A Study of RVT-1401 in Myasthenia Gravis (MG) Patients

November 30, 2023 updated by: Immunovant Sciences GmbH

A Phase 2a, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study With an Open-Label Extension of RVT-1401 in Myasthenia Gravis Patients

The purpose of the current study is to assess safety/tolerability and key pharmacodynamic (PD) effects that are considered to be associated with clinical benefit (reduction of total IgG and anti-AChR-IgG) in Myasthenia Gravis patients following treatment with RVT-1401 (also known as IMVT-1401) compared to placebo.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

17

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alberta
      • Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6G 2G3
        • University of Alberta Hospitals - Division of Pulmonary Medicine
    • Ontario
      • London, Ontario, Canada, N6G 2V4
        • London Health Sciences Centre
      • Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1Y 4E9
        • Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G 2C4
        • University Health Network Toronto General Hospital
    • Quebec
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H3A 2B4
        • Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
    • Alabama
      • Mobile, Alabama, United States, 36604
        • IMC/Diagnostic and Medical Clinic
    • Arizona
      • Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85018
        • Phoenix Neurological Associates
    • California
      • Carlsbad, California, United States, 92011
        • The Neurology Center of Southern California
      • Orange, California, United States, 92868
        • UC Irvine - MDA ALS and Neuromuscular Center
      • Pasadena, California, United States, 91101
        • Care Access Research
    • Colorado
      • Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States, 80907
        • CSNA
    • Connecticut
      • New Haven, Connecticut, United States, 06510
        • Yale School of Medicine Department of Neurology
    • Florida
      • Orlando, Florida, United States, 32806
        • Neurological Services of Orlando
    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30318
        • Rare Disease Research
    • Minnesota
      • Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, 55455
        • University of Minnesota - Department of Neurology
    • New York
      • Amherst, New York, United States, 14221
        • Dent Institute
      • Buffalo, New York, United States, 14260-1660
        • University of Buffalo
      • New York, New York, United States, 10021
        • Hospital for Special Surgery
    • Pennsylvania
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15212
        • Allegheny Neurological Associates
    • Texas
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75390
        • UTSW James W. Aston Ambulatory Care Center - Neurology Clinic

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Male or female ≥ 18 years of age.
  2. Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) Class II-IVa and likely not in need of a respirator for the duration of the study as judged by the Investigator.
  3. QMG score ≥12 at Screening and Baseline.

Other, more specific inclusion criteria are defined in the protocol.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Use of rituximab, belimumab, eculizumab or any monoclonal antibody for immunomodulation within 6 months prior to first dosing.
  2. Immunoglobulins given by SC, IV (IVIG), or intramuscular route, or plasmapheresis/plasma exchange (PE) within 4 weeks before Screening.
  3. Thymectomy performed < 12 months prior to screening.
  4. Total IgG level <6 g/L (at screening).
  5. Absolute neutrophil count <1500 cells/mm3(at screening).

Other, more specific exclusion criteria are defined in the protocol

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Regimen A
RVT-1401 680 mg weekly for 6 weeks + optional open-label extension (RVT-1401, 340 mg every 2 weeks for 6 weeks)
Subcutaneous administration of RVT-1401
Experimental: Regimen B
RVT-1401 340 mg weekly for 6 weeks + optional open-label extension (RVT-1401, 340 mg every 2 weeks for 6 weeks)
Subcutaneous administration of RVT-1401
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Placebo for 6 weeks + optional open-label extension (RVT-1401, 340 mg every 2 weeks for 6 weeks)
Subcutaneous administration of RVT-1401
Subcutaneous administration of Placebo

