Efficacy and Safety of Vibrant Capsule vs. Placebo for the Treatment of Chronic Idiopathic Constipation (Vibrant)

August 7, 2024 updated by: Vibrant Ltd.

A Prospective, Randomized, Multi-center, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled, 3-Arm Clinical Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Vibrant Capsule, for the Treatment of Chronic Idiopathic Constipation

The study is a prospective, randomized, multicenter, adaptive design, double blinded, placebo-controlled study, to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Vibrant Capsule vs. placebo in relieving constipation in subjects with Chronic Idiopathic Constipation.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Subjects came for 4 visits: Screening (visit 1), baseline (visit 2), after 4 treatment weeks from baseline (visit 3) and after 8 treatment weeks from baseline (Final visit , visit 4). A total of 8 treatment weeks

Three arms were assessed:

  • Vibrant Capsule mode A administered 5 times per week
  • Vibrant Capsule mode B administered 5 times per week
  • Placebo Capsule administered 5 times per week The difference between the 2 operating modes is in the vibrating sequence during the capsule's operating time.

Following Interim Analysis one active arm was dropped and the study continued with 2 arms, placebo and an active arm.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

349

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alabama
      • Foley, Alabama, United States, 36535
        • G & L Research, LLC.
    • Arizona
      • Tucson, Arizona, United States, 85712
        • Del Sol Research Management
    • Georgia
      • Augusta, Georgia, United States, 30912
        • Augusta University
    • North Carolina
      • Greensboro, North Carolina, United States, 27408
        • PharmQuest
    • Ohio
      • Beachwood, Ohio, United States, 44122
        • Great Lakes Medical Research LLC
      • Huber Heights, Ohio, United States, 45424
        • Clinical Inquest Center Ltd
      • Mentor, Ohio, United States, 44060
        • Great Lakes Gastroenterology Research
    • Tennessee
      • Memphis, Tennessee, United States, 38119
        • Clinical Neuroscience Solutions dba CNS Healthcare

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

22 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Subjects aged 22 years and older
  2. Subjects with Chronic Idiopathic Constipation (CIC) according to Rome III criteria and who have not experienced relief of their symptoms from available therapies (osmotic and stimulant laxatives used for at least one month at recommended dose)
  3. Subjects with an average of ≤2.5 Spontaneous Bowel Movements (SBM) per week and ≥1 SBM per week
  4. Normal colonoscopy performed within 5 years prior to study participation, unless the subjects are <50 years old and without alarm signs and/or symptoms
  5. Subject signed the Informed Consent Form (ICF)
  6. Female subjects must have a negative blood pregnancy test during screening, confirmed by a negative urine pregnancy test during baseline and must not be lactating prior to receiving study medication. For females of child-bearing potential, a hormonal (i.e., oral, implantable, or injectable) and single-barrier method, or a double-barrier method of birth control must be used throughout the study. All other female subjects must have the reason for their inability to bear children documented in the medical record [i.e., tubal ligation, hysterectomy, or post-menopausal (defined as a minimum of one year since the last menstrual period)]; in these circumstances, a pregnancy test will not be necessary

Exclusion Criteria:

History of complicated/obstructive diverticular disease 2. History of intestinal or colonic obstruction, or suspected intestinal obstruction.

3. History of significant gastrointestinal disorder, including any form of inflammatory bowel disease or gastrointestinal malignancy (celiac disease is accepted if the subject has been treated and is in remission) 4. History of gastroparesis 5. Use of any of the following medications:

  • Medications that may affect intestinal motility, prokinetics, anti-Parkinsonian medications, opiates, opioids, calcium-channel blockers, aluminum/magnesium hydroxide
  • With the exception of antidepressants, thyroid or hormonal replacement therapy, when the subject has been on a stable dose for at least 3 months prior to enrollment.

    6. Clinical evidence of significant respiratory, cardiovascular, renal, hepatic, biliary, endocrine, psychiatric or neurologic disease 7. Presence of cardiac pacemaker or gastric electrical stimulator. 8. History of, or current eating disorders, such as anorexia, bulimia, or compulsory overeating.

