Effectiveness of Preoxygenation With Positive Airway Pressure: a Comparison of the Supine and 25° Head up Position

March 4, 2019 updated by: Yogesh Dhakal, B.P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences

Effectiveness of Preoxygenation With Positive Airway Pressure in Non-obese Healthy Patient: a Comparison of the Supine and 25° Head up Position

Several techniques such as positive airway pressure and head-up tilt during preoxygenation have shown to prolong non-hypoxic apnea period compared to conventional technique. However, uniform recommendations have not yet been made. Therefore, in the present study the investigators attempted to find out the effect of combination of 5 cmH2O CPAP and 25° head up position during preoxygenation.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

In this study 60 non-obese healthy adult patients were divided into three groups; Group C receiving preoxygenation in conventional technique, Group S receiving preoxygenation with 5 cmH2O CPAP and Group H receiving preoxygenation in 25° head-up position with 5 cmH2O CPAP. After 3 min of preoxygenation, anesthesia was induced and trachea intubated. After confirming the tracheal intubation by direct visualization, all patients were left apneic in supine position with the tracheal tube exposed to atmosphere till the SpO2 dropped to 92%. The primary outcome compared between the groups was the non-hypoxic apnoeic period (time to fall SpO2 to 92%).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • adult patients of ASA physical status I and II undergoing surgery under general anaesthesia

Exclusion Criteria:

  • anticipated difficult mask ventilation/ intubation
  • individuals with significant cardiorespiratory or cerebrovascular disease
  • pregnant ladies
  • patient with history of epilepsy
  • body mass index >25 kg/m2
  • hemoglobin <8 gm/dL
  • patients who were non-ambulant for >24 h, having SpO2 < 97% while breathing in room air
  • phobia to facemask.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Conventional
preoxygenation done with 100% oxygen in supine position
Experimental: Positive-pressure
preoxygenation done with 5 cmH2O CPAP (continuous positive airway pressure) in supine position with 100% oxygen
Experimental: Head-up
preoxygenation done in 25 degree head-up position with 5 cmH2O CPAP with 100% oxygen

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
non-hypoxic apnoeic period (time to fall SpO2 to 92%)
Time Frame: 2 hours
After 3 min of preoxygenation, anesthesia was induced and trachea intubated. After confirming the tracheal intubation by direct visualization, all patients were left apneic in supine position with the tracheal tube exposed to atmosphere till the SpO2 dropped to 92%.
2 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparison of pH at different time points
Time Frame: 2 hours
Arterial blood gas analysis was done and the pH at the start of preoxygenation, after preoxygenation and at desaturation (SpO2= 92%) were compared.
2 hours
Comparison of PaO2 at different time points
Time Frame: 2 hours
Arterial blood gas analysis was done and the PaO2 at the start of preoxygenation, after preoxygenation and at desaturation (SpO2= 92%) were compared.
2 hours
Comparison of PaCO2 at different time points
Time Frame: 2 hours
Arterial blood gas analysis was done and the PaCO2 at the start of preoxygenation, after preoxygenation and at desaturation (SpO2= 92%) were compared.
2 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Balkrishna Bhattarai, Professor, B.P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences
  • Principal Investigator: Sindhu Khatiwada, Professor, B.P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences
  • Principal Investigator: Asish Subedi, Dr, B.P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 15, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 15, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

June 15, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 1, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 4, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

March 5, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 6, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 4, 2019

Last Verified

March 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IERB/205/014

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Intubation;Difficult

Clinical Trials on 5 cmH2O CPAP

3
Subscribe