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Double-Blind Treatment Period: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Time Frame: Up to Week 18
An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. SAEs were defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose: resulted in death, was life-threatening, required hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or was an important medical event that may have jeopardized the participant or may have required medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the other outcomes listed in the definition.
Up to Week 18
Open-Label Extension Period: Number of Participants Reporting AEs and SAEs
Time Frame: Up to Week 18
An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. TEAEs are defined as those AEs that started or worsened in severity after the initiation of study drug administration. SAEs were defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose: resulted in death, was life-threatening, required hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or was an important medical event that may have jeopardized the participant or may have required medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the other outcomes listed in the definition.
Up to Week 18
Double-Blind Treatment Period: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs
Time Frame: Up to Week 7
Vital signs including systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), pulse rate and temperature were measured after resting for at least 5 minutes in a semi-supine position.
Up to Week 7
Open-label Extension Period: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs
Time Frame: Up to Week 18
Vital signs including SBP, DBP, pulse rate and temperature were measured after resting for at least 5 minutes in a semi-supine position.
Up to Week 18
Double-blind Treatment Period: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Clinical Laboratory Parameters
Time Frame: Up to Week 7
Clinical laboratory parameters included clinical chemistry, hematology and urinalysis.
Up to Week 7
Open-label Extension Period: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Clinical Laboratory Parameters
Time Frame: Up to Week 18
Clinical laboratory parameters included clinical chemistry, hematology and urinalysis.
Up to Week 18
Double-Blind Treatment Period: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG)
Time Frame: Up to Week 7
Twelve-lead ECG was performed after 5 minutes of rest in the supine position.
Up to Week 7
Open-label Extension Period: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in ECG
Time Frame: Up to Week 18
Twelve-lead ECG was performed after 5 minutes of rest in the supine position.
Up to Week 18
Double-blind Treatment Period: Percent Change From Baseline in Levels of Total Immunoglobulin G (IgG)
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Up to Week 7
Serum samples were collected for the analysis of total immunoglobulin G. Percent change from Baseline was calculated as the mean value at the specified time frame (Week 7) minus the Baseline value, divided by the Baseline value x 100.
Baseline (Day 1) and Up to Week 7
Double-blind Treatment Period: Percent Change From Baseline in IgG Subclasses 1, 2, 3 and 4
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Up to Week 7
Serum samples were collected for the analysis of IgG 1, 2, 3 and 4 levels. Percent change from Baseline was calculated as the mean value at the specified time frame (Week 7) minus the Baseline value, divided by the Baseline value x 100.
Baseline (Day 1) and Up to Week 7
Double-Blind Treatment Period: Percent Change From Baseline in Anti-acetylcholine Receptor Immunoglobulin G (Anti-AChR-IgG) at Week 7
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 7
Serum samples were collected for the analysis of Anti-AChR-IgG. Percent change from Baseline was calculated as the mean value at the specified time frame (Week 7) minus the Baseline value, divided by the Baseline value x 100.
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 7

