Long-term Observation of Ophthalmic Changes in Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea

November 3, 2022 updated by: Joanna Przeździecka-Dołyk, Wroclaw Medical University
The ophthalmic changes during long-lasting sleep apnea are lacking in description and assessment. The investigators intend to observe patients for a long time and observe if the changes in eye tissues are progressing over the years in easily recognizable patterns.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

150

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Wrocław, Poland, 50-556
        • Department of Ophthalmology

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Adult individuals with an indication for therapy with positive airway pressure.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • newly diagnosed obstructive sleep apnea indicated for positive airway pressure therapy,
  • ongoing treatment of sleep apnea with positive airway pressure therapy,
  • patients older than 18 years,
  • signed inform consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • pregnant and breastfeeding persons

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Control
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Control group
Sleep apnea using CEPAP
Sleep apnea not using CEPAP
Glaucoma control group

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Perimetry changes over the years
Time Frame: 10 years
Changes in retinal sensitivity (measured in decibels/ dB) during observation time measured by standard automated perimetry. The manner of presentation of overall descriptors auch as: mean deviation (MD; dB) and pattern standard deviation (PSD; dB) will be recorded.
10 years
Flicker defined form perimetry changes over the years
Time Frame: 10 years
Changes in retinal sensitivity (measured in decibels/ dB) during observation time measured by standard automated perimetry with flicker defined form signal. The manner of presentation of overall descriptors auch as: mean deviation (MD; dB) and pattern standard deviation (PSD; dB) will be recorded.
10 years
RareBit perimetry changes over the years
Time Frame: 10 years
Changes in Changes in retinal sensitivity (measured in percentage of all presented excitors/ %) during observation time measured by RareBit signal perimetry. The manner of presentation of overall descriptors auch as: mean hit rate (MHR; %), area under 90% (%) and sectorial mean miss rate (MMR; %) will be recorded.
10 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire
Time Frame: 10 years
Quality assessed with the Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire (FOSQ) comparing the score at baseline with during 10 years of observation. The questionnaire are composed of 30 questions that can be answered from 1 to 4 points (where 1 means extreme difficulty of doing an activity and 4 - no difficulties). Five subscales are given such as: General Productivity (8 questions -1 - 4, 8 - 11), Social Outcome (2 questions - 12, 13), Activity Level (9 questions - 5, 14 - 16, 22 - 26), Vigilance (7 questions - 6, 7, 17 - 21), Intimate Relationships and Sexual Activity (4 questions - 27 - 30). To obtain a Total Score: Calculate the mean of the subscale scores and multiply that mean by the number of subscales for which there is a score. The potential range of scores for the Total Score is 5 - 20.
10 years
Epworth Sleepiness Scale
Time Frame: 10 years
Quality assessed with the Epworth Sleepiness Scale comparing the score at baseline with during 10 years of observation. The questionnaire are composed of 8 questions describing activities during which patient can feel sleepy, each scored from 0 (zero probability to falling asleep) to 3 (very likely that patient will fall asleep).
10 years
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index
Time Frame: 10 years
Quality assessed with the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index comparing the score at baseline with during 10 years of observation. The questionnaire are composed of 10 questions composed in seven component scores are derived, each scored 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (severe difficulty). The component scores are summed to produce a global score (range 0 to 21). Higher scores indicate worse sleep quality.
10 years
Change in thickness of the retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL)
Time Frame: 10 years
A difference in thickness of the retinal nerve fibre layer during the observation time frame.
10 years
Change in the optic nerve morphology - standard chart of HRT
Time Frame: 10 years
A difference in morphology parameters given by HRT (additional information given in supplementary materials) during the observation time frame.
10 years
AREDS 2008 Clinical Lens Opacity Grading Procedure
Time Frame: 10 years
Using AREDS system for classifying cataracts from photographs: AREDS Report No. 4 the lens opacity will be graded. The change in grading during the observation time frame.
10 years
Macular changes in optical coherent tomography (OCT)
Time Frame: 10 years
Evaluation of macular appearance based on the OCT scans. Any changes from normal appearance will be recorded and evaluated.
10 years
Disc damage likelihood scale (DDLS)
Time Frame: 10 years
Evaluation disc damage likelihood scale based on the fundus photographs (based on the visual scale given in additional documents)
10 years

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Peripapillar and macular vessels density
Time Frame: 5 years
Measured on the custom-derived protocol and manufacturer software macular and peripapillar vessels density - Angio OCT (OCTA)
5 years
Influence of fogging lens on retinal sensitivity to given trigger (Goldman III) on standard automated and RareBit perimetry
Time Frame: 1 day
A fogging lens will be applied (a modified by the author protocol of fogging - increasing of +0.5D lens to obtain the reduction in logMAR visual acuity by 0.2 from best-corrected visual acuity/ BCVA)
1 day
Influence of tiredness on retinal sensitivity to given trigger (Goldman III) on standard automated and RareBit perimetry
Time Frame: 1 day
Influence of different examinations that precedes visual field examination on the perimetry test results (MD and PSD, or MHR, MMR and area under 90%).
1 day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Marta Misiuk-Hojło, Professor, Wrocław Medical University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

October 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 14, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 24, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

April 26, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 4, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 3, 2022

Last Verified

November 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Study Data/Documents

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ocular Hypertension

Subscribe