Stretching Versus Traction in Patients With Cervical Radiculopathy.

March 24, 2019 updated by: Abeer Farag Hanafy, Cairo University

Which is Better to Decompress the Nerve Roots in Cervical Radiculopathy: Stretching or Traction From Foraminal Opening Position

The purpose of the study is to compare the effects of traction decompression and neck muscle stretching on the magnitude of Flexor Carpi Radialis H-Reflex(HR), Neck Disability Index (NDI), and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain scores in patients with cervical radiculopathy.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Cervical traction has long been used to relieve compression of nerve roots caused by intervertebral discs. Yet, there is lack of knowledge that compares the effect of traction decompression with neck muscles stretching in patients with cervical radiculopathy

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 50 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients should have C5-C6 and C6-C7 paramedian disc protrusion manifested by unilateral symptoms in C6-C7 roots dermatome and myotomes of the upper extremities.
  • They were diagnosed as cervical disc protrusion (C5- C7) for at least three months.
  • All patients should have a second grade of disc bulge (2-3mm) which was detected from T2 axial view of MRI.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients will be excluded from the study if they have upper cervical spine disc pathology, cord compression and upper motor neuron symptoms, curvature abnormalities of the neck including reversed curve (kyphotic) and deformities, cervical rib syndrome, double crush syndrome, diabetic neuropathy, text neck , short neck (Churchill neck), Marked facet joint, neuro-central joint arthropathic pathology, osteoporosis.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Stretch
Patients within Stretch Group will receive stretching protocols to the cervical musculature at the side of symptoms.
Patients within Stretch Group will receive stretching protocols to the cervical musculature at the side of symptoms. Traction Group will be treated with traction from 15-degree flexion, 30-degree lateral bending, and 15-degree rotation toward the painful side.
Other Names:
  • Traction using The Triton decompression system
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Traction
Patients within Traction Group will be treated with traction from 15-degree flexion, 30-degree lateral bending, and 15-degree rotation toward the painful side.
Patients within Stretch Group will receive stretching protocols to the cervical musculature at the side of symptoms. Traction Group will be treated with traction from 15-degree flexion, 30-degree lateral bending, and 15-degree rotation toward the painful side.
Other Names:
  • Traction using The Triton decompression system

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Flexor Carpi radialis H-reflex
Time Frame: change from Baseline after 6-week of treament
The peak-to-peak amplitudes of the four FCR-HR traces will be measured and averaged for each patient
change from Baseline after 6-week of treament

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Visual Analogue Scale Pain Scores(VAS)
Time Frame: Change from Baseline after 6-week of treament
A 10-cm VAS was used for assessing pain intensity. It is a line whose ends are labeled as the extremes of pain; no pain and very extreme pain. The line is marked at intervals 1 cm each without any label. Patients will be simply asked to indicate which point along the line that best represents the intensity of perceived pain. The distance from the "no pain" end to the mark made by the patient will be measured as the patient's pain intensity score.
Change from Baseline after 6-week of treament
The Neck Disability Index (NDI)
Time Frame: Change from Baseline after 6-week of treatment
The NDI will be measured on a 6-point scale from 0 (no disability) to 5 (full disability). The numeric response for each item will be summed for a score varying from 0 to 50. The NDI consists of 10 sections, each section the total possible score is 5, if the first statement is marked; the section score = 0, if the last statement is marked it = 5. The patients will choose the best choice that reflect his current state. If all ten sections are completed the score is calculated by dividing the obtained score on the total number of scores e.g. if the score recorded by the patients was (40) so the NDI=(40/50)x100=80%
Change from Baseline after 6-week of treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Samiha Hafez Hassan, Prof., Professor of Physical Therapy for Neurology, Department of Physical Therapy for Neuromuscular Disorder and its Surgery, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Cairo University.
  • Study Director: Salam Mohamed Elhafez, Prof., Professor and Head of Department of Biomechanics, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Cairo University, Egypt.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ANTICIPATED)

April 1, 2019

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

August 1, 2019

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

September 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 20, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 21, 2019

First Posted (ACTUAL)

March 25, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

March 26, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 24, 2019

Last Verified

March 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • nerve root decompression

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cervical Radiculopathy

Clinical Trials on Stretching protocol

Subscribe