- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03880838
Evaluation of a Letter Intervention Promoting a Plant-based Diet
Evaluation of a Letter Intervention Among At-risk Adults Promoting a Plant-based Diet Using a Combination of Provider Testimonials, the Forks Over Knives Documentary, and Commitment- or Prevention-focused Behavioral Nudges
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
Note that participant selection and assignment will be done at the level of the household, but analysis of outcomes will include individual-level analysis. This analytic decision was made because the researchers assume that the intervention may potentially affect other members of the household. While one person in a household will be selected for matching the eligibility criteria, the mailed materials will be addressed to all adult members of the household (defined as adults 18+ who are the spouse or child of the selected member) who are members of the Geisinger Health Plan. Outcome data will be pulled from all adult members of the household who have data through the Geisinger Health Plan.
The researchers will analyze the data using standard survey research analyses methods, including computing bivariate correlations, using general linear models, using non-parametric models for non-normally distributed insurance data, and entering variables as independent predictors in regression models to attempt to predict desired outcomes. The researchers will also use multilevel models to account for household- and individual-level data. The analysis of primary outcomes will focus on data one year after the intervention begins. Follow-up analysis on secondary outcomes will be conducted two years after the intervention begins. The researchers will conduct separate analyses of the selected participant (i.e., the individual who met the eligibility criteria) and other members of that participant's household. This will test whether there are any spillover effects of the intervention to other people in the household.
For clarity in this record, any discussion of sample size and participants refers to households, as this is the primary level for participant selection and assignment.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Danville, Pennsylvania, United States, 17822
- Geisinger Health System
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
Has two out of the three following conditions:
- Body mass index over 30
- Diagnosis of type 2 diabetes (specifically with at least one medication)
- Diagnosis of cardiovascular disease
Has health insurance through Geisinger Health Plan (is an active member with a full 12-month enrollment in the previous year) under one of the following categories:
- Medicare with required primary care provider
- Medicaid
- Individual policy under the Affordable Care Act
- Has visited their primary care provider in the past 12 months
Exclusion Criteria:
- Is institutionalized
- Has active cancer, cirrhosis, renal failure, dementia, or active psychosis
- Is in the same household as another selected participant
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
No Intervention: No contact control
Participants are not contacted.
|
|
|
Experimental: Letter
Participants are only contacted through a letter with a personal testimonial.
|
Participants will receive a letter promoting a plant-based diet.
This letter will feature a personal testimonial about the benefits of a plant-based diet.
Presenting this information to participants might encourage them to make behavioral changes to improve their health.
|
|
Experimental: Link and no nudge
Participants are sent the Forks Over Knives documentary online link and a letter with a personal testimonial and no nudges.
|
Participants will receive a letter promoting a plant-based diet.
This letter will feature a personal testimonial about the benefits of a plant-based diet.
Presenting this information to participants might encourage them to make behavioral changes to improve their health.
Participants will be mailed the documentary Forks Over Knives, which provides scientific arguments promoting a plant-based and whole foods diet.
The behavioral effect of this documentary comes from watching the documentary and potentially choosing to order a free cookbook (participants are given this opportunity in the letter accompanying the documentary).
The effect of the diet itself is not a central part of the intervention, as people can choose to adopt or not adopt any part of the diet.
|
|
Experimental: Link and commitment nudge
Participants are sent the Forks Over Knives documentary online link and a letter with a personal testimonial and a commitment nudge.
|
Participants will receive a letter promoting a plant-based diet.
This letter will feature a personal testimonial about the benefits of a plant-based diet.
Presenting this information to participants might encourage them to make behavioral changes to improve their health.
Participants will be mailed the documentary Forks Over Knives, which provides scientific arguments promoting a plant-based and whole foods diet.
The behavioral effect of this documentary comes from watching the documentary and potentially choosing to order a free cookbook (participants are given this opportunity in the letter accompanying the documentary).
The effect of the diet itself is not a central part of the intervention, as people can choose to adopt or not adopt any part of the diet.
At the end of the letter promoting a plant-based diet, participants will be asked to write dates and personal signatures committing to watching the documentary.
They will be asked to mail back this written commitment.
Stating one's intentions to implement certain behavior is meant to increase the likelihood of follow-up behavior.
This request might nudge more people to watch the documentary and make some behavioral changes to prevent negative health outcomes.
|
|
Experimental: Link and prevention nudge
Participants are sent the Forks Over Knives documentary online link and a letter with a personal testimonial and a prevention nudge.
|
Participants will receive a letter promoting a plant-based diet.
