Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Improves Functional Outcomes in Acute Stroke Patients (tDCS ASAP)

April 2, 2019 updated by: Bornheim Stephen, University of Liege

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation ASsociated With Physical-therapy In Acute Stroke Patients - the tDCS ASAP - a Randomized, Triple Blind, Sham-controlled Study ?

Acute stroke patient will undergo one month (20 sessions) of physical therapy and anodal tDCS.

Patients will undergo functional outcomes measured at 48h post onset, 7,14,21,28 days, 3 and 6 months and one year post onset.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Recruitment :

Patients with acute stroke (24-48h after stroke) who have upper and / or lower sensorimotor deficits

• Treatment : After being selected according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria of this study, patients will be randomized and placed in one of two groups: placebo (P) or transcranial anodic stimulation (A).

Once placed in one of two groups, patients will all receive intensive physiotherapy for functional improvement in order to increase motor, postural and motor control. This physiotherapy will be established 5 times a week (Monday to Friday).

In addition to physiotherapy, the patient will have electrodes placed on his head, attached via a system of straps, to deliver either a continuous current (A) or no current (P) and at a rate of 5 times per week for 4 weeks. Neither the physiotherapist nor the patient will know what treatment he will have received.

• Evaluations and measurements:

Patients will be required to perform functional tests of the upper limb (Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT)), filmed and timed, a test of spasticity (Tardieu) as well as to answer certain questionnaires concerning their perception of the evolution of the disease and their disability (Stroke Impact Scale, Barthel Index), their emotional state (HADS), if they have experienced side effects, sensitivity test with monofilaments or Semmes and Weinstein test, the Fugl Meyer, the timed up and go, the test of 10m, the four step square test, the berg balance scale, the postural assessment scale and the trunk impairment scale. These evaluations will take place at Day 0 (corresponding to the first day after the 48h of strict bedtime), Day 7, 15, 30, 90, 6 months and 1 year. They will be done in two stages, on two successive days, so as not to exhaust the patient.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Liege, Belgium, 4000
        • Recruiting
        • Liege Univeristy Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Stephen Bornheim, Msc

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Woman or man
  • Between 18 and 80 years old
  • First ever stroke
  • Capable of signing the consent form

Exclusion Criteria:

  • One on the TSST (in high and relatively high risk sections)
  • Previous neurological or orthopedic pathologies affecting limbs
  • Cognitive deficits

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Anodal tDCS
Patients will receive 20min anodal tDCS
20 minutes of anodal tDCS (C3/FP2 or C4/FP1 depending on side of lesion) 2mA or sham
Other Names:
  • Non invasive brain stimulation
Sham Comparator: Sham tDCS
Patients will receive 20 minutes of Sham anodal tDCS
20 minutes of anodal tDCS (C3/FP2 or C4/FP1 depending on side of lesion) 2mA or sham
Other Names:
  • Non invasive brain stimulation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Wolf Motor Function Test Change
Time Frame: 48 hours post onset, 7, 14, 21 and 28 days post onset, 3 and 6 months post onset and 1 year post onset
Functional outcome of the paretic limb
48 hours post onset, 7, 14, 21 and 28 days post onset, 3 and 6 months post onset and 1 year post onset
Semmes Weinstein Change
Time Frame: 48 hours post onset, days 7, 14, 21 and 28 post onset, 3 and 6 months post onset and 1 year post onset
Monofilament sensory test
48 hours post onset, days 7, 14, 21 and 28 post onset, 3 and 6 months post onset and 1 year post onset
Timed up and go Change
Time Frame: 48 hours post onset, days 7, 14, 21 and 28 post onset, 3 and 6 months post onset and 1 year post onset
walking test
48 hours post onset, days 7, 14, 21 and 28 post onset, 3 and 6 months post onset and 1 year post onset
10 meter walk test Change
Time Frame: 48 hours post onset, days 7, 14, 21 and 28 post onset, 3 and 6 months post onset and 1 year post onset
Walking speed test
48 hours post onset, days 7, 14, 21 and 28 post onset, 3 and 6 months post onset and 1 year post onset

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Tardieu spasticity scale Change
Time Frame: 48 hours post onset, days 7, 14, 21 and 28 post onset, 3 and 6 months post onset and 1 year post onset
spasticity scale, the higher the score the higher the spasticity
48 hours post onset, days 7, 14, 21 and 28 post onset, 3 and 6 months post onset and 1 year post onset
Stroke impact scale Change
Time Frame: 48 hours post onset, days 7, 14, 21 and 28 post onset, 3 and 6 months post onset and 1 year post onset
Scale measuring impact of stroke on life, the higher the score the higher the worse off the patient is
48 hours post onset, days 7, 14, 21 and 28 post onset, 3 and 6 months post onset and 1 year post onset
HADS Change
Time Frame: 48 hours post onset, days 7, 14, 21 and 28 post onset, 3 and 6 months post onset and 1 year post onset
Depression and anxiety scale, the higher the score the higher the more depressed or anxious the patient is
48 hours post onset, days 7, 14, 21 and 28 post onset, 3 and 6 months post onset and 1 year post onset
Fugl Meyer Change
Time Frame: 48 hours post onset, days 7, 14, 21 and 28 post onset, 3 and 6 months post onset and 1 year post onset
Upper and lower limb motor outcomes, the higher the score the higher the better the patient is
48 hours post onset, days 7, 14, 21 and 28 post onset, 3 and 6 months post onset and 1 year post onset
4 square step test Change
Time Frame: 48 hours post onset, days 7, 14, 21 and 28 post onset, 3 and 6 months post onset and 1 year post onset
Balance test, the higher the score the higher the worse the patient is
48 hours post onset, days 7, 14, 21 and 28 post onset, 3 and 6 months post onset and 1 year post onset
Berg Balance scale Change
Time Frame: 48 hours post onset, days 7, 14, 21 and 28 post onset, 3 and 6 months post onset and 1 year post onset
Balance test, the higher the score the higher the score, the better the patient is
48 hours post onset, days 7, 14, 21 and 28 post onset, 3 and 6 months post onset and 1 year post onset
Postural assessement scale Change
Time Frame: 48 hours post onset, days 7, 14, 21 and 28 post onset, 3 and 6 months post onset and 1 year post onset
Balance test, the higher the score the higher the better the patient is
48 hours post onset, days 7, 14, 21 and 28 post onset, 3 and 6 months post onset and 1 year post onset
Trunk impairment scale Change
Time Frame: 48 hours post onset, days 7, 14, 21 and 28 post onset, 3 and 6 months post onset and 1 year post onset
balance test, the higher the score the higher the better the patient is
48 hours post onset, days 7, 14, 21 and 28 post onset, 3 and 6 months post onset and 1 year post onset

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Stephen Bornheim, Msc, Liege Univeristy Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 31, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

June 30, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

August 31, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 21, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 22, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 3, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 2, 2019

Last Verified

April 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke, Acute

Clinical Trials on tDCS

3
Subscribe