    9. Diagnosis of mega-rectum or colon, congenital anorectal malformation, clinically significant rectocele, history of intestinal resection (with an exception for appendectomy, cholecystectomy and inguinal hernia repair), history of bariatric surgery or evidence of any structural abnormality of the gastrointestinal tract that might affect transit 10. History of Zenker's diverticulum, dysphagia, Barrett's esophagus, esophageal stricture or achalasia 11. Chronic use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs): chronic use is defined as taking full dose NSAIDs more than three times a week for at least six months. Subjects on cardiac doses of aspirin may be enrolled in the study 12. Subjects with pelvic floor dysfunction/defecatory disorder, based on subject history 13. Participation in another clinical study within one month prior to screening.

    14. Women who are pregnant or lactating 15. Use of any medication for constipation relief during the study, except as rescue medication, as indicated by study rules 16. Inability to use an electronic daily Diary (on a computer, phone application, tablet or other electronic device) to report bowel movements, symptoms and medication usage 17. Subject participated in a previous Vibrant study 18. Subjects planning to undergo MRI during the study 19. Any known allergy to soybean or beeswax or Calcium Carbonate 20. Any other condition which in the opinion of the investigator may adversely affect the safety of the subject or would limit the subject's ability to complete the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Vibrant Capsule mode A
Vibrant Capsule mode A administered 5 times per week
Vibrating Capsule administered 5 times per week
Placebo Comparator: Placebo Capsule
Placebo Capsule administered 5 times per week
Vibrating Capsule administered 5 times per week
Active Comparator: Vibrant Capsule mode B

Vibrant Capsule mode B administered 5 times per week.

Based on the analysis of the first pre-define phase of the study, active mode B was discontinued, and the trial was completed using mode A. Therefore, study results are not available for arm B.

Vibrating Capsule administered 5 times per week

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
CSBM1 & CSBM2 Success Rate
Time Frame: 8 weeks of treatment

CSBM1Success Rate: defined as the number of subjects with an increase from the run-in period of at least one weekly Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movement (CSBM) during at least 6 of the 8 weeks of treatment.

CSBM2 success rate: defined as the number of subject with an increase from the run-in period of at least two weekly Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movement (CSBM) during at least 6 of the 8 weeks of treatment.

The study will be deemed successful if either the CSBM1 or the CSBM2 success rate is statistically significantly higher in the active arm that was continued after the interim analysis (Vibrant Capsule Mode A), than in the placebo arm

NOTE:

  • A spontaneous bowel movement (SBM) is defined as a bowel movement that occurs at least 48h after laxative/rescue intake and without digital maneuver.
  • A complete spontaneous bowel movement (CSBM) is defined as a spontaneous bowel movement associated with a feeling of complete evacuation by the subject.
8 weeks of treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Average Straining
Time Frame: 8 weeks of treatment
Change from baseline in average straining using (0-10) scale where "0" is no straining and "10" is unbearable straining
8 weeks of treatment
Change From Baseline in Average Stool Consistency
Time Frame: 8 weeks of treatment
Change from baseline in average stool consistency, using the Bristol Stool Scale (1-7) where 1 = Separate hard lumps, like nuts (hard to pass) and 7 =watery, no solid pieces, entirely liquid
8 weeks of treatment
Change From Baseline in Average Bloating
Time Frame: 8 weeks of treatment
Change from baseline in average bloating using scale (0-10) for bloating where 0=No bloating and 10=Unbearable bloating
8 weeks of treatment

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in SBM
Time Frame: 8 weeks of treatment
Change from baseline in weekly number of Spontaneous Bowel Movement (SBM)
8 weeks of treatment
Change From Baseline in Quality of Life
Time Frame: 8 weeks of treatment

Change from baseline in average PAC-QOL (=Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life) score.

The results below present the number of participants who completed PAC-QOL questionnaire and reported an improvement in quality of life from baseline.

8 weeks of treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Tal Malina, MBA, Vibrant Ltd.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 8, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 16, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

January 5, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 17, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 14, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

March 18, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 9, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 7, 2024

Last Verified

August 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 270CLD

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Idiopathic Constipation

Clinical Trials on Vibrating capsule

Subscribe