This letter will feature a personal testimonial about the benefits of a plant-based diet.
Presenting this information to participants might encourage them to make behavioral changes to improve their health.
Participants will be mailed the documentary Forks Over Knives, which provides scientific arguments promoting a plant-based and whole foods diet.
The behavioral effect of this documentary comes from watching the documentary and potentially choosing to order a free cookbook (participants are given this opportunity in the letter accompanying the documentary).
The effect of the diet itself is not a central part of the intervention, as people can choose to adopt or not adopt any part of the diet.
As part of the letter promoting a plant-based diet, one paragraph will describe the risks of not taking action.
This phrasing reframes the status quo as contributing to future loss (e.g., costs of medication and operations).
In effect, the letter encourages participants to focus on preventing this loss by taking action.
This additional text might nudge more people to watch the documentary and make some behavioral changes to prevent negative health outcomes.
|
|
Experimental: Link and both nudges
Participants are sent the Forks Over Knives documentary online link and a letter with a personal testimonial and both commitment and prevention nudges.
|
Participants will receive a letter promoting a plant-based diet.
This letter will feature a personal testimonial about the benefits of a plant-based diet.
Presenting this information to participants might encourage them to make behavioral changes to improve their health.
Participants will be mailed the documentary Forks Over Knives, which provides scientific arguments promoting a plant-based and whole foods diet.
The behavioral effect of this documentary comes from watching the documentary and potentially choosing to order a free cookbook (participants are given this opportunity in the letter accompanying the documentary).
The effect of the diet itself is not a central part of the intervention, as people can choose to adopt or not adopt any part of the diet.
At the end of the letter promoting a plant-based diet, participants will be asked to write dates and personal signatures committing to watching the documentary.
They will be asked to mail back this written commitment.
Stating one's intentions to implement certain behavior is meant to increase the likelihood of follow-up behavior.
This request might nudge more people to watch the documentary and make some behavioral changes to prevent negative health outcomes.
As part of the letter promoting a plant-based diet, one paragraph will describe the risks of not taking action.
This phrasing reframes the status quo as contributing to future loss (e.g., costs of medication and operations).
In effect, the letter encourages participants to focus on preventing this loss by taking action.
This additional text might nudge more people to watch the documentary and make some behavioral changes to prevent negative health outcomes.
|
|
Experimental: DVD and no nudge
Participants are sent the Forks Over Knives documentary DVD and a letter with a personal testimonial and no behavioral nudges.
|
Participants will receive a letter promoting a plant-based diet.
This letter will feature a personal testimonial about the benefits of a plant-based diet.
Presenting this information to participants might encourage them to make behavioral changes to improve their health.
Participants will be mailed the documentary Forks Over Knives, which provides scientific arguments promoting a plant-based and whole foods diet.
The behavioral effect of this documentary comes from watching the documentary and potentially choosing to order a free cookbook (participants are given this opportunity in the letter accompanying the documentary).
The effect of the diet itself is not a central part of the intervention, as people can choose to adopt or not adopt any part of the diet.
|
|
Experimental: DVD and commitment nudge
Participants are sent the Forks Over Knives documentary DVD and a letter with a personal testimonial and a commitment nudge.
|
Participants will receive a letter promoting a plant-based diet.
This letter will feature a personal testimonial about the benefits of a plant-based diet.
Presenting this information to participants might encourage them to make behavioral changes to improve their health.
Participants will be mailed the documentary Forks Over Knives, which provides scientific arguments promoting a plant-based and whole foods diet.
The behavioral effect of this documentary comes from watching the documentary and potentially choosing to order a free cookbook (participants are given this opportunity in the letter accompanying the documentary).
The effect of the diet itself is not a central part of the intervention, as people can choose to adopt or not adopt any part of the diet.
At the end of the letter promoting a plant-based diet, participants will be asked to write dates and personal signatures committing to watching the documentary.
They will be asked to mail back this written commitment.
Stating one's intentions to implement certain behavior is meant to increase the likelihood of follow-up behavior.
This request might nudge more people to watch the documentary and make some behavioral changes to prevent negative health outcomes.
|
|
Experimental: DVD and prevention nudge
Participants are sent the Forks Over Knives documentary DVD and a letter with a personal testimonial and a prevention nudge.
|
Participants will receive a letter promoting a plant-based diet.
This letter will feature a personal testimonial about the benefits of a plant-based diet.
