A Phase I Study of Vitargus® in Vitrectomy

September 7, 2020 updated by: BioFirst Corporation

A Phase I, Safety and Tolerability Study of Vitargus® in Vitrectomy Surgery

A Phase I, safety and tolerability study of Vitargus® in vitrectomy surgery

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Study Objectives:

Primary Objective

• To evaluate the safety/tolerability of a single intravitreal (IVT) dose of BFC-1401 in participants as a vitreous substitute during vitrectomy surgery.

Secondary Objective

  • To assess retinal attachment and hydrogel degradation at Day 120.
  • To assess best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) after vitrectomy surgery.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

11

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New South Wales
      • Sydney, New South Wales, Australia, 2000
        • Sydney Retina Clinic and Day Surgery

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Male or female adults, aged 18 years or older at screening.
  2. a) Diagnosis of Diagnosis of Diagnosis of Diagnosis of complex or rhegmatogenous retinal detachment, or chronic retinal detachment with failure of gas or silicone oil treatment, OR b) Diagnosis of any vitreous haemorrhage that requires vitrectomy surgery
  3. BCVA of 20/40 to 20/2000.
  4. Scheduled vitrectomy with vitreous substitute.
  5. Must be able and willing to provide written informed consent, attend all scheduled visits and comply with all study procedures.

Exclusion Criteria:

A participant meeting any of the following criteria was to be excluded from the study:

  1. Any active intraocular or periocular infection or inflammation.
  2. Only one functional eye.
  3. Ocular disorders in the study eye that may confound the interpretation of the study results; macular oedema not requiring vitrectomy surgery, choroidal neovascularisation.
  4. High refractive error demonstrating >6 diopters of myopia.
  5. Any ophthalmic condition that reduces the clarity of the optical media that interferes with ophthalmic examination and adequate imaging (advanced cataract or corneal opacities).
  6. Uncontrolled glaucoma defined as intraocular pressure > 30 mmHg on maximal therapy.
  7. Aphakia or absence of the posterior capsule.
  8. Known hypersensitivity to hyaluronic acid or ADH.
  9. Uncontrolled blood pressure defined as systolic value ≥ 160 mmHg or diastolic value ≥100 mmHg at screening.
  10. Uncontrolled diabetes defined as glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) > 12%.
  11. Stroke or myocardial infarction within 90 days of baseline.
  12. Severe generalised disease resulting in a life expectancy shorter than 1 year.
  13. Currently pregnant or breastfeeding.
  14. Women of child-bearing potential, defined as all women physiologically capable of becoming pregnant, unless they are using effective methods of contraception during dosing of study treatment. Effective contraception methods included:

    • Total abstinence (when this is in line with the preferred and usual lifestyle of the participant). Periodic abstinence (e.g., calendar, ovulation, symptothermal, post-ovulation methods) was not acceptable.
    • Female sterilisation (surgical bilateral oopthorectomy with or without hysterectomy) or tubal ligation at least six weeks before taking study treatment. In case of oophorectomy alone, this was acceptable only when the reproductive status of the woman was confirmed by follow-up hormone level assessment.
    • Male sterilisation (at least 6 months prior to screening). For female participants on the study, the vasectomised male partner was to be the sole partner for that participant.
    • Barrier methods of contraception: Condom or Occlusive cap (diaphragm or cervical/vault caps).
    • Use of oral, injected or implanted hormonal methods of contraception or other forms of hormonal contraception that have comparable efficacy (failure rate<1%), for example hormone vaginal ring or transdermal hormone contraception.
    • Placement of an intrauterine device or intrauterine system.
    • In the case of use of oral contraception, women were to be stable on the same pill for a minimum of 3 months before taking study treatment.
    • The use of an effective contraception method was to continue for 4 months post-vitrectomy and injection of the investigational product, in line with the follow-up period of the study.
    • Because the experimental investigational product in this study may affect an unborn baby, males participating in this study were not to father a baby while on the study, and for 4 months following the injection of study medication.
    • Women were considered post-menopausal and not of child-bearing potential if they had 12 months of natural (spontaneous) amenorrhea with an appropriate clinical profile (e.g. age appropriate, history of vasomotor symptoms) or had surgical bilateral oophorectomy (with or without hysterectomy) or tubal ligation, at least six weeks prior to the study. In the case of oophorectomy alone, only when the reproductive status of the woman was confirmed by follow-up hormone level assessment was she considered to be not of child-bearing potential.
  15. Participation in any study involving an investigational drug or device within the past 30 days or ongoing participation in a study with an investigational drug or device.
  16. Any clinical evidence that the Investigator felt would place the participant at increased risk with the investigational product.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Active arm
Participants with a diagnosis of retinal detachment or vitreous haemorrhage, who are scheduled for vitrectomy surgery with a vitreous substitute
A single intravitreal (IVT) dose of BFC-1401 in participants as a vitreous substitute during vitrectomy surgery.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Safety/tolerability: Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events
Time Frame: 120 days
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events. Adverse events (AEs) were coded using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA), and data summarised by System Organ Class and preferred term.
120 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Efficacy for best corrected visual acuity (BCVA); retinal attachment and hydrogel degradation
Time Frame: 120 days

To assess best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) by LogMAR change from baseline over time after vitrectomy surgery.

To assess retinal attachment and hydrogel degradation by slit lamp biomicroscopy exam findings, dilated ophthalmoscopy exam findings, colour fundus photography, and OCT findings over time after vitrectomy surgery.

120 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Andrew Chang, MD, Ph.D, Sydney Retina Clinic | Medical Director

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 2, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

July 2, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 15, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 21, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

July 22, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 9, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 7, 2020

Last Verified

July 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • BFC-1401

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Vitreo-retinal Surgery

Clinical Trials on Vitargus, BFC-1401

Subscribe