Memory Encoding Strategies for People With Mild Cognitive Impairments

November 1, 2016 updated by: Karen Liu, University of Western Sydney

Perceptual and Semantic Memory Encoding Strategies for People With Mild Cognitive Impairment

The purposes of the study are:

  • To evaluate the effectiveness of a perceptual-based training program in enhancing cognitive and everyday functioning of older adults with mild cognitive impairment and mild dementia
  • To evaluate the effectiveness of a semantic-based training program in enhancing cognitive and everyday functioning of older adults with mild cognitive impairment and mild dementia

Study Overview

Detailed Description

People with dementia experience a cognitive decline that affects their functional performance. It has been identified that encoding is less effective in people with dementia. Rehabilitating at the encoding stage is, therefore, essential. A recent systematic review found that effective interventions needed to include training in individually selected memory encoding strategies. These strategies are classified as either perceptual (visual) or semantic (association) memory encoding strategies.

Based on the above literature, the chief investigator (Associate Professor Karen Liu) ran a pilot study on an integrated home and community centre cognitive training programme for 20 elderly people with memory problem using a pre-test and post-test comparison design.

Extending on the positive results, the aim of this project was to investigate the effectiveness of perceptual and semantic encoding strategies (and compare with a control intervention). It also aims to promote the understanding of memory loss and dementia and the need for early intervention for family members of the participants.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New South Wales
      • Penrith, New South Wales, Australia, 2751
        • Western Sydney University
      • Hong Kong, Hong Kong
        • The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

60 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Selection Criteria:

  • are aged 60 or above;
  • have no previous psychiatric or memory disorder history or other neurological illness;
  • have Mini-mental State Examination score (MMSE) greater than or equal to 21;
  • have Clinical Dementia Rating score (CDR) of 0.5 or 1 indicating very mild and mild dementia;
  • do not show sign of depression with score below 9 out of 30 in the Geriatric Depression Scale;
  • are able to communicate effectively;
  • have family member who can participate in the study; and
  • voluntarily consent to participate in the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NON_RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Behavioral: perceptual-based memory encoding training
Participants receive perceptual-based memory encoding training
Participants are trained in the use of perceptual-based memory encoding strategies, inclusive of visual imagery and the method of loci. Visual imagery involves the creation and encoding of mental images, while the method of loci refers to linking these images with specific places to facilitate memory (Simon et al., 2012). Participants are taught to visualise performing each step of a task in a familiar environment, such as in their home (Liu et al., 2009). After participants can correctly visualise the entire task, they then progress to actually performing the task. During the intervention sessions, 2-3 tasks are covered each session, and these tasks become progressively difficult as the weeks progress. The intervention lasts for 10 weeks with one session every week. Each session runs for 90 minutes. A follow-up home training program is run once a week for 30 minutes with the participant and their care-giver.
EXPERIMENTAL: Behavioral: Semantic-based memory encoding training
Participants receive semantic-based memory encoding training
Participants are asked to encode the steps of a task by forming an association of the steps and sequence. Participants are trained in the use of the chunking association method and honeycomb concept and perform different tasks each week, implementing this encoding strategy (Lim et al., 2012). The chunking association method breaks down information into smaller parts and helps with the encoding and retrieval of information. The honeycomb concept allows the steps to form a story in relation to place, time, characters, problem and solution and the story is verbalised. Participants then complete the task. During the intervention sessions, 2-3 tasks are covered each session, and these tasks become progressively difficult as the weeks progress. The intervention lasts for 10 weeks with one session every week. Each session runs for 90 minutes. A follow-up home training program is run once a week for 30 minutes with the participant and their care-giver.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Behavioral : control group
Participants receive cognitive stimulation intervention
Participants receiving cognitive stimulation intervention. It consists of eight sessions that train participants' visual attention and memory, auditory attention and memory and their application in daily activities. Two sessions are also given which allow for participants to apply the training practically in their daily lives. The intervention lasts for 10 weeks with one session every week. Each session runs for 90 minutes. A follow-up home training program is run once a week for 30 minutes with the participant and their care-giver.
Other Names:
  • Cognitive stimulation group

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Disability Assessment for Dementia
Time Frame: Within two days before the intervention and within two days after the 10-week intervention
Change in Disability Assessment for Dementia to assess assistance required in basic daily tasks such as dressing, bathing
Within two days before the intervention and within two days after the 10-week intervention
Change in Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale
Time Frame: Within two days before the intervention and within two days after the 10-week intervention
Change in Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale to assess assistance required in instrumental daily tasks such as laundry, meal preparation
Within two days before the intervention and within two days after the 10-week intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Cognistat
Time Frame: Within two days before the intervention and within two days after the 10-week intervention
Change in Cognistat to assess general cognitive function
Within two days before the intervention and within two days after the 10-week intervention
Change in Digit Span Test
Time Frame: Within two days before the intervention and within two days after the 10-week intervention
Change in Digit Span Test to assess attention and working memory
Within two days before the intervention and within two days after the 10-week intervention
Change in Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease
Time Frame: Within two days before the intervention and within two days after the 10-week intervention
Change in Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease to assess cognitive function in verbal fluency, memory
Within two days before the intervention and within two days after the 10-week intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2010

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

October 1, 2015

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

October 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 21, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 1, 2016

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

November 3, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

November 3, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 1, 2016

Last Verified

November 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Memory encoding

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Mild Cognitive Impairment

Clinical Trials on Behavioral: perceptual-based memory encoding training

3
Subscribe