Presenting this information to participants might encourage them to make behavioral changes to improve their health.
Participants will be mailed the documentary Forks Over Knives, which provides scientific arguments promoting a plant-based and whole foods diet.
The behavioral effect of this documentary comes from watching the documentary and potentially choosing to order a free cookbook (participants are given this opportunity in the letter accompanying the documentary).
The effect of the diet itself is not a central part of the intervention, as people can choose to adopt or not adopt any part of the diet.
As part of the letter promoting a plant-based diet, one paragraph will describe the risks of not taking action.
This phrasing reframes the status quo as contributing to future loss (e.g., costs of medication and operations).
In effect, the letter encourages participants to focus on preventing this loss by taking action.
This additional text might nudge more people to watch the documentary and make some behavioral changes to prevent negative health outcomes.
|
|
Experimental: DVD and both nudges
Participants are sent the Forks Over Knives documentary DVD and a letter with a personal testimonial and both commitment and prevention nudges.
|
Participants will receive a letter promoting a plant-based diet.
This letter will feature a personal testimonial about the benefits of a plant-based diet.
Presenting this information to participants might encourage them to make behavioral changes to improve their health.
Participants will be mailed the documentary Forks Over Knives, which provides scientific arguments promoting a plant-based and whole foods diet.
The behavioral effect of this documentary comes from watching the documentary and potentially choosing to order a free cookbook (participants are given this opportunity in the letter accompanying the documentary).
The effect of the diet itself is not a central part of the intervention, as people can choose to adopt or not adopt any part of the diet.
At the end of the letter promoting a plant-based diet, participants will be asked to write dates and personal signatures committing to watching the documentary.
They will be asked to mail back this written commitment.
Stating one's intentions to implement certain behavior is meant to increase the likelihood of follow-up behavior.
This request might nudge more people to watch the documentary and make some behavioral changes to prevent negative health outcomes.
As part of the letter promoting a plant-based diet, one paragraph will describe the risks of not taking action.
This phrasing reframes the status quo as contributing to future loss (e.g., costs of medication and operations).
In effect, the letter encourages participants to focus on preventing this loss by taking action.
This additional text might nudge more people to watch the documentary and make some behavioral changes to prevent negative health outcomes.
|
|
Experimental: Link and DVD and no nudge
Participants are sent the Forks Over Knives documentary online link and DVD and a letter with a personal testimonial and no behavioral nudges.
|
Participants will receive a letter promoting a plant-based diet.
This letter will feature a personal testimonial about the benefits of a plant-based diet.
Presenting this information to participants might encourage them to make behavioral changes to improve their health.
Participants will be mailed the documentary Forks Over Knives, which provides scientific arguments promoting a plant-based and whole foods diet.
The behavioral effect of this documentary comes from watching the documentary and potentially choosing to order a free cookbook (participants are given this opportunity in the letter accompanying the documentary).
The effect of the diet itself is not a central part of the intervention, as people can choose to adopt or not adopt any part of the diet.
|
|
Experimental: Link and DVD and commitment nudge
Participants are sent the Forks Over Knives documentary online link and DVD and a letter with a personal testimonial and a commitment nudge.
|
Participants will receive a letter promoting a plant-based diet.
This letter will feature a personal testimonial about the benefits of a plant-based diet.
Presenting this information to participants might encourage them to make behavioral changes to improve their health.
Participants will be mailed the documentary Forks Over Knives, which provides scientific arguments promoting a plant-based and whole foods diet.
The behavioral effect of this documentary comes from watching the documentary and potentially choosing to order a free cookbook (participants are given this opportunity in the letter accompanying the documentary).
The effect of the diet itself is not a central part of the intervention, as people can choose to adopt or not adopt any part of the diet.
At the end of the letter promoting a plant-based diet, participants will be asked to write dates and personal signatures committing to watching the documentary.
They will be asked to mail back this written commitment.
Stating one's intentions to implement certain behavior is meant to increase the likelihood of follow-up behavior.
This request might nudge more people to watch the documentary and make some behavioral changes to prevent negative health outcomes.
|
|
Experimental: Link and DVD and prevention nudge
Participants are sent the Forks Over Knives documentary online link and DVD and a letter with a personal testimonial and a prevention nudge.
|
Participants will receive a letter promoting a plant-based diet.
This letter will feature a personal testimonial about the benefits of a plant-based diet.
Presenting this information to participants might encourage them to make behavioral changes to improve their health.