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Double-Blind Treatment Period: Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to 168 Hours (AUC0-168h) of RVT-1401
Time Frame: Pre-dose; Day 1, Day 3, Day 5, Day 8, Day 15, Day 22, Day 29, Day 36, Day 38, Day 40, Week 7, Week 8
Blood samples were collected for the analysis of Pharmacokinetic parameter AUC (0-168h).
Pre-dose; Day 1, Day 3, Day 5, Day 8, Day 15, Day 22, Day 29, Day 36, Day 38, Day 40, Week 7, Week 8
Open-label Extension Period: AUC0-168h of RVT-1401
Time Frame: Pre-dose; Day 1, Day 3, Day 5, Day 8, Day 15, Day 22, Day 29, Day 36, Day 38, Day 40, Week 7, Week 8, Week 9, Week 12 and Week 14
Pharmacokinetic parameters were not estimated because the sparse PK sampling schedule did not allow for accurate estimates of these parameters.
Pre-dose; Day 1, Day 3, Day 5, Day 8, Day 15, Day 22, Day 29, Day 36, Day 38, Day 40, Week 7, Week 8, Week 9, Week 12 and Week 14
Double-Blind Treatment Period: Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of RVT-1401
Time Frame: Pre-dose; Day 1, Day 3, Day 5, Day 8, Day 15, Day 22, Day 29, Day 36, Day 38, Day 40, Week 7, Week 8
Blood samples were collected for the analysis of Pharmacokinetic parameter Cmax.
Pre-dose; Day 1, Day 3, Day 5, Day 8, Day 15, Day 22, Day 29, Day 36, Day 38, Day 40, Week 7, Week 8
Open-label Extension Period: Cmax of RVT-1401
Time Frame: Pre-dose; Day 1, Day 3, Day 5, Day 8, Day 15, Day 22, Day 29, Day 36, Day 38, Day 40, Week 7, Week 8, Week 9, Week 12 and Week 14
Blood samples were collected for the analysis of Pharmacokinetic parameter Cmax.
Pre-dose; Day 1, Day 3, Day 5, Day 8, Day 15, Day 22, Day 29, Day 36, Day 38, Day 40, Week 7, Week 8, Week 9, Week 12 and Week 14
Double-Blind Treatment Period: Trough Concentrations (Ctrough) of RVT-1401
Time Frame: Pre-dose
Blood samples were planned to be collected at indicated time points to measure the concentration of RVT-1401 pre-dose (Ctrough) as an assessment of the pharmacokinetic RVT-1401.
Pre-dose
Open-label Extension Period: Ctrough of RVT-1401
Time Frame: Pre-dose
Blood samples were planned to be collected at indicated time points to measure the concentration of RVT-1401 pre-dose (Ctrough) as an assessment of the pharmacokinetic RVT-1401.
Pre-dose
Double-blind Treatment Period: Change From Baseline in the Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis Score (QMG) Score
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 2, Week 3, Week 4, Week 5, Week 6 (Day 36) and Week 7
The QMG score is a physician-reported outcome measure was used to assess MG disease severity and pattern of deficits based on quantitative testing of affected muscle groups. The scale comprised of 13 test items that were graded on a scale of 0 (no myasthenic findings) to 3 (maximal myasthenic deficits). The total sum across all 13 items represents the QMG score. QMG total scores range from 0 to 39 for a given visit, with higher scores indicating more severe disease. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing value prior to the date (time) of first dose of study drug. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from the post-dose visit value.
Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 2, Week 3, Week 4, Week 5, Week 6 (Day 36) and Week 7
Double-Blind Treatment Period: Percentage of Participants With an Improvement/ Response on the QMG Score From Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 7
The response is defined as improvement from Baseline on the QMG score by => 3 points. The QMG score is a physician-reported outcome measure was used to assess MG disease severity and pattern of deficits based on quantitative testing of affected muscle groups. The scale comprised of 13 test items that were graded on a scale of 0 (no myasthenic findings) to 3 (maximal myasthenic deficits). The total sum across all 13 items represents the QMG score. QMG total scores range from 0 to 39 for a given visit, with higher scores indicating more severe disease. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing value prior to the date (time) of first dose of study drug. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from the post-dose visit value.
Baseline (Day 1) to Week 7
Double-Blind Treatment Period: Change From Baseline in the Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) Score
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 2, Week 3, Week 4, Week 5, Week 6 (Day 36), Week 7
The MG-ADL is an 8-item, participant-reported outcome measure that assessed Myasthenia Gravis symptoms and their effects on activities of daily living, with each response graded from 0 (normal) to 3 (most severe). The MG-ADL score was calculated by totaling the rating for each of the 8 items. Total MG-ADL scores range from 0 to 24 with higher scores indicating more severe disease. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing value prior to the date (time) of first dose of study drug. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from the post-dose visit value.
Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 2, Week 3, Week 4, Week 5, Week 6 (Day 36), Week 7
Double-Blind Treatment Period: Percentage of Participants With an Improvement/ Response on the MG-ADL Score
