Tu'Washindi na PrEP: Adolescent Girls in Kenya Taking Control of Their Health

January 10, 2020 updated by: RTI International

Targeted Interventions to Address the Multi-level Effects of Gender-based Violence on PrEP Uptake and Adherence Among Adolescent Girls and Young Women in Siaya County, Kenya

This study is nested within the ongoing DREAMS (Determined, Resilient, Empowered, AIDS-free, and Safe) initiative in Siaya County, Kenya. It will test a pilot intervention that will address barriers to pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) uptake and adherence in adolescent girls and young women (AGYW) to reduce their risk to HIV acquisition, with a focus on barriers stemming from male partners and gender-based violence.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

This study is designed to assess feasibility, safety, and preliminary effects of a behavioral intervention aimed at increasing pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) uptake and adherence in adolescent girls and young women (AGYW), with a focus on barriers stemming from male partners and gender-based violence, through a pilot cluster randomized-controlled trial (RCT). This study is nested within the ongoing DREAMS (Determined, Resilient, Empowered, AIDS-free, and Safe) initiative in Siaya County, Kenya. Six DREAMS Safe Spaces and their catchment areas will be randomized to receive this community-level intervention or standard of care. Primary outcomes will include feasibility (recruitment, retention) and safety (ongoing or renewed experience of GBV). The investigators will also determine whether the intervention shows promise in increasing PrEP uptake, adherence, and persistence at 6 months. After the intervention, small group discussions, in-depth interviews with male partners, and provider questionnaires will explore acceptability and effects on PrEP decision making and use.

Population: AGYW ages 15-24 enrolled in the DREAMS Initiative in Siaya County, Kenya, and, for in-depth interviews only, a subset of male partners of DREAMS participants.

Objectives: The goal of this work is to test the feasibility, acceptability, safety, and preliminary effects of the intervention on PrEP uptake and adherence among AGYW.

The primary objectives are to assess:

  1. Intervention safety
  2. Feasibility of delivering the intervention within DREAMS operations
  3. Acceptability of the intervention to participants, staff, and male partners.

The secondary objectives are to measure the intervention's effect on PrEP uptake, adherence, and persistence at 6 months.

Endpoints: The endpoints for the primary objectives are:

  1. Self-report of new or ongoing GBV, social harms, serious adverse events, or unanticipated problems during study participation, in the intervention arm versus the comparison arm.
  2. Measures of feasibility including recruitment, retention, intervention participation, and fidelity of intervention delivery.
  3. Qualitative and quantitative reports of intervention acceptability among participants, quantitative reports of acceptability among providers, and qualitative reports of acceptability among male partners.

The endpoints for the secondary objectives are:

  1. PrEP uptake: Among participants who are not on PrEP at study enrollment, the proportion of who receive a PrEP prescription during follow-up in the intervention arm vs. the control arm
  2. PrEP adherence: Among participants who were dispensed PrEP during the study, the proportion with >85% adherence over the duration of PrEP use and in the last month of PrEP use, according to Wisepill data in the intervention arm vs. the control arm.
  3. PrEP persistence: Among study participants who were dispensed PrEP during the study, the proportion of scheduled PrEP refills that were dispensed, in the intervention arm compared to the control arm.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

103

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Kisumu, Kenya
        • Impact Research and Development Organization

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

15 years to 24 years (ADULT, CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 1) Age 15-24 years (inclusive);
  • 2) HIV-negative, by self-report;
  • 3) At high risk for acquiring HIV, as defined by the 2016 Guidelines on Use of Antiretroviral Drugs for Treating and Preventing HIV Infections in Kenya;
  • 4) Fluent in English, Dholuo, or Swahili;
  • 5) Enrolled in DREAMS (defined by having a DREAMS identification (ID) number);
  • 6) Lives within the Safe Space catchment area - 7) Willing and able to attend support groups over the 6-month period;
  • 8) Potentially interested in PrEP and/or using PrEP already;
  • 9) Able and willing to provide adequate locator information, as defined in site standard operating procedures (SOPs);
  • 10)If aged 18 and above: Willing and able to provide informed consent;
  • 11)If non-mature minor aged 15-17: Willing and able to provide assent and parent or guardian willing and able to provide parental consent;
  • 12)If mature minor aged 15-17: Willing and able to provide informed consent or to provide assent and parent or guardian consent, per participant choice.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • 1)Planning to relocate away from the study catchment area in the next 6 months;
  • 2)Planning to travel away from the study catchment area for a time period that would interfere with study participation; or
  • 3) Has any condition that, in the opinion of the site PI, would preclude informed assent/consent, make study participation unsafe, complicate interpretation of study outcome data, or otherwise interfere with achieving the study objectives.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: PREVENTION
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
OTHER: Control
Standard of care will include PrEP delivery according to the usual DREAMS procedures
Standard of care will include PrEP delivery according to the usual DREAMS procedures, including attendance at routine Safe Space meetings and routine PrEP provision at the Safe Space, if applicable.
EXPERIMENTAL: Tu'Washindi intervention

Standard of care will include PrEP delivery according to the usual DREAMS procedures. The Tu'Washindi intervention includes the following components:

  1. PrEP sensitization for men (community level).
  2. "Buddy Days" (partner level).
  3. Adherence support clubs (individual and peer levels).