Participants will be mailed the documentary Forks Over Knives, which provides scientific arguments promoting a plant-based and whole foods diet.
The behavioral effect of this documentary comes from watching the documentary and potentially choosing to order a free cookbook (participants are given this opportunity in the letter accompanying the documentary).
The effect of the diet itself is not a central part of the intervention, as people can choose to adopt or not adopt any part of the diet.
As part of the letter promoting a plant-based diet, one paragraph will describe the risks of not taking action.
This phrasing reframes the status quo as contributing to future loss (e.g., costs of medication and operations).
In effect, the letter encourages participants to focus on preventing this loss by taking action.
This additional text might nudge more people to watch the documentary and make some behavioral changes to prevent negative health outcomes.
|
|
Experimental: Link and DVD and both nudges
Participants are sent the Forks Over Knives documentary online link and DVD and a letter with a personal testimonial and both commitment and prevention nudges.
|
Participants will receive a letter promoting a plant-based diet.
This letter will feature a personal testimonial about the benefits of a plant-based diet.
Presenting this information to participants might encourage them to make behavioral changes to improve their health.
Participants will be mailed the documentary Forks Over Knives, which provides scientific arguments promoting a plant-based and whole foods diet.
The behavioral effect of this documentary comes from watching the documentary and potentially choosing to order a free cookbook (participants are given this opportunity in the letter accompanying the documentary).
The effect of the diet itself is not a central part of the intervention, as people can choose to adopt or not adopt any part of the diet.
At the end of the letter promoting a plant-based diet, participants will be asked to write dates and personal signatures committing to watching the documentary.
They will be asked to mail back this written commitment.
Stating one's intentions to implement certain behavior is meant to increase the likelihood of follow-up behavior.
This request might nudge more people to watch the documentary and make some behavioral changes to prevent negative health outcomes.
As part of the letter promoting a plant-based diet, one paragraph will describe the risks of not taking action.
This phrasing reframes the status quo as contributing to future loss (e.g., costs of medication and operations).
In effect, the letter encourages participants to focus on preventing this loss by taking action.
This additional text might nudge more people to watch the documentary and make some behavioral changes to prevent negative health outcomes.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Medical Cost in US Dollars From One Year Before to One Year After Intervention
Time Frame: 2 years
|
Total annual amount of medical and pharmacy costs (sum) as reported by Geisinger Health Plan.
General linear models are used to model change between the data from the year before the intervention and the data from one year after intervention.
Lower costs is the desirable outcome.
|
2 years
|
|
Number of Visits From One Year Before to One Year After Intervention
Time Frame: 2 years
|
Total number of primary care physician and specialist visits (sum) as reported by Geisinger Health Plan.
General linear models are used to model change between the data from the year before the intervention and the data from one year after intervention.
Fewer visits is the desirable outcome.
|
2 years
|
|
Number of Prescriptions From One Year Before to One Year After Intervention
Time Frame: 2 years
|
Total number of prescriptions (fills) as reported by Geisinger Health Plan.
General linear models are used to model change between the data from the year before the intervention and the data from one year after intervention.
Fewer prescriptions is the desirable outcome.
|
2 years
|
|
Number of Unique Prescribed Medication From One Year Before to One Year After Intervention
Time Frame: 2 years
|
Total number of unique prescribed medication in the past year as reported by Geisinger Health Plan.
General linear models are used to model change between the data from the year before the intervention and the data from one year after intervention.
Less unique prescribed medication is the desirable outcome.
|
2 years
|
|
Body Mass Index From One Year Before to One Year After Intervention
Time Frame: 2 years
|
Taken from annual checkup with primary care provider.
Computed from height (in meters) and weight (in kilograms) data with the formula kilograms/meters^2.
General linear models are used to model change between the data from the year before the intervention and the data from one year after intervention.
A body mass index between the range of 18.5 to 25 is the desirable outcome.
|
2 years
|
|
Systolic Blood Pressure From One Year Before to One Year After Intervention
Time Frame: 2 years
|
Taken from annual checkup with primary care provider.
General linear models are used to model change between the data from the year before the intervention and the data from one year after intervention.
Systolic blood pressure that is 120 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) or less is the desirable outcome.
|
2 years
|
|
Diastolic Blood Pressure From One Year Before to One Year After Intervention
Time Frame: 2 years
|
Taken from annual checkup with primary care provider.
General linear models are used to model change between the data from the year before the intervention and the data from one year after intervention.