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 7
The response was defined as improvement (decrease) from Baseline on the MG-ADL score by => 2 points. The MG-ADL is an 8-item, participant-reported outcome measure that assessed Myasthenia Gravis symptoms and their effects on activities of daily living, with each response graded from 0 (normal) to 3 (most severe). The MG-ADL score was calculated by totaling the rating for each of the 8 items. Total MG-ADL scores range from 0 to 24 with higher scores indicating more severe disease. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing value prior to the date (time) of first dose of study drug.
Baseline (Day 1) to Week 7
Double-Blind Treatment Period: Change From Baseline in the Myasthenia Gravis Composite Score (MGC) Score
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 2, Week 3, Week 4, Week 5, Week 6 (Day 36), Week 7
The MGC was developed by selecting the best performing items from 3 commonly used Myasthenia Gravis specific scales (QMG, Myasthenia Gravis manual muscle test, and MG-ADL) and is comprised of 10 functional domains: 3 ocular, 3 bulbar, 1 respiratory, 1 neck, and 2 limb items. The total score ranges from 0 (no myasthenic findings) to 50 (maximal myasthenic deficits). The scale measures symptoms and signs of MG in these domains incorporating both physician and participant-reported test items. Higher scores correlate with clinical worsening of the disease. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing value prior to the date (time) of first dose of study drug. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from the post-dose visit value.
Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 2, Week 3, Week 4, Week 5, Week 6 (Day 36), Week 7
Double-Blind Treatment Period: Percentage of Participants With an Improvement on the MGC Score
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 7
The response was defined as improvement (decrease) from Baseline on the MGC score by => 3 points. The MGC was developed by selecting the best performing items from 3 commonly used Myasthenia Gravis specific scales (QMG, Myasthenia Gravis manual muscle test, and MG-ADL) and is comprised of 10 functional domains: 3 ocular, 3 bulbar, 1 respiratory, 1 neck, and 2 limb items. The total score ranges from 0 (no myasthenic findings) to 50 (maximal myasthenic deficits). The scale measures symptoms and signs of MG in these domains incorporating both physician and participant-reported test items. Higher scores correlate with clinical worsening of the disease. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing value prior to the date (time) of first dose of study drug.
Baseline (Day 1) to Week 7
Double-Blind Treatment Period: Change From Baseline in the Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life 15 Revised Score (MG-QOL 15r) Score
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 4 and Week 7
The MG-QOL15r is a participant-reported questionnaire designed to assess how a participant's Myasthenia Gravis affects different aspects related to their quality of life. The scale includes 15 items that are graded on a scale of 0 to2; the total across is the sum of all 15 items and represents the MG-QOL15r score. The range of the MG-QOL15r score is 0 - 30. Higher scores indicate worse outcomes. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing value prior to the date (time) of first dose of study drug. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from the post-dose visit value.
Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 4 and Week 7
Double-Blind Treatment Period: Number of Participants Reporting Confirmed Positive Anti-RVT-1401 Antibodies
Time Frame: Up to Week 7
The serum levels of anti-RVT-1401 antibodies were determined. All samples that were potentially positive were analyzed with the confirmation assay where presence of anti-RVT-1401 was confirmed; the therapeutic antibody was used to compete with the analytical responses of anti-drug antibody (ADA) to assess specificity of screened positive samples.
Up to Week 7
Open-Label Extension Period: Number of Participants Reporting Confirmed Positive Anti-RVT-1401 Antibodies
Time Frame: Up to Week 18
The serum levels of anti-RVT-1401 antibodies were determined. All samples that were potentially positive were analyzed with the confirmation assay where presence of anti-RVT-1401 was confirmed; the therapeutic antibody was used to compete with the analytical responses of ADA to assess specificity of screened positive samples.
Up to Week 18

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 21, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 7, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

December 21, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 20, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 4, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

March 5, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 20, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 30, 2023

Last Verified

November 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Myasthenia Gravis

Clinical Trials on RVT-1401

Subscribe