The intervention includes the following components:

  1. PrEP sensitization for men (community level). These activities will aim to provide men with basic information about PrEP and will be used to prepare men for more effective engagement in Buddy Days, described below.
  2. "Buddy Days" (partner level). Buddy days will target male partner engagement by inviting couples to attend a community-wide event with health screenings, and PrEP sensitization, which aim to facilitate further communications about PrEP and increase men's support for AGYW's PrEP use.
  3. Adherence support clubs (individual and peer levels). Support clubs will provide a forum for AGYW to discuss challenges and successes around PrEP use in relationships, including in the context of partner violence. Participation in these groups is hypothesized to increase self-efficacy for PrEP use by reducing social isolation and providing additional positive role-modeling from peer leaders.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Intervention safety - survey tool
Time Frame: 3 months
Self-report of experience of social harms in the past 3 months and violence or controlling behavior using an adapted version of the World Health Organization's questions on violence against women. Behaviors are reported for every experience in the past 3 months and frequency of experience (e.g., once, few times, many times).
3 months
Intervention safety - survey tool
Time Frame: 6 months
Self-report of experience of social harms in the past 3 months and violence or controlling behavior using an adapted version of the World Health Organization's questions on violence against women. Behaviors are reported for every experience in the past 3 months and frequency of experience (e.g., once, few times, many times).
6 months
Intervention safety - form
Time Frame: Throughout the study, approximately 6 months
Reports of new or ongoing gender-based violence (GBV), social harms, serious adverse events, or unanticipated problems during study participation. Information will be self-reported using an specially-developed form
Throughout the study, approximately 6 months
Feasibility of the behavioral intervention - Process Indicators
Time Frame: Throughout the study, approximately 6 months
Measures of feasibility including recruitment timelines and numbers enrolled, retention rates, intervention participation measured by attendance at support club sessions and other intervention activities, and fidelity of intervention delivery measured through documented observations of intervention delivery capturing activities administered and ratings of quality.
Throughout the study, approximately 6 months
Acceptability of the behavioral intervention - qualitative data from participants
Time Frame: 6 months
Acceptability measures include qualitative reports of intervention acceptability among participants. These will include in-depth interviews covering topics such as satisfaction with content, delivery, and length of the intervention, as well as reported impact on the participant's life.
6 months
Acceptability of the behavioral intervention - quantitative data from participants
Time Frame: 6 months
Quantitative reports of intervention acceptability among participants. Satisfaction with intervention content, delivery, length using the client satisfaction questionnaire and as measured on a likert scale response and as open-ended response options.
6 months
Acceptability of the behavioral intervention - quantitative data from providers
Time Frame: 6 months
Satisfaction with intervention content, delivery, length using the client satisfaction questionnaire and as measured on a likert scale response and as open-ended response options.
6 months
Acceptability of the behavioral intervention - qualitative data from male partners
Time Frame: 6 months
Qualitative reports of intervention acceptability among male partners. These will include in-depth interviews covering topics such as satisfaction with content, delivery, and length of the intervention, as well as reported impact on the male partner's life.
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) uptake
Time Frame: 6 months
Among participants who are not on PrEP at study enrollment, the number who receive a PrEP prescription during follow-up. This will be measured through retrospective clinic record extraction.
6 months
Proportion of participants with Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) adherence > 85% at six months
Time Frame: Throughout the study, approximately 6 months
Among participants who were dispensed PrEP during the study, the proportion with >85% adherence over the duration of PrEP use and in the last month of PrEP use, according to Wisepill data. This information will be collected using the Wisepill electronic data monitoring (EDM) device that collects information on pill adherence in real-time.
Throughout the study, approximately 6 months
Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) persistence among participants at six months
Time Frame: 6 months
Among study participants who were dispensed PrEP during the study, the number of scheduled PrEP refills that were dispensed. This will be measured through retrospective clinic record abstraction reflecting clinic visits throughout the study period.
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sarah Roberts, PhD, RTI International

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

April 15, 2019

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

December 13, 2019

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

December 13, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 17, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 3, 2019

First Posted (ACTUAL)

May 6, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

January 14, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 10, 2020

Last Verified

January 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • MSU/DRPI/MUERC/00418/17
  • 1R34MH114519-01 (NIH)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Gender-Based Violence

Clinical Trials on Control

3
Subscribe