Systolic blood pressure that is 80 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) or less is the desirable outcome.
|
2 years
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Triglyceride Levels From One Year Before to One Year After Intervention
Time Frame: 2 years
|
One component of cholesterol, used if data is on health record.
A triglyceride level of 150 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dl) or lower is the desirable outcome.
|
2 years
|
|
Low-density Lipoprotein (LDL) Levels From One Year Before to One Year After Intervention
Time Frame: 2 years
|
One component of cholesterol, used if data is on health record.
An LDL level of 100 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dl) or lower is the desirable outcome.
|
2 years
|
|
High-density Lipoprotein (HDL) Levels From One Year Before to One Year After Intervention
Time Frame: 2 years
|
One component of cholesterol, used if data is on health record.
An HDL level of 60 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dl) or higher is the desirable outcome.
|
2 years
|
|
Low-density Lipoprotein/High-density Lipoprotein (LDL/HDL) Ratios From One Year Before to One Year After Intervention
Time Frame: 2 years
|
Computed as the ratio of LDL/HDL.
An LDL/HDL ratio of 3 or less for men and 2.5 or less for women is the desirable outcome.
|
2 years
|
|
Hemoglobin A1c (hbA1c) From One Year Before to One Year After Intervention
Time Frame: 2 years
|
Test for diabetes, used if data is on health record.
Percentage score reflects blood-glucose levels.
An hbA1c level of 5.7% or lower is the desirable outcome.
|
2 years
|
|
Medical Cost in US Dollars From Five Years Before to Two Years After Intervention (Extended Time Frame)
Time Frame: 7 years
|
Total annual amount of medical and pharmacy costs (sum) as reported by Geisinger Health Plan.
Lower costs is the desirable outcome.
|
7 years
|
|
Number of Visits From Five Years Before to Two Years After Intervention (Extended Time Frame)
Time Frame: 7 years
|
Total number of primary care physician and specialist visits (sum) as reported by Geisinger Health Plan.
Fewer visits is the desirable outcome.
|
7 years
|
|
Number of Prescriptions From Five Years Before to Two Years After Intervention (Extended Time Frame)
Time Frame: 7 years
|
Total number of prescriptions (standard unit is prescription per number of days supplied) as reported by Geisinger Health Plan.
Fewer prescriptions is the desirable outcome.
|
7 years
|
|
Number of Unique Prescribed Medication From Five Years Before to Two Years After Intervention (Extended Time Frame)
Time Frame: 7 years
|
Total number of unique prescribed medication in the past year as reported by Geisinger Health Plan.
Less unique prescribed medication is the desirable outcome.
|
7 years
|
|
Body Mass Index From Five Years Before to Two Years After Intervention (Extended Time Frame)
Time Frame: 7 years
|
Taken from annual checkup with primary care provider.
Computed from height (in meters) and weight (in kilograms) data with the formula kilograms/meters^2.
A body mass index between the range of 18.5 to 25 is the desirable outcome.
|
7 years
|
|
Systolic Blood Pressure From Five Years Before to Two Years After Intervention (Extended Time Frame)
Time Frame: 7 years
|
Taken from annual checkup with primary care provider.
Systolic blood pressure that is 120 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) or less is the desirable outcome.
|
7 years
|
|
Diastolic Blood Pressure From Five Years Before to Two Years After Intervention (Extended Time Frame)
Time Frame: 7 years
|
Taken from annual checkup with primary care provider.
Systolic blood pressure that is 80 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) or less is the desirable outcome.
|
7 years
|
|
Triglyceride Levels From Five Years Before to Two Years After Intervention (Extended Time Frame)
Time Frame: 7 years
|
One component of cholesterol, used if data is on health record.
A triglyceride level of 150 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dl) or lower is the desirable outcome.
|
7 years
|
|
Low-density Lipoprotein (LDL) Levels From Five Years Before to Two Years After Intervention (Extended Time Frame)
Time Frame: 7 years
|
One component of cholesterol, used if data is on health record.
An LDL level of 100 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dl) or lower is the desirable outcome.
|
7 years
|
|
High-density Lipoprotein (HDL) Levels From Five Years Before to Two Years After Intervention (Extended Time Frame)
Time Frame: 7 years
|
One component of cholesterol, used if data is on health record.
An HDL level of 60 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dl) or higher is the desirable outcome.
|
7 years
|
|
Low-density Lipoprotein/High-density Lipoprotein (LDL/HDL) Ratios From Five Years Before to Two Years After Intervention (Extended Time Frame)
Time Frame: 7 years
|
Computed as the ratio of LDL/HDL.
