Fluoroscopy Time
Time Frame: up to 10 days
Fluoroscopy time, sec
up to 10 days
Total Air Kerma
Time Frame: up to 10 days
Total air kerma, mGy
up to 10 days
Number of Participants With a Perforation / Dissection of a Radial Artery.
Time Frame: up to 10 days
Rate of access site complications during percutaneous procedures performed via a transradial approach
up to 10 days
Number of Participants With Median Nerve Neuritis
Time Frame: up to 10 days
Rate of access site complications during percutaneous procedures performed via a transradial approach
up to 10 days
Number of Participants With a Bleeding of the Puncture Site.
Time Frame: up to 10 days
Rate of access site complications during percutaneous procedures performed via a transradial approach.
up to 10 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sergey V Popov, Tomsk National Research Medical Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 26, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 13, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

March 14, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 21, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 22, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

February 26, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 13, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 10, 2020

Last Verified

January 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Coronary Artery Disease

Clinical Trials on Long introducer sheath

3
Subscribe