An LDL/HDL ratio of 3 or less for men and 2.5 or less for women is the desirable outcome.
|
7 years
|
|
Hemoglobin A1c (hbA1c) From Five Years Before to Two Years After Intervention (Extended Time Frame)
Time Frame: 7 years
|
Test for diabetes, used if data is on health record.
Percentage score reflects blood-glucose levels.
An hbA1c level of 5.7% and below is the desirable outcome.
|
7 years
|
|
Five Years Before to Two Years After Intervention in Depressed Mood and Anhedonia as Assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2) (Extended Time Frame)
Time Frame: 7 years
|
Assesses depressed mood and anhedonia in the past two weeks; used if data is on health record.
The sum of two items (each scored 0-3) is computed with a total score range of 0-6.
A lower score is the desired outcome.
|
7 years
|
|
Values From One Year Before to One Year After Intervention of Depressed Mood and Anhedonia as Assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2)
Time Frame: 2 years
|
Although originally listed as secondary, this outcome measure was intended to be exploratory.
Due to the largely null pattern of results on the primary outcomes, it was decided to forgo additional analysis at this time.
|
2 years
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Amir Goren, PhD, Program Director
- Study Director: Henri Carlo Y Santos, PhD, Post-doctoral Fellow
- Study Director: Christopher Chabris, PhD, Professor
- Study Director: Michelle N Meyer, PhD, JD, Assistant Professor
- Study Director: Allison Hess, BS, Vice President
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Milkman KL, Beshears J, Choi JJ, Laibson D, Madrian BC. Using implementation intentions prompts to enhance influenza vaccination rates. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Jun 28;108(26):10415-20. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1103170108. Epub 2011 Jun 13.
- Tversky A, Kahneman D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science. 1981 Jan 30;211(4481):453-8. doi: 10.1126/science.7455683.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2019-0179
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
- ANALYTIC_CODE
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Cardiovascular Diseases
-
Weill Medical College of Cornell UniversityAmerican Heart AssociationRecruitingCardiovascular | Cardiovascular Health | Cardiovascular (CV) Risk | Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) Risk FactorsUnited States
-
Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS TrustNot yet recruitingCardiovascular Surgery | Cardiovascular Diseases (CVD)United Kingdom
-
Fu Jen Catholic UniversityRecruitingCardiovascular Disease | Cardiovascular SurgeryTaiwan
-
Medical College of WisconsinNational Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH)CompletedCardiovascular Diseases | Cardiovascular Risk Factor | Cardiovascular HealthUnited States
-
Hospital Mutua de TerrassaCompleted
-
IRCCS Policlinico S. DonatoIRCCS San Raffaele; Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS and other collaboratorsRecruitingCardiovascular Risk | Genetic Cardiovascular RiskItaly
-
Oregon Health and Science UniversityCompletedCardiovascular Disease | Cardiovascular Risk FactorsUnited States
-
Women's College HospitalUniversity Health Network, Toronto; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre; Brigham... and other collaboratorsUnknownCARDIOVASCULAR DISEASESCanada, United States
-
Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint JosephTerminatedCARDIOVASCULAR DISEASESFrance
-
Children's Hospital Medical Center, CincinnatiRecruitingCardiovascular Diseases (CVD)United States
Clinical Trials on Personal testimonial
-
Philipps University Marburg Medical CenterCompletedHealth Care UtilizationGermany
-
University of OklahomaRecruitingCRC (Colorectal Cancer) | CRC ScreeningUnited States
-
Geisinger ClinicCompletedHealth Promotion | Wellness ProgramUnited States
-
George Washington UniversityCompletedDepression | Psychosis | StigmatizationNepal
-
Arizona State UniversityNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA); Mesa Public SchoolsCompletedPatient ComplianceUnited States
-
Philipps University MarburgCompletedHealth Care Utilization | Health Care Seeking BehaviorGermany
-
Arizona State UniversityJ.B. Sutton Elementary SchoolCompletedPatient ComplianceUnited States
-
University of Massachusetts, AmherstCompleted
-
VA Office of Research and DevelopmentNYU Langone HealthRecruitingHearing Loss | Hospital Readmission | Emergency ServiceUnited States
-
University of Illinois at ChicagoNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH); Emory University; University of Mississippi... and other collaboratorsCompletedMedication Adherence | Retention in CareUnited States